The other immigration problem

But all the law guarantees is a hearing, not amnesty. And the passage of a law promising a hearing to a large segment of illegal immigrants who would not otherwise be entitled to one ensured an increased workload for the immigration court system–a promise the U.S. government largely ignored.


“It’s sort of ironic the one part of the immigration system that is underfunded is the one that provides due process to immigrants,” said Daniel Costa, Director of Immigration Law and Policy Research for the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. In recent years, he said, funding for immigration enforcement operations increased 300 percent—that’s the part of the system charged with apprehending illegal immigrants and bringing them before a judge. Over the same time frame, Costa said, the funding for the courts rose only 70 percent.


Read More Obama on immigration: I’m going to fix as much as I can, on my own


“If there wasn’t an immigration court crisis, there wouldn’t really be a border crisis,” Costa said. “The crisis is that we can’t provide everybody with a hearing. If they were being processed in an orderly fashion–if their cases were being processed in 60, 90, or 100 days—I don’t know if people would be making so much noise about it.”


President Barack Obama’s $4 billion proposal to address the crisis on the border would allow for the hiring of a few dozen judges. A more expansive proposal being pushed by Sen. Barbara Mikulski would provide for substantially more. Given the backlog, though, there’s no likelihood, in the near term, of changing the impression many potential illegal immigrants have that, simply by crossing the border, they will get to stay in the U.S. indefinitely.


Reducing the backlog is going to take years, even with additional funding, Costa said. “Even if you to double or triple the immigration judges you aren’t going to do it overnight.”


Read MoreA year later, bright hopes quashed on immigration


—By Rob Garver, The Fiscal Times


Source Article from http://www.cnbc.com/id/101871684
The other immigration problem
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101871684
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

The Immigration Problem We’re Not Talking About

One of the biggest factors driving the surge of unaccompanied children making the dangerous journey from Central America to the United States’ Southern border has been the incorrect impression that, once they arrive, they will be allowed to stay. Unfortunately, by vastly understaffing the country’s immigration courts, the U.S. government has made that myth appear to be reality.

Imagine this. What if the first wave of children in this migration of tens of thousands had been deported back to Honduras, El Salvador, or Guatemala a few months after they left home in the first place? It seems likely that word would have got around that, contrary to rumor, the United States was not providing blanket amnesty to children.

Related:  National Guard Border Fix Is Fraught With Danger

In fact, according to the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, the vast majority of unaccompanied children crossing the border are designated for deportation once they come before a judge. The problem is that wait time for a hearing in immigration court is measured not in weeks or months, but in years.

According to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), there was a backlog of 375,503 cases in the immigration court system as of the end of June. That’s more than twice the number of pending cases in 2008. It also translates into an average wait time, according to TRAC, of 587 days for an initial hearing, with wait times in some jurisdictions averaging much longer.

In Omaha, for instance, the average case takes 839 days to get in front of a judge. In Los Angeles, it’s 820, and in Phoenix it’s 808. And these are just averages. Immigration activists report some children waiting three to five years for a hearing. Worse yet, in some cases, the initial hearing is only part of the process; some drag on for years even after they first come before a judge.

Part of the reason is that the federal immigration court system is gravely understaffed when considering the magnitude of the task in front of it. There are currently about 243 immigration judges, or one to every 1,545 pending cases.

Related: Jeb Bush Warns GOP on Immigration Reform

This means that families in Central America who send their children north can report to friends and neighbors that those kids are in the United States and aren’t coming back anytime soon, creating an incentive for other parents to send their children on the perilous trip.

The worst part about this is that it was a completely predictable and avoidable problem.

There is a growing call among those most concerned about the influx of illegal immigrants to amend the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, which many blame for the current crisis on the Southern border. Originally passed in 2000, and meant to protect the victims of human trafficking from being returned to dangerous circumstances, the law barred the immediate deportation of children who enter the US illegally, and who are not from Mexico or Canada. The immigration caseload, flat or declining in the years immediately before 2000, has been on a nearly uninterrupted rise ever since.

But all the law guarantees is a hearing – not amnesty. And the passage of a law promising a hearing to a large segment of illegal immigrants who would not otherwise be entitled to one ensured an increased workload for the immigration court system – a promise the U.S. government largely ignored.

Related: Perry Tests Obama by Sending Troops to the Border

“It’s sort of ironic the one part of the immigration system that is underfunded is the one that provides due process to immigrants,” said Daniel Costa, Director of Immigration Law and Policy Research for the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. In recent years, he said, funding for immigration enforcement operations increased 300 percent – that’s the part of the system charged with apprehending illegal immigrants and bringing them before a judge. Over the same time frame, said Costa, the funding for the courts rose only 70 percent.

“If there wasn’t an immigration court crisis, there wouldn’t really be a border crisis,” said Costa. “The crisis is that we can’t provide everybody with a hearing. If they were being processed in an orderly fashion – if their cases were being processed in 60, 90, or 100 days, I don’t know if people would be making so much noise about it.”

President Obama’s $4 billion proposal to address the crisis on the border would allow for the hiring of a few dozen judges. A more expansive proposal being pushed by Sen. Barbara Mikulski would provide for substantially more. Given the backlog, though, there’s no likelihood, in the near term, of changing the impression many potential illegal immigrants have that, simply by crossing the border, they will get to stay in the U.S. indefinitely.

Reducing the backlog is going to take years – even with additional funding, said Costa. “Even if you to double or triple the immigration judges you aren’t going to do it overnight.”

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-problem-not-talking-101500664.html
The Immigration Problem We’re Not Talking About
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-problem-not-talking-101500664.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Haitian Illegal Immigration Through Puerto Rico Is Skyrocketing Too

While U.S. immigration agencies grapple with a recent surge of tens of thousands of illegal immigrants at the Mexican border, the number of Haitians trying to enter the U.S. illegally through Puerto Rico has skyrocketed as well.

In 2011, only 12 Haitians made the trek through the Dominican Republic to Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory in the Caribbean Sea. That number had ballooned to 1,760 as of last year, according to U.S. Coast Guard statistics, CBS News reports.

“That’s new, and that’s something we’re trying to target,” Capt. Mark Fedor, the Coast Guard’s chief of response for the Southeast and Caribbean, told CBS.

“Organized smugglers in the Dominican Republic are advertising their services to Haitians and saying, ‘We’ll smuggle you through the Dominican Republic, put you on a boat to Puerto Rico or to one of the islands in the Mona Pass – a much shorter journey and we can get you to the United States that way.’ And I think people are responding to that,” he said.

The Dominican smugglers often drop their Haitian charges off at Mona Island, an uninhabited Puerto Rican island 40 miles off of the Dominican coast in the Mona Pass.

“As soon as you’re in Puerto Rico, it’s like you’re in the United States,” Lolo Sterne, coordinator for Haiti’s Office of Migration, told the Associated Press last year.

Once in Puerto Rico, the illegal Haitian immigrants are able to fly to destinations in the U.S. without having to show a passport. All they need is a driver’s license, according to the Associated Press.

The new route through the Mona Pass is seen as more desirable as the U.S. Coast Guard has increased patrols of normal routes taken by immigrants from Haiti and the Dominican Republic. As the AP points out, it has become more difficult to travel directly to the U.S. mainland or through Miami, which has historically served as the choice destination for illegal immigrants from the Caribbean.

Follow Chuck on Twitter
Join the conversation on The Daily Caller

Read more stories from The Daily Caller

Haitian Illegal Immigration Through Puerto Rico Is Skyrocketing Too

What Do Puppies Dream Of? [SLIDESHOW]

Chicago Mayor Offers Housing, Free Legal Services To Child Immigrants

Ohio State Psychology Class Quiz Tells Students Atheists Are Smarter Than Christians

Man Says Police Wouldn’t Let Him Help His Dog After They Shot It

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/haitian-illegal-immigration-puerto-rico-skyrocketing-too-021611125.html
Haitian Illegal Immigration Through Puerto Rico Is Skyrocketing Too
http://news.yahoo.com/haitian-illegal-immigration-puerto-rico-skyrocketing-too-021611125.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration Laws Should Serve People, Not Politics

U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents take undocumented immigrants into custody on July 22, 2014 near Falfurrias, Texas.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents take undocumented immigrants into custody on July 22, 2014 near Falfurrias, Texas.
John Moore—Getty Images

Was the law made for people or people for the law?

Source Article from http://time.com/3034053/immigration-laws-should-serve-people-not-politics/
Immigration Laws Should Serve People, Not Politics
http://time.com/3034053/immigration-laws-should-serve-people-not-politics/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama Eyes Major Immigration Move

Barack Obama, Joe Biden
President Barack Obama, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, speaks about immigration reform on June 30, 2014, in the White House Rose GardenHouse
Manuel Balce Ceneta—AP

The President may be preparing to provide temporary legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants

Source Article from http://time.com/3028637/obama-eyes-major-immigration-move/
Obama Eyes Major Immigration Move
http://time.com/3028637/obama-eyes-major-immigration-move/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Jeb Bush Warns GOP on Immigration Reform

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, usually a key Republican voice on immigration issues, has been conspicuously silent with regard to the plight of thousands of unaccompanied children from violence-wracked countries in Central America crossing the Southern border illegally. Last night, though, he jumped into the debate, calling for various steps to be taken to address the crisis and delivering a stern warning to his fellow Republicans.

“President Obama has promised to once again act unilaterally if Congress fails to take up immigration reform,” he said in a Wall Street Journal op-ed co-written with Clint Bolick, a vice president with the Goldwater Institute and the co-author, with Bush, of a 2013 book on immigration reform.

Related: Perry Tests Obama by Sending Troops to the Border

“Now is the time for House Republicans to demonstrate leadership on this issue. Congress should not use the present crisis as an excuse to defer comprehensive immigration reform. Whether President Obama is making health-care policy by fiat or using the Environmental Protection Agency to circumvent the lawmaking process, we have too often seen what happens when the president oversteps his constitutional authority. Avoiding similar disastrous results will require legislative action by both parties.”

Bush took fire from the Republican base earlier this year for making the point that many illegal immigrants cross the border as “an act of love” in order to provide better lives for their families. This time around, he leveled plenty of criticism at the Obama administration, saying, “[H]e has failed to call for a change in the law, to engage across party lines or to take sufficient steps to keep more children from coming.”

While conceding that these children “are trying to escape horrific gang violence and dire conditions in their native countries,” Bush appeared to endorse a proposal put forward by Arizona Republican Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake, among others, which would make deporting children from Honduras, El Salvador, and other Central American countries easier and faster.

“Except for those deserving few who may demonstrate true cause for asylum or protection from sex trafficking, these children must be returned to their homes in Central America,” he wrote.

Related: Obama Twisting in Wind on Immigration Crisis

Bush’s re-entry into the immigration discussion comes as a Quinnipiac poll shows his political star dimming somewhat, even in his home state of Florida. The results, released Thursday morning not only show Bush losing to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by a margin of 49-42 percent, but also show him losing ground against other Republicans, including a surging Sen. Marco Rubio.

In May, 27 percent of voters polled by Quinnipiac picked Bush as their favorite from a field of potential Republican candidates. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul ran second with 14 percent, and Rubio third with 11 percent.

Just two months later, Bush’s numbers had fallen to 21 percent, while Rubio jumped to 18 percent. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz earned 10 percent, while Paul dropped to 8 percent.

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/jeb-bush-warns-gop-immigration-164600529.html
Jeb Bush Warns GOP on Immigration Reform
http://news.yahoo.com/jeb-bush-warns-gop-immigration-164600529.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Jeb Bush: Border crisis proves we need immigration reform

WASHINGTON, July 24 (UPI) –Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush urged his fellow Republicans not to lose sight of the larger illegal immigration problem — and its possible solution — over the current border crisis.

Bush has taken a somewhat softer stance on immigration in the past than some in his party and in a Wall Street Journal op-ed Wednesday, he called for exercising “compassion” with respect to the children fleeing violence in Central America.

He and Clint Bolick, his co-author on the 2013 book, Immigration Wars, support changes to a 2008 anti-trafficking law that requires officials to hand unaccompanied minors over to the Department of Health and Human Services pending a hearing before an immigration judge so that the children can be more quickly processed and repatriated.

But Bush also warned congressional Republicans not to miss the forest for the trees, urging them to recognize that any solutions now will only be temporary without passing comprehensive immigration reform as well.

“Preventing similar crises in the future begins with making our immigration system fair and effective now,” he wrote. “A chief reason so many people are entering through the back door, so to speak, is that the front door is shut.”

He continued:

“Unlike every other country, we do not have an immigration system as much as we have a family-reunification system. Nearly two-thirds of the one million lawful immigrants admitted into the U.S. each year do so through family preferences. That means that unless someone seeking to immigrate has a relative in America or can squeeze into the relative handful of available work-related or asylum visas, the only way they can enter is illegally.

“The best antidote to illegal immigration is a functioning system of legal immigration. We must rebuild one that is economically driven—for example, looking for those whose skills and drive will make a difference—in our national interest and true to our immigrant heritage.

“President Obama has promised to once again act unilaterally if Congress fails to take up immigration reform. Now is the time for House Republicans to demonstrate leadership on this issue. Congress should not use the present crisis as an excuse to defer comprehensive immigration reform.”

The influx of more than 52,000 children at the southwest border has all but sunk the chances of comprehensive immigration reform this year, and President Obama has promised to act unilaterally where he can.

But Democrats, and some Republicans, say that demographic changes in the U.S. means that unless the GOP can improve its standing with minorities — by helping to pass immigration reform — it may find itself in the political wilderness for years to come.

Source Article from http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014/07/24/Jeb-Bush-Border-crisis-proves-we-need-immigration-reform/4031406212860/
Jeb Bush: Border crisis proves we need immigration reform
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014/07/24/Jeb-Bush-Border-crisis-proves-we-need-immigration-reform/4031406212860/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration Reform Is Actually Happening – Just Not On Capitol Hill

AP

California Gov. Jerry Brown signs a bill adding California to the growing list of states allowing immigrants living in the country illegally to obtain driver licenses. (AP Photo/City of Los Angeles)

Though comprehensive immigration reform has sputtered and stalled in Congress, many Democrats and activists have turned their attention away from the federal government and started focusing their efforts on the local level. This push has resulted in a  number of pieces of local immigration reform legislation that have passed largely under the radar of the national debate. However, these laws have had dramatic effects and supporters argue they may inspire a wave of similar policies across the country.

Just this month New York City passed new legislation granting government ID cards to undocumented immigrants, joining cities like Oakland, New Haven, Trenton, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Since last year, a number of localities — including California, Maryland, Connecticut, Illinois, New Mexico, Nevada, and Oregon — have passed legislation granting drivers licenses to undocumented immigrants, according to the National Immigration Law Center. And a small slew of states have passed their own versions of the DREAM Act, giving undocumented students in-state tuition assistance.

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat looking at a run for president, told Business Insider that, when it comes to immigration reform, “progress has become a metropolitan phenomenon.”

“I think hopefully what will happen is the more states that pursue policies that are consistent with the longer arc of our American immigrant experience,” O’Malley explained at a New York City pub last week. “The more of us that follow those policies, the easier it will become for our federal government to catch up.”

According to the  most recent numbers  compiled by the National Conference of State Legislators, immigration-related legislation is accelerating at the local level. A total of 184 state immigration laws were enacted and 253 resolutions adopted in 2013 — a 64% increase over 2012, the report said. (This number includes both pro-immigration and anti-immigration measures.) Ann Morse, the NCSL program director who helped compile the report, said the upcoming 2014 numbers are on track to show similar trends.

O’Malley’s office.

Gov. Martin O’Malley at an event with Latino workers.

For his part, O’Malley predicted immigration reform could follow a similar path to same-sex marriage, which has rapidly become legal in state after state.

“I think that the genius of our system is that there is some flexibility and some room for states to follow some different approaches. And if they turn out to be better approaches then we learn from each other, right?” he asked. “Eventually, the result is in terms of extending fuller rights to greater numbers.”

O’Malley recently found himself in the center of the national immigration debate after he engaged in a high-profile back-and-forth with the White House over the influx of unaccompanied children who have crossed the Mexican border and been placed in crowded detention centers. In response, O’Malley criticized the detention centers while also accusing President Barack Obama’s administration of sending the children it planned to deport back to “certain death” in violent Central American countries. The White House fired back at O’Malley, who was one of Obama’s most dedicated surrogates during the 2012 presidential election, by reportedly leaking conversations between the governor and administration aides that were designed to make him look hypocritical on the issue.

Even with members of both parties describing the situation with the flood of children on the border as a humanitarian crisis, the White House’s solution to the problem —  $3.7 billion in emergency border spending — is currently stuck in the quagmire of congressional politics.

Federal comprehensive immigration reform legislation is in an even more intractable position. Though an immigration reform bill passed the Democratic-controlled Senate, anything that can be labeled “amnesty” meets steep opposition in the Republican-controlled House. A final nail in the coffin for the possibility of compromise on the issue came last month when  Eric Cantor, the soon-to-be-former House Republican majority leader, lost a primary in a shocking upset fueled by his willingness to consider a path to citizenship for undocumented children. Faced with this gridlock, Obama is exploring what actions he can take unilaterally without congressional approval.

Local leaders, including New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, have directly cited federal inaction on immigration reform as motivation for them to seek their own solutions.

“In the absence of federal leadership on a host of issues, cities around the country are taking on the challenge of finding ways to create progressive change that helps all our residents, and then sharing ideas with each other, inspiring each other to action,” de Blasio said as he signed a municipal ID card bill in July.

It’s not only the amount of local immigration legislation that has changed. According to Kica Matos, director of the Immigrant Rights and Racial Justice at the Center for Community Change, t he nature of the laws being passed has shifted from policies aimed at blocking illegal immigration to legislation designed to expand access to government services for undocumented immigrants.  

“What’s interesting is if you look at the trajectory of 2006 and 2007, the trend was more towards introducing anti-immigrant bills. What we’ve really seen is a shift in the types of legislation that’s being introduced in particular states and much more acceptance … of bills that are pro-immigration,” Matos told Business Insider.

This stands in contrast, she said, to laws like the one Arizona famously passed in 2010 — which both supporters and critics identified as the strictest immigration crackdown in generations. That law, which was mostly struck down by a subsequent Supreme Court ruling, made failure to carry immigration documents a crime and expanded police power to go after anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant.

Echoing many politicians and advocates for undocumented immigrants, Matos said one reason for the shift towards state- and city-level immigration reform is that officials have realized Congress is unlikely act on the issue anytime soon.

“The state legislatures and particularly the big cities are recognizing that when Congress is unwilling to move forward with legislation, … municipalities and the states really have to wrestle with the challenges that come with the undocumented population,” she argued.

William Alatriste/NYC Council

Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito holds press availability after testimony at municipal ID card hearing.

Of course, not everyone is happy with these measures. When New York City began to move forward with its municipal ID card bill in February, State Senator Greg Ball, a Republican leading his chamber’s homeland security committee, warned of dire consequences.

“Now a decade plus after 9-11, New York’s extremist mayor is laying out a hair brained scheme that can simply be dubbed the ‘de Blasio Terrorist Empowerment Act.’ My concern is not about the illegal alien dish washer looking to get to work, this extreme mayor’s proposal, joined by efforts in the New York State Senate to provide New York State driver’s licenses to illegals, will simply provide a mask to those seeking to harm the United States,” Ball said at the time. “This mayor’s proposal is a homeland security nightmare.”

But Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, who championed the bill in addition to other immigration-related measures, told Business Insider her legislative body was “very careful and deliberative” in how it crafted the municipal ID card law.

“We feel very comfortable about this. We feel very proud about what we’ve done,”  she said, also touting her efforts to expand legal services access in immigration courts and limit cooperation with federal deportation authorities in certain cases. 

Mark-Viverito further predicted other localities will follow New York’s lead.

“We know that New York City is the city this country and everywhere in the world has their eyes on,” she said. “Definitely it’s a strong signal and a strong message to … encourage others to implement it and take it a step further.”

More From Business Insider

Source Article from http://finance.yahoo.com/news/immigration-reform-actually-happening-just-110000593.html
Immigration Reform Is Actually Happening – Just Not On Capitol Hill
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/immigration-reform-actually-happening-just-110000593.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

On Immigration, America's Concerns Are Fiery But Fleeting

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.i i

hide captionPolice officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.


Mark J. Terrill/AP

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.

Mark J. Terrill/AP

Americans today are most likely to name immigration the nation’s biggest problem, but polling history suggests the alarm may have a limited shelf life.

In a Gallup survey released last week, 17 percent volunteered immigration as America’s most pressing issue, narrowly topping concerns that weigh more consistently on the nation’s mindset, like jobs and political leadership.

Though a small plurality, it was a sharp increase from the 5 percent who named the issue in Gallup’s June poll, conducted just days before the youth migrant crisis at the border broke into the headlines and cast fresh light on the nation’s troubled immigration policies.

Past polling shows a history of dramatic spikes in immigration concern, each coinciding with political flare-ups over the issue. The measure leapt beyond 15 percent twice in 2006, while Congress debated increased penalties for illegal immigration; and again to 10 percent in 2010, after Arizona passed tough anti-illegal-immigration laws.

But in each case, immigration concerns proved rather fickle; interest quickly sputtered as proposals died or other issues elbowed immigration out of the headlines.

That inconsistency might appear inherent in a survey that asks for respondents to name one issue — out of countless other possibilities — as the nation’s most daunting, over-representing those that bask in a momentary media spotlight.

But Jeff Jones, managing editor of the Gallup Poll, said few issues match the polling sensitivity of immigration, which behaves more like an international crisis, such as Syria, than other domestic policy issues.

“Immigration is something that can flare up, but it typically doesn’t stay in the headlines for months on end,” said Jones. And like the ongoing Syrian conflict, which less than 1 percent named in Gallup’s latest survey, “that doesn’t mean it’s getting any better, or they’re finding solutions on it.”

Since 2010, however (the last time immigration worries erupted in the polls), the nation’s interest in an immigration overhaul had steadily increased, he said. Polls had shown a marked shift from a majority worried about “halting the flow of illegal immigrants” to instead favor “dealing with immigrants already here.”

But that trend could reverse amid the current border crisis, he added. Those who named immigration America’s top problem in the latest survey skewed older and more Republican — groups that typically prioritize tightening border security.

Still, with three months left before the midterms, prior surges in immigration worries would have crested long before Election Day. And according to Stella Rouse, a government professor at the University of Maryland, immigration just hasn’t been the issue to drive voter choices in the past.

“If you look at polls that track voters’ concerns, immigration is never at the top of the list,” she said. Instead, voters tend to be driven more by issues that have a more consistent foothold in our worries, like jobs and education — a trend she emphasized extends even to Hispanic voters.

But she noted this current immigration crisis could have greater longevity, in political terms, than others. “You have the whole populace engaged in this issue; before you had pockets of it,” she said, pointing to decisions about harboring young migrants being made in states around the country.

And both parties have at least one good reason keep up the combative, headline-worthy rhetoric, added Efrén Pérez, a professor of political science at Vanderbilt University: It fires up the bases.

“The closer you get to Election Day, the more incentive you have to keep it an issue,” he said. “You know it’s a live wire.”

Source Article from http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/07/22/334079338/on-immigration-americas-concerns-are-fiery-but-fleeting?ft=1&f=1003
On Immigration, America's Concerns Are Fiery But Fleeting
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/07/22/334079338/on-immigration-americas-concerns-are-fiery-but-fleeting?ft=1&f=1003
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

On Immigration, America's Concerns Are Fiery But Fleeting

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.i i

hide captionPolice officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.


Mark J. Terrill/AP

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.

Police officers separate demonstrators on opposing sides of the immigration debate outside a U.S. Border Patrol station in Murrieta, Calif., on July 4.

Mark J. Terrill/AP

Americans today are most likely to name immigration the nation’s biggest problem, but polling history suggests the alarm may have a limited shelf life.

In a Gallup survey released last week, 17 percent volunteered immigration as America’s most pressing issue, narrowly topping concerns that weigh more consistently on the nation’s mindset, like jobs and political leadership.

Though a small plurality, it was a sharp increase from the 5 percent who named the issue in Gallup’s June poll, conducted just days before the youth migrant crisis at the border broke into the headlines and cast fresh light on the nation’s troubled immigration policies.

Past polling shows a history of dramatic spikes in immigration concern, each coinciding with political flare-ups over the issue. The measure leapt beyond 15 percent twice in 2006, while Congress debated increased penalties for illegal immigration; and again to 10 percent in 2010, after Arizona passed tough anti-illegal-immigration laws.

But in each case, immigration concerns proved rather fickle; interest quickly sputtered as proposals died or other issues elbowed immigration out of the headlines.

That inconsistency might appear inherent in a survey that asks for respondents to name one issue — out of countless other possibilities — as the nation’s most daunting, over-representing those that bask in a momentary media spotlight.

But Jeff Jones, managing editor of the Gallup Poll, said few issues match the polling sensitivity of immigration, which behaves more like an international crisis, such as Syria, than other domestic policy issues.

“Immigration is something that can flare up, but it typically doesn’t stay in the headlines for months on end,” said Jones. And like the ongoing Syrian conflict, which less than 1 percent named in Gallup’s latest survey, “that doesn’t mean it’s getting any better, or they’re finding solutions on it.”

Since 2010, however (the last time immigration worries erupted in the polls), the nation’s interest in an immigration overhaul had steadily increased, he said. Polls had shown a marked shift from a majority worried about “halting the flow of illegal immigrants” to instead favor “dealing with immigrants already here.”

But that trend could reverse amid the current border crisis, he added. Those who named immigration America’s top problem in the latest survey skewed older and more Republican — groups that typically prioritize tightening border security.

Still, with three months left before the midterms, prior surges in immigration worries would have crested long before Election Day. And according to Stella Rouse, a government professor at the University of Maryland, immigration just hasn’t been the issue to drive voter choices in the past.

“If you look at polls that track voters’ concerns, immigration is never at the top of the list,” she said. Instead, voters tend to be driven more by issues that have a more consistent foothold in our worries, like jobs and education — a trend she emphasized extends even to Hispanic voters.

But she noted this current immigration crisis could have greater longevity, in political terms, than others. “You have the whole populace engaged in this issue; before you had pockets of it,” she said, pointing to decisions about harboring young migrants being made in states around the country.

And both parties have at least one good reason keep up the combative, headline-worthy rhetoric, added Efrén Pérez, a professor of political science at Vanderbilt University: It fires up the bases.

“The closer you get to Election Day, the more incentive you have to keep it an issue,” he said. “You know it’s a live wire.”

Source Article from http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/07/22/334079338/on-immigration-americas-concerns-are-fiery-but-fleeting?ft=1&f=1003
On Immigration, America's Concerns Are Fiery But Fleeting
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/07/22/334079338/on-immigration-americas-concerns-are-fiery-but-fleeting?ft=1&f=1003
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results