Immigration agency internal affairs boss replaced

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Customs and Border Protection replaced its internal affairs chief, the agency said Monday.

Christopher O’Neil, a CBP spokesman, said FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Inspections Mark Morgan will lead the office on an interim basis starting later this month. For now, Anthony Triplett has been named acting assistant commissioner for internal affairs. Triplett replaced James F. Tomsheck, who had led CBP’s internal affairs office since 2006.

Triplett worked for the Secret Service before joining CBP in 2007.

The Los Angeles Times reported Monday that Tomsheck was replaced amid concerns about use-of-force investigations of Border Patrol agents. Tomsheck did not immediately answer an email request The Associated Press sent to him.

O’Neil said Morgan will focus on improving CBP’s internal review policy for investigating allegations and complaints against Border Patrol agents. He will also work with the department’s DHS Inspector General and interagency partners on investigating complaints, particularly those focused on use of force.

Customs and Border Protection released its use of force policy last month. Immigration advocates have raised concern about border agents’ use of deadly force against people who throw rocks at them along the Mexican border.

Tomsheck’s departure was greeted as a positive step Monday afternoon by those same advocates.

“This decision should be the first of a series of important steps forward to bring CBP up to best law enforcement standards and practices,” said Christian Ramirez, co-chair Southern Border Communities Coalition.

In an internal statement to employees CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske also announced Monday that Internal Affairs would be restructured, with two divisions being moved to other offices within the agency. Kerlikowske said the divisions were being moved to “maximize (the agency’s) effectiveness.”

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-agency-internal-affairs-boss-replaced-212457479–politics.html
Immigration agency internal affairs boss replaced
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-agency-internal-affairs-boss-replaced-212457479–politics.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

USD business heads urge action on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — Some of the leading U.S.; businesses are prodding lawmakers to act on immigration legislation as the issue enters a critical phase in Congress.

In a letter to be released Tuesday, the chief executives of Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Loews Hotels, Tyson Foods, Cargill and a half-dozen other national and regional companies write that without action to overhaul ineffective immigration laws and allow lower-skilled workers into the country legally, their businesses cannot ensure the workforce they need.

“This is indispensable for our businesses, but it’s also critical for the nation,” the executives write. “Without a workable temporary visa program, the U.S. can have no hope of ending illegal immigration.” A copy of the letter was obtained in advance by The Associated Press.

The letter comes as House Republican leaders confront a narrowing window to act on overhauling immigration laws nearly a year after the Senate passed a bipartisan bill with billions for border security and a path to citizenship for the millions now here illegally.

The Senate bill also included a new visa program for lower-skilled workers, like the one sought by the authors of the business letter. They note that there is presently no real way for lower-skilled workers without family in the U.S. to come here legally for year-round employment. “Congress has an obligation to fill this gap,” they write.

Many business lobbyists, advocates and others believe that if Congress does not act before leaving Washington for an annual August recess, there will be no chance of passing immigration legislation this midterm election year, and likely not until a new president has taken office in 2017. They are focused intently on the next month or so as the best and final opportunity to get the issue moving in the House.

Although House Speaker John Boehner has not publicly indicated any plans to bring bills to the floor, a small group of lawmakers and aides is working behind the scenes to ready legislation in case the opportunity emerges.

Advocates are intensely interested in the outcome of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s primary election on Tuesday as a possible indication of chances for action. Cantor, a Republican is facing a challenge from a tea party candidate who’s accusing him of being pro-”amnesty,” a charge Cantor has vigorously combated. Cantor is not seen as threatened in the election but his victory margin may give fresh evidence of the political potency of the topic, which so far has not emerged as a major issue in this year’s primaries.

Meanwhile outside advocates and White House officials are working hard to keep immigration in the spotlight. President Barack Obama met at the White House Monday with a group of nurses to discuss the issue, which is one of his top second-term priorities. He told them he thought there was a 50-50 chance of House action in the next month — perhaps higher if they kept up their advocacy — according to Alvin Vitug, a 31-year-old registered nurse who attended.

If Congress doesn’t move by August, Obama is widely expected to act on his own executive authority to take steps to curb deportations, which have reached record highs on his watch.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/usd-business-heads-urge-action-immigration-203839065.html
USD business heads urge action on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/usd-business-heads-urge-action-immigration-203839065.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

US business heads urge action on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — Some of the leading U.S. businesses are prodding lawmakers to act on immigration legislation at a critical moment in Congress.

In a letter to be released Tuesday, the chief executives of Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Loews Hotels, Tyson Foods, Cargill and a half-dozen other national and regional companies write that congressional action on immigration is indispensable to their businesses.

The letter comes as House Republican leaders confront a narrowing window to act on overhauling immigration laws. It’s been nearly a year since the Senate passed a bipartisan bill with billions of dollars for border security and a path to citizenship for the millions now here illegally, but it’s stalled in the House.

The Senate bill also included a new visa program for lower-skilled workers. The business leaders say such a program is critical.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/us-business-heads-urge-action-immigration-203440038.html
US business heads urge action on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/us-business-heads-urge-action-immigration-203440038.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Business heads urge action on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — Some of the nation’s leading businesses are prodding lawmakers to act on immigration legislation as the issue enters a critical phase on Capitol Hill.

In a letter to be released Tuesday, the chief executives of Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Loews Hotels, Tyson Foods, Cargill and a half-dozen other national and regional companies write that without action to overhaul ineffective immigration laws and allow lower-skilled workers into the country legally, their businesses cannot ensure the workforce they need.

“This is indispensable for our businesses, but it’s also critical for the nation,” the executives write. “Without a workable temporary visa program, the U.S. can have no hope of ending illegal immigration.” A copy of the letter was obtained in advance by The Associated Press.

The letter comes as House Republican leaders confront a narrowing window to act on overhauling immigration laws nearly a year after the Senate passed a bipartisan bill with billions for border security and a path to citizenship for the millions now here illegally.

The Senate bill also included a new visa program for lower-skilled workers, like the one sought by the authors of the business letter. They note that there is presently no real way for lower-skilled workers without family in the U.S. to come here legally for year-round employment. “Congress has an obligation to fill this gap,” they write.

Many business lobbyists, advocates and others believe that if Congress does not act before leaving Washington for an annual August recess, there will be no chance of passing immigration legislation this midterm election year, and likely not until a new president has taken office in 2017. They are focused intently on the next month or so as the best and final opportunity to get the issue moving in the House.

Although House Speaker John Boehner has not publicly indicated any plans to bring bills to the floor, a small group of lawmakers and aides is working behind the scenes to ready legislation in case the opportunity emerges.

Advocates are intensely interested in the outcome of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s primary election on Tuesday as a possible indication of chances for action. Cantor, R-Va., is facing a challenge from a tea party candidate who’s accusing him of being pro-”amnesty,” a charge Cantor has vigorously combated. Cantor is not seen as threatened in the election but his victory margin may give fresh evidence of the political potency of the topic, which so far has not emerged as a major issue in this year’s primaries.

Meanwhile outside advocates and White House officials are working hard to keep immigration in the spotlight. President Barack Obama met at the White House Monday with a group of nurses to discuss the issue, which is one of his top second-term priorities. He told them he thought there was a 50-50 chance of House action in the next month — perhaps higher if they kept up their advocacy — according to Alvin Vitug, a 31-year-old registered nurse from Burbank, Calif., who attended.

If Congress doesn’t move by August, Obama is widely expected to act on his own executive authority to take steps to curb deportations, which have reached record highs on his watch.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/business-heads-urge-action-immigration-201407740–politics.html
Business heads urge action on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/business-heads-urge-action-immigration-201407740–politics.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Amended Immigration Regulations Not In SA’s Best Interests, Says DA

The newly gazetted immigration regulations have ripped apart families, discouraged investors, and led to the suspension or cancellation of multi-million rand film and tourism ventures, said the Democratic Alliance (DA) Shadow Minister of Home Affairs, Haniff Hoosen, on Monday.

Last month, newly appointed Minister of Home Affairs, Malusi Gigaba, outlined the Immigration Regulations for 2014. Gigaba said the new regulations are in the best interest of the security of South Africa and will contribute to economic development and prosperity of the country.

The regulations, which came into effect on 26 May, introduce a new visa regime for the country which draws a clear distinction between short-stay and long-stay permanent residence permits.

It also stipulates that visa applications need to be made by applicants in person, and those wanting to change the status of their visa can no longer do so in South Africa, but have to do so at missions abroad.

“The regulations’ various omissions and lack of definitions and criteria raise serious concerns and will be subject to misappropriation and abuse by the department and its officials,” said Hoosen.

“Furthermore, the full cost of these regulations to our local economy and country’s reputation remain to be seen.”

Hoosen said he will approach the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs and request that these regulations be reviewed and debated by the committee as soon as possible.

He plans to submit parliamentary questions to determine the cost surrounding the new regulations, the list of skills eligible for the newly instituted Critical Skills work visa, what is considered a business in terms of ‘national interest’ and what is considered ‘undesirable business’ by the Department.

“These regulations suggest that Home Affairs is trying to ‘remedy’ problems within the department such as its rampant permit backlogs and poor vetting by imposing autocratic legislation instead of addressing the department’s internal disarray,” said Hoosen.

“The DA will not sit back while these regulations and the department continue to compromise our economy and kill jobs.”

photo credit: Sem Paradeiro via photopin cc


More Stories From SABreakingNews:
Watch: Highlights MTV Africa Awards 2014: Click to Read More…
Goodbye Epainette Mbeki: Your Nation Honours You:Click to Read More…
Jacob Zuma Out of Hospital: Click to Read More…

Source Article from http://za.news.yahoo.com/amended-immigration-regulations-not-sa-best-interests-says-113351675.html
Amended Immigration Regulations Not In SA’s Best Interests, Says DA
http://za.news.yahoo.com/amended-immigration-regulations-not-sa-best-interests-says-113351675.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

The House GOP’s Big Immigration Fail

Despite a string of embarrassing and disheartening mistakes, the Obama administration does not have to worry about a suddenly resurgent Republican Party. The GOP has its hands full. Even with this year’s primary season behind them, sharp divides between insurgents and establishment remain. The door is sliding closed on replacing Obamacare, and Republicans won’t get another shot at running our foreign policy until at least 2017. Just because the president has lost the initiative does not mean the GOP has regained it.

Now, Republicans are held captive by narratives, not just events. And the main narrative staring them down for the rest of Obama’s term is “obstructionism.”

READ MORE US Spies Worry About Gitmo 5’s New Home

It’s an old story, but this time it has some bite, because now, Republicans are obstructing themselves. What’s more, they’re doing it on what leading political and media figures want to be the next big marquee issue for sweeping, top-down reform.

A critical mass of influential figures now demands the GOP act on immigration, one way or the other. And that means the House GOP.

READ MORE Southern-Fried Freedom Lovers

House Speaker John Boehner has stalled on immigration with great vigor. This year, however, something’s got to give. In the Senate, big-time personal politics forged a team of Republican egos that can’t tolerate playing second fiddle to mere Representatives. They know that if there’s no vote by August, immigration is dead for the year—and the Senate will have to pass it again next year if it’s ever to return. The pressure is on from the left, as well. Democrats have given activist groups their marching orders: “Train all your fire on House Republicans from now until August,” as Politico sums them up.

As part of the Democrats’ offensive, the Center for American Progress has dutifully whipped up a survey showing that almost half of Latino respondents would blame the GOP for Congressional inaction on immigration, while just 16 percent would blame Democrats.

READ MORE Will McConnell Face a Senate Coup?

Those sorts of numbers are just the start of the House’s troubles, as Majority Leader Eric Cantor knows all too well. This election year, he was caught in a withering crossfire of immigration criticism from right and left alike—slammed for being pro-amnesty on the one hand and anti-reform on the other.

The justifiable concern this spectacle raises is that Republicans stand to lose no matter what they do. That same CAP poll puts a spotlight on the pitfalls: 45 percent of respondents said they’d be more “favorable” toward Republicans in general, and 61 percent more “open” to their ideas, if only the House GOP would “support immigration reform.”

READ MORE The Gubernatorial Glass Ceiling

Like many polls, CAP’s was carefully tailored to encourage the results desired. But the dilemma for Republicans is clear enough. Chasing after mere favorability and openness is an unbecoming act of desperation. The nightmare scenario for the GOP is a marginally more GOP-friendly Hispanic population that still breaks strongly Democratic, cycle after cycle. And there’s just no indication that, politically speaking, the Senate approach to reform will yield anything but that.

What House Republicans need, but do not have, is a cohesive approach to immigration that can be stacked up against the Senate’s. It’s got to be an approach that doesn’t go full remember-the-Alamo, like the grassroots’ preferred approach, or full dollar-sign-eyes, like the Chamber of Commerce wing of the party. But it’s also got to avoid the cloying, off-putting sentimentalism of the RINO wing that sees government as a salvific, nationalistic Santa Claus, bestowing the blessings of full American-ness on a people stuck in the “shadows.”

READ MORE Ben Carson: O’Care Worse Than 9/11

Now would seem like a strange time for a dispassionate, de-politicized immigration solution to emerge from the House. But there’s one waiting to be cobbled together, if only Boehner and company would think it through.

It would take shape in accordance with a three-step acknowledgement of the basic realities we confront on the issue. First, the “illegal immigration crisis” is over. Whether we keep border security about where it is or whether we ramp it up dramatically, there just isn’t going to be the kind of massive influx that got us where we are today. A future economic boom might bump up the numbers, but right now they’re around net zero—a figure that has more to do with Mexicans and Mexico than it does with the U.S. economy.

READ MORE Sandra Fluke Is Still Under Attack

That means, second, that we’re dealing with a finite, specific population of undocumented immigrants. They’re not going to clone themselves. Like all of us, they’re going to get old, and they’re eventually going to die. The political and legal problem posed by “illegal immigration today” is only going to get smaller over time. In fact, as we all know, the American-born children of those undocumented immigrants are all going to be citizens from day one.

And third of all, and in sum, the “immigration problem” boils down to a far more specific and narrow situation than so many of us have allowed ourselves to think. Although the Obama administration has done an energetic job of deporting some people, there just isn’t a strong enough consensus to kick out the finite population of undocumented. On the other hand, although a blanket amnesty is a far more elegant, enforceable, and principled policy than a patchwork of half-measures that plays favorites on the basis of ethnicity or education policy, there just isn’t a strong enough consensus to deliver that outcome, either.

READ MORE The Reason the US Didn’t Rescue Bergdahl

So one thing we know for sure is that we’re not going to give the boot or give amnesty to the finite, specific population of undocumented immigrants who crossed the border illegally. And another thing we know is that birthright citizenship means we don’t have to worry about their kids’ status.

Critics of immigration reform harbor one of two justified fears. Some critics worry that reform would be like an on/off switch—suddenly and irreversibly changing America forever. Others worry that reform would be the opposite—a neverending morass of bureaucracy, legalese, and special status, hardwiring yet more regulatory complexity and intrusive government into everything we do.

READ MORE McChrystal: Dont Judge Bergdahl Yet

By focusing solely on the actual humans whose legal status needs to be finalized, however, we can act swiftly, safe in the knowledge that a policy tailored to them won’t transform America or make implementation a permanent process.

Give the undocumented some documentation, but not citizenship. Let them pay some back taxes. Let them learn English if they like. And let their American-born children be American citizens. 

READ MORE Hillary’s Talks with the Taliban

Is that a “perfect” approach? Is it “comprehensive?” More importantly, do we need to care? It sidesteps most of our political and culture-war drama, attending to our present needs in a way that wins us back the most valuable commodity of all in a democracy: time to think and talk in relative peace and quiet.

Related from The Daily Beast

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterSign up for The Cheat Sheet Newsletter

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/house-gop-big-immigration-fail-094500236–politics.html
The House GOP’s Big Immigration Fail
http://news.yahoo.com/house-gop-big-immigration-fail-094500236–politics.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Correction: Arizona immigration law story

PHOENIX (AP) — In a story May 30 story about Arizona’s immigration law, The Associated Press erroneously reported that as part of an agreement in principle to end most of the Obama administration’s challenge to the statute, the state would do away with the law’s requirement that immigrants carry registration papers. The state is agreeing to end its defense of the law’s immigrant harboring ban. The story also incorrectly reported the administration challenged Arizona’s earlier smuggling law. The administration has contested only a minor revision to the smuggling ban that was contained in the landmark law.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Feds consider dropping immigration law challenge

Obama administration considers deal to drop challenge against Arizona immigration law

By JACQUES BILLEAUD

Associated Press

PHOENIX (AP) — The Obama administration has signaled a willingness to drop its legal fight against a section of Arizona’s 2010 immigration law that critics say opens the door to racial profiling.

A deal between the Justice Department and Republican Gov. Jan Brewer would end the court challenge asking a judge to strike down a requirement that police question the immigration status of people suspected of being in the country illegally, according to court records.

In exchange, Arizona would permanently do away with the law’s prohibition on harboring immigrants who are in the country illegally, lawyers on both sides of the case wrote. Courts have blocked that section on a preliminary basis.

The attorneys cautioned in Thursday’s filing that they haven’t yet come up with a proposed court order that would carry out their agreement in principle.

If such a deal is approved by a judge, all that would remain of the Obama administration’s case would be its challenge of a minor revision to a 2005 immigrant smuggling law that was contained in the 2010 statute. No agreement has been reached on that section.

The possible resolution of key parts of the challenge comes after nearly four years of litigation.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the questioning provision, but it threw out the section calling for registration paperwork.

The courts also blocked other parts of the law until the disputes are litigated further, such as the immigrant harboring ban. The harboring requirement would be permanently blocked if the proposed agreement goes through.

Messages left for the Justice Department and governor’s office weren’t immediately returned Friday.

Two of six other challenges to the 2010 law remain.

One of the suits was brought by a coalition of civil rights groups mounting a broader challenge than the Obama administration.

Karen Tumlin, an attorney representing the coalition, said that lawsuit will continue even if the Obama administration’s case fades.

“There needs to be clarity that Arizonans cannot be illegally detained based on their suspected immigration status,” Tumlin said.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/correction-arizona-immigration-law-story-211831941.html
Correction: Arizona immigration law story
http://news.yahoo.com/correction-arizona-immigration-law-story-211831941.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

How one Koch-backed group is selling immigration reform to the tea party

Daniel Garza had spoken for 30 minutes at a May meeting of the Scottsdale Tea Party about conservative outreach to Hispanics when he paused and focused on a set of notes in front of him.

“This is where I’m going to be a little bit more scripted, if you don’t mind,” Garza, the Texas-based director of a conservative Hispanic group called the LIBRE Initiative, told the gathering of about 50 tea party members before making the case for reforming U.S. immigration laws.

“Let me start by saying, I talked about opportunity,” he said. “I do not fear waves of poor immigrants coming to America. I fear a government, a government that would hinder opportunities for those poor. Our nation was built — was made wealthy, was made prosperous and powerful — by immigrants who were poor, who came here and had the opportunity to prosper, to create wealth, to earn and to risk, and to make life better for their children.”

Garza outlined a point-by-point case in favor of providing legal status to 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States to a skeptical group of Arizona tea party conservatives.

A conservative advocacy group founded in 2011, LIBRE is funded in part by grants from Freedom Partners and TC4 Trust, two of the many funding arms of the multimillion dollar network of donors overseen by libertarian industrialists Charles and David Koch. With a staff of 35, LIBRE is active in eight states and plans to expand into two more by the end of the year. The group has already spent more than a million dollars on English and Spanish-language ad buys targeting Democrats on Obamacare in Arizona, Texas and Florida.

For the most part, LIBRE makes Hispanic outreach its primary mission. As part of this effort, LIBRE mimics longstanding practices from groups traditionally associated with the American left. At events across the country, LIBRE has provided social services along with its small-government message: LIBRE partnered with H&R Block during tax season to help people prepare their tax forms; later this year it will offer free GED classes and subsidize the cost of the test for those seeking a degree; it offers scholarships at two U.S. colleges. Perhaps most controversially, LIBRE recently hosted a workshop in Las Vegas, Nev., to help people — including undocumented immigrants — receive state driver authorization cards, which they are legally permitted to register for there.

“For decades now, while we’ve been absent, while we haven’t engaged with the community, the left has,” Garza told the Scottsdale Tea Party. “It’s important that we gain the trust of the community so they know that we’re partners in helping them develop, prosper, to assimilate, to contribute to the American economy.”

As with other groups that meld social services and political activism, LIBRE collects data from participants who sign up as members of the organization. LIBRE then shares the data it collects with a group called Themis, which serves as the Koch network’s data-collection agency. Other Koch-backed groups, such as Generation Opportunity, which conducts outreach to young people, do the same.

The speech Garza delivered to the tea party group last month is one he gives often when speaking to groups with members who oppose immigration reform as part of LIBRE turning its gaze inward to the conservative movement in hopes of repairing the relationship with Hispanics. In recent months, Garza has addressed the Conservative Leadership Conference in Raleigh, N.C., and the Conservative Political Action Conference in Oxon Hill, Md., where he granted an interview with the Tea Party News Network. In January he addressed the House Republican Conference during its annual retreat in Cambridge, Md. In March he traveled to Atlanta to speak before the Georgia Public Policy Foundation Dinner. The next month he was in Las Vegas addressing members of the clergy at a pastors’ briefing, before flying to Milwaukee for a panel on education reform with Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul, a possible future presidential candidate. In June, Garza will speak at policy summits with Christian pastors and Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Florida Gov. Rick Scott in their home states. He also appears regularly on right-wing radio, where he debates Fox News hosts Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham.

In his speech in Arizona — a border state that has served as ground zero for the immigration reform debate — Garza urged tea partyers to support “immigration reform that’s going to improve security on the borders, but simultaneously … address the folks that are here so they can get on the business of assimilating.”

He argued that supporting an immigration overhaul would be one of the only ways conservatives could begin making inroads with Hispanics, pointing to a Univision poll showing that a majority of Hispanics will be closed off to politicians who are antagonistic to immigration, even if they agree with their views on policy.

“I know a lot of people say, ‘Well, they violated the law! They’re criminals,’” Garza said. “What I can tell you is this: In the 1920s we passed a law called the Prohibition Act. Millions of otherwise law abiding Americans violated federal law — federal law — for want of a beer. Were they bad people? No. It was a bad law. Today millions of these folks have violated federal law for want of opportunity — of opportunity. Are they bad people? No. It’s a bad law. We have to get on with the business of legalizing the relationship with the employer and the employee. That’s what we have to do. It’s critical that we do that. Why criminalize a rational activity where someone is seeking to improve their lot in life, and seeking to improve the conditions of their family, by selling labor?”

After his speech in Scottsdale, Garza took questions from the audience for nearly 30 minutes. Responses to his speech were mixed, but almost every question concerned immigration.

The first came from a man concerned about securing the U.S.-Mexico border; he asked if Garza believed it should be guarded by U.S. military.

“There’s no question that we need to do more to secure the border,” Garza said. “But I think by absorbing those folks that are industrious and hardworking and want to contribute to the American economy, we can then get to the priority issues which is the folks that would do harm to America.”

“But the border is so open right now,” the man responded, according to the video.

“That’s because we don’t have a law that allows us to absorb folks that we can quantify and qualify with work visas and these kinds of things and keep tabs on them. We don’t know who’s here. … We don’t have a system that allows us to process them.

“Militarizing the border, that’s too severe for me,” he added. “I think there’s other ways we can do it.”

Later, a woman who identified herself as “Shirley,” said she had been robbed by immigrants who she believed had “destroyed” the state of California.

“I fled California because the Hispanics, the illegals, destroyed California. They closed hospitals in California. They destroyed the fabric of that state,” she said. “You’ve exaggerated and made them appear wonderful and just coming here to work. I’ve been robbed twice. It was by an illegal in California. … The border has to be closed. … The illegals do not want to be Americans. They do not want to assimilate.”

“Look,” Garza said, “with all due respect, we have differences with how we see the immigrant community. But I think I’ve been honest. I did say that there is a certain sector of all immigrants — of all immigrant groups, regardless of race, regardless of nationality — that are here to exploit the American system. To exploit our social welfare issues. … But look, the vast majority of immigrants, the vast majority of immigrants, are here to work hard to contribute to our economy. And I know we have that difference, but we’ll agree to disagree.

“You have to ask yourself that question,” he went on to say, “Would you do the same in their position?”

“No!” the woman said from her seat.

Garza, now far from the script he had in front of him, became animated.

“It’s a tough life to live in the shadows and not be able to assimilate and to have your children treated, be treated as others. To be treated as almost like their aspirations are not equal to other American kids even though they were born in America as well. That’s a difficult life to live as a parent and for the children,” Garza, whose own parents were migrant workers from Mexico, said. “That’s a reality that we have to deal with, and inaction is not acceptable as a policy position. I will state my case and be very forceful about that, just as you will.”

The presentation ended, Garza said, with a standing ovation from “about half” in the audience. The other half, he noticed, sat quietly.

In an interview with Yahoo News after his Scottsdale speech, Garza said that the challenge of convincing non-Hispanic conservatives is “by far” more difficult than winning Hispanic hearts and minds for the conservative cause.

“It’s important that we not only do the outreach to the Hispanic community, but it’s also important that we do outreach to the non-Hispanic conservative movement,” Garza said. “The issue of immigration in and of itself is so complex and so emotionally charged. Immigration means change. It’s folks from the outside coming in.”

“It’s a process,” he said.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/how-one-koch-backed-group-is-selling-immigration-reform-to-the-tea-party-180449979.html
How one Koch-backed group is selling immigration reform to the tea party
http://news.yahoo.com/how-one-koch-backed-group-is-selling-immigration-reform-to-the-tea-party-180449979.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

White House wants delay in DOD immigration plan

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House has asked the Department of Defense to delay a plan that would allow some immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally as children to obtain a limited path to citizenship by serving in the military.

The decision to postpone the narrowly drawn proposal is part of the White House effort to put off any immigration-related executive actions until August in the hope that House Republicans act on legislation to overhaul the immigration system in the next two months.

White House officials have said they don’t want to hurt those chances by taking executive branch actions that would anger congressional Republicans. The Senate has already passed broad immigration legislation.

“The president is convinced there is a legislative opportunity, and that gives us the best opportunity to fix what’s broken in our immigration system,” White House spokesman Bobby Whithorne said Monday. “He wants to leave no stone unturned to make sure the House takes that opportunity, follows the Senate’s lead and takes action.”

The plan under consideration by the Pentagon would apply to immigrants who arrived illegally as children but already have received work permits and relief from deportation under a program President Barack Obama announced two years ago, called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. More than 500,000 immigrants have benefited from the program.

The Pentagon proposal would permit military service by immigrants who don’t have legal status if they meet criteria under the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest program. The program allows military service by non-citizens who have language or medical skills. As a result, the proposal would likely only affect a small portion of the immigrants who have benefited from DACA.

Last month, House Republican leaders blocked any votes on immigration legislation that could have been attached to a broader defense policy bill, including one measure that would have offered citizenship to immigrants in the U.S. illegally who serve in the military. That proposal had been introduced by Republican Rep. Jeff Denham of California. It had 26 Democrat and 24 Republican co-sponsors. But it was staunchly opposed by a minority of Republicans.

The delay sought by the White House was first reported by The New York Times.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-wants-delay-dod-immigration-plan-153750672–politics.html
White House wants delay in DOD immigration plan
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-wants-delay-dod-immigration-plan-153750672–politics.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Tory minister: Some people concerned about immigration are 'frankly racist'

By Ian Dunt

Some of the people who raise concerns about immigration are “frankly racist”, Anna Soubry has said.

The defence minister said she regularly dealt with people expressing discomfort with the level of immigration into the UK and tried to convince them the situation was more complicated than they might realise, but that there was a strain of racism behind some of the criticism.

“When you make the case with people who come and see me in my constituency surgery who say ‘I’m really worried about immigration’ you say: ‘Really, why? This is Broxtowe. We don’t have a problem with immigrants’,” she told BBC1′s The Andrew Marr Programme.

“When you explain that to them they get it. Not all of it. Some people have prejudices, some people are frankly racist, but there are many who just don’t know the argument.”

Downing Street did not reference the comments directly but said: “We understand people have legitimate concerns about immigration.”

Politicians have been resistant to labelling anyone expressing criticism of immigration racist since Gordon Brown’s disastrous exchange with Gillian Duffy during the 2010 general election campaign.

But polling suggests there is a hardcore rump of around 25% who are comfortable expressing prejudice.

A YouGov poll conducted just before the European elections showed 26% of people thought the government should encourage immigrants and their families to leave Britain, even if they were born in the UK.

Soubry added: “Undoubtedly there are certain parts of the country where there has been a huge influx of people. If you don’t put the right sort of infrastructure, you don’t put the schools and hospitals, people get fed up with it.

“But the principle of immigration, we have got to be up front about it. Immigrants have played a hugely important role in our society. They come over here overwhelmingly to work, they do not come here to scrounge.

“There are far fewer immigrants claiming benefit than there are people who have been born and bred in our country. That’s the debate we need to have.”

Soubry’s comments come as the three main parties are convulsed by debate over how to respond to Ukip’s victory in the European election.

Ed Miliband has so far refused to toughen up his approach to the subject, despite demands for a harsher stance from shadow chancellor Ed Balls, although he shocked some Labour figures by inserting a passage about west Africans into a speech in Thurrock last week.

“There is a contradiction in telling Ukip voters in Thurrock that you share their pain about west Africans and expecting those same west Africans to vote for the Labour party elsewhere in the country,” former Labour minister Diane Abbott responded.

Seven Labour MPs, including Frank Field and Kate Hoey, wrote to Miliband demanding a more critical approach to the impact of immigration on local services.

Source Article from http://uk.news.yahoo.com/tory-minister-people-concerned-immigration-frankly-racist-071638387.html
Tory minister: Some people concerned about immigration are 'frankly racist'
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/tory-minister-people-concerned-immigration-frankly-racist-071638387.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results