Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-allure-movie-review-20150313-story.html?track=rss
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-allure-movie-review-20150313-story.html?track=rss
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-allure-movie-review-20150313-story.html?track=rss
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-allure-movie-review-20150313-story.html?track=rss
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'

Writer-director Vladan Nikolic’s “Allure” is neither a documentary nor a traditional scripted drama but, rather, an extensively improvised experimental film relating the New York stories of a group of diverse immigrant women.

Set against the curious backdrop of the 2011 Occupy movement, the interwoven pieces pit personal struggles against that larger context with intriguing but ultimately distancing results.

Attempting to carve out an identity for themselves are Liliana (Diana Lotus), an Estonian immigrant who runs an escort service; Marta (Julia Konrad Viezzer), a Mexican immigrant who works as a hotel chambermaid and waitress; Valerie (Madeleine Assas), a French TV journalist; and Jin (Ying Ying Li), a Chinese college student.

As the film progresses, paths will be intersected and secrets will be revealed, as Manhattan looms large in the background.

Although the women’s experiences have been strikingly captured by cinematographer Aleksandar Kostic in silvery black-and-white CinemaScope shot on video, this throwback to 1960s-era Situationist sinema takes the uniformly strong performances only so far.

This portrait of strong, independent women grappling with change in their individual lives holds initial allure, but the effect proves ephemeral.

————

“Allure.”

MPAA rating: None.

Running time: 1 hour, 24 minutes.

Playing: Downtown Independent, Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigrant women grapple with change in the ephemeral 'Allure'
http://latimes.com.feedsportal.com/c/34336/f/625246/s/4455ead7/sc/38/l/0L0Slatimes0N0Cabout0Cla0Eet0Emn0Eallure0Emovie0Ereview0E20A150A3130Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigrant
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results
immigrant – Yahoo News Search Results

Birthright Citizenship: The New Immigration Scam

Immigration policy – and in particular what to do about the 11 million people in the U.S. illegally – is the new litmus test for the GOP. The arguments over “amnesty” and border security are stale, but the passions are not.

Scott Walker is only the latest candidate to stumble over the immigration tripwire. Though previously supportive of providing a path to citizenship for undocumented residents, now the Wisconsin governor is talking up border security. Advice to candidates: maybe it’s time for some new policy ideas, like demanding an end to our so-called “birthright citizenship.”

Among developed nations, only the U.S. and Canada still offer automatic citizenship to children born on their soil. Not a single European country follows the practice. We take this right for granted, but the evidence is that this entitlement encourages a booming birth tourism business (which undermines our immigration objectives) and virtually guarantees that the number of people in the country illegally will continue to grow. 

Related: Obama’s Immigration Setback Is a Gift to the GOP

Federal agents recently raided 37 sites in southern California, which appear to have provided thousands of Chinese women the chance to give birth to babies on U.S. soil in exchange for fees of up to $60,000. Enticements included not only the opportunity to acquire automatic citizenship for their children – a package of free schooling, food, health and retirement benefits potentially worth millions of dollars – but also more mundane attractions like nannies, trips to Disneyland and fancy restaurants.

The New York Times notes that affidavits filed by law enforcement authorities “quote Chinese government sources as reporting that Chinese nationals had 10,000 babies in the United States in 2012, up from 4,200 in 2008.”

For prosperous Chinese or residents of unstable countries like Russia, an American passport represents an invaluable safety net. Some estimate that as many as 40,000 children from all over the world are born under such circumstances in the U.S. each year. Over time, with family members climbing aboard, the total allowed into the country multiples.

Once those babies turn 21, and if they are in the country, they can sponsor other family members to enter the U.S. Under our law, which promotes family unification, parents, siblings and minor children of a U.S. citizen are welcome. According to a report from John Feere of the Center for Immigration Studies, admitting family members account for most of the nation’s growth in immigration levels. Of the 1,130,818 immigrants who were granted legal permanent residency in 2009, a total of 747,413 (or, 66 percent) were family-sponsored immigrants.

Related: A GOP Minority Is Holding the Party Hostage Over Immigration

The commercial exploitation of our laws is repugnant and should be targeted. But the entire notion that any baby born on U.S. soil should become a citizen should be challenged as well. The lure of U.S. citizenship is incalculable, and has long encouraged illegal immigration. In a phone interview, Feere estimates that some 300,000 to 400,000 babies are born each year to people living in the country illegally. Pew puts the figure at 340,000. This obviously causes substantial growth in the undocumented population, which most would like to limit.

Critics of the “amnesty” being offered to millions of undocumented persons by President Obama say that the offer will only encourage more illegal entrants – and entice even more families to have babies in the U.S.  Obama’s plan provides protection against deportation for three years, and singles out the undocumented parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents who have lived in the country for at least five years.

Some 4 to 5 million immigrants fall under that umbrella, people who had children once inside the country — children who automatically became U.S. citizens. Advocates of immigration reform need to convince opponents that they will reduce the number of undocumented persons entering the country. While many preach border security, it would be more powerful to make illegal residency less attractive. Revoking the birthright citizenship would be a good start.

Immigration advocates argue that automatic citizenship is protected by the 14th amendment of the Constitution, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” Others say the history of that amendment suggests otherwise; the debate hasn’t stopped legislators from attempting to limit the practice.

Related: Obama’s Action Gives Illegal Immigrants Billions in Tax Credits

The first such attempt was in 1993, at the hands of none other than immigrant advocate Harry Reid, whose bill would have restricted automatic citizenship to the children of U.S. citizens and legal resident aliens. Today, Louisiana Senator David Vitter is set to propose an amendment restricting the automatic citizenship provision to babies born to a U.S. citizen or a person who is a permanent resident or serving in the military. This would seem a reasonable change in the current law. 

Like so many policy debates, the issue of birthright citizenship may eventually land in the lap of the Supreme Court. Feere says that while there have been rulings that grant citizenship to the children of permanent resident aliens, there has been no decision on the children of temporary aliens – such as people visiting legally on a student visa – or on babies born to illegal immigrants.

Astonishingly, the government, which Feere describes as being on “automatic pilot” on this issue, even gives passports to children born to foreign diplomats here – clearly people not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. When he followed up with the Social Security Administration on this question, he was told they knew the practice was inappropriate, but were not sure how to monitor it. Sigh.

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/birthright-citizenship-immigration-scam-094500225.html
Birthright Citizenship: The New Immigration Scam
http://news.yahoo.com/birthright-citizenship-immigration-scam-094500225.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration officials see danger as local cooperation wanes

NEW YORK (AP) — Diminished local cooperation is putting federal immigration officers in dangerous situations as they track down foreign-born criminals, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials say.

They say that more of their officers are out on the streets, eating up resources, because cities and states have passed legislation that limits many of the detention requests issued by immigration authorities.

For years, ICE has issued the detainers to local and state law enforcement agencies, asking them to hold immigrants for up to 48 hours after they were scheduled for release from jail. Most detainees are then either taken into federal custody to face an immigration judge or be deported.

But more than 300 counties and cities, plus California, Connecticut, Illinois, Rhode Island and the District of Columbia, have chosen to release immigrants, claiming too many people who have committed low-level offenses or no crime at all were being deported and unnecessarily separated from their families. Courts have said that honoring detainers without probable cause could result in a civil rights offense.

ICE insists that its priorities have changed and it is only focused on foreign-born criminals who are a threat to society. It deported nearly 316,000 people in fiscal year 2014.

In the first eight months of 2014, immigration officers filed roughly 105,000 requests for local enforcement agencies to hold immigrants, but local agencies declined 8,800 of the requests, according to data provided by immigration authorities.

Officers now face more danger because they can’t just pick up foreign-born criminals in a safe environment like the Rikers Island jail, said Christopher Shanahan, field office director for Enforcement and Removal Operations in New York.

“We are in a situation in which we have to provide more men, more workers, more manpower in the streets, where it is more dangerous to take custody of somebody,” said Shanahan. “On the street, when you go into a house, a place of employment, when you are arresting somebody, you don’t know if they have weapons, you don’t know the surroundings.”

Last week, an Associated Press reporter and photographer accompanied officers as they conducted a series of early-morning arrests in the Bronx and Manhattan, part of a nationally-coordinated operation that netted 2,059 people.

A half-dozen ICE officers met at 5:30 a.m. in the parking lot of a Bronx coffee shop, put on black bulletproof vests and reviewed the three people they would try to arrest that morning. After driving quickly to each location in unmarked cars with sirens blaring, they made two arrests: a Mexican man and a Dominican man accused of illegally re-entering into the country, which is considered a high priority for ICE.

The Mexican man had been arrested 10 times by local police for driving without a license and then deported. The man, who was not identified per Department of Homeland Security policy, re-entered the U.S. illegally and then was accused of menacing a neighbor with a machete. ICE said it had issued a detainer for the man that was not honored by the city.

Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the legislation that limited cooperation with ICE in November. The law bars cooperation with detainers unless there’s a federal warrant and the person is on the terrorist watch list or committed a serious crime in the past five years.

From October 2013 through September 2014, the New York City Police Department received 2,635 immigration detainers. Of those, it held 196 individuals. The city says no ICE detainers have been honored this year.

New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, who proposed the limitations, said ICE officials for years “cast a dragnet at Rikers Island” that resulted in unnecessary deportations.

“In addition to being unfair, ICE’s policies were an offense to the rule of law and yet another symptom of our broken immigration system,” Mark-Viverito said in a statement.

In California, only immigrants illegally in the United States who have been convicted of a serious offense are eligible for the 48-hour hold.

David Marin, deputy field office director for Enforcement and Removal Operations in Los Angeles, said that of the seven counties that form the Los Angeles area of operation only two honor detainers that meet those standards.

More than one-fourth of the people arrested by ICE in the Los Angeles area last week had recently been released onto the street by local authorities despite ICE detainer requests. Fifty-nine of the 218 individuals detained by ICE during the enforcement action had been the subject of immigration detainers, said ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice.

The issue is not black-and-white, says Muzaffar Chishti, New York director of the Migration Policy Institute.

“My feeling is that, at some level, both (sides) are right”, said Chishti. “This is a classic case of where you stand on issues depends on where you sit. The concerns and the priorities of the city and police are very different from the concerns and priorities of the federal government.”

___

Associated Press writer Amy Taxin contributed to this report.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-officials-laws-limiting-detainers-risk-officers-050243596.html
Immigration officials see danger as local cooperation wanes
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-officials-laws-limiting-detainers-risk-officers-050243596.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration: more or less?









polish food


Should we be surprised that nearly two-thirds of Scottish voters want to see immigration reduced?

That’s according to the YouGov poll for BBC Scotland, the first part of which is being published today. The survey found only 5% of the 1,100 Scottish sample want to see immigration increased.

And within the 64% for reduction, 15% of the total want to see immigration stopped altogether.

So if you listen to the rhetoric in Holyrood, then yes, you would be surprised, because there’s a cross-party consensus in favour of increasing immigration.

The agreement across parties is not quite as firm as it was when Jack McConnell seized the issue of Scotland’s demographic challenge and made the case for more immigrants.


line


Welcome to Scotland?


welcome to scotland logo

You can also read:

Scots ‘want immigration cut’ – poll

Immigration: Charting Scotland’s new arrivals in graphs

Douglas Fraser on how Scotland has long dealt with immigration

Q&A: Why does immigration matter?

How do we define immigration?


line

Some of his Labour colleagues at Westminster were sceptical about the then first minister’s initiative. But other parties at Holyrood joined the Labour-Lib Dem administration in supporting the case.

It created one of the many tense encounters between the Labour first minister and the Labour administrations in Westminster.

This was over the ‘Fresh Talent’ initiative – giving a special right to non-European Union students at Scottish universities to have a work permit for a limited period after graduation.

By the standards of the Smith Commission, such divergence now seems no big deal. Yet the initiative was ended. Universities say it has put them at a significant disadvantage in recruiting students from Asia.

And attempts to bring it back, even with the support of prominent Scottish Conservatives, are understood to be getting nowhere in Whitehall.


Stricter controls





By contrast with Holyrood, the Westminster conversation about immigration is about sounding tough. That’s where the polls are, and that’s where UKIP is. Those polls have focussed the attention of party strategists ahead of the general election.

The odd bit is that the polls in Scotland have not been that different.

So in answer to my opening question: no, we shouldn’t be surprised. The YouGov polling last week was in line with what we already knew.

With the help of the What Scotland Thinks website, recent findings have gone like this:

In May last year, Survation found 68% supporting stricter controls on immigration, and 10% against. In November, the same pollster asked if immigration has been good or bad for Scotland. Good won, but by a margin of only 44 to 40%.

The Scottish Social Attitudes survey last year found 62% saying the number of migrants to Britain should be reduced, and 9% saying there should be more.







The Holyrood government’s plans for an independent Scotland foresaw the opportunity to relax immigration controls to suit Scotland’s demographic priorities.

Asked by YouGov 13 months ago what effect that would have on levels of immigration, 40% of its sample said they would get higher, and 19% said they would get lower. So the message seems to have got through.

But that doesn’t mean it was supported. Survation found last July that, if independent, only 10% said Scotland should have more immigrants and 56% said there should be fewer.


Distinctive

The evidence is consistent that Scottish public opinion on immigration is less negative or hostile than in Britain as a whole. But not by much.

Only rarely do the comparable Britain-wide survey results reach the opposite majority conclusion to those in Scotland.

So why the mismatch between public opinion and political consensus? Perhaps it is merely a desire for a point of difference.

Perhaps it is because it is a less salient issue for Scots: having less experience of ethnic minorities in their neighbourhoods, they care less about it than other issues.

You could argue that MSPs at Holyrood are out of touch, and in an elite which finds immigration useful in providing the low-price labour to support its lifestyle.

Or you could see MSPs as leading public opinion, setting out Scotland’s distinctive attitude to foreigners and incomers, on an evidence base about demographic change with which few others are familiar.

That version of Scotland’s outlook on the world may not be based on public opinion. But it’s a positive story to tell.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-31813407
Immigration: more or less?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-31813407
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results