1 August 2014
Last updated at 14:04

The independent chief inspector of borders and immigration is to leave the role more than six months early.

John Vine had been due to step down in July 2015 when his term ended but will now leave on 31 December this year.

During his six years in the role, his office issued more than 50 inspection reports, some of which were highly critical of the immigration system.

Shadow immigration minister David Hanson said the Home Office had tried to silence Mr Vine’s criticisms.

‘Indictment’

He said Mr Vine had brought a “rigorous and determined approach to the role of scrutinising our borders” and “highlighted flaws in the Home Secretary’s immigration regime”.

His departure, Mr Hanson said, was “an indictment of [Home Secretary] Theresa May’s attempts to silence his criticisms of her failing immigration system”.

Mrs May thanked Mr Vine “for his hard work and dedication in scrutinising the vital work of controlling immigration and protecting Britain’s borders”.

Mr Vine will publish his final annual inspection report in December, which will cover the period 2013/14.

Alongside the reports, the inspector has also made almost 500 recommendations.

Among his findings:

• In October 2013 he said the Home Office’s multi-million pound e-borders scheme had failed to meet its promises. He said staff at airports were not stopping those with terrorist alerts against them on arrival, and “not one person” had been stopped boarding a plane to the UK

• In June he told MPs that immigration officials did not know the true scale of the problem of sham marriages in the UK and that it represented “one of the biggest potential threats to immigration control”

• He discovered in 2012 that the Home Office had a “migration refusal pool” – people whose temporary or permanent migration application had been refused but whose whereabouts were unknown to the authorities

• In November 2013 he said thousands of smugglers of goods were going unpunished because of a breakdown in communication between Border Force and HMRC officials

• In November 2012 he accused the UK Border Agency of supplying inaccurate information to MPs about the backlog of asylum cases and said Parliament had received incorrect assurances about moves to address this.

Correspondents say Mr Vine had become frustrated that the Home Office had changed the timing of the publication of his reports.

Previously they were released at midnight, ensuring more media coverage, but now they are published during the day.

Mr Hanson said: “It’s a real shame that the home secretary’s increasing manipulation of the release of his reports to try to hide her failures has clearly led to his frustration and ultimately resignation from the role.”

Mr Vine said this was not the reason he had resigned but said he had “raised my concerns with the change in publication processes with the home secretary and the Home Affairs Committee”.

Analysis

Danny Shaw, home affairs correspondent, BBC News

For six years, John Vine painted a bleak picture of Britain’s border and immigration controls. His reports were a severe embarrassment for a government that had pledged to bring down net migration and restore order to the system.

Until January this year, Mr Vine determined when his reports were released – usually with an embargo time that suited newspapers and broadcasters, ensuring maximum coverage.

Then the Home Office decided it would control the publication times, with reports put out at short notice and sometimes grouped together. The result was less publicity.

Publicly, John Vine says that’s not the reason he’s quitting. But there’s a sense that frustration with the new arrangements may well have played a part.

Mr Vine said he now wanted a new challenge.

“Leaving at the end of the year and before the next general election, rather than in July 2015 when my term is due to end, makes sense.”

Mr Vine said he was “proud” of establishing the inspectorate, which had been “a catalyst for significant change and improvement across the UK’s border and immigration functions”.

He had previously agreed two extensions to his original term of office.

Mr Hanson said: “John Vine enjoyed cross party support in his independent role and his successor will have a tough job to follow his thorough and expert analysis of our borders, and it is vital the home secretary doesn’t simply appoint someone who will seek not to upset her.”

Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said Mr Vine had done “outstanding work in holding to account those who manage our borders and immigration service”.

He said: “When Mr Vine last appeared before the committee we were very concerned about the number of reports that he had produced which had not been published by the Home Office. All of these must be released immediately.”