Obama vows 'more fair and just' US immigration

Washington (AFP) – Pledging to fix America’s “broken” immigration system, President Barack Obama offered five million undocumented migrants protection from deportation Thursday, allowing families to emerge from the shadows and seek work permits.

In a move that infuriated his Republican critics, Obama said nearly all undocumented people living in country for more than five years and who have a child who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident can apply for three-year work authorization.

The president also broadened the program he launched in 2012 that provides temporary residency to young undocumented immigrants who arrived in the United States before the age of 16.

“There are actions I have the legal authority to take as president – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just,” Obama said in a 15-minute speech broadcast from the White House.

The order will affect about 44 percent of the 11.3 million people — mostly from Mexico and Central America — living in the United States illegally.

But he quickly stressed that the sweeping order, the most comprehensive immigration step in years, “does not grant citizenship, or the right to stay here permanently, or offer the same benefits that citizens receive.

“Only Congress can do that,” he added. “All we’re saying is we’re not going to deport you.”

Obama’s executive order shifts US policy from a dragnet approach to all illegal immigrants to a focus on deporting convicted felons and those who pose a danger to society.

People living and working illegally in the country and who meet the criteria can apply for deferred deportation from next spring, the White House said.

- Mass deportation ‘impossible’ -

For much of this year Republicans have warned that unilateral action on immigration would be an illegal and unconstitutional amnesty of millions of undocumented people.

But Obama shot back, saying he was taking needed action while congressional Republicans dithered.

“Mass amnesty would be unfair. Mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our character,” Obama said.

The president invoked the centuries-old history of America as a compassionate nation of immigrants, described his plan as “commonsense” accountability.

But in his words lay a warning, and a message to lawmakers that he would stand tough on immigration law.

“If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the US illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up,” he said.

Since 1986, when then-Republican president Ronald Reagan granted a sweeping amnesty, all attempts at major reform of the country’s immigration system have failed.

Faced with congressional stalemate, Obama — who made immigration a top priority on taking office in 2009 — has decided, with two years left in the White House, to take the matter into his own hands.

Under the new rules, those applying for deferred action must have a clean criminal record, pass a background check, and pay taxes.

The plan expands the program allowing temporary residency cards for minors to include those of all ages, provided they arrived in country prior to January 1, 2010 and were 16 or younger when they entered.

And it also eases legal immigration rules for high-tech workers and students in “STEM” fields — science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

- Storm brewing in Congress -

A new immigration law did pass the then-Democratically controlled Senate last year, but the Republican House of Representatives blocked it and failed to agree on its own alternative proposal.

Republicans, who will control both House and Senate in January after a huge win in this month’s midterm elections, say Obama is going too far.

Incoming Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell warned Thursday that the new Congress will exact political retribution.

“If President Obama acts in defiance of the people and imposes his will on the country, Congress will act,” he said.

The US border state of Texas wasted no time in announcing a suit.

Its attorney general Greg Abbott, the incoming governor, said: “I am prepared to immediately challenge President Obama in court, securing our state’s sovereignty and guaranteeing the rule of law.”

The political firestorm unleashed by Obama does not bode well for relations between Congress and the White House in coming months.

Republicans cannot halt a presidential decree, but they can make Obama’s last two years extremely difficult — by blocking his choices for ambassadorial and administration posts, as well as judgeships.

But with the 2016 presidential election on the horizon, the debate within the Republican Party on immigration will be lively, as it can ill afford to offend Hispanic voters, 70 percent of whom voted for Obama in 2012.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/obama-us-immigration-more-fair-just-011840461.html
Obama vows 'more fair and just' US immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-us-immigration-more-fair-just-011840461.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama: Immigration system broken, everybody knows

President Barack Obama announced his immigration reform plans to the country on Thursday. This plan, which will be enacted by executive action, “will help secure the border, hold nearly 5 million undocumented immigrants accountable, and ensure that everyone plays by the same rules,” the White House said in a press release. Obama announced the actions on immigration in an address from the White House. He is expected to sign the actions at a rally in Las Vegas on Friday. “Our immigration system is broken, and everybody knows it,” he said, later adding that his critics call the plan a form of amnesty. “Well, it’s not.” Obama said. “Amnesty is the immigration system we have today-millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time.” Obama emphasized in his address that he is instead pushing for the accountability of undocumented immigrants. “That’s the real amnesty-leaving this broken system the way it is. Mass amnesty would be unfair. Mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our character. What I’m describing is accountability-a commonsense, middle ground approach: If you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law,” the president said. “If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up.” Tweet. The three main elements of the actions will be cracking down on illegal immigration at the border; deporting felons, but not families; and establishing criminal background checks and taxes for undocumented immigrants. “By registering and passing criminal and national security background checks, millions of undocumented immigrants will start paying their fair share of taxes and temporarily stay in the U.S. without fear of deportation for three years at a time,” the White House release said. If undocumented immigrants submit to these background checks, register with the government, pay fees and show they have a child born in the U.S., then they “will have the opportunity to request temporary relief from deportation and work authorization for three years at a time.” Read More Obama being divisive: GOP Sen.

These reforms will actually make it more difficult to enter the country without documentation, Obama said, but some did not agree. Texas Governor Rick Perry said in a statement that Obama’s “decision tonight will lead to more illegal immigration, not less.” Obama addressed critics of the plan, explaining that “tracking down, rounding up, and deporting millions of people isn’t realistic. Anyone who suggests otherwise isn’t being straight with you.” “By providing individuals with an opportunity to come out of the shadows and work legally, we will also help crack down on companies who hired undocumented workers, which undermines the wages of all workers, and ensure that individuals are playing by the rules and paying their fair share of taxes,” the release said. The president’s executive actions will also expand the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. The rule currently offers temporary relief from deportation to children who had been in the country for at least five years and meet certain criteria. Now, anyone who came to the U.S. as a child can apply if they entered before Jan. 1, 2010-no matter how old they are now. The White House also said that DACA relief will be granted for three years in the country going forward.

White House tweet. Obama’s reforms will also cover a wide swath of issues related to immigration such as shifting more resources to the border, streamlining the immigration court process, and implementing a new Priority Enforcement Program that removes criminals. Additionally, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson will issue a memorandum making “clear that the government’s enforcement activity should be focused on national security threats, serious criminals, and recent border crossers,” as opposed to families. Still, some politicians said that Obama’s plan is not dealing sufficiently with undocumented entry into the country. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said in a statement that “the right way to do it is to first bring illegal immigration under control by securing the borders and enforcing the laws, then modernizing our legal immigration system.” In his address, Obama cited scripture’s call “that we shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger.” Read More Immigration puts Obama at political risk: NBC-WSJ poll While the reforms are sure to be praised by those attending the Friday rally in Las Vegas, many across the country are less favorable of a unilateral decision on the matter. A new NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll found that just 38 percent of Americans support executive action by the president on immigration without Congressional approval. “We’ve always believed it should be done by Congressional action-it’s more of a consensus way to do it,” said Russell Boening, a dairy farmer based south of San Antonio who has lobbied Washington for immigration reform for years as the state director for the Texas Farm Bureau. “That’s the right way to do it.” Despite the absence of any apparent forthcoming congressional agreement on immigration, Boening insisted that this path is the only way to achieve lasting comprehensive reform-his industry group is seeking a better guest worker program to help legally fill its labor shortages. “It’s been very frustrating to see nothing get done,” he said. “But we still live in the greatest country in the world, and I don’t lose hope: I get disappointed along the way, but somewhere along the lines common sense will prevail.” Read More Obama to make GOP rift much worse: Senator Thune South Dakota Sen. John Thune told CNBC on Thursday morning that executive action would be a “big mistake,” as it would anger the GOP. Some, however, are opposed to executive action on immigration because they see it as overstepping Obama’s executive authority. In fact, Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn told USA Today that “the country’s going to go nuts” in response to Thursday’s announcement. “The actions I’m taking are not only lawful, they’re the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican President and every Democratic President for the past half century,” Obama said. “And to those Members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill.” House Speaker John Boehner said the president is acting like an emperor or a king in a YouTube video ahead of the speech. Even the some in Obama’s own party are taking issue with the executive actions.

Read More GOP senator warns of violence after immigration order Saying he disagrees with the president’s decision, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin said “the American people made it clear on election night that they want government to work better for them and to solve real problems that impact their lives.” Obama said Thursday that he had tried to work with Congress, and blamed the House of Representatives for a bipartisan Senate bill never seeing a yes-no vote. Still, the president said, he still hopes to eventually “pass that kind of common sense law.” Fifty-seven percent of those surveyed by the NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll said they favored the government creating a way for people in the U.S. illegally to eventually become citizens. The president’s actions will also cover several other facets of immigration and naturalization, including “enhancing options for foreign entrepreneurs” and “streamlining the process for foreign workers and their employers.”

Source Article from http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-immigration-system-broken-everybody-011550364.html
Obama: Immigration system broken, everybody knows
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-immigration-system-broken-everybody-011550364.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Text of President Obama's immigration address

Text of President Barack Obama’s immigration address Thursday night, as provided by the White House:

___

My fellow Americans, tonight, I’d like to talk with you about immigration.

For more than 200 years, our tradition of welcoming immigrants from around the world has given us a tremendous advantage over other nations. It’s kept us youthful, dynamic, and entrepreneurial. It has shaped our character as a people with limitless possibilities – people not trapped by our past, but able to remake ourselves as we choose.

But today, our immigration system is broken, and everybody knows it.

Families who enter our country the right way and play by the rules watch others flout the rules. Business owners who offer their workers good wages and benefits see the competition exploit undocumented immigrants by paying them far less. All of us take offense to anyone who reaps the rewards of living in America without taking on the responsibilities of living in America. And undocumented immigrants who desperately want to embrace those responsibilities see little option but to remain in the shadows, or risk their families being torn apart.

It’s been this way for decades. And for decades, we haven’t done much about it.

When I took office, I committed to fixing this broken immigration system. And I began by doing what I could to secure our borders. Today, we have more agents and technology deployed to secure our southern border than at any time in our history. And over the past six years, illegal border crossings have been cut by more than half. Although this summer, there was a brief spike in unaccompanied children being apprehended at our border, the number of such children is now actually lower than it’s been in nearly two years. Overall, the number of people trying to cross our border illegally is at its lowest level since the 1970s. Those are the facts.

Meanwhile, I worked with Congress on a comprehensive fix, and last year, 68 Democrats, Republicans and independents came together to pass a bipartisan bill in the Senate. It wasn’t perfect. It was a compromise, but it reflected common sense. It would have doubled the number of border patrol agents, while giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship if they paid a fine, started paying their taxes, and went to the back of the line. And independent experts said that it would help grow our economy and shrink our deficits.

Had the House of Representatives allowed that kind of a bill a simple yes-or-no vote, it would have passed with support from both parties, and today it would be the law. But for a year and a half now, Republican leaders in the House have refused to allow that simple vote.

Now, I continue to believe that the best way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as president – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just.

Tonight, I am announcing those actions.

First, we’ll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings, and speed the return of those who do cross over.

Second, I will make it easier and faster for high-skilled immigrants, graduates, and entrepreneurs to stay and contribute to our economy, as so many business leaders have proposed.

Third, we’ll take steps to deal responsibly with the millions of undocumented immigrants who already live in our country.

I want to say more about this third issue, because it generates the most passion and controversy. Even as we are a nation of immigrants, we are also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable – especially those who may be dangerous. That’s why, over the past six years, deportations of criminals are up 80 percent. And that’s why we’re going to keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our security. Felons, not families. Criminals, not children. Gang members, not a mother who’s working hard to provide for her kids. We’ll prioritize, just like law enforcement does every day.

But even as we focus on deporting criminals, the fact is, millions of immigrants – in every state, of every race and nationality – will still live here illegally. And let’s be honest – tracking down, rounding up, and deporting millions of people isn’t realistic. Anyone who suggests otherwise isn’t being straight with you. It’s also not who we are as Americans. After all, most of these immigrants have been here a long time. They work hard, often in tough, low-paying jobs. They support their families. They worship at our churches. Many of their kids are American-born or spent most of their lives here, and their hopes, dreams, and patriotism are just like ours.

As my predecessor, President Bush, once put it: “They are a part of American life.”

Now here’s the thing: we expect people who live in this country to play by the rules. We expect that those who cut the line will not be unfairly rewarded. So we’re going to offer the following deal: If you’ve been in America for more than five years; if you have children who are American citizens or legal residents; if you register, pass a criminal background check, and you’re willing to pay your fair share of taxes – you’ll be able to apply to stay in this country temporarily, without fear of deportation. You can come out of the shadows and get right with the law.

That’s what this deal is. Now let’s be clear about what it isn’t. This deal does not apply to anyone who has come to this country recently. It does not apply to anyone who might come to America illegally in the future. It does not grant citizenship, or the right to stay here permanently, or offer the same benefits that citizens receive – only Congress can do that. All we’re saying is we’re not going to deport you.

I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time.

That’s the real amnesty – leaving this broken system the way it is. Mass amnesty would be unfair. Mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our character. What I’m describing is accountability – a commonsense, middle ground approach: If you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up.

The actions I’m taking are not only lawful, they’re the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican president and every single Democratic president for the past half century. And to those members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill. I want to work with both parties to pass a more permanent legislative solution. And the day I sign that bill into law, the actions I take will no longer be necessary. Meanwhile, don’t let a disagreement over a single issue be a deal-breaker on every issue. That’s not how our democracy works, and Congress certainly shouldn’t shut down our government again just because we disagree on this. Americans are tired of gridlock. What our country needs from us right now is a common purpose – a higher purpose.

Most Americans support the types of reforms I’ve talked about tonight. But I understand the disagreements held by many of you at home. Millions of us, myself included, go back generations in this country, with ancestors who put in the painstaking work to become citizens. So we don’t like the notion that anyone might get a free pass to American citizenship. I know that some worry immigration will change the very fabric of who we are, or take our jobs, or stick it to middle-class families at a time when they already feel like they’ve gotten the raw end of the deal for over a decade. I hear these concerns. But that’s not what these steps would do. Our history and the facts show that immigrants are a net plus for our economy and our society. And I believe it’s important that all of us have this debate without impugning each other’s character.

Because for all the back-and-forth of Washington, we have to remember that this debate is about something bigger. It’s about who we are as a country, and who we want to be for future generations.

Are we a nation that tolerates the hypocrisy of a system where workers who pick our fruit and make our beds never have a chance to get right with the law? Or are we a nation that gives them a chance to make amends, take responsibility, and give their kids a better future?

Are we a nation that accepts the cruelty of ripping children from their parents’ arms? Or are we a nation that values families, and works to keep them together?

Are we a nation that educates the world’s best and brightest in our universities, only to send them home to create businesses in countries that compete against us? Or are we a nation that encourages them to stay and create jobs, businesses, and industries right here in America?

That’s what this debate is all about. We need more than politics as usual when it comes to immigration; we need reasoned, thoughtful, compassionate debate that focuses on our hopes, not our fears.

I know the politics of this issue are tough. But let me tell you why I have come to feel so strongly about it. Over the past few years, I have seen the determination of immigrant fathers who worked two or three jobs, without taking a dime from the government, and at risk at any moment of losing it all, just to build a better life for their kids. I’ve seen the heartbreak and anxiety of children whose mothers might be taken away from them just because they didn’t have the right papers. I’ve seen the courage of students who, except for the circumstances of their birth, are as American as Malia or Sasha; students who bravely come out as undocumented in hopes they could make a difference in a country they love. These people – our neighbors, our classmates, our friends – they did not come here in search of a free ride or an easy life. They came to work, and study, and serve in our military, and above all, contribute to America’s success.

Tomorrow, I’ll travel to Las Vegas and meet with some of these students, including a young woman named Astrid Silva. Astrid was brought to America when she was 4 years old. Her only possessions were a cross, her doll and the frilly dress she had on. When she started school, she didn’t speak any English. She caught up to the other kids by reading newspapers and watching PBS, and became a good student. Her father worked in landscaping. Her mother cleaned other people’s homes. They wouldn’t let Astrid apply to a technology magnet school for fear the paperwork would out her as an undocumented immigrant – so she applied behind their back and got in. Still, she mostly lived in the shadows – until her grandmother, who visited every year from Mexico, passed away, and she couldn’t travel to the funeral without risk of being found out and deported. It was around that time she decided to begin advocating for herself and others like her, and today, Astrid Silva is a college student working on her third degree.

Are we a nation that kicks out a striving, hopeful immigrant like Astrid – or are we a nation that finds a way to welcome her in?

Scripture tells us that we shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger – we were strangers once, too.

My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of immigrants. We were strangers once, too. And whether our forebears were strangers who crossed the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we are here only because this country welcomed them in, and taught them that to be an American is about something more than what we look like, or what our last names are, or how we worship. What makes us Americans is our shared commitment to an ideal – that all of us are created equal, and all of us have the chance to make of our lives what we will.

That’s the country our parents and grandparents and generations before them built for us. That’s the tradition we must uphold. That’s the legacy we must leave for those who are yet to come.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless this country we love.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/text-president-obamas-immigration-address-012229295.html
Text of President Obama's immigration address
http://news.yahoo.com/text-president-obamas-immigration-address-012229295.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama's immigration plan: 'Deport felons, not families'

Washington (CNN) — President Barack Obama will order immigration officers to deport “felons not families” as he wields executive power to shield five million undocumented immigrants in the most sweeping overhaul of the immigration system in decades.

Obama will reject claims he is offering a free pass to undocumented immigrants and argue that “the real amnesty” would be leaving a broken system as it is now, according to excerpts of his remarks released by the White House.

“Mass amnesty would be unfair. Mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our character. What I’m describing is accountability — a commonsense, middle ground approach,” Obama will say.

“If you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up.”

Obama will lay out changes he is making to immigration laws without the consent of Congress. A key element of his plan is to instruct immigration authorities to prioritize expulsion action against gang members, felons and suspected terrorists rather than law abiding undocumented parents of U.S. citizens and residents and others, senior administration officials said.

The changes will offer those who qualify the chance to stay temporarily in the country for three years, as long as they pass background checks and pay back taxes. But they will not be offered a path to eventual citizenship or be eligible for federal benefits or health care programs. And, in theory, the measures could be reversed by a future president.

READ: What to expect in Obama’s speech

Chart: Who could be affected? Chart: Who could be affected?

Chart: Who could be affected?Chart: Who could be affected?

GOP: ‘Emperor’ Obama overstepping power

McConnell: Executive action ignores law

Republicans are slamming Obama’s use of executive authority as a mammoth presidential power grab. But aides said the President was tired of waiting to act and felt compelled to go it alone because House Republicans refuse to vote on a bill to fix the broken immigration system that cleared the Senate more than 500 days ago.

“Instead of working together to fix our broken immigration system, the President says he’s acting on his own,” Republican House Speaker John Boehner said in a YouTube video released before the president’s speech. “The President has said before, that he’s not king and he’s not an emperor. But he’s sure acting like one.”

But Obama will say he is acting in a manner consistent with action taken by every Republican and every Democratic president in half a century.

“To those members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill.”

Officials insist that Obama’s moves are deeply grounded in law and constitutional precedent, despite claims by Republicans that they represent an unlawful overreach of his authority as president and his oath of office.

“The actions you see here reasonably sit within his powers,” one senior administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the plans before the President speaks. “I think that they are bold and they are aggressive but they are in keeping with precedent.”

Congressional Republicans are weighing their response, juggling ideas that range from a government shutdown to holding up Obama’s nominees in the Senate.

The most far-reaching changes in Obama’s order will offer papers and work authorization to up to four million people who are undocumented parents of U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents, as long as they have lived in the U.S. for five years or longer.

Obama will also remove the upper age limit of 30 years old from a program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) or Dreamers that allows those brought illegally to the country as children to stay, offering relief to thousands more people.

The program will cover anyone who arrived in the country before 2010 and will extend a previous two-year guarantee of relief to three years.

READ: Speech will delay Latin Grammys

But White House lawyers concluded the president did not have the power to offer parents of those covered under DACA permits to stay in the country and work, a move that will disappoint some immigration reform lobby groups.

Castro: Obama ‘doing the right thing’

Senate Dems: Obama, we’ve got your back

Should these parents be deported?

In one concession however, parents of the so-called “Dreamers” will be removed from priority lists for deportation.

Officials said that the broad sweep of the immigration measures were within Obama’s powers because he was directing authorities to prioritize which groups of the 11.4 million illegal immigrants in the country should be deported.

“Deferred action is not a pathway to citizenship. It is not legal status. It simply says that for three years, you are not a law enforcement priority and are not going to go after you,” said one senior official. “It is temporary and it is revocable.”

READ: GOP mulls shutdown options

Officials said law enforcement officials made similar decisions each day about which categories of offenders to target with prosecution and the president was simply charting a new way to apply existing immigration laws.

The new approach, which will begin to be phased in next spring, will include a more robust effort to target gang members, suspected terrorists, and felons.

It will also focus more sharply on undocumented immigrants who have recently crossed U.S. borders in a bid to slow the flow of illegal immigration, the officials said. New resources are also expected to be announced to secure borders, following claims that enforcement is lax and contributed to the flow of thousands of illegal child migrants into the U.S. earlier this year, which sparked a hot political controversy.

In moves likely be applauded by the business community, the administration will also reform immigration rules to make it easier for science and technology students to study in the U.S. There will also be a new program to attract entrepreneurs to come to the U.S. if they can show they have sufficient investors.

READ: Immigrants will be listening

Will GOP impeach Obama over immigration?

Actions ‘huge’ for Hispanic community

The changes that Obama will announce, however, fall far short of the reforms that could be enacted were Congress to pass a comprehensive immigration bill.

“He cannot just by fiat put the entire Senate immigration bill into law. He does not have that authority,” senior Obama advisor Dan Pfeiffer told CNN Thursday.

The president has no power to put undocumented immigrants on the long road to citizenship. He cannot grant permanent residence permits known as Green Cards, and all of his changes could be struck down by a future president.

Officials insisted that Obama’s moves were consistent with immigration actions ordered by presidents, including Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, for decades. The magnitude of the numbers involved here though surpass anything any president had done before.

Republican leaders did not wait for Obama’s speech, from the East Room of the White House, to lambast the president and warned his moves could shatter slim hopes of cooperation with the new Republican Congress next year.

“If President Obama acts in defiance of the people and imposes his will on the country, Congress will act,” said Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell who will lead the chamber next year. “We’re considering a variety of options.”

Republicans have accused Obama of flexing his presidential powers in defiance of Congress. They are also highlighting his previous comments that he did not have the power to simply change the immigration system on his own.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz took to the Senate floor to quote Roman philosopher Cicero to hammer Obama’s pending actions.

“When, President Obama, do you mean to cease abusing our patience? How long is that madness of yours still to mock us? When is there to be an end to that unbridled audacity of yours, swaggering about as it does now,” Cruz said.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, like Cruz, a potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate, said there was a “very real possibility” that his border state could sue the president over his actions.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/obama-immigration-speech/index.html
Obama's immigration plan: 'Deport felons, not families'
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/obama-immigration-speech/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration 101: why public is conflicted on Obama move

Public opinion on President Obama’s soon-to-be-announced move to shield up to 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation is sharply divided – and internally contradictory.

Almost half of Americans – 48 percent – oppose the president’s plan, while 38 percent support it, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

But at the same time, 57 percent of Americans favor a pathway to citizenship for people in the United States illegally – a key sticking point that immigration hard-liners call “amnesty,” the poll finds. And that number increases to 74 percent when those surveyed are told that to get on the “pathway” one must pay fines and back taxes, and pass a security background check.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

What the poll shows is that Obama’s biggest problem, beyond the legal argument, is process, NBC News’ “First Read” observes. By a margin of 63 percent to 30 percent, Americans want compromise over sticking to positions on the immigration issue, the poll finds.

“Americans prefer elected leaders coming together to get something done,” says “First Read.”

Obama is likely to pay a political price for giving up on Congress, analysts say. At the same time, if he were to delay executive action further, he would infuriate the immigration activists to whom he has long promised action. At first, he pledged an announcement at the end of the summer, then delayed it until after the Nov. 4 midterms so as not to harm endangered Democrats (many of whom lost anyway).

In fact, perhaps Obama should have made his move before the election to spur Latino turnout in key races, some activists suggest. Overall, Latino turnout this year remained flat at 8 percent of the nation’s voters, same as in the last two midterms (2010 and 2006), while the number of Hispanic eligible voters is more than 25 million today, up from 17.3 million in 2006, according to the Pew Research Center.

Democratic House candidates won 62 percent of the Latino vote this year. That’s similar to the 2010 midterm, but down from 2012, when Latinos voted for Democrats over Republicans for the House by a margin of 68 percent to 30 percent.  

In the gubernatorial races in Georgia and Texas, the Republican candidates won more than 40 percent of the Latino vote, Pew notes.

In Nevada, where Obama will deliver a speech Friday promoting his immigration plan, Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) scored notable gains with Latino voters in his reelection bid. He won 47 percent – a threefold increase over his share of the vote in 2010.

“To be sure, Sandoval’s stronger 2014 performance reflects the lack of a serious Democratic challenger, as well as his support for a number of Latino policy priorities including Medicaid expansion, funding for English Language Learners, and support for driver’s privilege cards,” writes David Damore, a senior analyst for Latino Decisions polling firm.

“Perhaps no Democrat though owes his political survival to the Latino community more than Harry Reid,” Mr. Damore adds. “In 2010 it was strong Latino turnout and these voters’ overwhelming support for Reid allowed Reid to escape that year’s Republican wave and continue serving as Senate majority leader.”

Senator Reid is up for reelection in 2016. 

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-101-why-public-conflicted-obama-move-210324987.html
Immigration 101: why public is conflicted on Obama move
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-101-why-public-conflicted-obama-move-210324987.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Will Tear Us Apart

US-POLITICS-IMMIGRATION-OBAMA
President Barack Obama meets with business leaders on immigration reform on June 24, 2013 in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC.
MANDEL NGAN—AFP/Getty Images

Russell Moore is President of The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention

Acting unilaterally threatens an emerging consensus

Source Article from http://time.com/3597981/obamas-executive-action-immigration/
Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Will Tear Us Apart
http://time.com/3597981/obamas-executive-action-immigration/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration Action Will Likely Bring Pain (for Obama and GOP)

With President Obama making his announcement to take executive action on immigration at 8:00 pm ET and with Republicans vowing to fight him, we have one simple prediction for both sides. To quote the famous 20th Century philosopher Clubber Lang, “Pain.” For Obama, our new NBC/WSJ poll previews that predicted pain, with 48% of Americans opposing him taking executive action here, versus 38% supporting him. (Those numbers look very similar to polling on the health-care law, no?) That said, our NBC/WSJ survey also shows the public supporting him on the underlying policy — with 57% favoring a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and with 74% backing it when they hear what that pathway entails. Beyond the legal arguments (and most legal experts believe Obama’s action is within the law), Obama’s biggest problem here is process. Americans prefer elected leaders coming together to get something done; indeed, our NBC/WSJ poll shows the public wanting compromise over sticking to positions by a 63%-30% margin. So Obama probably is going to take a hit for going it alone. WHAT he is doing here isn’t as unpopular as HOW he’s doing it. And if we’ve learned anything in this era of political trench warfare, when the opposition is throwing the kitchen sink back at the White House, that doesn’t help a president’s poll numbers.

GOP is more divided right now than the Democrats

But pain also is coming for the Republican Party. Why? Because no current issue divides the GOP more than immigration reform. Just look at the reaction after yesterday’s news that Obama was going to make his executive-action announcement. On the one hand, there was outgoing Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) calling the recipients of Obama’s deportation policy “illiterate” potential Democratic voters. On the other hand, there was Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), one of the co-authors of the “Gang of 8” Senate immigration bill, who told reporters that Republicans should respond to Obama by passing immigration-reform legislation. “I hope we respond with legislation,” he said. “I hope we pass legislation.” Right now, the Democratic Party is much more united here than the Republican Party is, at least when it comes to how they respond. And then there’s the 2016 angle. As we wrote last week, Obama’s immigration action is going to ENSURE that immigration becomes a key part of the GOP presidential nominating race. Most (if not all) of the Republicans running for president are going to have to denounce the move. And then the GOP contest will turn into who’s tougher against the action. Like we saw in 2008 and 2012, that would push the eventual GOP nominee farther to the right than he or she might want to go. This is why some Republicans wanted to get immigration done last year — to keep the issue away from the 2016 race.

A product of Obama’s own doing

Here’s one final point we’ll make on Obama’s immigration announcement and the blowback that’s coming his way: It’s his own doing. By allowing Senate Democrats to persuade him to wait until AFTER the midterms to do this, you’re hearing Republicans complain that Obama is ignoring the will of the voters. (Then again, the 2014 national exit poll found 57% saying illegal immigrants working in the United States should be offered a chance to apply for legal status.) Of course, had Obama made his announcement in August or September, the blowback might have come then instead of now. But given what we said above about how it’s already divided Republicans, you wonder if Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) wishes immigration had been the storyline heading in the final weeks of his failed re-election bid instead of everything else.

Jim Webb announces presidential exploratory committee

If you picked the former one-term Virginia senator as the FIRST person to announce a presidential bid (either in the form of an exploratory committee or full-fledged run), you win a prize. Late last night (at 11:59 pm ET !!!!!), former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, Democrat, launched his exploratory committee late Wednesday night via Twitter, NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell reports. The former Marine, Navy secretary and author has been hinting at a run for the Democratic nomination for months. “I made this decision after reflecting on numerous political commentaries and listening to many knowledgeable people,” Webb wrote on new website Webb2016.com. “I look forward to listening and talking with more people in the coming months as I decide whether or not to run.” Why announce this so late at night? And why during the Great Immigration War? If you know Webb, nothing he does conforms to conventional wisdom.

Kasich stands out in Boca

At yesterday’s RGA confab in Boca Raton, FL, Ohio Gov. John Kasich stood out — by sounding different than his fellow GOP governors who might run for president (Mike Pence, Rick Perry, Scott Walker, Bobby Jindal). Per NBC’s Sarah Blackwill, of the five governors on stage, only Kasich was open to the possibility of a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, saying: “We’ve got to think about what’s going to bring about healing. My sense is, I don’t like the idea of citizenship when people jump the line, we may have to do it.” Kasich’s tone throughout the panel was strikingly different than his Republican colleagues, who called the president’s planned move “the height of arrogance” (Jindal), “unconstitutional in his own words” (Perry), a “profound mistake” (Pence) and a “political” act to “change the subject” (Walker). Instead, Kasich called on Republican leaders in Congress to work with the president. As Yahoo’s Jon Ward writes, Kasich also appeared to support Common Core, and he justified his decision to expand Medicaid (“Ronald Reagan expanded Medicaid, OK?”).

“Almost like the election never happened”

The recently concluded midterms cost billions of dollars, generated thousands of different headlines and resulted in Republicans winning control of the U.S. Senate. But they didn’t change much else — especially the public’s attitudes about politics in Washington, according to our new NBC/WSJ poll. Consider:

  • More than three-quarters of Americans say the election won’t substantially change the nation’s direction;
  • More say they have less confidence that elected leaders in Washington will start working together to solve problems;
  • And Americans are split almost evenly between positive (41%) and negative (39%) reactions to Republicans controlling both the House and Senate next year.

“While this wave election has changed the composition of Congress and added Republican governors, it has not changed the nation’s psyche or their expectations,” says NBC/WSJ co-pollster Fred Yang (D). Indeed, about two-thirds of Americans continue to say that the nation is on the wrong track, President Obama’s approval rating remains in the 40s and a majority still thinks the nation’s economic and political systems are stacked against them. “It is almost like the election never happened,” Yang adds.

Obama’s job approval at 44%

Speaking of Obama, 44% of adults approve of his overall job performance in the NBC/WSJ poll, which is his highest rating since April. Our poll taken before the midterm elections showed the president’s job rating at 42%, but that was among registered voters, not all adults. Also, Obama’s personal favorable/unfavorable rating is right-side-up at 45% positive, 43% negative among adults – the first time it’s been above water since April.

The 2016 field is crowded — and not all that popular

Here’s the other headline from our NBC/WSJ poll: The potential presidential candidates don’t have a lot of crossover appeal. As one of us writes, “For all the preparation and jockeying for the 2016 presidential campaign that’s taken place more than a year before the nomination process formally begins, most of the top White House contenders aren’t enjoying high ratings among the American public. Even the most positively-viewed potential candidates get nearly as much opposition as support, according to the latest NBC News/WSJ poll.

Among all respondents:

  • Ben Carson 17%-7% (+10)
  • Elizabeth Warren 23%-17% (+6)
  • Hillary Clinton 43%-40% (+3)
  • Rand Paul 26%-23% (+3)
  • Marco Rubio 21%-19% (+2)
  • Mike Huckabee 25%-24% (+1)
  • Scott Walker 15%-14% (+1)
  • John Kasich 11%-10% (+1)
  • Chris Christie 29%-29% (even)
  • Joe Biden 35%-38% (-3)
  • Jeb Bush 26%-33% (-7)
  • Rick Perry 20%-29% (-9)
  • Ted Cruz 16%-26% (-10)

Among Democrats:

  • Hillary Clinton 78%-5% (+73)
  • Joe Biden 62%-9% (+52)
  • Elizabeth Warren 36%-6% (+30)

Among Republicans

  • Huckabee 52%-8% (+44)
  • Rand Paul 48%-6% (+42)
  • Jeb Bush 44%-12% (+32)
  • Ben Carson 33%-2% (+31)
  • Marco Rubio 37%-7% (+30)
  • Scott Walker 29%-2% (+27)
  • Chris Christie 40%-19% (+21)
  • Rick Perry 33%-13% (+20)
  • John Kasich 23%-6% (+17)
  • Ted Cruz 27%-12% (+15)

FYI: Our NBC/WSJ poll didn’t measure Jim Webb.

Click here to sign up for First Read emails. Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @carrienbcnews



Source Article from http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663295/s/40ac5cc2/sc/7/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cpolitics0Cfirst0Eread0Cimmigration0Eaction0Ewill0Elikely0Ebring0Epain0Eboth0Eobama0Egop0En252426/story01.htm
Immigration Action Will Likely Bring Pain (for Obama and GOP)
http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663295/s/40ac5cc2/sc/7/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cpolitics0Cfirst0Eread0Cimmigration0Eaction0Ewill0Elikely0Ebring0Epain0Eboth0Eobama0Egop0En252426/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration action is daring test of Obama's power

Washington (CNN) — President Barack Obama’s plan to take the immigration system in his own hands is a daring test of the limits of presidential power.

The steps he will lay out tonight in a prime time address will fuel a debate over his use of executive authority to enact change without the agreement of an opposition Congress.

Conservatives are howling that Obama’s effort to shield millions of illegal immigrants from deportation oversteps his own authority and infringes the Constitution. His backers say he’s simply exercising his power to select which areas of law to prioritize — and addressing a major national issue that seems to elude Congress.

GOP: ‘Emperor’ Obama overstepping power

Sens. weigh in on Obama’s immigration move

Will GOP impeach Obama over immigration?

W.H.: Obama not exceeding authority

Actions ‘huge’ for Hispanic community

The law, however, may be as murky as the immigration system itself.

“The issue is, if the president’s actions effectively nullify federal law, then they are unconstitutional,” said Alex Nowrasteh, immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute. “But if his actions merely channel enforcement resources to other areas covered under the law then it is within his discretion to do so.”

He added: “Drawing that line is a very difficult and murky process.”

READ: Obama immigration plans rile GOP

Republicans and legal critics warn that by dictating groups of illegal immigrants that will not be deported, Obama risks infringing a clause in the Constitution that requires him to “take care” that laws are faithfully executed.

“All the signals of what they are planning to do suggest that it is beyond the bounds of the take care clause,” said Gregory Jacob, a former special assistant to President George W. Bush on immigration reform.

After Bush’s own push for comprehensive immigration reform failed, he asked his legal team to examine his executive powers to change immigration policy. But they quickly concluded the kind of action Obama is now contemplating would go beyond presidential authority.

“The president is taking an entire chunk of the law and simply declining to enforce it,” said Jacob.

The Obama White House is pointing to legal precedents established by earlier presidents who have used executive power to reshape the immigration system, notably John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush.

The elder Bush, for example, used executive power to permit 1.5 million undocumented spouses and children of people shielded from deportation by a previous law to also stay in the United States. White House officials point out that number accounted for about 40 percent of illegal immigrants in the country at the time. Obama could cover a similar proportion of the current total of 11.4 million illegal immigrants with the moves he’s expected to announce.

READ: 5 questions you should be asking about immigration

But lawyers who disagree with that view say Bush was using his power to fix problems with a recently passed immigration law — not acting alone after Congress refused to act.

For his part, Reagan used executive power to help 100,000 families caught in a loophole included in a comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by Congress in 1986. He also offered relief to 200,000 Nicaraguan exiles.

The Obama administration is adamant that the president is acting within his powers to implement laws already passed by Congress and to prioritize resources but officials won’t reveal the legal reasoning until tonight’s speech. Other Obama supporters were reluctant to speak publicly about the potential legal arguments ahead of the address.

But in essence, the White House is expected to argue that Obama is simply wielding his constitutional powers to decide how laws are applied.

The executive branch of the U.S. government decides all the time whether or not to pursue certain offenders in much the same way a police officer sometimes turns a blind eye toward a driver traveling at 58 mph in a 55 mph zone but choosing to pull over someone else doing 70.

It’s a concept known as prosecutorial discretion and Obama’s supporters contend what he is doing is perfectly legal because he is directing U.S. law enforcement agencies where they should focus their attention.

So, instead of seeking to deport the undocumented parents of American citizens, the president is expected to channel resources towards enforcing U.S. borders.

Officials said he may also require U.S. authorities to spend more time seeking to deport felons or recently arrived illegal immigrants than those brought to America years ago as children

Obama has argued that acting in this way is in fact more consistent with his legal obligations and authorities as president. And he says he is not infringing his powers by changing the law because a new president could take office and wipe out his executive orders with the stroke of a pen.

“I can’t wait in perpetuity when I have authorities that, at least for the next two years, can improve the system, can allow us to shift more resources to the border rather than separating families,” he said last week. “I would be derelict in my duties if I did not try to improve the system that everybody acknowledges is broken.”

READ: Immigration fast facts

If Republicans do conclude that Obama has overstepped the bounds of his office, what remedy do they have?

Of course, they could pass legislation next year — after they gain majorities in the House and Senate — that would undo Obama’s actions. But the president could then veto that legislation — and it’s unlikely that there will be enough support in Congress to overturn a veto.

House Republicans are already taking the president to court alleging abuse of power over Obamacare. They could add a question on immigration to the case.

But that would risk turning what is at root a political crisis into an unpredictable constitutional showdown. And courts are notoriously loath to inject themselves into a dispute between separate branches of government.

Obama could find his actions challenged in other courts. But an organization wanting to sue the president might struggle to find someone hurt by his orders — the legal term is “standing” — on whom to base a case.

Other Republicans have even mentioned the “i” word — impeachment — but that’s also fraught with political peril.

The most realistic path may be for Republicans, who next year will control both chambers of Congress, to cut funding for Obama’s executive actions. Or they can wait until 2016 and elect a president who might overturn Obama’s executive order.

The debate over Obama’s authority is partially of his own making. No one has made the case against the course of action Obama is taking better than the former constitutional law professor who now sits in the Oval Office.

Under pressure for years by Hispanic supporters to stem deportations, the president has repeatedly complained that he cannot just wave a magic wand and make things right.

“This notion that somehow, I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true …. The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books that I have to enforce,” he said in 2011.

Obama has pointed out that he is not a “king” or an “emperor” — words now being used against him by opponents and spooling on a loop on television channels.

“Our president has a preternatural ability to stay one thing and then do another,” Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn said this week.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/immigration-obama-legal-analysis/index.html
Immigration action is daring test of Obama's power
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/immigration-obama-legal-analysis/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration plan to face GOP block

Washington (CNN) — President Barack Obama will unveil his long-awaited immigration plan Thursday evening, changing rules governing deportations that could affect millions of undocumented immigrants and setting off an explosive battle with Republicans.

Obama’s prime-time address will be followed Friday by an event in Las Vegas, sources tell CNN. While exact details of his announcement aren’t yet public, the basic outline of the plan, as relayed by people familiar with its planning, includes deferring deportation for the parents of U.S. citizens, a move that would affect up to 3.5 million people.

“Everybody agrees that our immigration system is broken. Unfortunately, Washington has allowed the problem to fester for far too long,” Obama said in a video posted on his Facebook page Wednesday. “And so what I’m going to be laying out is the things that I can do with my lawful authority as President to make the system work better, even as I continue to work with Congress to encourage them to get a bipartisan, comprehensive bill that can solve the entire problem.”

Obama invited congressional Democratic leaders to the White House for a dinner Wednesday night to discuss his plans for an executive order, a source told CNN.

Obama to announce immigration action

RELATED: 5 questions you should be asking about Obama and immigration

Actions ‘huge’ for Hispanic community

Red News/Blue News: Debating immigration

What’s at stake in immigration debate?

The President declared in June he wouldn’t wait for Congress to pass a comprehensive overhaul of the immigration system, initially saying he would announce changes by the end the summer. The decision was delayed until after the midterm elections, when the White House believed it wouldn’t be caught up in campaign politics.

But Republicans are expressing deep anger at the anticipated move, saying unilateral action on immigration would forestall any legislative action.

Two House Republicans who would play a key role in crafting immigration legislation made a fresh call for Obama to hold off on his plans Wednesday — and warned that if he goes ahead, they’ll try to stop the White House from implementing his executive order.

“Instead of proceeding with ill-advised executive action, we implore you to work with Congress to enact legislation to address our broken immigration system,” Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) said in a letter to Obama.

Related: ‘Orange is the New Black’ actress pushes Obama for immigration overhaul

“We strongly urge you to respect the Constitution and abandon any unconstitutional, unilateral executive actions on immigration. Let’s secure the border, enforce our immigration laws in the interior of the United States, and build a broad consensus for immigration reform,” they wrote. “Otherwise, as the chairmen of the committees with oversight over border security and our nation’s immigration laws, we will be forced to use the tools afforded to Congress by the Constitution to stop your administration from successfully carrying out your plan.”

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest chided the GOP during his briefing Wednesday, saying concerns about how Obama’s immigration move could affect the government funding debate and presidential nominations in the weeks ahead are “predicated on at least the premise that Republicans have been exceedingly cooperative with the president.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — the Nevada Democrat who will lose his post once Republicans take control of the chamber in January — lauded Obama’s move, saying the GOP forced his hand.

“Comprehensive immigration reform brings relief to families being torn apart by our broken system,” he said. “Comprehensive immigration reform is an economic issue and one we must address. That’s why I have been so disappointed that Republicans have ducked, dodged and skirted taking up legislation this Congress forcing President Obama to act administratively.”

What’s in the plan

The contours of Obama’s announcement have been the subject of speculation among immigration activists for months, though the White House has yet to officially relay what Obama will announce when he speaks to the American people on Thursday night.

Administration officials say a key part of the announcement will be allowing the parents of American citizens, who are undocumented immigrants themselves, to remain in the United States without the threat of deportation. That would include the parents of legal residents, but not the parents of children eligible for delayed deportation under a rule Obama enacted in 2012.

Up to 3.6 million people would be affected by that change, according to an estimate from the Migration Policy Institute, though the figures are smaller if Obama’s announcement includes a minimum number of years spent in the country.

Mandating parents live in the U.S. for at least 5 years before becoming eligible would bring the number affected to 3.3 million; a 10-year minimum would bring it down further to an estimated 2.5 million people.

READ: Immigration fast facts

Other potential areas of reform include extending the deportation deferment for immigrants who were brought to the United States as children. Altering the age restrictions on that action could allow hundreds of thousands more people to remain in the United States.

Officials also said the plan could include a stronger focus on deporting criminals who are undocumented immigrants and an expansion of worker visas in areas like technology.

Lastly, the plan could include new resources to bolster security on the border. Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said the “reforms will be comprehensive,” and that border security measures will be included.

Obama’s position on immigration could be a popular one. Despite an overall wave of support for GOP candidates, 57% of this year’s midterm election voters believe undocumented immigrants should have a chance to apply for legal status, while just 39% want them deported to the country they came from, CNN’s exit polls found.

Those exit polls found that 71% of U.S. midterm voters believe undocumented immigrants should be allowed to stay in the country legally if they meet certain requirements — while 25% said those immigrants shouldn’t be allowed to stay.

A September CBS/New York Times poll found 51% saying Obama should use his executive powers to address immigration if Congress fails to act while 43% said he should not. A similar ABC/Washington Post survey earlier that month found 52% support for Obama acting on his own.

Dana Bash and Eric Bradner contributed to this report.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/19/politics/obama-immigration-announcement-thursday/index.html
Immigration plan to face GOP block
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/19/politics/obama-immigration-announcement-thursday/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

President Obama to Announce Major Immigration Executive Action Thursday

President Obama will announce a major executive action on immigration reform in prime time on Thursday, the White House said today.

“Our immigration system has been broken for decades — and every minute we fail to act, millions of people who live in the shadows but want to play by the rules and pay taxes have no way to live right by the law and contribute to our country, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest wrote on the White House website.

Flip Flop? White House Concedes Obama Shift on Immigration Action

What We Know — And Don’t Know — About Obama’s Imminent Immigration Action

President Obama Defends Executive Authority on Immigration

“So tomorrow night, President Obama will address the nation to lay out the executive actions he’s taking to fix our broken immigration system.”

The president will then travel to Del Sol High School Las Vegas on Friday “to discuss why he is using his executive authority now, and why Republicans in Congress must act to pass a long-term solution to immigration reform,” according to Earnest.

President Obama has invited senior lawmakers to the White House tonight for dinner to explain his immigration decision. Earnest confirmed Obama will dine tonight with a group of 18 top Democrats from the House and Senate.

The most controversial aspect of Obama’s planned action is likely to be an order to, on a temporary basis, exempt from deportation and grant work permits to as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants.

White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough is being dispatched to Capitol Hill on Thursday for lunch with Senate Democrats, a move that presaged the announcement.

On Wednesday, Democrats took to the Senate floor to defend President Obama’s forthcoming executive action, saying the House could have avoided it by passing immigration reform themselves.

“I’m glad he’s going to in the next couple of days for sure to use his constitutionally established authority to fix our broken immigration system as much as possible,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., added: “The dithering and dawdling on the House side is particularly perplexing because our bill would achieve so many goals that republicans claim are part of their agenda.”

ABC’s Devin Dwyer and Arlette Saenz contributed reporting.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/president-obama-announce-major-immigration-executive-action-thursday-185800625.html
President Obama to Announce Major Immigration Executive Action Thursday
http://news.yahoo.com/president-obama-announce-major-immigration-executive-action-thursday-185800625.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results