Why is Obama unveiling immigration changes in Las Vegas?

It looks like Washington’s coming uproar over immigration finally has a starting date. On Friday, President Obama will announce details of his long-awaited executive moves delaying deportation for up to 5 million unauthorized immigrants, according to multiple news reports on Wednesday.

It’s possible the White House may release a broad outline of the plan on Thursday, according to CNBC. Then Mr. Obama could use his already-planned trip to Las Vegas as the forum for explaining the move in depth and justifying his actions.

The order is expected to affect, at the least, the parents and guardians of children who are American citizens or have green cards. It’s possible that Obama could expand this to include other subgroups of immigrants living in the shadows.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

Any changes Obama could order in this area would of necessity be temporary. The president does not have the power to alter eligibility for citizenship or green cards. As a legal matter, he does have the power to defer prosecution for many offenses, as the government doesn’t have the resources to pursue all lawbreakers at the same time.

The order will set up a ferocious debate with House and Senate Republicans who oppose Obama’s impending actions as executive overreach that take prosecutorial discretion much too far. Many in the GOP describe Obama’s approach as “amnesty” for people who have entered the country illegally.

The choice of Nevada as a venue for the rollout of the immigration moves is an interesting one. It’s the home state of soon-to-be Senate minority leader Harry Reid, who faces a very tough reelection fight in 2016.

It’s unlikely the president would be speaking on immigration this Friday in Nevada unless he’d first run the idea by Senator Reid.

Obama traveled to Las Vegas for a major 2013 speech on immigration. At the time he was pushing broad bipartisan immigration reform legislation in the Senate. That approach is now stuck in the GOP-controlled House.

Nevada has a small population, but a high percentage of undocumented immigrants. According to Pew Research data, in 2012 it had the highest percentage of such residents in the United States: 7.6 percent.

It also has the highest percentage of illegal immigrants in its labor force, at 10.2 percent. And crucially for the White House, it has in its schools many, many children of these workers. In Nevada, 17.7 percent of students in K-12 schools have at least one undocumented parent.

“Yes, this is about immigration, about Reid, about Nevada. Bye 2014 cycle; hello, 2016,” tweeted Jon Ralston, a well-known Nevada political reporter, after news broke of the impending presidential visit.

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/why-obama-unveiling-immigration-changes-las-vegas-172425217.html
Why is Obama unveiling immigration changes in Las Vegas?
http://news.yahoo.com/why-obama-unveiling-immigration-changes-las-vegas-172425217.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Clock counts down on immigration

Washington (CNN) — President Barack Obama, who will act on immigration reform by the end of the year, and his administration have not finalized plans on the issue, but he’s aware of the general details in the expected plan, according to sources in the government and elsewhere who have been briefed on the White House plans.

At the end of the day it will all come down to what the legal team thinks can be defended in court, in addition to some political considerations, sources say.

“It’s not like this is the Academy Awards,” one official told CNN recently, meaning that the contents of the envelope are not a surprise.

Citing his legal authority as chief executive of the United States, Obama said in a press conference in Myanmar Friday that he would act on immigration reform by the end of the year.

“I believe that America is a nation of immigrants,” the President said. Everybody agrees that the system is broken; there has been ample opportunity for Congress to pass a bipartisan immigration bill that would strengthen our borders, improve the legal immigration system and lift millions of people out of the shadows so that they are paying taxes and getting right by the law.”

Obama issues new immigration ultimatum

Sen. Cruz targets immigration, internet

Hoyer: Obama should act on immigration

Boehner’s tough words for Obama on immigration

The senior White House official who spoke to CNN said that any executive action could come as soon as this week. The White House is also not going to yield to threats of a shutdown.

Asked Tuesday about a potential scenario in which Congressional Republicans would try to defund Obama’s immigration action in an upcoming spending bill. White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Wednesday that the president’s actions would be within the law.

“We would consider it to be unwarranted for Republicans in Congress to try to undo that executive action using the budget process,” Earnest told reporters, casting doubt that such an a move would “determine the outcome at all” of Obama’s actions.

Warnings from Republicans are not affecting White House plans, according to the official, who said the White House is not going to command less in the executive action order just to appease furious lawmakers. Obama Friday encouraged Congress to act on immigration and said he told Republican congressional leaders that he was interested in working on a legislative solution, but without that he would act.

“I indicated to (House) Speaker (John) Boehner several months ago that if in fact Congress failed to act I would use all the lawful authority that I possess to try and make the system work better. And that’s gonna happen, that’s gonna happen before the end of the year,” said Obama.

The senior White House official said that before issuing any order the president will review his administration’s proposals for extending deportation relief to undocumented immigrants with American-born children and those who entered the United States as children themselves.

Another senior administration official told CNN that the main contours of the executive action are three-fold: direct immigration agents to allow parents of children who are American citizens to obtain documents that allows them to stay in the United States legally, protect illegal immigrants who came to the United States as children and make clear deportation should still be the policy for convicted criminals.

The plans appear to exclude any parents of “Dreamers,” those who were brought in illegally as children who already have deferred action themselves from Obama’s earlier action, according to sources.

Though the general details of the plan are known, it is still in flux, and may change by the time it is announced, according to two other sources briefed on the subject who shared more in-depth details under consideration with CNN.

Those sources said that the plan includes a focus on deporting criminal illegal immigrants. The final number of immigrants shielded will be affected by restrictions such as whether people with police infractions such as a DUI can qualify, they said.

The plan would include an expansion of visas in certain categories of workers such as those in the technology industry, which is popular with the business community, and more resources to protect the border, according to the sources.

The move has been the subject of months of anticipation. But with lame duck legislative wrangling underway on Capitol Hill, the president’s advisers could also wait until next month to make a final decision on how to repair a system both Republicans and Democrats admit needs fixing.

And while officials say the specifics of what he will announce haven’t been finalized, the broad outlines of a potential plan that eases deportations for millions of undocumented immigrants have been floated by immigration groups for months.

For the multitude of groups who are watching the process unfold, the moment is charged.

“Without hesitation I can say the level of anticipation is intense. We were hoping this would happen in September,” said Clarissa Martinez, deputy vice president of the National Council of La Raza. “It’s long overdue. The sooner the better.”

Millions affected

An expansion of Obama’s “deferred action” program (DACA) that went into place in the summer of 2012 is considered to be a likely component of Obama’s immigration action, according to two sources close to the plan who spoke to CNN. DACA delayed deportation proceedings for undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States by their parents as children.

In the DACA plan there were caveats on who was eligible. In order to apply, immigrants needed to be younger than 31 at the time the rule was enacted, and younger than 16 when they were brought to the United States. And applicants are required to either be in school, have earned a high school degree or be honorably discharged veterans.

The Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, says 1.2 million people were eligible under those rules and nearly 700,000 applied for deferred deportation, with hundreds of thousands more aging into the requirements over the next decade.

But many more would become eligible if Obama expands, or eliminates altogether, those requirements, which were meant to encompass the same sector that would have qualified for permanent resident status under the DREAM Act, which has languished in Congress.

The sources said that some parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, or so-called “green-card holders,” would be granted legal status that allows them to work and avoid deportation. The President’s plan would affect those parents who have been in the United States five years. That move would bring another 3.4 million people into the eligibility ranks, according to a Migration Policy Institute analysis.

According to the two sources who spoke to CNN, any executive action is not expected to include broader use of so-called “parole” status. While some pro-immigration advocates support this idea, it is seen as a red line by many conservatives who view it as a potential way to provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens. Currently such parole status is provided to spouses and family members of people serving in the U.S. military. If the parents of children who are eligible under the current DACA rules were included, the number would rise to 3.7 million.

Changing those rules could also expand the eligible population: eliminating the education requirement, for example, would allow 430,000 more undocumented immigrants to be eligible for deferred deportation, the Migration Policy Institute estimates.

And allowing people over 30 who were brought to the United States by undocumented parents would allow another 200,000 immigrants to apply, the think-tank’s report says.

Immigration activists, frustrated with the rate of deportations under Obama and further exasperated with the delay in Obama’s immigration action, have been urging the White House to go big and expand the deferred deportation order in a way that allows the maximum number of people to stay.

But many who have been watching the process closely believe the eventual announcement will fall short of those appeals.

Political football

Whatever Obama finally decides — and at this point, the options seem clear — he’ll be met with fierce blowback from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who have spent months preparing for the announcement by warning of executive overreach and political well-poisoning.

The White House yielded to politics once already, delaying the immigration announcement from its promised debut this summer to a new date before the end of this year. The move was meant to shield vulnerable Democrats from political attacks on the topic; many of them lost their races anyway.

The postponement wasn’t met kindly from immigration groups, who said there wasn’t time to spare on providing deportation relief for the millions of people who could be affected by new rules.

There could still be election year ramifications, since Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu remains locked in a runoff contest with a Republican rival. But with the Senate firmly in Republican hands, any further delay would seem to offer little political advantage while only eroding support further among immigration reform activists.

“For us, every day that there’s a delay, and every day that people have to wait, means more people unjustly deported,” said Praeli.

Some Democrats want Obama to wait to announce the executive action after essential business clears the House and Senate. Sen. Harry Reid, the outgoing Senate Majority Leader, told CNN the president should hold off any immigration action until a new bill funding the federal government is approved. He said enacting the immigration plan ahead of the spending measure could anger Republicans and risk a government shutdown.

“I’d like to get the finances of this country out of the way before he does it. But it’s up to him,” Reid said.

But no matter when the action comes, it seems destined to ignite GOP furor. The near certainty of an executive action by year’s end hasn’t slowed Republican efforts to stop it: this week a Republican congressman from Texas, Rep. Joe Barton, said if Obama goes forward with the plan, impeachment proceedings could be a possibility.

Those threats aren’t exactly a new thing. Democrats have raised millions of dollars by warning their party’s base about impeachment threats from conservative House members.

More real is the threat that taking executive action on immigration forestalls any legislative effort on the matter. GOP leaders on Capitol Hill say a new plan delaying deportations would enrage Republicans, leaving little political will to push through a comprehensive overhaul of the immigration system.

Obama seems little concerned by Republican threats against making the immigration move, however, pointing out they had an opportunity to pass a bipartisan reform measure in the House but balked.

“I feel obliged to do everything I can lawfully with my executive authority to make sure that we don’t keep on making the system worse,” he said during last week’s news conference.

CNN’s Gabe LaMonica, Jim Acosta, Evan Perez and Ashley Killough contributed to this report.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/14/politics/obama-immigration/index.html
Clock counts down on immigration
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/14/politics/obama-immigration/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration Action Impact for Asian Americans

President Obama’s anticipated executive action on immigration is long overdue, but still might not include important provisions for Asian Americans, said Bill Ong Hing, founder of the Immigration Legal Resource Center and University of San Francisco law professor.

Missing from the list of policy details so far has been any positive mention of the petitioning of older siblings, the historical way Asian families have reunited in America. “We’re disappointed that wasn’t on the list,” Hing said in an interview with NBC News. “He could have taken action on that. We’re still going to fight for that.”

It’s estimated that of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, 1.4 million are either Asian or from the Pacific Islands.

Hing praised any executive action that could provide deportation relief for up to five million people by expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) and making it possible for those not here legally to apply for temporary work permits.

“There are people here who are helping society, helping the economy, have strong family ties, and make contributions to this county,” said Hing. “In my opinion, they’ve earned the right to be here.”

Hing, who recently met with top Obama advisors on the plan — including Cecilia Munoz, the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, and Esther Olavarria, Senior Advisor at the Department of Homeland Security — warns any action would be temporary, and could be reversed by future administrations.

Some Republicans have already threatened counter action. This week, Democrats closed ranks with a letter of support for immigration reform. Hing hopes Congressional leaders will find a way to come together.

“If Republicans want any chance at winning the White House,” said Hing, “they can’t afford to alienate the groups that support immigration reform.”

The full details of the plan are expected to be announced by the president this week.

IN-DEPTH



Source Article from http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663303/s/40a39822/sc/7/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cnews0Casian0Eamerica0Canticipated0Eimmigration0Eaction0Ewelcome0Efar0Eperfect0En250A771/story01.htm
Immigration Action Impact for Asian Americans
http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663303/s/40a39822/sc/7/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cnews0Casian0Eamerica0Canticipated0Eimmigration0Eaction0Ewelcome0Efar0Eperfect0En250A771/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

2 GOP presidents acted unilaterally on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two presidents have acted unilaterally on immigration — and both were Republican. Ronald Reagan and his successor George H.W. Bush extended amnesty to family members who were not covered by the last major overhaul of immigration law in 1986.

Neither faced the political uproar widely anticipated if and when President Barack Obama uses his executive authority to protect millions of immigrants from deportation.

Reagan’s and Bush’s actions were conducted in the wake of a sweeping, bipartisan immigration overhaul and at a time when “amnesty” was not a dirty word. Reagan and Bush’s actions were less controversial because there was a consensus in Washington that the 1986 law needed a few fixes and Congress was poised to act on them. Obama is acting as the country — and Washington — are bitterly divided over a broken immigration system and what to do about 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally.

Obama wants to extend protection from deportation to millions of immigrant parents and spouses of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, and expand his 2-year-old program that shields immigrants brought illegally to this country as children.

A tea party-influenced GOP is poised to erupt, if and when Obama follows through on his promise.

“The audacity of this president to think he can completely destroy the rule of law with the stroke of a pen is unfathomable to me,” said GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, an outspoken opponent of relaxing U.S. immigration law. “It is unconstitutional, it is cynical, and it violates the will of the American people.”

Some Republicans have even raised the possibility of impeachment.

Here’s a timeline of then and now:

—1986. Congress and Reagan enacted a sweeping overhaul that gave legal status to up to 3 million immigrants without authorization to be in the country, if they had come to the U.S. before 1982. Spouses and children who could not meet that test did not qualify, which incited protests that the new law was breaking up families.

—1987. Early efforts in Congress to amend the law to cover family members failed. Reagan’s Immigration and Naturalization Service commissioner announced that minor children of parents granted amnesty by the law would get protection from deportation. Spouses and children of couples in which one parent qualified for amnesty but the other did not remained subject to deportation, leading to efforts to amend the 1986 law.

—1989. By a sweeping 81-17 vote, the Senate in July voted to prohibit deportations of family members of immigrants covered by the 1986 law. The House failed to act.

—1990. In February, President George H.W. Bush, acting through the Immigration and Naturalization Service, established a “family fairness” in which family members living with a legalizing immigrant and who were in the U.S. before passage of the 1986 law were granted protection from deportation and authorized to seek employment. The administration estimated up to 1.5 million people would be covered by the policy. Congress in October passed a broader immigration law that made the protections permanent.

—2012. In July, the Obama administration announces a new policy curbing deportations for certain immigrants brought illegally to the country as kids. The policy, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), applies to people younger than 30 who were brought to the U.S. before they turned 16 and meet other criteria such as graduating high school. It has now granted two-year deportation reprieves and work permits to nearly 600,000 people.

—2013-2014 (Congress). After months of work, the Senate in June of 2013 passes, 68-32, a huge immigration overhaul bill that includes a path to citizenship for immigrants who meet strict criteria. The House fails to act. In a televised interview with Telemundo, Obama says expanding the DACA program to cover the parents of children allowed to remain in the country under the program “would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally. So that’s not an option.”

—2014 Frustrated by Congress’ inability to act on immigration, Obama announces in June that he’ll use executive powers to cover as many as 5 million people. Like Bush, Obama is expected to extend deportation protections to families of U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Obama’s anticipated action would not award legal status, but it would offer temporary protection from deportation and the possibility of obtaining a work permit. He delayed action until after Election Day. On Monday, Democratic leaders sent a letter to Obama saying they strongly support his plans to take executive action on immigration.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/reagan-bush-acted-alone-shield-immigrants-171420251.html
2 GOP presidents acted unilaterally on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/reagan-bush-acted-alone-shield-immigrants-171420251.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration isn't impeachable offense

Editor’s note: Ruben Navarrette is a CNN contributor and a nationally syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group. Follow him on Twitter: @rubennavarrette. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

(CNN) — Like misery, failure loves company. Look at the immigration debate and how both liberals and conservatives — and elected officials in both parties — bungle it.

President Barack Obama has failed on immigration policy. But now that he appears to be poised to take executive action to fix some of what’s broken with the country’s immigration system, Republicans in Congress sound like they’re about to overreact and join him in that failure.

Conservatives love to stir their flock by pushing the narrative that Obama is a staunch supporter of “amnesty” and that the President has always been in lockstep with immigration reform advocates.

Ruben Navarrette Jr.

That’s fiction. It’s been a rocky relationship. That’s because Obama belongs to that wing of the Democratic Party that hasn’t been interested in legalizing the undocumented and creating more competition in the job market for U.S. workers.

Obama broke his campaign promise to make reform a top issue and eroded trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement by expanding 100-fold the program known as Secure Communities, which ropes local police into enforcing federal immigration law. He tried to fend off critics who wanted him to slow deportations by claiming that he didn’t have the power to act “as a king,” only to later flip-flop and do just that during his 2012 re-election campaign when he unveiled Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

Obama, GOP ready to fight on immigration

Does Obama have the legal authority?

Obama deported a record 2 million people in five years, divided hundreds of thousands of families, failed to deal effectively with thousands of child refugees who streamed across the U.S.-Mexico border last summer and then broke another promise when he said he would take executive action on immigration before the midterm elections but blinked.

Now, according to news reports that look like a trial balloon from the White House, Obama might, as early as this week, take unilateral action to offer several million illegal immigrants a temporary reprieve from deportation and perhaps even give some of them work permits.

If it materializes, I’ll be proved wrong. A few months ago, I said this would never happen and now it looks like it might.

Options include some common sense items: Eliminating Secure Communities; broadening DACA by eliminating restrictions on how old applicants can be and when they had to have arrived; restating that the enforcement priority should be to remove violent criminals and not housekeepers and students; and expanding visa programs for immigrant spouses of U.S. citizens.

But it’s the final item on the list that could really upset the apple cart: deferred action for parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, which could result in as many as 4 million to 5 million people getting a temporary reprieve from deportation. When those undocumented college students known as DREAMers first argued for special treatment, the claim was based on the simple idea that they were brought here as children and thus didn’t intentionally choose to break the law.

Fair enough. But the same thing can’t be said of their parents, who did intentionally break the law. Now what? Is there a new argument?

Besides, if Obama offers deferred action to parents, it will validate what conservatives have always insisted about how the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants can be used to keep their parents from being deported.

That has never been the case. Parents get deported all the time, and their U.S.-citizen kids either go with them or stay on this side of the border and get put in foster care. Republicans have been wrong all along. Now, if he goes too far, Obama could prove them right.

If the President follows through on the proposed course of action, both sides will need to calm down.

Those on the left should hold their applause. By ending the deportation juggernaut, the President would merely be putting out a fire that he started. Besides, this is just a temporary reprieve that would require the undocumented to surrender to law enforcement officials, get fingerprinted and all the rest. And it could all be revoked by the next president.

Finally, this is not what Obama promised way back when — that he would work aggressively with Congress to pass legislation that would permanently improve the lives of millions. This isn’t reform. It’s “reform lite.”

Yet at the same time, those on the right need to rein in their scorn. In the post 9/11 era, conservatives shouldn’t need a reminder of something they’ve been telling us for years: how sweeping can be the executive power of the president. As head of the executive branch, Obama naturally has the power to set priorities for the enforcement of immigration law.

Republicans have no trouble deflecting criticism by reminding Latino voters that Obama is in charge of deportations. So, instead of threatening the suicidal tantrums of a government shutdown or impeachment, conservatives should pipe down and let him be in charge of deportations. That doesn’t just mean deciding who goes but also who stays.

Besides, Republicans like to talk tough about illegal immigration and the need to uphold the “rule of law” but that slogan would mean more coming from them if they didn’t always run away from enforcing those laws that target the root of illegal immigration: U.S. employers who hire the undocumented, many of whom contribute to the re-election campaigns of Republican lawmakers.

What Obama has in mind isn’t some kindhearted miracle or the coming of the apocalypse. It’s just a legitimate exercise of the power that any president would have under the Constitution and our system of government.

I know that isn’t sexy, or inspiring, or inflammatory. It won’t help the parties fundraise. But it does have the advantage of being true.

Read CNNOpinion’s new Flipboard magazine.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.

Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.


Source Article from http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/16/opinion/navarrette-immigration-not-impeachable-offense/index.html?eref=edition
Immigration isn't impeachable offense
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/16/opinion/navarrette-immigration-not-impeachable-offense/index.html?eref=edition
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Nothing to lose on immigration, Obama pushes ahead on his own

Immigration must be a frustrating subject for President Obama. He’s been battling Republicans – those in Congress, and those trying to take his job in 2012 – for years.

But now, one senses a sort of serenity about immigration for Obama.

He never has to run for election again. And the newly-powerful GOP on Capitol Hill has yet to sort itself out on a clear immigration policy and message – not least because it has at least three US Senators with strong presidential ambitions (Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul).

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

Remember how Republican presidential hopefuls two years ago got twisted up trying to out-tough-guy each other on illegal immigrants? Mitt Romney’s “self-deportation” was classic. When Rick Perry tried to explain state tuition breaks for young illegal immigrants in Texas, the others pounced.

As Newt Gingrich said at the time, “It’s a very complicated situation.”

Today, of course, it’s only gotten more complicated. Meanwhile, Republican Party leaders know they need to do a lot better attracting Latino voters, the great majority of whom (71-27 percent) went for Obama over Romney two years ago.

Soon, Obama is expected to issue an executive order removing the threat of deportation for upward of 5 million immigrants in the US illegally – mainly the parents of children born in this country and therefore US citizens.

Since the US Department of Homeland Security has the resources to deport only a few hundred thousand illegal immigrants a year (of the estimated 11 million in the country today), the order in essence would move those 5 million to the bottom of the list of those eligible for deportation.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and some other Democrats say Obama’s promised executive action on immigration should wait until Congress passes a funding bill, which would avert another government shutdown.

But immigration reform advocates argue otherwise, and the recent midterm election may have pushed Obama to move sooner rather than later.

Democrats no longer have to worry that the Senate runoff in Louisiana will tip the balance of power,” Seung Min Kim and Carrie Budoff Brown write in Politico.com. “The West Wing assumes Republicans will use immigration to gum up the government funding bill no matter when Obama announces the executive actions. And the pressure to move quickly only intensified this week as details of the plan leaked, giving Republicans free rein to bloody it.”

Signals from the voting public on immigration are mixed.

A Pew Research Center survey in July found 61 percent said it is important to pass significant immigration legislation this year.

‘But there is a wide partisan gap among the public as to how immigration reform should be approached,’ Pew reported. “More than half (53 percent) of Republicans said the priority should be on better border security and stronger law enforcement, compared with just 19 percent of Democrats who said the same…. By contrast, 33 percent of Democrats favored prioritizing a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants, compared with 9 percent of Republicans.”

Some 45 percent of Democrats and 36 percent of Republicans said both approaches should be given equal priority, according to Pew, which adds up to comprehensive immigration reform – the thing that has eluded the White House and Congress.

“There is a very simple solution to this perception that somehow I’m exercising too much executive authority: pass a bill I can sign on this issue,” Obama Sunday said at a news conference at the conclusion of the G20 Summit in Brisbane, Australia.

If Congress does act, Obama said, “Metaphorically, I’ll crumple up whatever executive actions that we take and we’ll toss them in the wastebasket because we will now have a law that addresses these issues.”

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/nothing-lose-immigration-obama-pushes-ahead-own-170055349.html
Nothing to lose on immigration, Obama pushes ahead on his own
http://news.yahoo.com/nothing-lose-immigration-obama-pushes-ahead-own-170055349.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Oregon immigration vote is a warning for Obama

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The fate of a little-noticed ballot measure in strongly Democratic Oregon serves as a warning to President Barack Obama and his party about the political perils of immigration policy.

Even as Oregon voters were legalizing recreational marijuana and expanding Democratic majorities in state government, they decided by a margin of 66-34 to cancel a new state law that would have provided driver’s licenses to people who are in the United States illegally.

Obama is considering acting on his own, as early as this week, to possibly shield from deportation up to 5 million immigrants now living illegally in the country. Some Republicans in Congress are threatening a government shutdown if the president follows through.

“The Oregon measure tells you these measures are not easy or simple,” said Muzaffar Chishti of the Migration Policy Institute. “The political cost may be significant, even in blue states.”

The state law had seemed to be popular. It easily passed last year with bipartisan support in the Democratic-controlled Legislature and was signed Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber, who was re-elected Nov. 4.

Opponents barely gathered enough signatures to put the repeal question on the ballot. Immigrant rights groups outspent their opponents 10-1.

Still, the measure failed in every county but the state’s most liberal one, Multnomah, home to Portland. Even there it trailed significantly behind other Democratic candidates and causes.

“It was really the epitome of a grassroots effort,” said Cynthia Kendoll, one of the activists who led the campaign against licenses. “There’s such a disconnect between what people really want and what’s happening.”

Obama made his postelection pledge on immigration despite the drubbing that Democrats took across the country. He said he had to act because Congress has deadlocked on immigration for years.

A bipartisan Senate bill to provide citizenship to many of the 11 million people in the U.S. illegally died in the Republican-controlled House, and with the GOP now holding a majority in the Senate, many believe it is unlikely any broad immigration measure could make it to Obama before the end of his term.

Allowing immigrants in the U.S. illegally to remain in the country generally polls well. Even 57 percent of the conservative-leaning national electorate that voted Nov. 4 favors legalization, according to exit polling for the Associated Press and other news organizations.

Immigration has been seen as a winning issue for Democrats because Hispanic and Asian populations account for an increasing share of the electorate, especially in presidential years.

Eleven other states have granted driver’s licenses to people in the U.S. illegally, and 17 allow them to pay in-state tuition at public universities.

But Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C., which advocates more restrictions on immigration, says voters often are befuddled by complex immigration proposals and polling questions, overstating the actual support for an immigration overhaul.

The Oregon vote, he said, is proof of that.

“Whenever the public gets that sort of clear-cut, black-and-white issue for tougher controls — even in Oregon, when they’re legalizing dope — they support them,” Krikorian said. “It really highlights how this issue is not a Republican-liberal issue like, say, taxes and abortion, but an up-down issue, elites versus the public.”

Greg Olson, a lifelong Portland resident and conservative, was pleasantly surprised the driver’s license law was repealed by such a large margin in his liberal state. “Licensing for driving I think is a privilege for a legal citizen,” Olson said.

Oregon immigrant rights groups argue that the issue wasn’t as clear as opponents are suggesting after the fact. The state has a relatively small immigrant community — only 12 percent of the population is Hispanic and 3 percent Asian, below the national average for both ethnic groups.

Because relatively little money was spent on the campaign, voters did not know why they should preserve the licenses, said Andrea Miller, director of the Oregon immigrant-rights group Causa.

“This was a very nuanced, very complex measure,” Miller said. “Just because someone voted no doesn’t mean they don’t accept the immigrant community. It doesn’t mean that they don’t want immigration reform. It means they don’t want that particular solution for Oregon.”

Marshall Fitz of the Center for American Progress in Washington, which has argued that Obama should act, acknowledged that the first response of many voters may be unfavorable to immigrant rights groups’ cause.

“Is there an instinct toward security, hunkering down and against welcoming the other?” Fitz said. “That’s part of human nature. But that doesn’t mean instincts can’t be overcome by reason.”

___

Online:

Oregon election results: http://oregonvotes.gov/results/2014G/1415319963.html

___

Follow Jonathan J. Cooper on Twitter at https://twitter.com/jjcooper and Nicholas Riccardi at https://twitter.com/NickRiccardi .

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/oregon-immigration-vote-warning-obama-132923803.html
Oregon immigration vote is a warning for Obama
http://news.yahoo.com/oregon-immigration-vote-warning-obama-132923803.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration executive actions expected from Obama before year-end: official

President Barack Obama is expected to announce a series of executive actions on immigration issues before the end of the year, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson said on Saturday, a move that could anger Republican lawmakers.

Johnson told a conference at the Reagan Presidential Library that the current immigration system had serious problems and reforms were clearly needed. Given the failure of Congress to pass legislation, the Obama administration could resolve some issues under existing legal authorities, he said.

Johnson provided few details, but said the executive actions would be comprehensive and would include measures aimed at strengthening border security.

“We’re in the final stages of developing some executive actions,” Johnson said. “We have a broken immigration system. The more I delve into it, the more problems I see.”

Guatemala’s President Otto Perez said in an interview with Venezuelan broadcaster Telesur that U.S. Vice President Joe Biden had told him and the leaders of Honduras and El Salvador during talks on Friday the actions would be “very important.”

Perez said he expected the measures to be announced by late November or early December and would benefit many migrants from the three Central American countries, without elaborating.

The three nations have been at the center of a U.S. political row this year after the apprehension of record numbers of unaccompanied minors from Central America trying to enter the United States to escape poverty and violence in their homelands.

Republicans, who won control of the Senate in the Nov. 4 election, have warned Obama that executive action on immigration would poison hopes for bipartisan cooperation in Congress.

Asked on Thursday if there was a way for Republicans to block Obama on immigration without a government shutdown over funding the government, House Speaker John Boehner said: “We’ll find out.”

Several House Republicans, including some in leadership, said on Friday they were trying to find alternatives that would stop short of directly threatening a government shutdown.

A vocal group of conservatives is pressing to ban funds needed to implement any move that would allow millions of undocumented immigrants to stay and work in the United States.

The New York Times reported on Thursday that Obama plans to announce an overhaul of U.S. immigration policy through executive action that would shield up to 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Reuters

Copyright © 2014, Chicago Tribune

Source Article from http://chicagotribune.feedsportal.com/c/34253/f/622809/s/4084a0b3/sc/1/l/0L0Schicagotribune0N0Cnews0Cchi0Eobama0Eimmigration0E20A1411150Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
Immigration executive actions expected from Obama before year-end: official
http://chicagotribune.feedsportal.com/c/34253/f/622809/s/4084a0b3/sc/1/l/0L0Schicagotribune0N0Cnews0Cchi0Eobama0Eimmigration0E20A1411150Estory0Bhtml0Dtrack0Frss/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

IMMIGRATION FIGHT GOP mulls options to stop Obama from acting alone

House Republicans are engaged in a high-stakes internal debate and political game of dare with President Obama over immigration reform — with the threat of another government shutdown resurfacing.

The president is expected by as early as next week to announce executive action on U.S. immigration law that would protect roughly 5 million illegal immigrants from deportation, change federal law-enforcement programs and expand business visas for non-citizens.

Obama made clear in the immediate aftermath of the Nov. 4 elections — in which Republicans won control of the Senate and added to their House majority — that he would move immediately on immigration, saying he has waited too long for the GOP House to act.

Republican leaders in turned warned Obama that taking executive action, particularly before they control the Senate next year, would be a bad idea.

House Speaker John Boehner on Thursday repeated his early warnings that Obama is “playing with fire” and that “executive amnesty” will keep immigration reform from getting enacted during his final six years in the White House and will jeopardize his other legislative priorities.

However, some of the most conservative House Republicans in recent days have raised the specter of using upcoming, must-pass spending bills to block Obama from acting.

They are considering passing a temporary spending bill into next year when Republicans control the Senate to try to see if they can use their grip on the purse strings to gain leverage over the president.

Pragmatists in the caucus are warning loudly that such an approach could result in a government shutdown because Obama would likely veto the bill.

Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., thinks Obama boldly announcing imminent executive action just one day after big election losses was an attempt to lure Republicans into a political trap.

“A lot of people on our side think that he’s intentionally trying to bait us into some sort of fight,” Cole told Fox News on Friday.

Cole said he wasn’t in favor of shutting down the government. But at least some House Republicans appear unconcerned about a possible shutdown and the potential backlash.

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said he wants to keep open the option of using “the power of the purse to restrain a president who has threatened to violate the Constitution in the most obscene manner possible.”

King also argues the GOP’s success in the midterms proves the party wasn’t hurt by the 2013 partial government shutdown, in an unsuccessful effort to “defund” ObamaCare.

“We picked up beaucoup seats in the House and won the vast majority in the Senate. Where’s the political penalty for doing the right and just and responsible thing?” King said.

Other options include suing the president to overturn his action or passing a stand-alone bill to try to stop him.

Some are pushing for House Republicans to write their own immigration bill to show they are serious about acting and pre-empt Obama.

But it’s not clear that any of the options will be enough to deflate the brewing efforts to use the spending bills to try to block Obama from acting.

Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who will take over as majority leader come January, both are intent upon avoiding a shutdown.

They are joined by several rank-and-file members including Pennsylvania GOP Rep. Charlie Dent.

“Shutting the government down would only serve the president’s interests and we shouldn’t take the bait,” he said.

And immigration advocates doubt the lower chamber will arrive at a bill that could pass the Senate and that Obama would sign.

The Democrat-controlled Senate last year passed bipartisan, comprehensive reform legislation, which includes a pathway to citizenship for most of the 11.5 million people in the country illegally.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., is exploring options including a lawsuit to stop Obama on immigration, aides said. House Republicans already have announced a lawsuit against Obama over his health care plan but have not yet filed it, so it could be expanded to include immigration.

Some on the right have gone so far as to suggest that Obama should be impeached if he takes unilateral action on immigration, but few if any in the House view that as a viable option, even if they think it might be merited.

“Doing something that’s an impeachable offense and getting impeached are two different things,” said Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., who’s leading the conservative effort to include language in must-pass spending bills to try to block Obama from acting. “Impeachment’s not going to be on the table.”

Meanwhile there’s debate within the White House on whether Obama should announce the immigration decision as early as next week when he returns from a trip in Asia, or wait until Congress finishes work on a government-funding bill that must be done by the time an existing one expires Dec. 11.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that “I’d like to get the finances of this country out of the way” before Obama acts. But his office provided a statement from him Friday to clarify that Congress must act to fund the government “regardless of when the president acts to provide relief to families.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

Source Article from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/15/gop-mulls-options-to-stop-obama-from-acting-alone-on-immigration-with-spending/
IMMIGRATION FIGHT GOP mulls options to stop Obama from acting alone
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/15/gop-mulls-options-to-stop-obama-from-acting-alone-on-immigration-with-spending/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration: Against GOP warnings, Obama appears set to go big (+video)

President Obama appears set to go big on immigration policy, even though a unilateral move is sure to stir up furious opposition from Republicans, who will soon have full control of Congress.

That picture became clearer Thursday as news reports cited Obama administration sources saying the president’s promised executive action could provide legal status for as many as 5 million immigrants who currently lack it.

The move could win Mr. Obama resounding praise from pro-immigrant groups, but would draw intense opposition from Republicans – and further sour relations between the president and lawmakers on issues that go well beyond immigration.

Both sides agree on the need for immigration reform, which could pair new border-security efforts with an acknowledgement that many immigrants now in the United States illegally should be granted legal residency and potential paths toward citizenship.

But with legislative efforts currently stalled, Obama pledged to take actions on his own after last week’s election. His announcement could come next week.

According to reports from The New York Times and Fox News, a centerpiece of Obama’s expected announcement will be to grant a reprieve to the parents of children who are US citizens or legal residents. They would no longer need to fear deportation when they seek jobs.

Republican critics call Obama’s anticipated move a “nuclear option” on a sensitive issue that deserves to be settled through traditional legislation.

A new Christian Science Monitor/TIPP poll finds that most Americans agree with that view.

The Obama administration has said any executive action can be superseded by legislation that is signed into law, and it has encouraged the Republican-led House to act on comprehensive reforms that have passed the Senate.

House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio warned last week that an executive action would “poison the well,” reducing rather than enhancing the chances for legislation to pass. Still, he acknowledged an urgent need for the nation to have immigration reform.

If critics call the move reckless politically, some also warn of a practical risk – that perceptions of a broad shift toward “amnesty” could result in a new rush of immigrants over the border at a time when officials already have their hands full.

According to Fox News, Obama will roll out a 10-part program of actions. The president has already granted to many immigrant children “deferred action” reprieves from deportation. The new actions ​would extend the policy to many parents and more young people. Other steps include measures to boost border security and to enhance pay for immigration officers in a morale-boosting effort, Fox reported.

Still unclear is how many of 11 million or more illegal immigrants in the US will be affected. The New York Times report said the administration is still weighing how many years people must have lived in the US to qualify for a reprieve.

By going big, Obama may help solidify support for the Democratic Party among the Hispanic Americans who represent a sizable and fast-growing share of the electorate.

In that light, Obama can be seen as taking a preemptive political strike against a Republican Party that very much needs to make inroads with Latino voters. Republicans showed some gains in Latino support last week in the elections, but political strategists caution that the voters who turn out for midterm elections tend to be more conservative than in presidential elections. Thus the GOP still has a big gap to close.

Obama faces his own political risk, though.

Many voters are concerned about what they view as lax federal policies on immigration and border security. And now Americans may view him as taking a partisan and unnecessary end run around Congress.

In the Christian Science Monitor/TIPP poll, taken in the week prior to the Nov. 4 elections, nearly 3 in 4 US adults said they think the executive action would “give the Democratic Party a significant advantage with the Latino community in future elections.”

But an even higher share (76 percent) said they favor Obama working “with Congress on immigration reform” rather than acting on his own. A majority of Democrats, independents, and Hispanics felt that way in the poll of 910 Americans, which was conducted by TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence.

Some members of Congress are considering responses such as trying to withdraw funding for Obama’s immigration efforts or even holding up a must-pass spending bill. Congress needs to pass a new funding bill by Dec. 11 to keep federal programs running for the rest of the fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, 2015.

Source Article from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2014/1113/Immigration-Against-GOP-warnings-Obama-appears-set-to-go-big-video
Immigration: Against GOP warnings, Obama appears set to go big (+video)
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2014/1113/Immigration-Against-GOP-warnings-Obama-appears-set-to-go-big-video
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results