House Republicans Might Pass Immigration Bills After All, Just as They Always Planned

Remember earlier this year when House Republicans said they would deal with immigration reform once the primaries were over? Well, according to The Wall Street Journal, House Speaker John Boehner told a group of donors that they’ll pass bills addressing the issue this summer.

At a fundraiser in Las Vegas last month, Boehner told a gorup that he was “hellbent on getting this done this year,” as several participants confirmed to the Journal‘s Laura Meckler. Another member of the House, Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte, told a business group in Silicon Valley that he was optimistic about getting something done. Goodlatte suggested that the House would consider five to seven bills that an aide to another representative said would be ready to go in June or July.

There is a very good chance that Boehner was telling donors what they want to hear. The split in the Republican Party is largely between donors and established institutions — who favor moderate policy moves including immigration reform aimed at securing Latino votes for future elections — and the far-right activist base, which supports much stronger restrictions on immigration, political realities notwithstanding. In other words, Boehner might have been telling the donors what they want to hear.

RELATED: Rob Ford Launches Re-Election Campaign With Understatements, Free Booze

But a timeline of how 2014 has evolved for the GOP suggests that the new report is simply a reversion to form.

  • January 27: The post-primary plan emerges. Meckler also revealed the “wait it out” strategy earlier this year. According to that report, House Republicans wanted to pass immigration reform, but didn’t want to lose their jobs. So they developed a plan that involved waiting until at-risk members got past their Republican party primaries — meaning they didn’t need to worry about candidates motivating the activist base to vote against them — and then pass a package of reform measures.
  • January 28: The plan shapes up. House Republicans went on a three-day retreat in Maryland to discuss the components of those bills. The debate, as always, was how to meet the needs of the Latino and immigrant communities while not giving the far-right the chance to say they were granting “amnesty” to people who immigrated without following the legal process.
  • January 30: Republicans list their priorities. At the end of the retreat, the party released a list of priorities for any reform packages. Leading the list (which is at right) was border security. But the proposals included measures that would likely meet the needs of those looking for actual reform.
  • February 7: Boehner’s bluff. And then either 1) the plan fell apart or 2) Boehner commenced Operation Ignore This Until Summer. At his weekly press conference, he told reporters that Obama couldn’t be trusted and reform would be “difficult.” This was widely interpreted as a declaration that the party would give up on the idea. I argued that it was a bluff in line with the January 27 plan. [Sound of horn tooting.]
  • April 16: Obama fights with Cantor. Earlier this week, Obama apparently irritated House Republicans with a statement challenging them to act on immigration reform. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor used the moment to repeat Boehner’s criticism of Obama — but also indicated that the House wanted Obama to work with them on the issue. They’ve said this before, many times, but Cantor’s statement was not “we will do nothing,” as Boehner’s was interpreted to mean.

Predicting what House Republicans will do is a fool’s errand; Boehner himself has at times over the past two years seemed as though he’s not sure what they’ll end up doing. But the new Journal report fits squarely into a plan announced in January that lets Republicans keep donors happy and keep their jobs. As always, we will see. But for immigration reform advocates, there’s new reason for optimism.

This article was originally published at http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/house-republicans-might-pass-immigration-bills-after-all-just-as-they-always-planned/360879/

Read more from The Wire

•   What the Devastating Droughts in California and Texas Look Like When Graphed

•   Alert: Chelsea Clinton’s Baby Can Run for President in 2052

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/house-republicans-might-pass-immigration-bills-just-always-133500884.html
House Republicans Might Pass Immigration Bills After All, Just as They Always Planned
http://news.yahoo.com/house-republicans-might-pass-immigration-bills-just-always-133500884.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama, Republicans openly feud over immigration legislation

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Partisan bickering over immigration reform legislation intensified on Wednesday as President Barack Obama and House of Representatives Republicans accused each other of standing in the way of progress one year after bipartisan Senate legislation was introduced.

On the one-year anniversary of the Senate bill, Obama went on the attack after a long period of trying to encourage progress in the House.

“Unfortunately, Republicans in the House of Representatives have repeatedly failed to take action, seemingly preferring the status quo of a broken immigration system over meaningful reform,” Obama said in a statement released by the White House.

“I urge House Republicans to listen to the will of the American people and bring immigration reform to the House floor for a vote,” Obama said.

He repeated that plea in a private conversation with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, the second-ranking House Republican said.

The Senate legislation, unveiled on April 16, 2013, and passed by the full Senate in June, has remained stalled in the Republican-led House, despite a strong vote by the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Over the past few months, there has been little evidence the House would make progress in this mid-term election year in passing comprehensive immigration reform, even in a piecemeal fashion.

Instead, Republicans have devoted much of their efforts to blasting Obama’s landmark healthcare law and calling for its repeal.

Obama has warned that a failure by Congress to pass legislation could prompt him to look for ways to use his executive powers to make some limited advances on U.S. immigration policy.

Cantor responded to Obama with a statement later on Wednesday, saying, “After five years, President Obama still has not learned how to effectively work with Congress to get things done. You do not attack the very people you hope to engage in a serious dialogue.”

Cantor’s statement concluded with a plea for Obama to work with Congress on addressing “the issues facing working middle-class Americans” who are struggling.

In February, House Speaker John Boehner floated a set of principles for immigration legislation, which included legalizing some of those who entered the United States illegally or overstayed their visas.

But conservative Republicans balked and warned their leaders to avoid such a divisive fight in this election year, when they are hoping to add to their House majority and take control of the Senate.

Instead of pursuing comprehensive immigration reform, so far, the House Judiciary Committee has focused mainly on clamping down on illegal entries and ferreting out undocumented residents.

More than 11 million people are thought to be in the United States illegally. Many are children brought over the southern U.S. border from Mexico by their parents, many of whom are employed by American firms in need of unskilled labor.

(Reporting By Richard Cowan; Editing by Tom Brown)

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/obama-republicans-openly-feud-over-immigration-legislation-221713841–finance.html
Obama, Republicans openly feud over immigration legislation
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-republicans-openly-feud-over-immigration-legislation-221713841–finance.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama's deportations dilemma

Washington (CNN) — Immigration champion Rep. Luis Gutierrez feels confident that President Barack Obama will use his executive powers to push through reform. House Speaker John Boehner feels confident that doing so will tank what little support the President has among Republicans on immigration reform.

They’re both right, immigration law experts say.

After pushback from immigration activists and some members of his party, the President has directed his administration to reexamine its deportation policy.

The administration could shift noncriminals and minor offenders to the lowest deportation priorities.

“I think the President has a difficult decision to make here,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor at Cornell University Law School. “The courts have upheld wide discretion on immigration matters. He could make noncriminals the lowest deportation priorities. … But there is a penalty he could pay through using executive action rather than waiting for Congress to act on immigration reform.”

Rubio on Bush’s immigration comments

Bush: Illegal immigration is ‘act of love’

Cruz counters Bush on illegal immigration

McCain ‘won’t give up’ on immigration

That political price, Boehner told Fox News last week, is “that will make it almost impossible to ever do immigration reform, because he will spoil the well to the point where no one will trust him by giving him a new law that he will implement the way the Congress intended.”

“The American people want us to deal with immigration reform,” Boehner said on Fox News’ “Kelly File” during the same interview. “But every time the President ignores the law, like the 38 times he has on Obamacare, our members look up and go, ‘Wait a minute: You can’t have immigration reform without strong border security and internal enforcement. How can we trust the President to actually obey the law and enforce the law that we would write?’”

Legislation stuck in the House

Last year, the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform package — which includes a citizenship path for an estimated 8 million of the more than 11 million undocumented immigrants in the country, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Roughly one-third of that chamber’s Republicans supported the measure, but the legislation has been stymied in the Republican-controlled House as lawmakers there hammer out more incremental approaches to such things as a path to legalization.

Dems to Obama: Suspend deportations

In the meantime, Obama has faced increasing pressure from immigration activists and members of his own party to use the power of his pen to help stem the high number of deportations that have occurred during his administration.

Under this President, there have been roughly 2 million deportations, a number that far exceeds that of previous administrations and led the head of the National Council of La Raza to dub him “the deporter-in-chief.

There are things Obama could do right away, experts say.

Currently, law enforcement agents along the border and those investigating national security matters can engage in ethnic or racial profiling. Federal agents elsewhere in the country can profile based on a person’s religion, national origin, sexual orientation or gender identification if they suspect immigration or national security laws have been broken.

Obama could, through executive action, expand a ban on any kind of profiling, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brennan Center at New York University’s School of Law, which would reduce the amount of people taken into custody and reduce deportations.

“This is something the President has known he could do since the beginning of his administration,” said Faiza Patel, co-director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program. “And I do think the renewed commitment to doing executive action should help push things forward.”

The Justice Department is reviewing racial profiling in federal law enforcement, and the White House recently directed the Justice Department to include Homeland Security in its review.

Why hasn’t Obama acted on immigration?

The President’s apparent reluctance to use the power of his office to more heavily push immigration reform is a bit baffling, immigration and political analysts say.

“It’s a mystery,” said CNN senior political analyst David Gergen. “He clearly cares, but he hasn’t fought the issue. Public opinion is still malleable on this. …This is an opportunity for the President to get back into this fight and embrace the Jeb Bush spirit,” Gergen said of the former Florida governor’s “compassionate conservative” approach to immigration, which includes understanding the impact of deportation on families.

Obama said in November that he does not have the power to halt the record number of deportations that have occurred under his watch. But he does have some latitude in implementing such laws, immigration law experts say.

Using prosecutorial discretion, the executive branch has the “inherent power to choose which cases to act on,” Richard A. Boswell, an immigration law professor at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law, told CNN.

Obama said he can’t stop deportations of immigrants, but maybe he can

Some prominent Democrats agree and point to his executive action in 2012 in halting the deportations of “Dreamers,” the children of undocumented immigrants dubbed for the DREAM Act, which would have provided amnesty for them.

“Mr. President, you do have the power to stop what’s going on,” Rep. Charles Rangel, D-New York, said at a news conference in December calling for an end to the deportations.

Rangel and Gutierrez were among the 30 Democratic lawmakers who signed a letter telling the President that not only did he have the authority to halt the high number of deportations, but “our efforts in Congress will only be helped by the sensible and moral step of stopping deportations.”

Obama netted 71% of the Latino vote in the last election, while Republican nominee Mitt Romney garnered 27%. Hispanics are the fastest-growing minority group.

GOP wants to expand appeal beyond its base

After the GOP’s losses among African-Americans, women and Latinos, the party performed an autopsy of sorts and has since redoubled efforts to make better inroads with those groups.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi last week said race was part of the reason Republicans in that chamber are blocking immigration reform efforts.

“I think race has something to do with the fact that they’re not bringing up an immigration bill,” she said.

However, despite the popularity the President enjoyed among Hispanics, a minority group that has been vocal about the record-high deportations, using executive action to do more on immigration reform could have negative political consequences, said Yale-Loehr, the Cornell University Law School professor.

“In the short term for Obama himself, it might not matter, but what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,” Yale-Loehr said. “If a Republican president made an executive action and used Obama as an example to say ‘I could do what I want,’ it could hurt Democrats.”

Still, strong signals from the White House recently in directing Homeland Security to look into how it can apply immigration laws “more humanely” give members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and their constituents hope.

Gutierrez took to the House floor recently to warn Republicans that when it comes to immigration, a day of reckoning is coming.

“If you refuse to give the President a bill he can sign because you do not trust him to enforce immigration laws … he will act without you,” Gutierrez, a Democrat who hails from the President’s home state of Illinois, said on the House floor this month.

“He has alternatives under existing law. There are concrete ways within existing law to help keep families together and spare U.S. citizens from losing their wives, their husbands and their children to deportation. In spite of your lack of action,” Gutierrez said. “And I believe the President is going to use those tools. I saw it in his eyes when I met with him.”

CNN’s Leigh Ann Caldwell contributed to this report.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/15/politics/immigration-executive-action/index.html
Obama's deportations dilemma
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/15/politics/immigration-executive-action/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration activists push House GOP in last-ditch campaign for vote

WASHINGTON — In a last-ditch effort to bring an immigration overhaul to a vote in Congress, House Democrats on Tuesday began targeting key GOP lawmakers in hopes of pressuring House Speaker John A. Boehner to act.

The election-year campaign against 30 House Republicans, who have expressed interest in changing the nation’s immigration laws, was framed by Democrats as one last opportunity to engage in a legislative debate before President Obama begins taking executive actions.

The administration has indicated it plans to halt strict enforcement of some immigration laws, including deportations that separate families, if Congress fails to act. Obama met Tuesday with faith leaders as protesters continued their second week of vigil in front of the White House.

“The president’s going to be forced to act,” said Rep. Joe Garcia (D-Fla.), a chief sponsor of a bipartisan bill that has sat idle in the House.

Boehner has tried to nudge the Republican majority to consider immigration reform, but lawmakers have been cool to the issue. Only three have signed onto the House bill.

A sweeping package approved last year in a robust bipartisan vote in the Senate landed with a thud in the House, where many Republicans from congressional districts with few minority residents have little interest in the issue. But GOP elders believe immigration reform is paramount to expanding the party’s voter base before the 2016 presidential election.

The inaction has left immigration advocates increasingly frustrated with Obama, but the administration has urged them to focus instead on Republicans as the main obstacle to reform.

The effort launched Tuesday is a long-shot attempt to force a floor vote through procedural methods. Under House rules, Boehner would be forced to allow the vote if a majority of lawmakers sign a so-called discharge petition. Democrats are about two dozen signatures short of the 218 needed, and are targeting those key Republicans to make gains.

Both sides acknowledge that if the vote was held, the legislation may, in fact, pass, which could prove thorny for Republicans from conservative districts where many voters criticize the reform bill as “amnesty” for immigrants.

The measure would beef up border security and guest worker programs, while allowing a route to legal status for those who have immigrated illegally. It is similar to the bill that was approved by the Senate.

The White House is expected to announce some changes in immigration law in the weeks ahead, and more if Congress fails to act this summer.

lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

Twitter: @lisamascaroinDC

Source Article from http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-immigration-push-gop-congress-20140415,0,1160990.story?track=rss
Immigration activists push House GOP in last-ditch campaign for vote
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-immigration-push-gop-congress-20140415,0,1160990.story?track=rss
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

No Executive Action on Immigration Overhaul for Now

President Obama has no plans to enact unilateral immigration overhaul by executive action, faith leaders from across the country said Obama told them today.

“We did not discuss the need; we did not bring up the issue of the president doing unilateral action,” Luis Cortes, president of  Esperanza, a nonprofit law office serving immigrants, said at a news briefing after the Washington meeting.

“We felt it was more important that Congress take action at this time.”

Obama had asked the director of Homeland Security to look at ways to reduce the number of people deported for entering the United States without documentation. But White House press secretary Jay Carney says that is different from implementing immigration overhaul on his own.

The Department of Homeland Security is now performing a “review of practices and implantation of enforcement guidelines.” In other words, the administration is trying to obey the law and still rid the president of a title recently given him by Hispanic leaders, “Deporter in Chief.”

As for his changing immigration law, Carney said that is a nonstarter.

“I think the president believes that there is an opportunity that still exists for House Republicans to follow the lead of the Senate, including Republicans in the Senate, and take up and pass comprehensive immigration reform,” Carney said at today’s press briefing. “And today’s meeting that the president had with faith leaders demonstrates and reinforces the fact that there is a broad, unusually broad, coalition that supports that effort, that supports comprehensive immigration reform and all the benefits that making reform the law would provide to the country, to our security, to our economy, to our businesses.

“I think it highlights the isolation that House Republicans find themselves in when so many, not just politicians or advocacy leaders, but folks across the country support doing the right thing here and the irony, of course, is that there is a really strong conservative argument to be made on behalf of comprehensive immigration reform,” he said.

In a series of meetings in the past few months, Obama has met with immigration reform activists and leaders on the topic, hoping to gain their support to pressure House republicans into action.

Today’s meeting with religious leaders was in hopes of  gaining their support and influence in pushing Republicans in the House to act.

“While the DACA action that was taken through executive order has been helpful, it was not the ultimate solution,” Noel Castellanos, CEO of the Christian Community Development Association, said of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. “We were here to talk about that ultimate solution … we need to have Congress work.”

DACA is executive action by the president that affects so-called Dreamers, children who arrive in the United States without documentation, and allows them to stay without fear of deportation.

The six faith leaders who met with the president today emphasized the agreement on the issue of immigration overhaul.

“For the first time we have in this country the entire religious community, Muslim Jewish, Christian, Baha’i .. all the major denominations and churches and religious bodies of this country believe that it is a moral imperative that we get immigration reform done,” Cortes said. “It is the first and only political issue in this country where we all agree.”

During today’s meeting, the president stressed, according to a statement from the White House, “the importance of taking action to pass common sense immigration reform.”

“While his Administration can take steps to better enforce and administer immigration laws, nothing can replace the certainty of legislative reform and this permanent solution can only be achieved by Congress,” Obama emphasized, according to the statement.

Russell Moore, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission for the Southern Baptist Convention, said after the meeting, “I disagree with the president on many things, including life, marriage, religious liberty, HHS mandate; this is one of those issues that isn’t a red state, blue state divide.

“Most people agree, across the religious spectrum and across the political spectrum that our immigration system is broken so we need to have a system that respects the rule of law, secures the border and finds a way forward for this country.”

It has been more than nine months since the Senate passed its comprehensive immigration overhaul bill, and in that time the House has done little. It did release a set of immigration principles in January, but those seemed to stop at their introduction.

Source Article from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/04/no-executive-action-on-immigration-overhaul/
No Executive Action on Immigration Overhaul for Now
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/04/no-executive-action-on-immigration-overhaul/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration activists urge Obama to act boldly

WASHINGTON (AP) — Latinos and immigration activists are warning of political peril for President Barack Obama and Democrats in the fall election unless the president acts boldly and soon to curb deportations and allow more immigrants to remain legally in the U.S.

Many activists say Obama has been slow to grasp the emotions building within the Latino community as deportations near the 2 million mark for his administration and hopes for immigration legislation fade. With House Republicans unlikely to act on an overhaul, executive action by Obama is increasingly the activists’ only hope.

“There is tremendous anger among core constituencies of the president and the Latino and Asian communities in particular,” said Deepak Bhargava, executive director of the Center for Community Change, which champions immigration change. “He has a momentous choice to make.”

Activists credit their sit-ins and hunger strikes for Obama directing new Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to review the administration’s deportations policy and suggest ways to make it more humane. Now they’re focused on ensuring they get the outcome they want — an expansion of Obama’s two-year-old policy allowing work permits for immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children who have been in school or the military.

The program has helped more than 600,000 people. Activists want it expanded to include more immigrants, such as those who have been in the U.S. for at least five years or who since their arrival have had children. Depending on how it’s defined, that could help many millions more.

Obama has said he doesn’t have the authority to take such a step without Congress. At a White House meeting with religious leaders Tuesday he emphasized he wouldn’t act on his own while there still was a window for congressional action, participants said.

Republicans have warned that a unilateral move by Obama would end any possibility for cooperation on immigration legislation. A bill to improve border security and offer a path to citizenship for many of the 11.5 million immigrants here illegally remains stalled in the GOP-led House 10 months after passing the Senate.

But many activists say they’ve all but given up on Republicans and argue that Obama has the responsibility and authority to take expansive steps to legalize large segments of the population. They worry that Johnson’s review will produce only small measures aimed at slowing deportations and improving procedures.

“At this point anything short of an affirmative administrative relief program for parents of U.S. citizens and Dreamers is not enough,” said Lorella Praeli, director of advocacy at United We Dream, which represents immigrants brought here illegally as kids, known by their supporters as Dreamers. “The clock on Obama has run out.”

Administration officials haven’t tipped their hand on the timing or outcome of Johnson’s review, though activists anticipate initial steps fairly soon. Peter Boogaard, spokesman for the Homeland Security Department, said the review will be completed expeditiously and the aim is to see “if there are areas where we can further align our enforcement policies with our goal of sound law enforcement practice.”

Despite the complaints from activists, Republicans accuse the Obama administration of inflating its record on deportations by counting people removed as they’re attempting to cross the border or shortly thereafter. In the 2013 fiscal year more than 60 percent of the nearly 370,000 deportations were of recent border crossers, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Immigration activists, meanwhile, say they feel betrayed by Obama, who was elected with strong Latino and Asian support in 2008. They complain his strategy of winning GOP cooperation by increasing enforcement has failed.

Cynthia Diaz, 18, participated in a six-day hunger strike outside the White House last week to protest her mother’s detention. She pointed to Obama’s promise to prioritize immigration reform.

“That’s how he got the Latino vote, and now he just stabbed us in the back,” Diaz said, adding she and others would think twice in the future before supporting the president and his party.

Democratic pollster Celinda Lake said recent polling shows a drop-off in enthusiasm among Latino voters. “Lack of progress on immigration is hurting our chances of getting these voters out to vote,” Lake said

Immigrants’ rights leaders say executive action by the president would energize Latino and Asian voters, as happened before the 2012 election when Obama deferred deportations for young immigrants. However, it also could mobilize conservative voters.

Frustration has spilled over onto some of Obama’s allies in Congress. Protesters from California were arrested last week after swarming the offices of Democratic Reps. Loretta Sanchez and Xavier Becerra to push toward stronger action.

“We’re doing everything that we can,” Sanchez later complained. “So when they come and they pressure us it’s almost like, ‘Guys, we understand where you’re coming from, but what we need to do is we need to get a vote out of” House Speaker John Boehner. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said activists were giving “a gift to the Republicans” by targeting Obama instead of the GOP.

Obama expressed a similar complaint at a meeting with immigration rights groups last month, asking officials present to give him 90 more days and meantime keep the focus on the GOP. Participants portrayed a president getting drawn reluctantly into contemplating executive action and focused, at least initially, on smaller steps that he told them would likely not satisfy them.

That meeting, and Obama’s announcement of a review by Johnson, came shortly after Janet Murguia, head of the National Council of La Raza, labeled Obama “deporter in chief.”

Now activists are waiting for Obama’s next step.

“The pressure for sure is working, and I think the question is how bold are they ready to go,” said Marielena Hincapie, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center. “The hard part is this is not a bold administration, and especially on immigration where the focus has been on legislation.”

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-activists-urge-obama-act-boldly-195120113–finance.html
Immigration activists urge Obama to act boldly
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-activists-urge-obama-act-boldly-195120113–finance.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

The power of the pen and immigration

Washington (CNN) — Immigration champion Rep. Luis Gutierrez feels confident that President Barack Obama will use his executive powers to push through reform. House Speaker John Boehner feels confident that doing so will tank what little support the President has among Republicans on immigration reform.

They’re both right, immigration law experts say.

After pushback from immigration activists and some members of his party, the President has directed his administration to reexamine its deportation policy.

The administration could shift noncriminals and minor offenders to the lowest deportation priorities.

“I think the President has a difficult decision to make here,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor at Cornell University Law School. “The courts have upheld wide discretion on immigration matters. He could make noncriminals the lowest deportation priorities. … But there is a penalty he could pay through using executive action rather than waiting for Congress to act on immigration reform.”

Rubio on Bush’s immigration comments

Bush: Illegal immigration is ‘act of love’

Cruz counters Bush on illegal immigration

McCain ‘won’t give up’ on immigration

That political price, Boehner told Fox News last week, is “that will make it almost impossible to ever do immigration reform, because he will spoil the well to the point where no one will trust him by giving him a new law that he will implement the way the Congress intended.”

“The American people want us to deal with immigration reform,” Boehner said on Fox News’ “Kelly File” during the same interview. “But every time the President ignores the law, like the 38 times he has on Obamacare, our members look up and go, ‘Wait a minute: You can’t have immigration reform without strong border security and internal enforcement. How can we trust the President to actually obey the law and enforce the law that we would write?’”

Legislation stuck in the House

Last year, the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform package — which includes a citizenship path for an estimated 8 million of the more than 11 million undocumented immigrants in the country, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Roughly one-third of that chamber’s Republicans supported the measure, but the legislation has been stymied in the Republican-controlled House as lawmakers there hammer out more incremental approaches to such things as a path to legalization.

Dems to Obama: Suspend deportations

In the meantime, Obama has faced increasing pressure from immigration activists and members of his own party to use the power of his pen to help stem the high number of deportations that have occurred during his administration.

Under this President, there have been roughly 2 million deportations, a number that far exceeds that of previous administrations and led the head of the National Council of La Raza to dub him “the deporter-in-chief.

There are things Obama could do right away, experts say.

Currently, law enforcement agents along the border and those investigating national security matters can engage in ethnic or racial profiling. Federal agents elsewhere in the country can profile based on a person’s religion, national origin, sexual orientation or gender identification if they suspect immigration or national security laws have been broken.

Obama could, through executive action, expand a ban on any kind of profiling, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brennan Center at New York University’s School of Law, which would reduce the amount of people taken into custody and reduce deportations.

“This is something the President has known he could do since the beginning of his administration,” said Faiza Patel, co-director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program. “And I do think the renewed commitment to doing executive action should help push things forward.”

The Justice Department is reviewing racial profiling in federal law enforcement, and the White House recently directed the Justice Department to include Homeland Security in its review.

Why hasn’t Obama acted on immigration?

The President’s apparent reluctance to use the power of his office to more heavily push immigration reform is a bit baffling, immigration and political analysts say.

“It’s a mystery,” said CNN senior political analyst David Gergen. “He clearly cares, but he hasn’t fought the issue. Public opinion is still malleable on this. …This is an opportunity for the President to get back into this fight and embrace the Jeb Bush spirit,” Gergen said of the former Florida governor’s “compassionate conservative” approach to immigration, which includes understanding the impact of deportation on families.

Obama said in November that he does not have the power to halt the record number of deportations that have occurred under his watch. But he does have some latitude in implementing such laws, immigration law experts say.

Using prosecutorial discretion, the executive branch has the “inherent power to choose which cases to act on,” Richard A. Boswell, an immigration law professor at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law, told CNN.

Obama said he can’t stop deportations of immigrants, but maybe he can

Some prominent Democrats agree and point to his executive action in 2012 in halting the deportations of “Dreamers,” the children of undocumented immigrants dubbed for the DREAM Act, which would have provided amnesty for them.

“Mr. President, you do have the power to stop what’s going on,” Rep. Charles Rangel, D-New York, said at a news conference in December calling for an end to the deportations.

Rangel and Gutierrez were among the 30 Democratic lawmakers who signed a letter telling the President that not only did he have the authority to halt the high number of deportations, but “our efforts in Congress will only be helped by the sensible and moral step of stopping deportations.”

Obama netted 71% of the Latino vote in the last election, while Republican nominee Mitt Romney garnered 27%. Hispanics are the fastest-growing minority group.

GOP wants to expand appeal beyond its base

After the GOP’s losses among African-Americans, women and Latinos, the party performed an autopsy of sorts and has since redoubled efforts to make better inroads with those groups.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi last week said race was part of the reason Republicans in that chamber are blocking immigration reform efforts.

“I think race has something to do with the fact that they’re not bringing up an immigration bill,” she said.

However, despite the popularity the President enjoyed among Hispanics, a minority group that has been vocal about the record-high deportations, using executive action to do more on immigration reform could have negative political consequences, said Yale-Loehr, the Cornell University Law School professor.

“In the short term for Obama himself, it might not matter, but what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,” Yale-Loehr said. “If a Republican president made an executive action and used Obama as an example to say ‘I could do what I want,’ it could hurt Democrats.”

Still, strong signals from the White House recently in directing Homeland Security to look into how it can apply immigration laws “more humanely” give members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and their constituents hope.

Gutierrez took to the House floor recently to warn Republicans that when it comes to immigration, a day of reckoning is coming.

“If you refuse to give the President a bill he can sign because you do not trust him to enforce immigration laws … he will act without you,” Gutierrez, a Democrat who hails from the President’s home state of Illinois, said on the House floor this month.

“He has alternatives under existing law. There are concrete ways within existing law to help keep families together and spare U.S. citizens from losing their wives, their husbands and their children to deportation. In spite of your lack of action,” Gutierrez said. “And I believe the President is going to use those tools. I saw it in his eyes when I met with him.”

CNN’s Leigh Ann Caldwell contributed to this report.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/15/politics/immigration-executive-action/index.html
The power of the pen and immigration
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/15/politics/immigration-executive-action/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration bill: political panic attack | Editorial

Conservative MPs looked over the precipice and some of them stepped back. But not enough to prevent an unruly confrontation over the twin issues of immigration and Europe that could, as their one-time leader Michael Howard angrily warned, cost them the election next year. And not enough to escape the impression of a prime minister who is losing control of his party. Despite a handful of high-profile retractions – the leading rightwinger Douglas Carswell was among those returning to the fold – Dominic Raab’s amendment giving ministers power to deport convicted criminals without an appeal to the right to family life was supported by 97 MPs, 85 of them Tories. The government, which abstained, was saved from humiliation only when Labour chose to vote against the amendment.

For the rebels, their defeat had many of the attributes of victory. David Cameron is left looking weaker than ever, less able to handle the next confrontation over Europe whenever it comes. Labour and the Liberal Democrats, who voted together against the Raab amendment, have established a further piece of common ground.

The Commons debate was a deeply political occasion, a matter of last-minute deals, hand-written amendments and low horsetrading. Not an attractive sight for voters who, an Ipsos Mori poll showed earlier in the week, now regard immigration as the most serious issue facing the country. This may not be surprising, in the context of the sometimes grotesque misrepresentation of the nature of immigration and the hysterical anticipation at the start of the month about the arrival of Romanian and Bulgarian citizens in much of the media.

But it is also true that there have been good reasons recently for the public to question the government’s capacity to monitor and control migration – although it is worth noting that the British Social Attitudes survey found as long ago as 1995 that two-thirds of voters thought immigration was too high. Net migration at that time was a mere 60,000, easily within Mr Cameron’s new objective of a “sensible” level. In those days many Conservatives were enthusiastic advocates of extending the EU to the Baltic in the north and the Black Sea in the south. They were equally passionate about the free movement of capital and labour. This week, many of the same people will have been voting against the consequences of their actions. Immigration and Europe are now, for all political purposes, aspects of the same problem – and a colossal party management headache for the prime minister.

The government is visibly shaken, and no wonder. The bill – a largely mean-minded and probably not very effective attempt to clamp down on illegal migrants and make deportations easier – has had a wretched passage. Debate had to be postponed before Christmas in order to prevent MPs from voting on an amendment attempting to extend restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians before the restrictions ended on 1 January. But that did nothing to prevent the sense of crisis mounting as about 95 MPs signed a letter demanding a move to extend restrictions on Romanian and Bulgarian workers. More than 100 backed the Raab amendment before the vote, including former Labour home office ministers

At the eleventh hour, Theresa May introduced another amendment proposing powers to strip Britons born abroad of their citizenship, leaving them stateless, a power more customarily reserved for dictators. Mrs May insisted it would be needed only rarely and the Lib Dem leadership backed her, even though, as the former DPP and now Lib Dem peer Ken Macdonald observed, it would unquestionably be fought to the bitter end in the courts. When there are already signs that the existing power to strip citizenship from those with dual nationality is being used more widely, this looks like another disproportionate move in the name of security. It was a bad day for Mr Cameron, and it will not have done much to reassure those worried about migration.

Source Article from http://feeds.theguardian.com/c/34708/f/663865/s/368be099/sc/7/l/0L0Stheguardian0N0Ccommentisfree0C20A140Cjan0C30A0Cimmigration0Ebill0Epolitical0Epanic/story01.htm
Immigration bill: political panic attack | Editorial
http://feeds.theguardian.com/c/34708/f/663865/s/368be099/sc/7/l/0L0Stheguardian0N0Ccommentisfree0C20A140Cjan0C30A0Cimmigration0Ebill0Epolitical0Epanic/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Correction: Immigration Reform story

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) – In a story April 3 about a hunger strike by immigration reform advocates, The Associated Press misspelled the name of a Christian social justice organization. It is Sojourners, not Soujourners.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Immigration reform advocates begin fast in Va.

Immigration reform advocates bring national tour, hunger strike to Richmond

By LARRY O’DELL

Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) – Advocates for immigration reform began a four-day hunger strike Thursday in Richmond, hoping to rally support for their cause and capture the attention of two powerful Virginia congressmen.

The event is part of the national “Fast for Families Across America” campaign that has taken two busloads of advocates to 30 states over the last few weeks. The campaign set up a tent in a park near downtown to serve as headquarters for its Richmond stay before heading back to Washington, D.C., next week.

Members of the organization staged a 22-day fast outside the U.S. Capitol in November before embarking on its tour of 75 congressional districts, including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s in Virginia. Yanet Limon, 18, said she and a few other advocates met with Cantor staffers Thursday morning but received no commitment on immigration reform.

House Speaker John Boehner has refused to schedule a vote on a comprehensive bill the Senate passed in June and has said it is unlikely to pass the GOP-led House this year.

Fast for Families leader Eliseo Medina said at a news conference that Virginia is a key player in the debate because of the influence of Cantor and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

“These two have a moral responsibility to act, to make sure a vote is held in the U.S. Congress,” he said, adding that he hopes the hunger strike will “touch their hearts.”

Michel Zajur, CEO of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Virginia, lauded the entrepreneurial spirit of immigrants and Jim Wallis of the Christian social justice organization Sojourners stressed the religious aspect of immigration reform.

“To not fix a broken system because of politics is a religious failure,” he said.

Along with the fast, the advocates plan a series of community meetings and prayer services through Sunday.

Source Article from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/15/immigration-reform-advocates-begin-fast-in-va/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS
Correction: Immigration Reform story
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/15/immigration-reform-advocates-begin-fast-in-va/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

BI nabs fake immigration officer

The Bureau of Immigration (BI) collared a fake agent posing as an immigration officer who promised to facilitate the departure of prospective overseas workers without proper documents.

Immigration Commissioner Siegfred Mison disclosed on Tuesday that BI operatives arrested certain Jennifer Ching Javier, alias “Jana Reyes,” in an entrapment operation through the help of her two latest victims.

Reyes reportedly operated in Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) and shopping malls, victimizing unsuspecting individuals by charging them P25,000 for employment in Dubai even without necessary overseas permits.

Her recent victims, Arlyn Aceron, 33, and Magnolia Raga, 25, were recently offloaded from a flight bound for Dubai. They have paid Reyes P16,000 and P10,000, respectively.

BI said the suspect, facing usurpation of authority and forgery, is now detained at the Pasay City Jail. The Pasay City Prosecutor’s Office has not issued a resolution since her arrest, according to BI’s Intelligence Division.

The Immigration agency has repeatedly issued warnings against travelers, including foreign nationals, against lawless elements posing as fake immigration agents to extort money. (Ron B. Lopez)

Source Article from http://www.mb.com.ph/bi-nabs-fake-immigration-officer/
BI nabs fake immigration officer
http://www.mb.com.ph/bi-nabs-fake-immigration-officer/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results