Immigration talk 'deters students'








students


The government’s “overblown rhetoric” on efforts to bring down immigration has contributed to a drop in students doing technology, engineering and maths courses at UK universities, peers say.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said “inflammatory” media coverage and people’s “perception of the rules” were a deterrent.

The UK was seen as an “unwelcoming destination”, it added.

But the government said the peers’ report lacked “clear evidence”.

It said it was controlling immigration while “attracting the brightest and the best”.

Prime Minister David Cameron has said he wants to get the level of net migration – the difference between the number of people coming in and leaving – down to “tens of thousands” by 2015.


‘Complexity’

Since April 2012, foreign students have faced stricter visa regulations, in an effort to cut down on bogus immigrants.

But the government stresses that there is no cap on the number of people legitimately coming to the UK to study.

The number of students studying science, technology and maths (Stem) subjects – including courses such as medicine, architecture and computer science – fell by more than 10% from 58,815 in 2010-11 to 52,905 in 2012-13.

The committee’s report said: “It was put to us on numerous occasions that it was not the immigration rules as such that were deterring students, but their perception of the rules as a result of overblown rhetoric from ministers and sometimes inflammatory media coverage in the UK and in overseas countries.”

It added: “The UK was seen as a destination that was unwelcoming to some international students.”

But the report said the evidence “pointed to difficulties beyond simply those of perception”, with the “complexity and instability” of the immigration rules also posing problems.

“The UK’s offer to prospective international students remains a good one; it is founded on academic excellence, but it has been diminished by perceived and real barriers so that the overall offer is not as competitive as it needs to be,” the peers said.

Ministers have set out plans to increase the number of international students by up to 20% over the next five years.


‘Widespread abuse’

But the committee said: “The government maintain that they emphatically welcome international students, unfortunately, elements of policy and perception are working against this admirable aim.

“The view within government that current policies are working well is disconnected from the concerns we repeatedly heard.”

But a Home Office spokesman said: “We do not accept that the UK’s immigration rules are deterring international students and there is no clear evidence in the report to support that argument – where some courses and countries have seen falling numbers, other countries and courses are on the rise.”

He said the UK remained “the second most popular destination for international higher education students”, with enrolments from “key markets”, such as China, Malaysia and Hong Kong increasing.

The spokesman added: “The student visa system we inherited was weak and open to widespread abuse. We are controlling immigration while still attracting the brightest and the best – as the published figures show.”

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
Immigration talk 'deters students'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration talk 'deters students'








students


The government’s “overblown rhetoric” on efforts to bring down immigration has contributed to a drop in students doing technology, engineering and maths courses at UK universities, peers say.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said “inflammatory” media coverage and people’s “perception of the rules” were a deterrent.

The UK was seen as an “unwelcoming destination”, it added.

But the government said the peers’ report lacked “clear evidence”.

It said it was controlling immigration while “attracting the brightest and the best”.

Prime Minister David Cameron has said he wants to get the level of net migration – the difference between the number of people coming in and leaving – down to “tens of thousands” by 2015.


‘Complexity’

Since April 2012, foreign students have faced stricter visa regulations, in an effort to cut down on bogus immigrants.

But the government stresses that there is no cap on the number of people legitimately coming to the UK to study.

The number of students studying science, technology and maths (Stem) subjects – including courses such as medicine, architecture and computer science – fell by more than 10% from 58,815 in 2010-11 to 52,905 in 2012-13.

The committee’s report said: “It was put to us on numerous occasions that it was not the immigration rules as such that were deterring students, but their perception of the rules as a result of overblown rhetoric from ministers and sometimes inflammatory media coverage in the UK and in overseas countries.”

It added: “The UK was seen as a destination that was unwelcoming to some international students.”

But the report said the evidence “pointed to difficulties beyond simply those of perception”, with the “complexity and instability” of the immigration rules also posing problems.

“The UK’s offer to prospective international students remains a good one; it is founded on academic excellence, but it has been diminished by perceived and real barriers so that the overall offer is not as competitive as it needs to be,” the peers said.

Ministers have set out plans to increase the number of international students by up to 20% over the next five years.


‘Widespread abuse’

But the committee said: “The government maintain that they emphatically welcome international students, unfortunately, elements of policy and perception are working against this admirable aim.

“The view within government that current policies are working well is disconnected from the concerns we repeatedly heard.”

But a Home Office spokesman said: “We do not accept that the UK’s immigration rules are deterring international students and there is no clear evidence in the report to support that argument – where some courses and countries have seen falling numbers, other countries and courses are on the rise.”

He said the UK remained “the second most popular destination for international higher education students”, with enrolments from “key markets”, such as China, Malaysia and Hong Kong increasing.

The spokesman added: “The student visa system we inherited was weak and open to widespread abuse. We are controlling immigration while still attracting the brightest and the best – as the published figures show.”

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
Immigration talk 'deters students'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration talk 'deters students'








students


The government’s “overblown rhetoric” on efforts to bring down immigration has contributed to a drop in students doing technology, engineering and maths courses at UK universities, peers say.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said “inflammatory” media coverage and people’s “perception of the rules” were a deterrent.

The UK was seen as an “unwelcoming destination”, it added.

But the government said the peers’ report lacked “clear evidence”.

It said it was controlling immigration while “attracting the brightest and the best”.

Prime Minister David Cameron has said he wants to get the level of net migration – the difference between the number of people coming in and leaving – down to “tens of thousands” by 2015.


‘Complexity’

Since April 2012, foreign students have faced stricter visa regulations, in an effort to cut down on bogus immigrants.

But the government stresses that there is no cap on the number of people legitimately coming to the UK to study.

The number of students studying science, technology and maths (Stem) subjects – including courses such as medicine, architecture and computer science – fell by more than 10% from 58,815 in 2010-11 to 52,905 in 2012-13.

The committee’s report said: “It was put to us on numerous occasions that it was not the immigration rules as such that were deterring students, but their perception of the rules as a result of overblown rhetoric from ministers and sometimes inflammatory media coverage in the UK and in overseas countries.”

It added: “The UK was seen as a destination that was unwelcoming to some international students.”

But the report said the evidence “pointed to difficulties beyond simply those of perception”, with the “complexity and instability” of the immigration rules also posing problems.

“The UK’s offer to prospective international students remains a good one; it is founded on academic excellence, but it has been diminished by perceived and real barriers so that the overall offer is not as competitive as it needs to be,” the peers said.

Ministers have set out plans to increase the number of international students by up to 20% over the next five years.


‘Widespread abuse’

But the committee said: “The government maintain that they emphatically welcome international students, unfortunately, elements of policy and perception are working against this admirable aim.

“The view within government that current policies are working well is disconnected from the concerns we repeatedly heard.”

But a Home Office spokesman said: “We do not accept that the UK’s immigration rules are deterring international students and there is no clear evidence in the report to support that argument – where some courses and countries have seen falling numbers, other countries and courses are on the rise.”

He said the UK remained “the second most popular destination for international higher education students”, with enrolments from “key markets”, such as China, Malaysia and Hong Kong increasing.

The spokesman added: “The student visa system we inherited was weak and open to widespread abuse. We are controlling immigration while still attracting the brightest and the best – as the published figures show.”

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
Immigration talk 'deters students'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration talk 'deters students'








students


The government’s “overblown rhetoric” on efforts to bring down immigration has contributed to a drop in students doing technology, engineering and maths courses at UK universities, peers say.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said “inflammatory” media coverage and people’s “perception of the rules” were a deterrent.

The UK was seen as an “unwelcoming destination”, it added.

But the government said the peers’ report lacked “clear evidence”.

It said it was controlling immigration while “attracting the brightest and the best”.

Prime Minister David Cameron has said he wants to get the level of net migration – the difference between the number of people coming in and leaving – down to “tens of thousands” by 2015.


‘Complexity’

Since April 2012, foreign students have faced stricter visa regulations, in an effort to cut down on bogus immigrants.

But the government stresses that there is no cap on the number of people legitimately coming to the UK to study.

The number of students studying science, technology and maths (Stem) subjects – including courses such as medicine, architecture and computer science – fell by more than 10% from 58,815 in 2010-11 to 52,905 in 2012-13.

The committee’s report said: “It was put to us on numerous occasions that it was not the immigration rules as such that were deterring students, but their perception of the rules as a result of overblown rhetoric from ministers and sometimes inflammatory media coverage in the UK and in overseas countries.”

It added: “The UK was seen as a destination that was unwelcoming to some international students.”

But the report said the evidence “pointed to difficulties beyond simply those of perception”, with the “complexity and instability” of the immigration rules also posing problems.

“The UK’s offer to prospective international students remains a good one; it is founded on academic excellence, but it has been diminished by perceived and real barriers so that the overall offer is not as competitive as it needs to be,” the peers said.

Ministers have set out plans to increase the number of international students by up to 20% over the next five years.


‘Widespread abuse’

But the committee said: “The government maintain that they emphatically welcome international students, unfortunately, elements of policy and perception are working against this admirable aim.

“The view within government that current policies are working well is disconnected from the concerns we repeatedly heard.”

But a Home Office spokesman said: “We do not accept that the UK’s immigration rules are deterring international students and there is no clear evidence in the report to support that argument – where some courses and countries have seen falling numbers, other countries and courses are on the rise.”

He said the UK remained “the second most popular destination for international higher education students”, with enrolments from “key markets”, such as China, Malaysia and Hong Kong increasing.

The spokesman added: “The student visa system we inherited was weak and open to widespread abuse. We are controlling immigration while still attracting the brightest and the best – as the published figures show.”

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
Immigration talk 'deters students'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26980384
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Jeb Bush remarks expose GOP's immigration problem

MIAMI (AP) — With three little words, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush set off a fury this week that served as a potent reminder of how difficult the immigration issue remains for his possible presidential ambitions and the Republican Party.

An early GOP establishment favorite, Bush has long urged his fellow Republicans to show more compassion for those who enter the country illegally. But when he described illegal immigration in an interview as an “act of love” by people hoping to provide for their families, the backlash from his own party was swift and stinging.

Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho, accused Bush of “pandering.” Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and House Speaker John Boehner said the country should enforce the “rule of law.” And conservative commentator Michelle Malkin created a new Twitter hashtag: #CancelJebBush.

Some of the party’s most powerful insiders and financiers are concerned immigration could define the coming nominating contest in the way it did in 2012. Like Bush, Texas Gov. Rick Perry was jeered when he implied that his rivals were heartless if they opposed a law that lets some children of undocumented immigrants pay in-state tuition at public colleges.

The nominee, Mitt Romney, took a hard line and advocated “self-deportation” for those here illegally. He won just 27 percent of the Hispanic vote, the lowest portion for a Republican in 16 years.

“The worst thing that can happen to a political party is not for voters to decide they don’t like you,” said Alex Castellanos, a GOP consultant and former Romney adviser. “It’s for voters to decide you don’t like them, and that’s where the Republican Party is right now.”

The Republican National Committee has urged the GOP to embrace an immigration overhaul, but comprehensive legislation remains stalled in Congress. Action is unlikely in an election year with high stakes. All 435 House seats, and 36 in the Senate, are on state ballots. Republicans need to gain only six Senate seats to win majority control from Democrats. The political calculus makes the GOP’s core base of voters critical, so House Republicans want to avoid an immigration fight that could alienate them. But some establishment Republicans say the delay threatens the long-term future of the GOP.

“It’s going to kill the Republican Party,” said Al Hoffman, a Republican megadonor who chaired George W. Bush’s presidential campaigns.

He and others argue the GOP needs a nominee with a “Nixon-goes-to-China mentality”_in which the party leader takes an audacious, if not popular, step_on issues such as immigration. They suggest that’s necessary in part to peel away some Hispanic voters from Democrats in 2016.

For Bush, the debate is personal. His wife, Columba, was born and grew up in Mexico. The two met while Bush was an exchange student there; she is now an American citizen.

On Sunday, in an interview with Fox News before an audience at the George Bush Presidential Library in Texas, Bush said immigrants who enter the country illegally should, in fact, pay a penalty. But he added that he viewed such a violation as “a different kind of crime.”

“Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony,” he said. “It’s an act of love.”

Hispanics are a crucial voting bloc in an increasing number of swing-voting states, from Florida to Colorado to Nevada.

Some see a new opportunity for the GOP to appeal to Latinos, many of whom have soured on President Barack Obama because of his administration’s record-setting number of deportations.

“Hispanics are eager to hear from a leader in the Republican Party talk about immigration in the way that Jeb Bush talked about it,” said Janet Murguia, president of the National Council of La Raza, the country’s largest Hispanic civil rights organization. “Some may argue that a bold country-first stance on immigration cannot win the nomination, but what is certain is that a divisive, anti-immigration stance does not win the presidency in a nation of immigrants.”

In contrast to the 2012 nomination fight, most of the potential 2016 presidential contenders have signaled support for some kind of immigration overhaul. But they remain deeply divided over whether legislation should offer a pathway to citizenship for those living here illegally. After the Senate passed a bipartisan measure last year that would do just that, the barrage of conservative criticism virtually silenced the GOP’s most outspoken immigration advocates, including Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.

The furor over Bush’s remarks shows the potential perils of picking up the issue, especially in the early voting states that play an outsized role in choosing party nominees. Bush’s “act of love” comment was pithy and provocative enough to stir deep discomfort in a party still searching for a single message on the subject. And it challenged GOP officials to disagree without further alienating a voter group they’re trying to attract.

“We appreciate the compassion in the statement, but the best compassion you can show a people is to uphold justice,” said Tamara Scott, a RNC committeewoman and prominent Christian conservative in Iowa.

Bush, the two-term, Spanish-speaking former governor of a state with a booming Hispanic population, has struggled to articulate his views in a party that has changed dramatically since the last time he ran for office in 2002.

Last year, Bush released a book that championed legal status_but not citizenship— for illegal immigrants, seemingly contradicting his past statements. But in recent months, he has been giving speeches around the country that often include a full-throated defense of an immigration overhaul. Speaking at a recent financial advisers’ conference in Florida, Bush lauded immigrants as “the risk takers,” arguing that they embody the entrepreneurial spirit of America and invigorate the country’s economy.

Katon Dawson, a South Carolina Republican strategist and Perry adviser, said Bush is wise to detail his nuanced positions so that potential rivals can’t easily define his immigration stance if he decides to run.

“Look, the word ‘amnesty’ is a killer” in a Republican primary, Dawson said. “So you’ve got to take every chance you get to explain yourself ahead of the campaign.”

___

Associated Press writer Bill Barrow contributed to this report.

___

Follow Michael J. Mishak on Twitter: https://twitter.com/mjmishak

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/jeb-bush-remarks-expose-gops-immigration-problem-190154806–election.html
Jeb Bush remarks expose GOP's immigration problem
http://news.yahoo.com/jeb-bush-remarks-expose-gops-immigration-problem-190154806–election.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Volokh Conspiracy: Frederick Douglass on immigration

Volokh Conspiracy: Frederick Douglass on immigration
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636635/s/393663e9/sc/7/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cfrederick0Edouglass0Eon0Eimmigration0C20A140C0A40C10A0C7edfca0Ad0Ea87f0E44dc0Ebbdd0E59ce0Aa1ab4230Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Inational/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Nebraska city ready to enforce immigration rules

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Four years after Fremont residents first voted to impose restrictions on illegal immigration, the small Nebraska city will finally start requiring renters to get a $5 permit on Thursday.

Earlier this year, nearly 60 percent of voters in the conservative city of about 26,000 again backed the housing restrictions that require renters to swear they have legal permission to live in the United States and prohibit landlords from renting to anyone without a city permit.

The housing restrictions originally adopted in 2010 had been on hold while lawsuits challenging them worked their way through the courts, and the City Council gave voters a chance to reconsider in February.

Now a U.S. Supreme Court review is about the only thing that could stop the permits from being issued.

“Unless the U.S. Supreme Court jumps in during the next few hours, we’re going ahead,” Fremont Police Chief Jeff Elliott said Wednesday afternoon.

The civil rights groups that challenged Fremont’s immigration ordinance in court have asked the nation’s high court to evaluate the appeals court ruling that upheld it. And the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska has said it will be watching implementation of the rental rules closely for examples of discrimination that might be grounds for a new lawsuit.

Critics say the immigration restrictions are ineffective and might cost Fremont millions of dollars in legal fees and lost federal grants. They also believe the ordinance has hurt the image of Fremont, which is about 30 miles northwest of Omaha.

Most other cities that have tried to restrict illegal immigration — including Hazelton, Pa., and Farmers Branch, Texas — have wound up mired in costly court battles.

Beginning Thursday, Elliott said adult renters are required to get the licenses before moving into an apartment or home. Current renters don’t have to get permits, but a new permit is required with each move within the city. Application forms in English and Spanish are available at the police station or on the city’s website, www.fremontne.gov .

Applicants will be asked to supply basic identifying information and swear whether or not they have legal permission to be in the country, either as citizens or legal residents. No identification is required.

Initially, everyone who fills out the form and pays the fee will be issued a permit. But those who say they aren’t U.S. citizens will have their information submitted to a federal database for review.

If the federal government says an applicant is not in the country legally, police will begin revocation procedures. But Elliott said the ordinance prohibits Fremont police from investigating anyone’s citizenship status.

It’s difficult to determine how many people live in Fremont illegally. According to census figures, the town is home to 1,150 noncitizens. That figure includes immigrants who do not have permission to be in the U.S., as well as lawful permanent residents, foreign students and refugees who are legally in the U.S.

If a license is revoked, both the renter and the landlord will be informed.

Elliott said that if the landlord continues to allow a renter without a license to stay, the landlord could be fined $100. The ordinance doesn’t specify any penalties for renters.

Another section of Fremont’s immigration ordinance that requires employers to use a federal online system to check whether prospective employees are permitted to work in the U.S. has been in place since 2012. Many larger employers, including the major meatpacking plants just outside Fremont, were already using that federal E-Verify system before the ordinance was adopted.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/nebraska-city-ready-enforce-immigration-rules-214811964.html
Nebraska city ready to enforce immigration rules
http://news.yahoo.com/nebraska-city-ready-enforce-immigration-rules-214811964.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform will happen: Jack Lew

Immigration reform will happen, and the public has grown far too pessimistic on its prospects, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told CNBC on Wednesday.

Lew said he believes lawmakers will come to a resolution on reforms languishing in Congress for the past year. After months of false starts, Lew said, there’s now enough consensus among lawmakers to act.

“I personally believe there will be a resolution on immigration reform,” Lew said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “And we’re all going to have to work hard to make that happen.”

Lew declined to attach his own economic value on reforms that would create a new path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants.

He deferred to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which last year found that immigration reform would increase real GDP by 3.3 percent in 10 years and help drive down the federal debt.

Read More Jack Lew: ‘Main Street’ hasn’t been made whole yet

Putting more workers “on the books” would increase the tax base and help fund cash-strapped programs such as Social Security and Medicare, Lew said.

“It’s the right thing to do,” Lew said. “It’s the history of our country, how we’ve grown as a country. It’s how we’ve prospered.”

—By CNBC’s Jeff Morganteen.

Source Article from http://www.cnbc.com/id/101568692
Immigration reform will happen: Jack Lew
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101568692
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration policing protested in Doña Ana County

LAS CRUCES – Dozens of demonstrators holding signs in Spanish denouncing “la poli-migra” – the immigration police – protested outside the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office on Tuesday.

Members of the Border Network for Human Rights, which organized the demonstration, said they had collected 10,876 signatures in a petition asking the sheriff to “instruct his deputies to stop asking questions regarding immigration status” during routine traffic stops – a practice the Sheriff’s Office denies.

“What we want is for there to stop being abuses against our community,” said Claudia Díaz, Border Network for Human Rights coordinator for Anthony.

The petition follows a December report by the network documenting 10 cases in which Doña Ana County deputies allegedly enforced federal immigration law. At the time, the Sheriff’s Office noted it handles tens of thousands of traffic citations each year and receives few complaints.

Sheriff spokeswoman Kelly Jameson said, “We don’t ask immigration status on a casual contact with somebody.” Deputies are tasked with establishing a person’s identity during a stop, primarily to establish whether warrants exist for their arrest.

Jameson said the office does not have a written policy regarding immigration enforcement. However, deputies are “not trained to inspect documents related to immigration status,” she said. “People’s immigration status is really none of our concern.”

Several demonstrators had personal stories of traffic stops by sheriff’s deputies that ended with the arrival of immigration authorities.

Lilia Rivera of Las Cruces alleges a deputy stopped her for an expired sticker, then called immigration authorities after she couldn’t produce a valid license. María Ceniceros of Las Cruces said she signed the petition after a deputy allegedly stopped her son and then called “la migra.”

Jameson said all traffic stops are recorded and the office is available to review any case in which a name, date and time are provided.

Doña Ana County voters in November will elect a new sheriff to replace Todd Garrison, whose term ends Dec. 31.

Seven candidates – five Democrats and two Republicans – have announced their intention to run, and campaign posters have gone up around Las Cruces and surrounding communities. It’s not clear whether immigration issues will play a role in the campaign.

Source Article from http://www.abqjournal.com/381033/news/immigration-policing-protested.html
Immigration policing protested in Doña Ana County
http://www.abqjournal.com/381033/news/immigration-policing-protested.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform 'love': Did Jeb Bush comment change shape of 2016 race? (+video)

Jeb Bush is going to run for president in 2016, unless he decides that he won’t. Or is it the other way around – he’s out, but reserves the right to jump in? In any case that’s the (hazy) bottom line from the ex-Florida governor’s appearance on Sunday at the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum. At the talk, Mr. Bush did not announce a candidacy but said he’ll decide whether or not to try for the presidency by the end of this year.

Skip to next paragraph


Washington Editor

Peter Grier is The Christian Science Monitor’s Washington editor. In this capacity, he helps direct coverage for the paper on most news events in the nation’s capital.

Recent posts


“It turns out that not running has generated way more interest than running,” he said, to laughter from the crowd assembled to celebrate the 25th anniversary of his father George H.W. Bush’s administration. “I’m not that smart, it just kind of happened that way.”

Bush said his decision would depend upon two “simple things”: whether he could run a campaign with an optimistic message and not get sucked into the “vortex of the mud fight” and whether it’s OK for his family.

“All the tactics of a campaign aren’t nearly as relevant because I don’t think you can predict the context of a campaign this far out,” said Bush, the son of one president and brother of another.

However, for all his studied indecision as to whether he’ll throw his heritage in the ring and try for a Bush three-peat, Bush did do something which could well reverberate throughout the GOP primary season. He repeated that he’s a strong defender of the nationalized Common Core education standards, and that he supports immigration reform over the objections of the conservative wing of the party.

“We need to elect candidates that have a vision that is bigger and broader, and candidates that are organized around winning the election, not making a point,” said Bush to a Fox News interviewer on stage at his dad’s presidential library. “Campaigns ought to be about listening and learning and getting better. I do think we’ve lost our way.”

What Bush is doing here is preemptively discussing his weaknesses within the GOP, write Chuck Todd and the rest of the NBC “First Read” gang this morning.

Both issues are so controversial among Republicans that, if he runs, some of his competitors will surely try to use his stances against him.

“These issues could be two Achilles’ heels for him in a competitive Republican primary, in part because they are such raw, emotional issues,” write Mr. Todd and his compatriots.

In particular, immigration reform has already tied the party’s elected members in knots, as conservatives who oppose any sort of “amnesty” for undocumented immigrants fight with establishment Republicans who believe that the GOP must deal with the reality of the problem and the growing importance of the Hispanic vote.

So in raising immigration again – and repeating his assertion that immigrants sneak into the country as an “act of love” to help provide for their families – Bush may have ensured that the party will settle this internal dispute once and for all in the 2016 race, whether he runs or not.

That’s because Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida pretty much shares Bush’s view on this issue, and has fought to pass some sort of immigration reform in Congress. He’s gotten battered by the right in the process.

Senator Rubio is likely to run, especially if Bush does not. And Bush has now laid down a marker on immigration for both of them.

Bush’s statements on the issue “will answer the question about his own electability in a contest that tests the most conservative credentials of its contenders. Or it will provide some running room for people closer to his own views on immigration,” according to Bloomberg’s Mark Silva.

Thus Bush on Sunday may have issued a direct challenge to the tea party wing of the Republicans: Let’s see what you’ve got. Their response, and how that plays out in polls over the coming months, could well be a major influence on whether he ends up running or not.

Source Article from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/Decoder-Buzz/2014/0407/Immigration-reform-love-Did-Jeb-Bush-comment-change-shape-of-2016-race-video
Immigration reform 'love': Did Jeb Bush comment change shape of 2016 race? (+video)
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/Decoder-Buzz/2014/0407/Immigration-reform-love-Did-Jeb-Bush-comment-change-shape-of-2016-race-video
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results