Immigration reform: More and more deportations are defeated in court

Nearly half of immigrants facing deportation from the US are now winning their cases before an immigration judge, their highest success rate in more than 20 years, according to a new analysis of court data published Thursday.

Skip to next paragraph


The US government has been losing more deportation cases each year since 2009, according to the Transaction Records Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, which collects and studies federal prosecution records.

It does not say how many deportation cases Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose lawyers represent the government in immigration courts, successfully appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The government can appeal immigration court rulings to the Board of Immigration Appeals, part of the Justice Department.

Since the start of the 2014 budget year in October, immigration judges ruled in favor of immigrants in about half of the 42,816 cases heard, TRAC reported. In 2013 the government won about 52 percent of cases.

Immigrants in California, New York and Oregon have been most successful recently, while judges in Georgia, Louisiana and Utah have sided more often with the government, according to TRAC.

Immigration supporters accuse the Obama administration of deporting too many people, but Republicans say the president is too lenient on immigrants living in the country illegally.

Nearly 2 million immigrants have been removed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement under President Barack Obama.

“ICE’s enforcement strategies and policies are designed to prioritize its resources on public safety, national security and border security threats,” said ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen. “ICE continues to focus on sensible, effective immigration enforcement that prioritizes the removal of criminal aliens and those apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States.”

In recent years the Obama administration has issued policy orders directing immigration authorities to exercise discretion when deciding which immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported. Then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said discretion should be used for immigrants who didn’t pose a threat to national security or public safety.

In 2011, the government reviewed hundreds of thousands of cases pending in immigration courts. The effort was designed to curtail the backlog of more than 300,000 pending cases. Tens of thousands of cases were eventually dismissed but there are now more than 360,000 cases pending, according to TRAC.

In 2012 Obama also created a program, called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, to allow tens of thousands of young immigrants living in the United States illegally to apply to stay in the country for up to two years and get a work permit.

Kathleen Campbell Walker, an El Paso, Texas, immigration lawyer, said it may be too soon to know what the TRAC data means for immigration enforcement. She said immigration court backlogs mean cases now being heard by immigration judges could be years old. And though immigration laws have not changed in recent years, some immigrants may be more successful in arguing that they should be allowed to stay in the country based on those discretion memos.

“The true implications of these numbers are murky and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions yet,” Walker said.

Obama pledged during both of his presidential campaigns to overhaul the country’s immigration laws.

The Democrat-led Senate passed a wide-ranging bill last year but similar legislation has stalled in the Republican-controlled House.

Last month, House Republicans announced a plan that touched on both border security and the fate of the more than 11 million immigrants thought to be living in the United States illegally. A week later, however, House Speaker John Boehner said it would be difficult for an immigration bill to pass this year.

“The American people, including many of our members, don’t trust that the reform we’re talking about will be implemented as it was intended to be,” Boehner told reporters at his weekly news conference earlier this month.

The administration has made several immigration policy changes in recent years and during his State of the Union address last month Obama pledged to keep using his authority to address a variety of issues.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source Article from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0213/Immigration-reform-More-and-more-deportations-are-defeated-in-court
Immigration reform: More and more deportations are defeated in court
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0213/Immigration-reform-More-and-more-deportations-are-defeated-in-court
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration officer's secret: She was smuggled into the country

ImageImage

Sam Morris

Former Immigration and Naturalization Services employee Victoria Galan, the author of the the book “Forever Illegal”
about the immigration system, is sen in her home Thursday, Feb. 13, 2014.

Friday, Feb. 14, 2014 | 2 a.m.

Victoria Galan entered the country illegally but became a federal official who held the stamp of immigration in her hand.

Now, a new edition of her book, “Forever Illegal,” shares her story, disclosing for the first time after 19 years working for the government that she was smuggled here from Mexico as a child.

In her book, Galan, who retired from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service in 2010 after a back injury, dishes out advice for both government agencies and immigrants.

She was passionate about her work and readily professes her love for the United States, but she has pointed criticisms. In her book, she recounts the work of dedicated immigration agents but also points out needlessly complicated procedures and often arbitrary decision-making. She also tells the stories of immigrants who tried but failed, through no fault of their own, to earn legal residency through proper procedures, and calls out immigrants who willfully gamed the system.

She was weeks from her fifth birthday when her mother, who was already in California, paid a human smuggler to take Galan and her siblings across the border. The book also marked the first time that Galan publicly revealed that she was raped during the journey. Galan’s mother earned her permanent residency and later sponsored her children for residency. Galan then became a citizen of the United States.

Today, she co-hosts, along with Gisela de la Rosa, a weekly radio show, “La Otra Cara de Imigracion” (The other side of immigration) on KRLV 1340 AM. She also takes several calls a week from people seeking informal immigration advice. She never offers legal guidance but does her best to steer the person in the right direction.

Galan sat down with the Sun to discuss her thoughts on reforming the immigration system, how her own experiences informed her work and the view from the immigrant perspective.

You seem to address several groups in your book. Who was your target audience?

There was no specific target audience. I’m one of the few people who became an officer and who is also a face of immigration. I know the story in the service, and I know the story of people coming in. I’m not on this side or that side; I’m on both sides.

I want the immigrant and the American to understand: I’m on the United States’ side.

If you’re an American citizen, I want you to know that not everyone is here without documents by choice, like the kids who were brought here. For a lot of them, this is their home. There are people here who have tried, but because they were ripped off by an attorney, a notary or just screwed by the system, they will be here illegally.

I understand that immigrants are people who are looking for a better life. They have to realize that there are other people in line trying to do the same thing, and it’s not fair to skip the line.

Did you ever allow your own experience as an immigrant to inform your decisions as an immigration officer?

I blocked out my experience of coming here for a long time, and when I was asked, I told people I was born in California.

I never allowed my story to influence my decision-making in the job. Never. I still believe the law has to be respected. I went by the book.

In your opinion, what should we do about immigration reform and the 11 million undocumented immigrants estimated to be living in America?

If you pass reform now, 11 million more will come. With the immigration system, we need reform within the system first, from the inside out, before we need changes to any laws. With the reform of 1986, people were getting off the planes and applying. There was a lot of fraud.

You have to reform the service, and you have to provide those who have been waiting the right way the first shot.

A work permit is not such a bad idea for the people here illegally, because we should be able to identify these people.

What problems do you see with the debate on immigration going on in Congress?

Congress does not know how the process works. They need to know what it’s like to be inside an immigration office and how things work in order to fix them. All they know is there are a lot of illegal immigrants, but they don’t know what’s needed. How will you fix something if you don’t know what’s broken?

Why was it important for you to share the story of how you crossed the border and the sexual assault you experienced?

I decided at one point, I have nothing to lose. When something like that happens to you, you’ve lost a lot already. If you don’t speak up, it will continue to happen. All these people who came without documents, how do you think their kids got here? If you smuggle a child today, and that child gets raped and killed, who are you going to go to? Are you going to go to American police and say, ‘I was trying to commit a crime, but in the process this is what happened’? So, I think a lot of those cases go unreported.

Source Article from http://lasvegassun.com/news/2014/feb/14/immigration-officers-secret-she-was-smuggled-count/
Immigration officer's secret: She was smuggled into the country
http://lasvegassun.com/news/2014/feb/14/immigration-officers-secret-she-was-smuggled-count/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Report: Immigrants improve record fighting deportation in immigration court












































































































































































Quantcast



















































































ul > li > a > img {
margin-left: 4px;
}
]]>
























































































































































































































































WASHINGTON — Immigrants facing deportation are increasingly finding success in immigration courts, according to a new analysis of court data.



















































































































Nearly half of immigrants facing deportation have won their cases in the last year, according to the Transactional Records Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, which collects and studies federal prosecution records.



















































































































The government has been losing more deportation cases each year since 2009.



















































































































The analysis published Thursday does not say how many deportation cases Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose lawyers represent the government in immigration courts, successfully appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The government can appeal immigration court rulings to the Board of Immigration Appeals, part of the Justice Department.



















































































































Since the start of the 2014 budget year in October, immigration judges ruled in favor of immigrants in about half of the 42,816 cases heard, TRAC reported. In 2013 the government won about 52 percent of the cases.



















































































































Immigrants in California, New York and Oregon have been most successful recently, while judges in Georgia, Louisiana and Utah have sided more often with the government, according to TRAC.



















































































































“ICE’s enforcement strategies and policies are designed to prioritize its resources on public safety, national security and border security threats,” said ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen. “ICE continues to focus on sensible, effective immigration enforcement that prioritizes the removal of criminal aliens and those apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States.”



















































































































Immigration supporters accuse the Obama administration of deporting too many people, but Republicans say the president is too lenient on immigrants living in the country illegally. Nearly 2 million immigrants have been removed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement under President Barack Obama.



















































































































It’s unclear what has prompted judges to side with a growing number of immigrants fighting to stay in the country. Immigration laws have not changed in recent years, but the Obama administration has changed how it enforces immigration laws.



















































































































In 2011, the government reviewed hundreds of thousands of cases pending in immigration courts. The effort was designed to curtail the backlog of more than 300,000 pending cases. Tens of thousands of cases were eventually dismissed, but there are now more than 360,000 cases pending, according to TRAC.



















































































































And the Obama administration has since issued policy orders directing immigration authorities to exercise discretion when deciding which immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported. Then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said discretion should be used for immigrants who didn’t pose a threat to national security or public safety.



















































































































In 2012 Obama also created a program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals to allow tens of thousands of young immigrants living in the United States illegally to apply to stay in the country for up to two years and get a work permit.



















































































































Kathleen Campbell Walker, an El Paso, Texas, immigration lawyer, said it may be too soon to know what the TRAC data means for immigration enforcement. She said immigration court backlogs mean cases now being heard by immigration judges could be years old. And though immigration laws have not changed in recent years, some immigrants may be more successful in arguing that they should be allowed to stay in the country based on those discretion memos.



















































































































“The true implications of these numbers are murky and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions yet,” Walker said.



















































































































Obama pledged during both of his presidential campaigns to overhaul the country’s immigration laws.



















































































































The Democratic-led Senate passed a wide-ranging bill last year but similar legislation has stalled in the Republican-controlled House.



















































































































Last month, House Republicans announced immigration principles that touched on both border security and the fate of the more than 11 million immigrants thought to be living in the United States illegally. A week later, however, House Speaker John Boehner said it would be difficult for an immigration bill to pass this year.



















































































































“The American people, including many of our members, don’t trust that the reform we’re talking about will be implemented as it was intended to be,” Boehner told reporters at his weekly news conference earlier this month.



















































































































The administration has made several immigration policy changes in recent years and during his State of the Union address last month, Obama pledged to keep using his authority to address a variety of issues that Congress hasn’t addressed.






















‘);
}
if(jQuery.inArray(’2611′, userSubsArray ) == -1) {
document.write(‘

  • ‘);
    }
    if(jQuery.inArray(’2751′, userSubsArray ) == -1) {
    document.write(‘

  • ‘);
    }

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • ‘);
    }
































    ul > li > a > img {
    margin-left: 4px;
    }
    ]]>
























































    Close





    Source Article from http://www.startribune.com/politics/245491661.html
    Report: Immigrants improve record fighting deportation in immigration court
    http://www.startribune.com/politics/245491661.html
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Immigration New Zealand is defending Odd Future ban

    Immigration New Zealand is defending a ban on a rap group it’s comparing to white supremacists and Holocaust deniers.

    Odd Future have been blocked from visiting the country, ahead of a scheduled performance with Eminem in Auckland tomorrow night.

    National border operations manager Karen Irwin says the decision is because of their history of inciting violence at concerts.

    She says Immigration New Zealand is not here to be morals police, but to protect the country from threats to public safety.

    She says any foreign national visiting New Zealand who poses a risk of inciting violence doesn’t have a right to visit the country.

    Its decision follows pressure from Auckland Councillors who objected to the group’s lyrics about rape and violence.

    But it’s been suggested that the decision was race-based – given Eminem’s own lyrics.

    The Immigration and Associate Immigration Ministers aren’t commenting – calling it an operational matter for the department.

    Source Article from http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/21463847/immigration-new-zealand-is-defending-odd-future-ban/
    Immigration New Zealand is defending Odd Future ban
    http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/21463847/immigration-new-zealand-is-defending-odd-future-ban/
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Immigration NZ clarifies Odd Future ban

    Immigration New Zealand have clarified the reasons for not allowing hip-hop collective Odd Future into the country – and say if the group’s controversial frontman was not coming they “probably” would have been allowed in.

    The group, fronted by Tyler, the Creator, were scheduled to play at Auckland’s Rapture festival this weekend.

    They got the call up last week to replace Kendrick Lamar, who withdrew to play the higher-profile NBA All-Star weekend in New Orleans this Sunday.

    Immigration NZ Border Operation Manager Karen Urwin says despite public perception, the decision to block them had nothing to do with the lyrical content of their songs.

    Ms Irwin says Immigration NZ made the decision around 2pm yesterday after receiving information from another Government agency.

    The information related to incidents Odd Future had been involved with in the past – notably one in 2011 where a police officer was assaulted by a fan during a public appearance, and another last year where Tyler verbally blasted an activist who had tried to get a concert shut down.

    “Because the lead singer has got 1.7 million followers on Twitter and because of the comments he made about her and the things he tweeted about her that poor woman was effectively harassed and threatened and we consider that kind of behaviour pretty serious,” she says.

    Under Immigration legislation, people who are believed to be a threat to public order can be refused entry to the country – though Ms Urwin says this is the first time she can recall it being applied to a musical act.

    “Generally it’s aimed at organisations like white supremacists and neo-Nazis, people who have come in here to be public speakers, holocaust deniers – those kinds of people.”

    But whether the ban is because of Odd Future as a whole is unclear – the group has already played three New Zealand shows, including two earlier this month in Auckland and Wellington.

    “I think the key thing is that Tyler the Creator wasn’t there. I think he seems to be, from what I can see, one of the main instigators,” says Ms Urwin.

    “I’d say that they probably would [be allowed in without him] since he seems to be the person who creates most of the trouble, but that’s a matter for them – and if that’s what they would like to do in the future, make an application to that effect, then we’d happily consider it.”

    Ms Urwin adds if Immigration NZ had known about the past issues before any of the other three concerts, it is likely the group would have been refused entry.

    There have been no incidents on either of Odd Future’s trips to New Zealand, but she says that does not weigh into the decision-making process.

    “When you’re dealing with public safety and you’re dealing with crowds of people I think you have a duty to be really careful,” says Ms Urwin.

    And what of other acts such as Justin Bieber or One Direction, both of which have been involved in riots and controversies of their own?

    “A thousand screaming teenage girls is quite different to a crowd attacking police,” says Ms Urwin.

    Despite the forced withdrawal of Odd Future from the Auckland show, Australia-based ticket agent Showbiz is not allowing refunds for the show. TicketMaster, another vendor, has not decided whether they will offer refunds but a spokesperson said as Odd Future were a supporting act it would be unusual.

    3 News

    Source Article from http://www.3news.co.nz/Immigration-NZ-clarifies-Odd-Future-ban/tabid/418/articleID/332149/Default.aspx
    Immigration NZ clarifies Odd Future ban
    http://www.3news.co.nz/Immigration-NZ-clarifies-Odd-Future-ban/tabid/418/articleID/332149/Default.aspx
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Immigration Minister all at sea over complaints – Prasad

    Michael Woodhouse is clearly not in command of his portfolio as he simply does not appreciate the scale of the scams in our immigration system relating to job selling, says Labour’s Immigration spokesperson Dr Rajen Prasad.

    “The Minister believes that all that victimised migrants who have been scammed for thousands of dollars have to do is to call a phone line at Immigration New Zealand and provide the information.

    “He clearly has little appreciation of the scale and nature of the practices adopted by the illegal scammers. They lock people into paying exorbitant fees and leave them dangling on the promise of a job that they hope will eventually qualify them for residence.

    “This Minister is not interested in finding out what keeps those complainants from coming forward. Those who scam migrants trade on the vulnerability of migrants because they want to make New Zealand their permanent home. They clearly feel they will lose everything if they complain in a very public way.

    “In Parliament today The Minister of Immigration refused to accept that Immigration New Zealand threatened with deportation three people who complained of scams and refused them a visa while their complaint was being investigated. This decision demonstrates the very thing that complainants fear. It took the persistent advocacy of a very experienced lawyer over almost two months for this matter to be addressed.

    “The Catch 22 that the Minister refuses to address is that when victims complain, their visas are cancelled or not renewed. If they don’t complain, they pay huge sums of money to illegal scammers and New Zealand does not get the migrants it seeks to attract. Some of the worst cases being reported to my office are from foreign fee paying students.

    “The reputation of the New Zealand immigration system will suffer if its integrity is not protected. Many cases have been aired in the media, especially the ethnic media. Callers to radio stations have confirmed many of these scams and have made it clear why they are reluctant to come forward.

    “This is why I have asked the Minister to set up an enquiry with sufficient safeguards to allow those who have been scammed to tell their story and expose the elaborate methods that are used by those scammers.”

    Source Article from http://nz.sports.yahoo.com/news/immigration-minister-sea-over-complaints-045928059–spt.html
    Immigration Minister all at sea over complaints – Prasad
    http://nz.sports.yahoo.com/news/immigration-minister-sea-over-complaints-045928059–spt.html
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Immigration groups turn to anger


    Immigration reform advocates are done playing nice with House Republicans.

    After holding their fire for years at the urging of the Obama administration, several immigration reform groups now plan to unleash their anger at the right.






















    A new, more aggressive campaign kicks off Tuesday, when these groups say they will begin confronting Republican lawmakers at public appearances, congressional hearings and events back in home districts. The goal: Shame Republicans in swing districts into taking up the issue — or make them pay at the ballot box in November.

    (Also on POLITICO: Bill Gates: U.S. immigration ‘incredible’)

    It’s unclear if the strategy will truly damage Republicans with their constituents. Or worse, whether it might backfire and oust some of the movement’s best potential allies across the aisle.

    Still, the groups believe it’s time to try something new. The movement embraced a distinctly positive message when Barack Obama took office in 2009 and stuck with it publicly even until last month, when the groups applauded House Republican leaders for releasing a set of immigration reform principles at a GOP winter retreat.

    But things changed last week when Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) dashed hopes that a major immigration overhaul could happen this year — leaving immigration groups to say enough is enough.

    “Obviously, persuasion only got us so far,” Kica Matos, a spokeswoman for the Fair Immigration Reform Movement, said Monday. “What we are now doing is to switch tactics from persuasion to punishment.”

    Matos declined to say which members of Congress are at risk for the in-your-face treatment but warned that the campaign would be “relentless and constant.” America’s Voice and CASA in Action are also leading the effort. The plan for now is to engage in daily confrontations for at least the next two months, Matos said.

    (WATCH: Chuck Schumer proposes immigration work-around)

    The groups also plan to target House Republicans in swing districts with a wide section of Latino voters — even if they’ve expressed support for immigration reform before. That means that lawmakers such as Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Calif.), who has gone as far as to sign onto a Democratic-backed comprehensive bill, aren’t safe from the wrath of the pro-reform groups.

    The strategizing extends to allies on Capitol Hill. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and House Democratic Caucus Chairman Xavier Becerra have been in talks with key advocacy groups such as America’s Voice, Alliance for Citizenship, and two powerful pro-reform labor unions — the AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union — among other faith-based, Latino and Asian organizations. The focus of those conversations is to figure out how best to put pressure on House Republicans to move on immigration reform this year, according to a Democratic aide familiar with the talks.

    “We’re not going to go away,” added Kevin Appleby, director of migration policy for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. “The speaker’s comments were a reality check that we have to redouble our efforts. We need to translate the overwhelming support of the American public for this into public power, and I think it would be a mistake to let Congress — and especially the House — off the hook.”

    Another Catholic bishops event being planned for the coming weeks, most likely along the Arizona border, will highlight the dangers that immigrants face while crossing the U.S-Mexico boundary, Appleby said. That is meant to be a domestic version of Pope Francis’s first official trip outside Rome to Lampedusa, Italy, last summer — where the pope commemorated immigrants who tried to cross into Italy from North Africa.

    Appleby said the bishops will also be “focusing like a laser” on key House Republicans who are Catholic to see whether they can persuade the lawmakers in favor of reform.

    There’s also a split in the pro-reform coalition over whether it would be wise for Obama to use his executive discretion to defer deportations for a broader subset of undocumented immigrants in the United States — particularly those who would likely qualify for legalization.

    (Also on POLITICO: Rand Paul warns Texas could turn blue)

    Some groups, like the AFL-CIO and longtime reform advocate Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), have urged Obama to use his executive authority on deportations. So far, the White House has not threatened to take unilateral executive action, wanting to give House Republicans space to bring forward their own proposal.

    While this latest salvo will only increase the amount of pressure advocates put on the White House, taking any action could play into Republicans’ hands. GOP lawmakers have long said Obama does not enforce current immigration laws and used that as a reason to stop any momentum on the issue. Some proponents, like Appleby, think that Obama taking unilateral action would kill chances of an immigration deal in Congress.


    Source Article from http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/immigration-reform-groups-house-republicans-barack-obama-103358.html
    Immigration groups turn to anger
    http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/immigration-reform-groups-house-republicans-barack-obama-103358.html
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Immigration: Is Scotland really different?








    signWould Scotland’s more tolerant approach to immigration continue if the numbers rose?


    Immigration has risen to the top of the political agenda in recent years. While politicians at Westminster want to cut back on the number of people entering the UK, the policy in Scotland is to have more. Why the difference? And do people in Scotland support the need for more immigrants?

    Last month Scotland’s education secretary Michael Russell rammed home the message that Scotland was not following the same path as the UK government by saying the debate south of the border was “being driven by UKIP and by a nasty xenophobia”.

    His comments were dismissed by the UK government as “outrageous” and “ridiculous” but Mr Russell’s outburst illustrates the large political gulf between the attitudes of those in charge in Scotland and at Westminster.

    The Conservatives in London have been pursuing policies designed to reduce net migration and even Labour at Westminster, which welcomed East Europeans a decade ago, has said it may have gone too far.


    Boosting economy

    Add to that UKIP’s desire to take Britain out of the European Union and to close its borders to those from other EU countries and there is growing pressure to curb immigration in England and Wales.

    But not in Scotland. Unlike almost every other Nationalist party in Europe, the SNP has set out in its White Paper the ways it would seek to increase immigration should it gain independence in September’s referendum.


    Nigel Farage's visit to Edinburgh last year was met with protestsNigel Farage’s visit to Edinburgh last year was met with protests

    Demographics suggest Scotland’s population is ageing and, despite immigration-driven population growth over the past decade, the political consensus is in favour of migrants of working age coming in to take on jobs and set up businesses which can grow the economy.

    The main opposition parties in Scotland are not opposing this part of the SNP’s independence plan and they agree that migrants can boost the economy.

    But are the people of Scotland convinced by the argument? Do they share the views of their politicians?

    Are the Scottish public really more accepting of immigration than people down south?


    ‘Thin evidence’

    The Oxford University Migration Observatory has just undertaken what it says is the first major survey to ask people in Scotland about immigration to Scotland.

    Scott Blinder, director of the observatory, says: “Pretty much all the previous work on Scotland has been based on small numbers of respondents and a small number of questions.

    “People were making a lot of claims on the basis of very thin evidence.”

    The observatory study, conducted by polling organisation YouGov, with more than 2,000 respondents in Scotland and a similar number in England and Wales found that Scottish attitudes to migration are different from the rest of Britain but “not massively different”.


    Van showing the 'Go home' messageThe UK government was criticised for advertising vans which told illegal immigrants to “go home”

    Dr Blinder says: “The majority of Scots (58%) would still like to see immigration reduced but it is a much smaller percentage than the rest of Britain (75%).

    “In Scotland they are more likely to say immigration is good for Scotland, which is the reverse of the rest of Britain, and it seems to be a somewhat less important issue on the agenda for people in Scotland.”

    The observatory’s finding are in line with a recent British Social Attitudes Survey which suggested that 78% of people in England thought the number of immigrants to Britain should be reduced and gave a figure for Scotland of 69%.

    The new study asked people about various types of immigration such as bringing in high-skilled migrants, students or immediate family members of existing migrants.


    Dramatic change

    Across the range of types of immigration Scottish people were less likely to want immigration reduced.

    And although the numbers rose dramatically for reducing immigration for categories such as low-skilled migrants, extended family members and asylum seekers, they were always less than the figures for England.

    It could be said that Scots do not seem to be “pro” immigration but they do appear to less “anti”.

    Scotland has had historically low levels of inward migration and is generally not as densely populated as England.

    A decade ago Scotland had the fastest falling population in Europe, with the birth rate at an all-time low and more people leaving the country than were arriving from overseas.

    The population of Scotland was hovering just above five million at the end of 2003 after a decline of almost a quarter of a million in the previous 30 years.


    Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon launch the white paperThe White Paper on Scottish independence set out plans to increase immigration

    All the projections said the decline would continue but since 2004 there has been a dramatic change which has seen the Scottish population grow past its 1974 peak to its highest level ever.

    Economists say Scotland’s population needs to grow by 24,000 people a year just to keep pace with European economies.

    The majority of immigrants to Scotland have traditionally been from Pakistan and India but over the past decade the number of people from Poland has risen from just a couple of thousand to about 60,000.

    This rise coincided with removal of EU restrictions on Polish people having the freedom to work in other countries, a right which has recently been granted to citizens of Romania and Bulgaria.

    Despite the rise over the past decade Scotland still has a relatively small immigrant population relative to England, especially London.

    About 7% of Scots were born outside the UK, whereas the figure for the rest of the UK is almost 14%.

    Robert Wright, professor of economics at the University of Strathclyde, says Scotland has not really been tested with mass immigration.

    He says: “I think the difference between Scotland and the UK really boils down to the fact there has been less immigration in Scotland than the UK for a significant period of time.


    Polish migrant workers leave Poland for the UK in 2006The number of people arriving from Poland has increased over the past decade

    “So the fact I think there is more tolerance here is because there has been less of it. That does not mean there will be tolerance in the future when there is more immigration, so this will be a hurdle we have to jump later.”

    Professor Christina Boswell, professor of politics at University of Edinburgh, agrees that tolerant immigration policies do not tend to be vote winners.

    She says: “Even if at the moment the SNP, Lib Dems and Labour are largely supportive of a more liberal approach, in the event of independence, actually the temptation to break ranks and criticise and tap into public concerns about immigration would be quite high.”

    Prof Boswell says this has been the experience across Europe where public attitudes have been largely quite sceptical and cautious about the benefits of immigration.

    She says: “It is really quite easy and quite tempting for political parties to tap into those political concerns about immigration and try to mobilise support on the basis of an anti-immigrant position, or at least of a less liberal position on immigration.

    “You don’t win votes by adopting a liberal progressive labour migration policy and, in fact, the Labour government in the UK has found that in the past few years and it has obviously had to backtrack on its more expansive policy of the early-2000s.”



















    Nigel Farage

    Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.










    UKIP leader Nigel Farage faced a hostile crowd during a campaigning visit to Edinburgh








    This is the same line taken by UKIP leader Nigel Farage when he visited Edinburgh last year, a trip which saw him swarmed by angry protesters and having to take refuge in a pub.

    He said: “We heard these arguments in England, 10-15 years ago that we must have uncontrolled immigration into Britain to help the economy, and what we now have is thousands of youngsters in England unemployed and priced out of the jobs market.

    “Immigration can be a very good thing for the economy but it needs to be controlled.”

    Prof Boswell says there is much research to show that immigrants do not create high unemployment and generally do not create a high burden on the welfare state.

    However, she says: “Immigration is often used as a lightning rod for channelling a lot of anxieties about employment, about welfare, about social cohesion.”

    Prof Boswell adds: “It is much easier to sell the benefits of labour migration where an economy is facing very tangible acute shortages in particular sectors or regions.

    “It is much easier as well to sell labour migration when it is about recruiting highly-skilled migrants.

    “I think it is much more difficult for governments to make a case or sell the case for recruiting semi or low-skilled migrants.

    “If it were to become a major issue of concern, for example with Romanian or Bulgarian immigration, then I would expect the SNP to water down its claims about a more liberal immigration policy, at least not to emphasise those in the election campaign because it clearly would not be a vote-winner.”

    Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-25910947
    Immigration: Is Scotland really different?
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-25910947
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Senator suggests quick approval, delayed enactment of immigration law

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. immigration reforms could be passed now but enacted after President Barack Obama leaves office if Republicans fear he will not enforce the new rules, a key Democratic senator said Sunday, offering a way to achieve one of Obama’s main policy objectives.

    Last week, Republican House Speaker John Boehner expressed doubts Obama’s long-sought overhaul of immigration laws would be passed this year and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said there was little interest in the issue with congressional elections looming in November.

    Boehner said one of the biggest obstacles to immigration reform in the House was a concern that Obama would not fully enforce any laws that might be approved. As evidence of that, he accused him of changing “the healthcare law on a whim, whenever he likes”.

    On NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat and one of chief architects of the Senate’s bipartisan immigration plan, offered what he said was a simple solution.

    “Let’s enact the law this year but simply not let it actually start until 2017 after President Obama’s term is over,” he said.

    “Now, I think the rap against him that he won’t enforce the law is false. He’s deported more people than any president but you could actually have the law start in 2017 without doing much violence to it.”

    Schumer said it would be difficult to pass immigration reform in 2015 or 2016 when the next presidential election season opens because Republican candidates would be staking out conservative positions on immigration in order to differentiate themselves from Democrats.

    Representative Rob Portman, a Republican from Ohio who has been active on immigration in the House, said “some Republicans would be interested” in Schumer’s idea about delayed enactment, especially if there were measures to increase border security and prevent employers from hiring undocumented workers.

    In June, the Senate passed a comprehensive bill that would provide a path to citizenship for those in the country illegally and tighten border security.

    The bill stalled in the House, where many lawmakers oppose offering legal status for some 11 million people who live in the United States unlawfully.

    (Writing by Bill Trott; Editing by Jim Loney and Sophie Hares)

    Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/senator-suggests-quick-approval-delayed-enactment-immigration-law-174722069–business.html
    Senator suggests quick approval, delayed enactment of immigration law
    http://news.yahoo.com/senator-suggests-quick-approval-delayed-enactment-immigration-law-174722069–business.html
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

    Swiss vote to curb immigration by EU citizens

    GENEVA (AFP) – Switzerland voted Sunday to impose curbs on immigration by European Union citizens, in a nail-bitingly close referendum that threatened to ignite a row with Brussels.

    Final results showed that 50.3 percent of voters had backed the “Stop Mass Immigration” proposal pushed by right-wing populists, even though it could mean the demise of a raft of deals signed in 1999 with the EU including on the economic front.

    “This is a turning point in our immigration policy,” said Toni Brunner, head of the Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which piloted the referendum campaign in a country that has steadfastly resisted joining the EU.

    Switzerland’s seven-member multiparty government, the Federal Council, in which the SVP has one cabinet post, had opposed the measure on the grounds that it could hit the economy and undermine the country’s credibility as a negotiating partner.

    However in Switzerland, the people have the last word on a huge range of issues in referendums, and the government acknowledged that.

    “The Federal Council will without delay begin the work needed to implement the decision of the people,” it said in a statement.

    It added that it would examine over coming weeks how to “recast relations between Switzerland and the EU”, underlining that the current rules would remain in force until a new version has been drawn up.

    The measure binds the government to renegotiate within three years a deal with Brussels that since 2007 has given most EU citizens free access to the country’s labour market.

    It also means that Switzerland will add a clause to its constitution stating migration must serve the nation’s economic interests.

    The SVP, which is hawkish about Swiss sovereignty, claims the country has been swamped by migrants.

    It says that with 80,000 EU citizens arriving per year — rather than the 8,000 predicted before the rules were liberalised — it is time for the nation of eight million people to rein things in.

    Proponents argued that EU citizens undercut Swiss workers, and that overpopulation has driven up rents, stretched the health and education systems, overloaded the road and rail networks, and eaten into the landscape due to housing construction.

    In a nod towards such concerns, the government recently adopted measures making it harder for newly-arrived EU citizens to apply for Swiss social security.

    The measure will mean a return to the annual sector-by-sector limits on work permits for foreigners in force in the past.

    It leaves it up to the authorities to set the numbers.

    Opponents, also including lobby groups from across the economy, have said it would be foolhardy to revive the bureaucratic hurdles of the past.

    They say restricting the hiring of EU citizens would act as a brake on the wealthy Swiss economy, which enjoys virtually full employment but has an ageing population, and could also hurt trade with a disgruntled EU.

    A ‘signal’ for eurosceptics

    Brussels warns that Switzerland cannot pick and choose from the binding package of deals negotiated painstakingly in the 1990s, seen as a way for the country to enjoy the benefits of access to the EU market without membership.

    But the vote has also been watched closely by eurosceptics within the EU who want to rein in immigration among its member states, notably from eastern to western Europe.

    “A signal from Switzerland is clearly going to be welcome,” SVP politician Oskar Freysinger told public broadcaster RTS.

    Switzerland is ringed by EU member countries and does the bulk of its trade with the bloc.

    The labour market accord is part of a raft of deals signed with the EU in 1999 after five years of talks, approved by Swiss voters in 2000 and phased in.

    Critics of the migration control plan underline that the treaty with the EU already allowed Switzerland to reimpose temporary quotas — something it has deployed to control numbers of workers from the EU’s ex-communist member states.

    But the quota clause expires this year.

    Immigration and national identity are traditional political themes in a country with a long history of drawing foreign workers and some of Europe’s toughest rules for obtaining citizenship.

    But over recent years, the proportion of foreigners has risen from around one-fifth of the population to roughly a quarter.

    The majority of recent immigrants are from neighbouring Germany, Italy and France, as well as Portugal.

    There was a clear division in the vote, with Switzerland’s German- and Italian-speaking cantons, in favour, and French-speaking regions voting against.

    Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/swiss-vote-eu-migrant-curbs-39-too-close-132413518.html
    Swiss vote to curb immigration by EU citizens
    http://news.yahoo.com/swiss-vote-eu-migrant-curbs-39-too-close-132413518.html
    http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
    immigration – Yahoo News Search Results