Immigration dept makes temporary arrangements for foreigners



From January 13 until further notice, services will be available at Immigration Service Centre on the first floor of Major Hollywood Suksawat in Ratburana district as well as at the Immigration department on the fifth floor of Imperial World Lat Phrao, Wang Tong Lang district.


Both offices are open Monday to Friday from 10.30am to 6.30pm. They are closed on official holidays. For more information, call 1111.

Source Article from http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Immigration-dept-makes-temporary-arrangements-for–30223769.html
Immigration dept makes temporary arrangements for foreigners
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Immigration-dept-makes-temporary-arrangements-for–30223769.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform's narrow window


Immigration reform backers see a narrow window in late spring to push a sweeping overhaul through the House — a goal that eluded them in 2013.

The politics of immigration in the Republican-controlled chamber is still tough — and might be impossible — with many lawmakers opposed to any measure that could be seen as providing amnesty to millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally.


















But proponents of an immigration rewrite on and off Capitol Hill hope the tension will ease once Republicans get past primary season and don’t have to worry about challenges to their conservative credentials.

(POLITICO’s full coverage of immigration issues)

“For many members, they’d be more comfortable when their primaries are over,” said California Rep. Darrell Issa, an influential Republican who has favored immigration reform.

Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said waiting out the primaries makes “perfect sense” — although he’s not convinced that the GOP base is as riled up over immigration as it is over other issues such as Obamacare.

“However, perception is reality, so you have members that are concerned, and the perception is out there that our base does not like this,” Aguilar said.

Jeremy Robbins, the executive director of the Partnership for a New American Economy — the pro-reform group with ties to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — said reform “certainly gets easier” after the primaries pass.

(Also on POLITICO: Obama renews call for Senate immigration bill)

“I think there are multiple viable windows … and that makes us optimistic,” Robbins said, adding that primary deadlines are a “big factor.”

“We are planning all of our organizing around these windows,” he said.

The Democratic-controlled Senate passed a broad immigration overhaul last June, but the effort stalled in the House, where Republicans are pursuing a piecemeal strategy of individual bills instead of one comprehensive piece of legislation.

House Republican leaders have said publicly that they still want to take up immigration reform but have not committed to a specific time frame for bringing bills up for a vote. In a memo sent to members earlier this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) listed immigration among several issues that “may be brought to the floor over the next few months.”

Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing their own comprehensive immigration overhaul bill that has three Republican co-sponsors, but it isn’t likely to make it to the House floor.

(PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes)

Even if they wanted to, it would be tough to push immigration to the top of the agenda. The beginning of the congressional year is clogged with deadlines for other must-do legislative items such as passing a funding bill to keep the government running and approving a new five-year farm bill.

And another major fiscal deadline looms in late February or early March: the debt ceiling.

The primary season will be in full swing by that point. Though primaries can occur as late as September, most of the filing deadlines for more than 80 percent of sitting House Republicans will have come and gone by the end of April, according to a POLITICO analysis.

Three of the five states with the largest number of House Republicans in their delegations — Texas, Pennsylvania and Ohio — will have held their primaries by the end of May. Texas is the earliest, with a March 4 primary. The two others — California and Florida — are where Republican lawmakers generally have been more amenable to an immigration overhaul.


Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
Immigration reform's narrow window
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform's narrow window


Immigration reform backers see a narrow window in late spring to push a sweeping overhaul through the House — a goal that eluded them in 2013.

The politics of immigration in the Republican-controlled chamber is still tough — and might be impossible — with many lawmakers opposed to any measure that could be seen as providing amnesty to millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally.


















But proponents of an immigration rewrite on and off Capitol Hill hope the tension will ease once Republicans get past primary season and don’t have to worry about challenges to their conservative credentials.

(POLITICO’s full coverage of immigration issues)

“For many members, they’d be more comfortable when their primaries are over,” said California Rep. Darrell Issa, an influential Republican who has favored immigration reform.

Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said waiting out the primaries makes “perfect sense” — although he’s not convinced that the GOP base is as riled up over immigration as it is over other issues such as Obamacare.

“However, perception is reality, so you have members that are concerned, and the perception is out there that our base does not like this,” Aguilar said.

Jeremy Robbins, the executive director of the Partnership for a New American Economy — the pro-reform group with ties to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — said reform “certainly gets easier” after the primaries pass.

(Also on POLITICO: Obama renews call for Senate immigration bill)

“I think there are multiple viable windows … and that makes us optimistic,” Robbins said, adding that primary deadlines are a “big factor.”

“We are planning all of our organizing around these windows,” he said.

The Democratic-controlled Senate passed a broad immigration overhaul last June, but the effort stalled in the House, where Republicans are pursuing a piecemeal strategy of individual bills instead of one comprehensive piece of legislation.

House Republican leaders have said publicly that they still want to take up immigration reform but have not committed to a specific time frame for bringing bills up for a vote. In a memo sent to members earlier this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) listed immigration among several issues that “may be brought to the floor over the next few months.”

Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing their own comprehensive immigration overhaul bill that has three Republican co-sponsors, but it isn’t likely to make it to the House floor.

(PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes)

Even if they wanted to, it would be tough to push immigration to the top of the agenda. The beginning of the congressional year is clogged with deadlines for other must-do legislative items such as passing a funding bill to keep the government running and approving a new five-year farm bill.

And another major fiscal deadline looms in late February or early March: the debt ceiling.

The primary season will be in full swing by that point. Though primaries can occur as late as September, most of the filing deadlines for more than 80 percent of sitting House Republicans will have come and gone by the end of April, according to a POLITICO analysis.

Three of the five states with the largest number of House Republicans in their delegations — Texas, Pennsylvania and Ohio — will have held their primaries by the end of May. Texas is the earliest, with a March 4 primary. The two others — California and Florida — are where Republican lawmakers generally have been more amenable to an immigration overhaul.


Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
Immigration reform's narrow window
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform's narrow window


Immigration reform backers see a narrow window in late spring to push a sweeping overhaul through the House — a goal that eluded them in 2013.

The politics of immigration in the Republican-controlled chamber is still tough — and might be impossible — with many lawmakers opposed to any measure that could be seen as providing amnesty to millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally.


















But proponents of an immigration rewrite on and off Capitol Hill hope the tension will ease once Republicans get past primary season and don’t have to worry about challenges to their conservative credentials.

(POLITICO’s full coverage of immigration issues)

“For many members, they’d be more comfortable when their primaries are over,” said California Rep. Darrell Issa, an influential Republican who has favored immigration reform.

Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said waiting out the primaries makes “perfect sense” — although he’s not convinced that the GOP base is as riled up over immigration as it is over other issues such as Obamacare.

“However, perception is reality, so you have members that are concerned, and the perception is out there that our base does not like this,” Aguilar said.

Jeremy Robbins, the executive director of the Partnership for a New American Economy — the pro-reform group with ties to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — said reform “certainly gets easier” after the primaries pass.

(Also on POLITICO: Obama renews call for Senate immigration bill)

“I think there are multiple viable windows … and that makes us optimistic,” Robbins said, adding that primary deadlines are a “big factor.”

“We are planning all of our organizing around these windows,” he said.

The Democratic-controlled Senate passed a broad immigration overhaul last June, but the effort stalled in the House, where Republicans are pursuing a piecemeal strategy of individual bills instead of one comprehensive piece of legislation.

House Republican leaders have said publicly that they still want to take up immigration reform but have not committed to a specific time frame for bringing bills up for a vote. In a memo sent to members earlier this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) listed immigration among several issues that “may be brought to the floor over the next few months.”

Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing their own comprehensive immigration overhaul bill that has three Republican co-sponsors, but it isn’t likely to make it to the House floor.

(PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes)

Even if they wanted to, it would be tough to push immigration to the top of the agenda. The beginning of the congressional year is clogged with deadlines for other must-do legislative items such as passing a funding bill to keep the government running and approving a new five-year farm bill.

And another major fiscal deadline looms in late February or early March: the debt ceiling.

The primary season will be in full swing by that point. Though primaries can occur as late as September, most of the filing deadlines for more than 80 percent of sitting House Republicans will have come and gone by the end of April, according to a POLITICO analysis.

Three of the five states with the largest number of House Republicans in their delegations — Texas, Pennsylvania and Ohio — will have held their primaries by the end of May. Texas is the earliest, with a March 4 primary. The two others — California and Florida — are where Republican lawmakers generally have been more amenable to an immigration overhaul.


Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
Immigration reform's narrow window
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform's narrow window for survival


Immigration reform backers see a narrow window in late spring to push a sweeping overhaul through the House — a goal that eluded them in 2013.

The politics of immigration in the Republican-controlled chamber is still tough — and might be impossible — with many lawmakers opposed to any measure that could be seen as providing amnesty to millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally.


















But proponents of an immigration rewrite on and off Capitol Hill hope the tension will ease once Republicans get past primary season and don’t have to worry about challenges to their conservative credentials.

(POLITICO’s full coverage of immigration issues)

“For many members, they’d be more comfortable when their primaries are over,” said California Rep. Darrell Issa, an influential Republican who has favored immigration reform.

Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said waiting out the primaries makes “perfect sense” — although he’s not convinced that the GOP base is as riled up over immigration as it is over other issues such as Obamacare.

“However, perception is reality, so you have members that are concerned, and the perception is out there that our base does not like this,” Aguilar said.

Jeremy Robbins, the executive director of the Partnership for a New American Economy — the pro-reform group with ties to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — said reform “certainly gets easier” after the primaries pass.

(Also on POLITICO: Obama renews call for Senate immigration bill)

“I think there are multiple viable windows … and that makes us optimistic,” Robbins said, adding that primary deadlines are a “big factor.”

“We are planning all of our organizing around these windows,” he said.

The Democratic-controlled Senate passed a broad immigration overhaul last June, but the effort stalled in the House, where Republicans are pursuing a piecemeal strategy of individual bills instead of one comprehensive piece of legislation.

House Republican leaders have said publicly that they still want to take up immigration reform but have not committed to a specific time frame for bringing bills up for a vote. In a memo sent to members earlier this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) listed immigration among several issues that “may be brought to the floor over the next few months.”

Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing their own comprehensive immigration overhaul bill that has three Republican co-sponsors, but it isn’t likely to make it to the House floor.

(PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes)

Even if they wanted to, it would be tough to push immigration to the top of the agenda. The beginning of the congressional year is clogged with deadlines for other must-do legislative items such as passing a funding bill to keep the government running and approving a new five-year farm bill.

And another major fiscal deadline looms in late February or early March: the debt ceiling.

The primary season will be in full swing by that point. Though primaries can occur as late as September, most of the filing deadlines for more than 80 percent of sitting House Republicans will have come and gone by the end of April, according to a POLITICO analysis.

Three of the five states with the largest number of House Republicans in their delegations — Texas, Pennsylvania and Ohio — will have held their primaries by the end of May. Texas is the earliest, with a March 4 primary. The two others — California and Florida — are where Republican lawmakers generally have been more amenable to an immigration overhaul.


Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
Immigration reform's narrow window for survival
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform's narrow window


Immigration reform backers see a narrow window in late spring to push a sweeping overhaul through the House — a goal that eluded them in 2013.

The politics of immigration in the Republican-controlled chamber is still tough — and might be impossible — with many lawmakers opposed to any measure that could be seen as providing amnesty to millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally.


















But proponents of an immigration rewrite on and off Capitol Hill hope the tension will ease once Republicans get past primary season and don’t have to worry about challenges to their conservative credentials.

(POLITICO’s full coverage of immigration issues)

“For many members, they’d be more comfortable when their primaries are over,” said California Rep. Darrell Issa, an influential Republican who has favored immigration reform.

Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said waiting out the primaries makes “perfect sense” — although he’s not convinced that the GOP base is as riled up over immigration as it is over other issues such as Obamacare.

“However, perception is reality, so you have members that are concerned, and the perception is out there that our base does not like this,” Aguilar said.

Jeremy Robbins, the executive director of the Partnership for a New American Economy — the pro-reform group with ties to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — said reform “certainly gets easier” after the primaries pass.

(Also on POLITICO: Obama renews call for Senate immigration bill)

“I think there are multiple viable windows … and that makes us optimistic,” Robbins said, adding that primary deadlines are a “big factor.”

“We are planning all of our organizing around these windows,” he said.

The Democratic-controlled Senate passed a broad immigration overhaul last June, but the effort stalled in the House, where Republicans are pursuing a piecemeal strategy of individual bills instead of one comprehensive piece of legislation.

House Republican leaders have said publicly that they still want to take up immigration reform but have not committed to a specific time frame for bringing bills up for a vote. In a memo sent to members earlier this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) listed immigration among several issues that “may be brought to the floor over the next few months.”

Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing their own comprehensive immigration overhaul bill that has three Republican co-sponsors, but it isn’t likely to make it to the House floor.

(PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes)

Even if they wanted to, it would be tough to push immigration to the top of the agenda. The beginning of the congressional year is clogged with deadlines for other must-do legislative items such as passing a funding bill to keep the government running and approving a new five-year farm bill.

And another major fiscal deadline looms in late February or early March: the debt ceiling.

The primary season will be in full swing by that point. Though primaries can occur as late as September, most of the filing deadlines for more than 80 percent of sitting House Republicans will have come and gone by the end of April, according to a POLITICO analysis.

Three of the five states with the largest number of House Republicans in their delegations — Texas, Pennsylvania and Ohio — will have held their primaries by the end of May. Texas is the earliest, with a March 4 primary. The two others — California and Florida — are where Republican lawmakers generally have been more amenable to an immigration overhaul.


Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
Immigration reform's narrow window
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-congress-senate-house-2014-101612.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Record support for severe curbs on immigration

Significantly, attitudes have also hardened even among those from immigrant
families themselves with less than half now convinced that it is good for
the economy and a quarter doubting the cultural benefits.

The findings came as Vince Cable, the Business Secretary, underlined divisions
with the Coalition over immigration insisting that the Government “certainly
won’t achieve” its target of getting numbers below 100,000 before the
General Election next year.

Speaking in a BBC documentary, The Truth About Immigration, he described the
cap, a flagship Conservative policy, as “not sensible”.

In the same programme, Jack Straw, the former Home Secretary, described
Labour’s estimates of migrant numbers ahead of the main eastward expansion
of the EU in 2004 as “completely catastrophic”.

And David Blunkett, his successor, admitted that the Blair government had not
spelt out likely the full impact because of a “fear of racism”.

Nick Robinson, the BBC’s political editor, who presents the programme, said at
the weekend that the corporation had made a “terrible mistake” in
downplaying public concerns over immigration.

The study of more than 3,000 people found that 77 per cent want immigration
reduced, with only four per cent favouring an increase.

Fifty six per cent support reducing it “a lot” – a record level. In 1995, when
the question was first asked, only 39 per cent supported major reductions
and two years ago only 51 per cent did.

Although the number of people believing that immigration benefits the economy
is marginally higher than two years ago, it is still a view held by less
than a third of Britons, compared with almost half who see it as harmful.

Only one in three Britons believe immigration enriches Britain culturally,
against 45 per cent who think it is detrimental.

Significantly, 54 per cent of those who see immigration as good for the
economy still want to reduce it, including a quarter who would support
severe reductions. Among those who see immigration as culturally beneficial,
55 per cent now support curbs.

Penny Young, chief executive of NatCen Social research, which conducted the
study, said other issues not specifically covered by the questions – such as
pressure on the NHS or housing – could be at work.

“Reducing immigration is technically about stopping more immigrants coming to
Britain so it may well be that people have got to the point where they think
that we are ‘full’,” she said.

“They may think that it has been good for the economy or culturally but that
if it carries on it may have a problematic effect.”

Strikingly, the proportion of first or second generation immigrants who
believe migration is good for the economy has slipped below half in the last
two years. A quarter of migrants now even doubt that it immigration is even
benefiting Britain culturally.

When responses were analysed along class lines, one of the most notable
findings is that only a third of those in the top earnings bracket see
immigration as bad for the economy compared with around half of those in the
middle.

David Cameron has pledged to reduce net migration to the “tens of
thousands” rather than hundreds of thousands . But figures published in
November show it rose markedly ni the last year and now stands at 182,000.

Aked whether he thought the target was realistic, Mr Cable said: “It’s
not sensible to have an arbitrary cap because most of the things under it
can’t be controlled.

“So it involves British people emigrating – you can’t control that. It
involves free movement within the European Union – in and out. It involves
British people coming back from overseas, who are not immigrants but who are
counted in the numbers. So setting an arbitrary cap is not helpful, it
almost certainly won’t achieve the below 100,000 level the Conservatives
have set anyway, so let’s be practical about it.”

Asked whether it was “nonsense”, he said: “The idea it should
come down to 100,000 is something the Liberal Democrats have never signed up
to because we simply regard it as impractical.”

Immigration is expected to dominate the agenda in the lead up to the European
elections later this year and a General Election next year.

While the UK Independence Party is expected to take votes from the
Conservatives over the issue, the study shows that Labour voters are the
most sharply divided over immigration.

Similar proportions of Labour voters – roughly four out of 10 – see
immigration as helping or harming the economy and Britain’s cultural life.

Government estimates a decade ago were that around 13,000 people from Eastern
European member states would come to Britain a year. According to the ONS
there are now just over a million people from Poland and the seven other
countries which joined the EU in 2004 living in the UK.

“The predications were completely catastrophic,” Mr Straw told the programme.

“I mean they were wrong by a factor of 10.

“On immigration, it was bluntly a nightmare and it got more and more
difficult”

Mr Blunkett addeds that the Treasury was convinced that the economic benefits
would outweigh the disadvantages.

“We didn’t spell out in words of one syllable what was happening, partly
because of a fear of racism” he said.

Source Article from http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/534871/s/35965dc2/sc/7/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cuknews0Cimmigration0C10A55380A40CRecord0Esupport0Efor0Esevere0Ecurbs0Eon0Eimmigration0Bhtml/story01.htm
Record support for severe curbs on immigration
http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/534871/s/35965dc2/sc/7/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cuknews0Cimmigration0C10A55380A40CRecord0Esupport0Efor0Esevere0Ecurbs0Eon0Eimmigration0Bhtml/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Court prevents deportation of felon adopted by citizen

Immigration officials sought to deport Luis Gonzalez-Marquez to Mexico after his prison sentence for robbery, saying his father’s U.S. citizenship does not make him a U.S. citizen because they were not biologically related. But a federal appeals court disagrees and says the Napa man is a citizen entitled to remain in the United States.

Federal law, which allows a naturalized U.S. citizen to confer citizenship on a minor child after immigration, “does not expressly require a blood relationship to the citizen parent,” the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said in a 3-0 ruling Friday.

Gonzalez-Marquez was born in 1987 in the Mexican state of Chihuahua, with no father listed on his birth certificate. Four years later, his mother’s husband, Jesus Gonzalez-Hernandez, went to the municipal registry with his wife and declared the child to be his legitimate son. Under the state’s law, the child’s birth certificate was changed to include his father, with no need for the formal adoption that most governments require.

The family entered the United States as legal residents in 1994, and the father became a U.S. citizen two years later, said the son’s lawyer, Richard Coshnear. After he turned 18, Coshnear said, the son pleaded guilty to robbery and served time in prison.

Immigration officials then moved to deport him and have kept him behind bars for most of the past three years, the lawyer said. A noncitizen can be stripped of legal residency and deported for committing a crime classified as an “aggravated felony.”

Immigration courts upheld the deportation, but the appeals court overruled them Friday and said Gonzalez-Marquez, now 26, is a U.S. citizen, not just a legal resident, and thus cannot be deported.

U.S. law “honors concepts of family law from foreign countries,” including the Mexican state that recognized Jesus Gonzalez-Hernandez as the child’s father, the court said. The man “undertook the legal obligation to raise (the child) as if he were his biological or adopted son,” and the United States must respect that relationship, the court said.

Coshnear praised the ruling. He said his client made “one mistake” as a youth, but now has “an opportunity to rehabilitate himself and lead a law-abiding life here.”

Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: begelko@sfchronicle.com

Source Article from http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Court-prevents-deportation-of-felon-adopted-by-5119068.php
Court prevents deportation of felon adopted by citizen
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Court-prevents-deportation-of-felon-adopted-by-5119068.php
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Will the DREAM of US immigration reform become reality in 2014?


Vivienne McLean is torn. “I go to every march, I come to every meeting, I sign every petition,” the silver-haired activist told me, laying out her credentials as an advocate on behalf of the estimated 11.7 million undocumented migrants in the United States. “But I am also a human being. I have to respond to my feelings about what is happening to my sister.”

We are sitting together at a seminar organised by the New York Immigration Coalition, and she has just asked an uncomfortable question. The seminar is launching a new report, Preparing for Legalization, which anticipates the day when comprehensive immigration reform will enable millions of undocumented migrants to regularise their status in this country. That day is not too far off, according to the seminar speakers, who anticipate that an alignment of political forces will allow the legislation through Congress this year. While Jamaican-born McLean welcomes that prospect, she fears that the monumental administrative task will push out waiting times for people who have applied to migrate to the US through formal channels.

In June 2007 I applied for my sister to join me under the Category 4 program,” she explained. Category 4 enables adult US citizens to sponsor the migration of a brother or sister. “She has waited six years and still has another minimum six years to go.”

Like many other formal migration programs, Category 4 is subject to massive delays — US Citizenship and Immigration Services has a backlog of 4.4 million visa applications — and country-based quotas. Waiting times for Filipinos and Mexicans exceed those for Jamaicans, for example, extending out beyond 20 years. McLean wants an assurance that if Congress passes comprehensive migration reform it will also increase processing capacity massively so that applicants already in the system, like her sister, will not be forced to wait even longer. It is an assurance no one can give, not least because the shape of migration reform remains unclear.

So far, the main legislative action has been in the Senate, where reformers managed to assemble majority support for the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Bill. More commonly referred to as S 744, the bill was drafted by a bipartisan group of senators, known as the “gang of eight”, that includes Arizona Senator John McCain, the Republican candidate in the 2008 presidential election. In an effort to meet different goals and satisfy divergent interests, it links a process for regularising the status of millions of undocumented migrants — essentially a mass amnesty — to a comprehensive overhaul of the formal immigration program and a substantial beefing up of border security.

… there has to be comprehensive immigration reform that includes some kind of legalisation in order to not have Republicans lose all of the future presidential elections.”

If it were to become law, S 744 would enable undocumented migrants to apply immediately for the newly created status of a Registered Provisional Immigrant, which would grant them formal work rights and protect them from deportation. A new set of border enforcement measures would be needed before these provisional immigrants could become permanent residents or citizens, however. According to a summary prepared by the Library of Congress, these include the construction of “no fewer than 700 miles of pedestrian fencing” and a doubling of staff numbers to ensure that there are “at least 38,405 trained full-time active duty US Border Patrol agents” along the border with Mexico. S 744 also seeks to address the concerns of people like Vivienne McLean, proposing measures intended to clear the backlog of visa applications within the space of seven years.

Of course a Senate bill has no effect unless it is also passed by the House of Representatives, where progress has been slower. In October, Democrats proposed a complementary immigration reform bill called HR 15, which replicates most of the measures in S 744 while taking a less militarised approach to border security. Rather than mandate certain levels of infrastructure and staffing, or require the use of specific surveillance technologies (like aerial drones), HR 15 focuses on creating targets and accountability mechanisms to ensure improved border control. The bill has yet to move beyond the committee stage. Even if it’s passed by the House, it will need to be reconciled with the Senate bill — a potentially tortuous process — before comprehensive immigration reform can become law.

Despite the hurdles — and political disappointments stretching back more than a decade — advocates of immigration reform are cautiously optimistic about progress in 2014. After addressing the seminar in New York, Steven Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition, told me that his optimism is based on the fact that “everybody now recognises that this is an issue that has to be dealt with”.

Another speaker at the seminar, Katherine Fennelly, a senior fellow at the Immigration Policy Center in Washington, concurs. She believes that Republicans have a strong incentive to support immigration reform ahead of the November 2014 mid-term Congressional elections. “Most opposition to comprehensive immigration reform has come from Republicans, but more than 70% of immigrants voted for Obama in the last election,” she said. All 435 seats in the House of Representatives will be up for grabs, along with 30 of the 100 seats in the Senate, and many state legislatures and governorships.

It has become a political truism to say that Republicans can no longer rely on the “white vote” to win US elections, and the country’s demographic trajectory suggests that this trend will intensify. Hispanics and Asian-Americans make up 10.8% and 3.8% of enrolled voters respectively; both groups are growing, and both overwhelmingly support immigration reform. As a result, says Fennelly, conservatives are under great pressure to compromise. “The Republican National Committee has put the writing on the wall. It has said that there has to be comprehensive immigration reform that includes some kind of legalisation in order to not have Republicans lose all of the future presidential elections.”

*Read the rest of this article at Inside Story

Source Article from http://www.crikey.com.au/2014/01/06/will-the-dream-of-us-immigration-reform-become-reality-in-2014/
Will the DREAM of US immigration reform become reality in 2014?
http://www.crikey.com.au/2014/01/06/will-the-dream-of-us-immigration-reform-become-reality-in-2014/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform: 2013 brought frustration

By Eduardo Stanley

Fasting for immigration reform was something Maya Medina, of Chula Vista, had to do in November and Jennifer Chung Klam brought to us her story. Medina who had an inner drive to make a difference also had her grandfather, Eliosa Medina, labor and immigration reformer to support her.  Picutured top row (left to right): S.J. Jung; Eliseo Medina; Gloria Steinem; Mary Grillo; Cristian Avila; Shoshanah Kay; Rev. Michael Livingston. Second row (left to right): Alesa MacKool; Maya Medina; Elena Medina; Tom Weis; Sang Hyug Jung; Dae Joong (D.J.) Yoong. Third row: Lupita Medina

Fasting for immigration reform was something Maya Medina, of Chula Vista, had to do in November and Jennifer Chung Klam brought to us her story. Medina who had an inner drive to make a difference also had her grandfather, Eliosa Medina, labor and immigration reformer to support her.
Picutured top row (left to right): S.J. Jung; Eliseo Medina; Gloria Steinem; Mary Grillo; Cristian Avila; Shoshanah Kay; Rev. Michael Livingston. Second row (left to right): Alesa MacKool; Maya Medina; Elena Medina; Tom Weis; Sang Hyug Jung; Dae Joong (D.J.) Yoong. Third row: Lupita Medina

The much announced immigration reform didn’t happen during 2013. But many things happened around the issue and the pressure toward a change in the existing law was intense —yet worthless due to the Republican refusal to pass a bill in this regard. However, Obama and Democrats are not innocents about this political and legislative impasse since they controlled the issue, marginalizing from the discussion about immigration reform activists and community based organizations involved in the 2006 and 2007 immigrant’s mobilizations.

Can 2014 be the year of the immigration reform? If so, what type of reform? The “model,” based on the recently approved bill on the Senate would leave millions out of the loop and will militarize the US-Mexico border. Yet they call it “comprehensive” reform bill.

Lets take a look on the highlights surrounding the immigration issue that took place in the last 12 months.

* * * *

April. National Rally for Citizenship. Thousands of people marched in some US cities, mainly in Washington, D.C., in support for an immigration reform. It wasn’t like in 2006 and 2007 because this time it was an organized event from “the top” by several unions and organizations.

One week later, eight senators, four from each party, known as the “Gang of Eight,” introduced a bill in which contemplates a path to citizenship after a 13 years waiting period of time.

June. Three “Dreamers” hugged their deported mothers through the fence along the Mexico-USA border. The campaign, “Operation Butterfly,” was organized to complain against the high levels of deportations orchestrated by the Obama Administration: an average of 400,000 per year.

June 27, US Senate passed the immigration bill introduced in April by the “Gang of Eight” by a big margin: 68 to 32, with all Democrats and 14 Republicans voting yes.

Even though the bill establishes a “path to citizenship,” those interested would have to wait 13 years to apply for the citizenship. Also establishes fines for those undocumented applicants, and the need to have a job with a minimum salary, maintain “good moral character,” and more limitations. During those 13 years, applicants would get a “temporarily” status, subject of control by authorities. The bill also contemplates an almost 10 billion budget increase for enforcement along the US-Mexico border, something that generated strong criticism from community based organizations of the area.

July. Three “Dreamers” crossed the border into Mexico with the goal to come back into USA and bring with them four other who were deported recently. Another group of undocumented immigrants crossed the Texas-Mexico border and asked humanitarian parol. Some were accepted, a few deported.

August. Civil disobedience in Washington, D.C., where activists try to pressure Republicans in the House to pass a similar Senate bill on immigration —which they refused to do.

All summer activists participated in several similar actions. Dozen got arrested.

October. California will provide drivers licenses for undocumented, and passed also the TRUST Act, which limits deportations of non-violent immigrants.

Currently, 11 states — California, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, Illinois, Nevada, Oregon, Maryland, Vermont, Colorado, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia, provide drivers licenses to those without residence.

March – November. Local and state anti-immigrant laws blocked. In Arizona, the Ninth Circuit of Appeals upheld a previous court judgement on a key provision of the state’s anti-immigrant law which would have made it illegal to give rides or provide shelter to undocumented immigrants.

Alabama passed the nation’s strictest immigration law in 2011. Key provisions of HB 56 designed to encourage racial profiling and make immigrants’ daily lives difficult to impossible, have been permanently blocked.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down a Texas town’s ordinance that prohibited landlords from renting to undocumented residents.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia also ruled that anti-immigration city ordinances in Hazleton, PA, infringed on federal immigration policies and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals similarly issued decisions against an anti-immigration South Carolina law that would have among other violations of federal immigration policies, criminalized undocumented immigrants seeking “shelter.”

November. “Fast for Families.” In Washington, three immigration reform activists started a fast that lasted 22 days to stress the urgency of passing immigration reform. They received Obama’s visit at the tent.

November 25. A “Dream-er” interrupts Obama speech in San Francisco questioning the president for his refusal to stop de massive deportations.

Source Article from http://laprensa-sandiego.org/featured/immigration-reform-2013-brought-frustration/
Immigration reform: 2013 brought frustration
http://laprensa-sandiego.org/featured/immigration-reform-2013-brought-frustration/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results