British immigration minister quits over illegal cleaner

London (AFP) – Britain’s immigration minister resigned on Saturday after it emerged he had employed a cleaner who was in the country illegally, Prime Minister David Cameron’s office said.

Downing Street said there was no suggestion Mark Harper, a junior minister in the Home Office interior ministry, knew the cleaner was an illegal immigrant, adding that the woman had given him false papers.

Harper last year launched a controversial campaign featuring trucks with billboards urging illegal immigrants to go home, while in recent months he had been had been overseeing the passage of new immigration laws.

Immigration is a key issue for Cameron’s Conservative Party ahead of the next general election in May 2015.

“Although I complied with the law at all times, I consider that as immigration minister, who is taking legislation through parliament which will toughen up our immigration laws, I should hold myself to a higher standard than expected of others,” Harper wrote in his resignation letter to Cameron.

He said that he had employed the cleaner in 2007 after making background checks but did not carry out further checks until last month, despite being appointed minister in 2012.

He then found out on Thursday that the cleaner did not have leave to stay in the country.

“I am sorry for any embarrassment caused,” Harper added.

Cameron said he was “very sorry indeed to see you leave the government” but added that Harper had taken an “honourable decision”.

Junior Home Office minister James Brokenshire was named to replace Harper.

Downing Street said in a statement: “Mark Harper offered his resignation after he was informed that his cleaner did not have indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom, despite having shown him documents claiming she did.

“He immediately notified the prime minister, who accepted his resignation with regret. There is no suggestion that Mr Harper knowingly employed an illegal immigrant.”

It was not immediately clear which country the cleaner was from.

Harper will remain a member of parliament.

- Immigration a touchy issue -

Harper came under fire last year over the Home Office campaign involving mobile billboards telling illegal immigrants to “go home or face arrest” and giving them a hotline number to call.

Critics said the campaign was racist.

Cameron’s centre-right Conservatives face a growing electoral threat from the anti-immigration, anti-EU UK Independence Party.

The issue has heated up sharply since Bulgarians and Romanians were given full rights on January 1 to free movement within the European Union, stoking claims in Britain and elsewhere they would take local jobs or abuse the welfare system.

The government’s efforts to push a new immigration bill through parliament have had a bumpy ride, with Conservative rebels saying it does not go far enough despite the inclusion of measures such as stripping naturalised terror suspects of British citizenship.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/british-immigration-minister-quits-over-illegal-cleaner-173200717.html
British immigration minister quits over illegal cleaner
http://news.yahoo.com/british-immigration-minister-quits-over-illegal-cleaner-173200717.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration minister Harper resigns over illegal cleaner

LONDON (Reuters) – British immigration minister Mark Harper has resigned after discovering a cleaner he employed was not legally allowed to work in the country, Prime Minister David Cameron’s office said on Saturday.

The issue will be an embarrassment for Cameron’s Conservative-led government which has pledged to bring down the number of immigrants to below 100,000 a year by 2015.

Trailing in the polls ahead of European elections in May and national polls next year, Cameron is striving to stem a right-wing threat from the anti-immigration UK Independence Party.

Cameron had accepted the resignation with regret, his office said. “There is no suggestion that Mr Harper knowingly employed an illegal immigrant,” the statement read.

In an exchange of letters with Harper, dated Friday and released by Downing Street, Cameron said: “I am very sorry indeed to see you leave the government, but I understand your reasons for doing so.

“In particular, I understand your view that, although you carried out checks on your cleaner, you feel that you should hold yourself to an especially high standard as Immigration Minister. You have taken an honourable decision.”

Harper was elected Conservative MP for the Forest of Dean in Gloucestershire in 2005 and was appointed immigration minister in 2012. He was told that the cleaner did not have indefinite leave to remain the UK earlier this week, he said.

He added in his resignation letter to Cameron that he had checked the cleaner’s immigration status when he first employed her in 2007.

“When you then appointed me as Immigration Minister … I went through a similar consideration process and once again concluded that no further check was necessary,” he added. “In retrospect, I should have checked more thoroughly.”

Harper will stay on as a member of parliament.

(Reporting by Stephen Addison; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-minister-harper-resigns-over-illegal-cleaner-165719515.html
Immigration minister Harper resigns over illegal cleaner
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-minister-harper-resigns-over-illegal-cleaner-165719515.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

White House giving Boehner room on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — As Republican leaders dampen expectations for overhauling immigration laws this year, the White House is hoping that the GOP resistance is temporary and tactical, and it’s resisting pressure from some political allies for President Barack Obama to take matters into his own hands and ease his administration’s deportation record.

For a president looking for a legacy piece of legislation, the current state of the immigration debate represents a high wire act. He could act alone to slow deportations, and probably doom any chance of a permanent and comprehensive overhaul. Yet if he shows too much patience, the opportunity to fix immigration laws as he wants could well slip away.

House Speaker John Boehner on Thursday all but ruled out passage of immigration legislation before the fall midterm elections, saying Republicans had trouble trusting that Obama would implement all aspects of an immigration law.

White House officials say they believe Boehner ultimately wants to get it done. But they acknowledge that Boehner faces stiff resistance from conservatives who oppose any form of legalization for immigrants who have crossed into the United States illegally or overstayed their visas. As well, Republicans are eager to keep this election year’s focus on Obama’s contentious health care law.

Obama is willing to give Boehner space to operate and to tamp down the conservative outcry that greeted a set of immigration overhaul principles the speaker brought forward last week. For now, the White House is simply standing behind a comprehensive bill that passed in the Senate last year, but is not trying to press Boehner on how to proceed in the Republican-controlled House.

“That news yesterday was disappointing but not entirely surprisingly,” White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri said . “It’s a difficult issue for them.”

Vice President Joe Biden told CNN on Friday that Obama is waiting to see what the House passes before responding. “What you don’t want to do is create more problems for John Boehner in being able to bring this up,” he said.

The White House view could be overly optimistic, playing down the strength of the opposition to acting this year.

For Republicans the immigration issue poses two political challenges. In the short-term, it displays intra-party divisions when they want to use their unified opposition to the health care law as a key issue in the 2014 elections. Immigration distracts from that strategy. But failure to pass an immigration overhaul would be a significant drag on the chances of a Republican winning the 2016 presidential election if angry Latino voters are mobilized to vote for the Democratic nominee.

Making the case for a delay, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, said there’s “overwhelming support for doing nothing this year.” Labrador, who worked with a small group of Republicans and Democrats on comprehensive legislation last year then abandoned the negotiations, said it would be a mistake to have an internal battle in the GOP. He argued for waiting until next year when the Republicans might have control of the Senate.

Some Republican supporters of a new immigration law are pushing back. “I’m trying to convince my colleagues that regardless of primaries, regardless of elections this November, that we have an obligation and a duty to solve this crisis once and for all,” Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., told the Spanish-language television network Telemundo in an interview scheduled to air Sunday.

White House spokesman Jay Carney did not criticize Boehner’s talk of a delay, though he called the speaker’s claims that Obama is the problem “an odd bit of diversion.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, however, did not hold back, signaling that Democrats are prepared to lay the blame on Boehner and his party if legislation does not materialize.

“Republicans should be candid about putting extremism ahead of the good of the country,” she said. “I hope that Speaker Boehner will overcome the dereliction of duty that is holding back his party and our nation, and seize this opportunity to work to enact the bipartisan immigration reform the American people need and deserve.”

Democratic officials familiar with the White House thinking say there is also a possibility that the House could act in November or December, during a lame duck session of Congress after the elections. That would require swift work in a short time. What’s more, if Republicans win control of the Senate, there would be pressure to leave the issue to the new Senate.

If Republicans do well in Senate elections, new senators could include Paul Broun of Georgia, who shortly after Boehner issued his immigration principles said he wouldn’t support amnesty for immigrants illegally in the United States. The issue also raises questions about what Republicans with presidential aspirations such as Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Marco Rubio of Florida would do, given that the Iowa presidential caucuses, the first test for the GOP nomination, tend to favor the most conservative candidates in the field.

The longer the immigration issue remains unresolved, the more pressure will fall on Obama from immigrant advocates to act alone and ease the deportations that have been undertaken by his administration. Since Obama took office in January 2009, more than 1.9 million immigrants have been deported.

“Inevitably more and more advocates will be calling on the president to stop and roll back the deportation machinery,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of the pro-immigration group America’s Voice. “It is a source of tremendous anger, frustration on the part of immigrants and their allies that Obama is deporting people today that would benefit from immigration reform tomorrow.”

The White House insists the president is following the law and cannot act unilaterally to change it, a view disputed by advocacy groups.

“The administration has both the legal authority and moral authority to make changes that would reduce the pain and suffering in the community right now,” said Marielena Hincapie, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center. Such advocates dismiss Boehner’s claims that Obama can’t be counted on to enforce the border security components of a new immigration law.

Sharry called Boehner’s remarks a “flimsy excuse” given that Obama has “deported more people than ever, that net unauthorized migration at the border is zero or less, that we’ve doubled the number of border patrol in the last decade to 21,000.”

The White House has decided to leave that argument to the outside groups, unwilling to counter Boehner’s allegation by drawing attention to policies that anger immigrant advocates. Administration officials point to recent bipartisan passage of farm legislation, which Obama signed Friday, and a broad budget agreement, as evidence that Boehner apparently trusts Obama to deal on other matters.

_______

Follow Jim Kuhnhenn on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-giving-boehner-room-immigration-220859004–politics.html
White House giving Boehner room on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-giving-boehner-room-immigration-220859004–politics.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration: Gains and Pains for GOP

What Boehner tapping the brakes on immigration reform means: short-term gain for GOP, but also long-term pain… Immigration remaining a political issue come 2016 won’t help the GOP… How to parse Biden’s comment on 2016… Obama to sign farm bill into law… A second-straight disappointing jobs report… 2014 eyes will be on Montana… Also watching Michigan’s Senate race… And RIP, Marty Plissner.

FIRST THOUGHTS.

Boehner tapping the brakes on immigration reform means short-term gain but long-term pain for his party

So much for those immigration principles House Republican leaders unveiled last week. On Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner hit the brakes on passing immigration reform because he said his GOP caucus couldn’t trust the president. “The American people, including many of my members, don’t trust that the reform that we’re talking about will be implemented as it was intended to be. The president seems to change the health-care law on a whim whenever he likes,” he said. “Listen, there’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws. And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes.” Although Boehner’s rationale is borderline illogical (if you can’t trust the president, why pass ANY laws? Hello, farm bill?), it does make perfect short-term sense for the speaker to hit the pause button here. As NBC’s Luke Russert points out, why take up an issue that divides your party, especially before what seems to be a favorable midterm cycle? Why poke your conservative base in the eye at the time when you’re trying to raise the debt limit? But in the long term, Boehner’s reluctance to push ahead is very, very risky, and it shows the limits of how much he’s willing to use his power.

Immigration remaining a political issue come 2016 won’t help the GOP

For one thing, the House not moving on immigration — after the Senate already did so last year — would make it clear to everyone that only one party is standing in the way of reform: the Republican Party. In the 2012 presidential election, Republicans were able to use this counter-argument on immigration: “If this is so important to the president, why didn’t he move on this in his first term when he had a Democratic Congress?” It was a fair rebuttal. But what the public — especially viewers of Telemundo and Univision — WON’T buy is: “We’re not going to consider this legislation because we don’t trust the president.” More importantly, hitting the brakes on immigration reform won’t do anything to solve the GOP’s demographic problems after losing the increasingly growing Latino vote by a whopping 44 points in the last presidential election. And while Boehner knows that bringing up immigration reform will divide his party, the problem is that the divide will still be exposed in the next presidential race. Indeed, just like Romney did in ’12, there will be political incentive for the GOP presidential candidates to move to the right on immigration in the primaries. We know how that turned out in the general election. By the way, one more point on this Boehner’s we-don’t-trust-the-president excuse: Obama is not going to be president after 2016, when much of the actual new immigration law (if it does pass) gets implemented.

How to parse Biden’s comment on 2016

Vice President Joe Biden discussed his 2016 thinking to CNN this way: “There may be reasons I don’t run, but there’s no obvious reason for me why I think I should not run.” That sentence is pretty easy to parse: I’d like to run for president, he’s saying (examples: his visit to Jim Clyburn’s fish fry, his wooing of key Iowa and New Hampshire politicos). BUT: there still could be reasons I don’t (the biggest one being Hillary Clinton). Bottom line: Joe Biden isn’t going to run for president if Hillary does. But if she doesn’t, he probably will. And so while Republicans are looking for a 2016 front-runner, the Democrats have two of them — Hillary and Biden. Yet only one of them will be running for president.

Obama sign farm bill into law

Meanwhile, President Obama heads to East Lansing, MI to sign the recently passed farm bill into law. The Detroit Free Press: “After seeing firsthand the work of agricultural researchers at Michigan State, the president is expected to deliver remarks about the importance of the farm bill, which he will sign. The U.S. Senate gave final passage to the bill this week. Three years in the making, the farm bill represents some $500 billion in federal spending over five years, but it has pulled back on direct payments to growers and extended crop insurance to farmers who raise specialty crops, like many of those grown in Michigan. Bipartisan majorities ended up supporting the legislation in both the House and Senate.” Obama signs the farm bill into law at 2:10 pm ET.

A second-straight disappointing jobs report

The AP with the latest federal jobs figures. “Hiring was surprisingly weak in January for the second straight month, likely renewing concern that the U.S. economy might be slowing after a strong finish last year. The Labor Department says employers added 113,000 jobs, less than the average monthly gain of 194,000 in 2013. This follows December’s tepid increase of just 75,000. Job gains have averaged only 154,000 the past three months, down from 201,000 in the preceding three months. Still, more people began looking for work in January, and some of the jobless were hired, reducing the unemployment rate to 6.6 percent. That’s the lowest since October 2008.”

2014 eyes will be on Montana

The day after retiring Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) was confirmed as President Obama’s next U.S. ambassador to China, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D) has called for a news conference set for noon ET. And it’s widely expected that Bullock will appoint Lt. Gov. John Walsh (D) to temporarily fill the Senate seat. Walsh is already running for the seat in 2014, so this appointment could give him a leg up — in both the Democratic primary and possibly general election (by boosting his name ID). That said, Republicans right now have the advantage in this race given that Obama got just 42% of the vote in the state in 2012. Then again, Sen. Jon Tester (D) was able to win re-election that year. The front-runner for the GOP nomination in this Senate race is Rep. Steve Daines (R-MT). By the way, the Senate confirmed Baucus by a 96-0 vote (with Baucus voting present). It’s a reminder that unless your name is Chuck Hagel, your Senate colleagues often will easily vote for you, regardless of the position or your party.

2014 ad to watch

Speaking of Daines, don’t miss the TV ad he unveiled this week in Montana’s Senate race. To us, it’s all intended to soften the image of a Republican congressman running for the Senate. “I’m running for the U.S. Senate because we need solutions, and Washington needs some Montana common sense,” Daines says in the ad. After several House Republicans LOST key Senate races in 2012 (think Denny Rehberg in Montana, Rick Berg in North Dakota, Connie Mack in Florida) — several more House Republicans are running for Senate in 2014 (Daines in Montana, Tom Cotton in Arkansas, Shelley Moore Capito in West Virginia, Bill Cassidy in Louisiana). So this is an important ad strategy to watch.

Watching Michigan’s Senate race

Speaking of 2014, it’s worth mentioning that the state where Obama will sign the farm bill — Michigan — could be a Senate race to watch in November. Yes, Obama won the state in 2012 with 54% of the vote (against a Republican nominee with big roots in the state). And yes, Democrats have cleared the race for Rep. Gary Peters (D-MI). But Peters hasn’t wowed yet. Meanwhile, Republicans have a decent candidate in former Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land. And the overall political environment isn’t necessarily that favorable to Democrats right now.

A second Quinnipiac poll in Colorado finds Udall, Obama, Clinton treading water

On Thursday, we wrote about a new Quinnipiac poll showing Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s (D) numbers improving in this swing state. But hours later, a second Q-poll found numbers for Sen. Mark Udall (45% approval), President Obama (37% approval), and Hillary Clinton (trailing Paul Ryan and Rand Paul in ’16 hypotheticals) pretty much unchanged in the state.

RIP, Marty Plissner

On Thursday, CBS’s long-time political director, Marty Plissner, passed away at the age of 87. Before Plissner, there were no political units at any TV networks, no exit polling, no high-profile campaign coverage beyond the conventions. Then came Plissner, who built the first political reporting unit of any network. He also coined the phrase “too close to call” and changed the way networks covered political conventions. So we wouldn’t have our current jobs without him. RIP, Marty Plissner.



Source Article from http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663303/s/36d521b1/sc/42/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cpolitics0Cfirst0Eread0Cimmigration0Egains0Epains0Egop0En24481/story01.htm
Immigration: Gains and Pains for GOP
http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663303/s/36d521b1/sc/42/l/0L0Snbcnews0N0Cpolitics0Cfirst0Eread0Cimmigration0Egains0Epains0Egop0En24481/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration pain/gain for GOP

What Boehner tapping the brakes on immigration reform means: short-term gain for GOP, but also long-term pain… Immigration remaining a political issue come 2016 won’t help the GOP… How to parse Biden’s comment on 2016… Obama to sign farm bill into law… A second-straight disappointing jobs report… 2014 eyes will be on Montana… Also watching Michigan’s Senate race… And RIP, Marty Plissner.

FIRST THOUGHTS.

Boehner tapping the brakes on immigration reform means short-term gain but long-term pain for his party

So much for those immigration principles House Republican leaders unveiled last week. On Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner hit the brakes on passing immigration reform because he said his GOP caucus couldn’t trust the president. “The American people, including many of my members, don’t trust that the reform that we’re talking about will be implemented as it was intended to be. The president seems to change the health-care law on a whim whenever he likes,” he said. “Listen, there’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws. And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes.” Although Boehner’s rationale is borderline illogical (if you can’t trust the president, why pass ANY laws? Hello, farm bill?), it does make perfect short-term sense for the speaker to hit the pause button here. As NBC’s Luke Russert points out, why take up an issue that divides your party, especially before what seems to be a favorable midterm cycle? Why poke your conservative base in the eye at the time when you’re trying to raise the debt limit? But in the long term, Boehner’s reluctance to push ahead is very, very risky, and it shows the limits of how much he’s willing to use his power.

Immigration remaining a political issue come 2016 won’t help the GOP

For one thing, the House not moving on immigration — after the Senate already did so last year — would make it clear to everyone that only one party is standing in the way of reform: the Republican Party. In the 2012 presidential election, Republicans were able to use this counter-argument on immigration: “If this is so important to the president, why didn’t he move on this in his first term when he had a Democratic Congress?” It was a fair rebuttal. But what the public — especially viewers of Telemundo and Univision — WON’T buy is: “We’re not going to consider this legislation because we don’t trust the president.” More importantly, hitting the brakes on immigration reform won’t do anything to solve the GOP’s demographic problems after losing the increasingly growing Latino vote by a whopping 44 points in the last presidential election. And while Boehner knows that bringing up immigration reform will divide his party, the problem is that the divide will still be exposed in the next presidential race. Indeed, just like Romney did in ’12, there will be political incentive for the GOP presidential candidates to move to the right on immigration in the primaries. We know how that turned out in the general election. By the way, one more point on this Boehner’s we-don’t-trust-the-president excuse: Obama is not going to be president after 2016, when much of the actual new immigration law (if it does pass) gets implemented.

How to parse Biden’s comment on 2016

Vice President Joe Biden discussed his 2016 thinking to CNN this way: “There may be reasons I don’t run, but there’s no obvious reason for me why I think I should not run.” That sentence is pretty easy to parse: I’d like to run for president, he’s saying (examples: his visit to Jim Clyburn’s fish fry, his wooing of key Iowa and New Hampshire politicos). BUT: there still could be reasons I don’t (the biggest one being Hillary Clinton). Bottom line: Joe Biden isn’t going to run for president if Hillary does. But if she doesn’t, he probably will. And so while Republicans are looking for a 2016 front-runner, the Democrats have two of them — Hillary and Biden. Yet only one of them will be running for president.

Obama sign farm bill into law

Meanwhile, President Obama heads to East Lansing, MI to sign the recently passed farm bill into law. The Detroit Free Press: “After seeing firsthand the work of agricultural researchers at Michigan State, the president is expected to deliver remarks about the importance of the farm bill, which he will sign. The U.S. Senate gave final passage to the bill this week. Three years in the making, the farm bill represents some $500 billion in federal spending over five years, but it has pulled back on direct payments to growers and extended crop insurance to farmers who raise specialty crops, like many of those grown in Michigan. Bipartisan majorities ended up supporting the legislation in both the House and Senate.” Obama signs the farm bill into law at 2:10 pm ET.

A second-straight disappointing jobs report

The AP with the latest federal jobs figures. “Hiring was surprisingly weak in January for the second straight month, likely renewing concern that the U.S. economy might be slowing after a strong finish last year. The Labor Department says employers added 113,000 jobs, less than the average monthly gain of 194,000 in 2013. This follows December’s tepid increase of just 75,000. Job gains have averaged only 154,000 the past three months, down from 201,000 in the preceding three months. Still, more people began looking for work in January, and some of the jobless were hired, reducing the unemployment rate to 6.6 percent. That’s the lowest since October 2008.”

2014 eyes will be on Montana

The day after retiring Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) was confirmed as President Obama’s next U.S. ambassador to China, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D) has called for a news conference set for noon ET. And it’s widely expected that Bullock will appoint Lt. Gov. John Walsh (D) to temporarily fill the Senate seat. Walsh is already running for the seat in 2014, so this appointment could give him a leg up — in both the Democratic primary and possibly general election (by boosting his name ID). That said, Republicans right now have the advantage in this race given that Obama got just 42% of the vote in the state in 2012. Then again, Sen. Jon Tester (D) was able to win re-election that year. The front-runner for the GOP nomination in this Senate race is Rep. Steve Daines (R-MT). By the way, the Senate confirmed Baucus by a 96-0 vote (with Baucus voting present). It’s a reminder that unless your name is Chuck Hagel, your Senate colleagues often will easily vote for you, regardless of the position or your party.

2014 ad to watch

Speaking of Daines, don’t miss the TV ad he unveiled this week in Montana’s Senate race. To us, it’s all intended to soften the image of a Republican congressman running for the Senate. “I’m running for the U.S. Senate because we need solutions, and Washington needs some Montana common sense,” Daines says in the ad. After several House Republicans LOST key Senate races in 2012 (think Denny Rehberg in Montana, Rick Berg in North Dakota, Connie Mack in Florida) — several more House Republicans are running for Senate in 2014 (Daines in Montana, Tom Cotton in Arkansas, Shelley Moore Capito in West Virginia, Bill Cassidy in Louisiana). So this is an important ad strategy to watch.

Watching Michigan’s Senate race

Speaking of 2014, it’s worth mentioning that the state where Obama will sign the farm bill — Michigan — could be a Senate race to watch in November. Yes, Obama won the state in 2012 with 54% of the vote (against a Republican nominee with big roots in the state). And yes, Democrats have cleared the race for Rep. Gary Peters (D-MI). But Peters hasn’t wowed yet. Meanwhile, Republicans have a decent candidate in former Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land. And the overall political environment isn’t necessarily that favorable to Democrats right now.

A second Quinnipiac poll in Colorado finds Udall, Obama, Clinton treading water

On Thursday, we wrote about a new Quinnipiac poll showing Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s (D) numbers improving in this swing state. But hours later, a second Q-poll found numbers for Sen. Mark Udall (45% approval), President Obama (37% approval), and Hillary Clinton (trailing Paul Ryan and Rand Paul in ’16 hypotheticals) pretty much unchanged in the state.

RIP, Marty Plissner

On Thursday, CBS’s long-time political director, Marty Plissner, passed away at the age of 87. Before Plissner, there were no political units at any TV networks, no exit polling, no high-profile campaign coverage beyond the conventions. Then came Plissner, who built the first political reporting unit of any network. He also coined the phrase “too close to call” and changed the way networks covered political conventions. So we wouldn’t have our current jobs without him. RIP, Marty Plissner.



Source Article from http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/immigration-gains-pains-gop-n24481?ocid=msnhp&pos=2
Immigration pain/gain for GOP
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/immigration-gains-pains-gop-n24481?ocid=msnhp&pos=2
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration Overhaul Suffers Setback

At the debt ceiling.

Peter cook is with us.

He is our chief wash and correspondent.

I know there is a shift in the last 24 hours in this debate.

The debate was like to immigration.

What is the shift?

Immigration is the bigger story.

As close as we are to the debt ceiling deadline, john boehner tabled immigration for this year is a very big deal.

It has big implications for the big — midterm elections.

As for the debt ceiling, john boehner is a man and a box.

At some point, he must concede defeat and move on and allow for a clean debt ceiling increase.

Everybody knows that is what is going to happen at the end of the day.

There is a narrow window for them to get that done.

There are still the risk for some kind of mayhem in between.

The clock is ticking and the window is narrow.

On immigration, it will have an impact on midterm elections, but what about the presidential elections?

That is the best case scenario, to deal with this year.

Top republicans have been telling him that.

He is also listening to his rank-and-file members in the house.

They believe that introducing this issue right now would jeopardize their chances for boosting the numbers in the house and retaking the senate.

That is job one for them.

They think obamacare is the story of the year.

They think putting immigration in their jeopardizes that.

Ultimately, they have to get it done.

Chairman yellen had some important testimony next week.

How will that be treated in washington?

The testimony on tuesday is a bigger deal of people think, only because it set the tone and terms of the reception she will get.

They want to spend a lot of this year scrutinizing the federal reserve, not necessarily bashing janet yellen personally, this is her first time on the hill and she will get tough questions.

It will set the tone for the future.

He was to scrutinize the fed this year.

I think it will be more political than economic should be the take away.

We have been buzzing about joe biden.

He was speaking in philadelphia about infrastructure talking about more investment in the country.

He made some unflattering comments about new york city.

If i blindfolded somebody and took them to an airport in hong kong and said it where do you think you are, they would say this is america, it is a month — modern airport if i took you to look warning, you must think you are in a third world country.

He knows his airports.

Airport export stephen roach from el university.

Boy did joe biden nail that.

When was last time he was in any kind of airport.

He travels on that super exclusive private jet.

Those are the old days.

La guardia is lousy.

Jfk is slow motion.

Your tax dollars in washington, la guardia is better than it was 10 years ago.

That is not saying much.

Joe biden can find that out when he rejoins the private sector.

Apparently he will decide about running for president next year.

Peter cook in washington, a busy weekend on the debt ceiling as we go to chairman yellin’s testimony.

Everybody new york will remember those questions if he runs for president.

I will be knocking on his door.

I get so much mail about your caution of the economic experiment.

We have a jobs day today.

Last month, everybody got it wrong.

Why are we too optimistic?

Companies have higher — higher — please higher — most people are overly in debt and saving short and reluctant to spend.

So much of the economics

Source Article from http://www.bloomberg.com/video/immigration-overhaul-suffers-setback-zuJyTzPZRQ~GCHt0xGTPuQ.html
Immigration Overhaul Suffers Setback
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/immigration-overhaul-suffers-setback-zuJyTzPZRQ~GCHt0xGTPuQ.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'

Immigration reform, long stalled in the US House, is coming down to this: Republicans don’t trust President Obama to enforce immigration laws and won’t act on new legislation until that trust gap narrows. 

On Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio said that distrust is “one of the biggest obstacles” to getting reform done.“There’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws,” he said. “And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes.”

Democrats dubbed this new focus on “trust” a dodge to get around the fact that Boehner can’t control his fractious caucus. But some close observers of Congress’s difficult and protracted struggle over immigration debate see some promise in this turn in the debate.

For the first time in a very long time, policy differences are not at the heart of the immigration dispute – at least among many Republicans in the House, where immigration reform hit a wall after the Senate passed a bipartisan bill last year.

In an aside, Mr. Boehner commented Thursday that Republicans “by and large” support principles that he released at a private GOP retreat for House members a week ago. Both the president and key Democrats in the House have expressed openness to the principles, which allow for a path to legal status for some 11 million undocumented immigrants in America, but no “special” path to citizenship.

That said, the trust issue is a mountainous obstacle, depending on whose trust the president needs to win. If “trustees” include the faction of Republicans who will never agree to immigration reform, who dislike Mr. Obama so intensely that they can’t bring themselves to support anything he supports, then, no, he is unlikely to ever win their trust. But if it refers to the Republican leadership – and if it is the leadership that is driving reform in the House – it is not mission impossible, according to some observers.

“Certainly, some Republicans, no matter what, say ‘We can’t trust this guy and we can’t negotiate with him.’ But they’re not the head of the party and they’re not the kingmaker,” says Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, director of social policy and politics at Third Way, a moderate Democrat think tank. She, and others, can think of several ways that Mr. Obama can respond on the trust front.

Hold the line on deportations. The president is under tremendous pressure to ease up on deportations, even stop them altogether, especially given his State of the Union emphasis on using executive orders, when necessary, when Congress fails to act. But the president has so far held the line on these anti-deportation demands. There may be no better way to show that he’s enforcing the law than by reminding Congress that he’s doing that now in the face of huge pressure.

Keep working on the personal. Trust gets built through personal relationships – and as America has learned by now, schmoozing is not this professor-in-chief’s strong point. As Ms. Erickson Hatalsky points out, he may not be able to build relationships with the “backbenchers” but he can at least improve them with Republican leaders in the House. “He’s begun to do that,” she said, and if there is continued progress on issues such as a noneventful raising of the debt ceiling, that could continue.

Get others to reinforce the enforcement message. Republicans complain that Obama has ignored the law by blocking deportation action for children of illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria and by prioritizing enforcement for those who  are considered of highest risk to America. But this is well within the president’s authority, says Doris Meissner, director of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that studies global migration. Not only that, she says, the Obama administration has continued a 20-year trend of increasing spending and action on enforcement of US immigration laws. In fact, spending on immigration outpaces all other federal criminal law enforcement combined, she says.

This positive record of enforcement and its benefits should be voiced by police chiefs and mayors around the country, as well as leaders of other countries who are receiving record numbers of deportees,” not by a toxic president who’s made the case before, says Ms. Meissner. Many in Congress weren’t around for the last big immigration push and aren’t aware of the two-decade upward trend in enforcement, she adds.

These, however, are the views of outsiders. Democrats on the Hill and the White House don’t see the president as having to respond – the ball is in Boehner’s court, they say. He needs to follow through on his repeated line that he wants to get immigration reform done.

White House spokesman Jay Carney dismissed the trust issue as irrelevant. ”The challenges within the Republican Party on this issue are well-known, and they certainly don’t have anything to do with the president,” Mr. Carney said.

A key House Democrat, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D) of Maryland, echoed that sentiment: “I see this as a sad and desperate attempt by the speaker to blame the president for the speaker’s own inability to persuade his caucus of the importance of taking action on immigration reform,” he said, in an interview.

“I interpret this as the speaker throwing in the towel with his own caucus,” he added. Democrats had hoped – and “still hold out hope” – that House Republicans will move forward on immigration reform. “But these kinds of comments just poison the well” with Democrats.

In fact, many Republicans oppose taking up immigration in an election year, period. At his press conference Thursday, Boehner acknowledged the “difficulty” of getting immigration reform done in the House this year.

But Third Way’s Erickson Hatalsky suggests that if Boehner is sincere in wanting immigration reform – and many Democrats, even minority leader Nancy Pelosi, believe he is – he has plenty of cover to push an unpopular position, including from the business community and Evangelicals.

It’s possible, she adds, that Boehner could get started this year and finish next year. Republicans and Democrats are now “very close together” on the “big issues,” she says. “I’m feeling pretty optimistic that at least some progress will happen in this Congress.”

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'

Immigration reform, long stalled in the US House, is coming down to this: Republicans don’t trust President Obama to enforce immigration laws and won’t act on new legislation until that trust gap narrows. 

On Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio said that distrust is “one of the biggest obstacles” to getting reform done.“There’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws,” he said. “And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes.”

Democrats dubbed this new focus on “trust” a dodge to get around the fact that Boehner can’t control his fractious caucus. But some close observers of Congress’s difficult and protracted struggle over immigration debate see some promise in this turn in the debate.

For the first time in a very long time, policy differences are not at the heart of the immigration dispute – at least among many Republicans in the House, where immigration reform hit a wall after the Senate passed a bipartisan bill last year.

In an aside, Mr. Boehner commented Thursday that Republicans “by and large” support principles that he released at a private GOP retreat for House members a week ago. Both the president and key Democrats in the House have expressed openness to the principles, which allow for a path to legal status for some 11 million undocumented immigrants in America, but no “special” path to citizenship.

That said, the trust issue is a mountainous obstacle, depending on whose trust the president needs to win. If “trustees” include the faction of Republicans who will never agree to immigration reform, who dislike Mr. Obama so intensely that they can’t bring themselves to support anything he supports, then, no, he is unlikely to ever win their trust. But if it refers to the Republican leadership – and if it is the leadership that is driving reform in the House – it is not mission impossible, according to some observers.

“Certainly, some Republicans, no matter what, say ‘We can’t trust this guy and we can’t negotiate with him.’ But they’re not the head of the party and they’re not the kingmaker,” says Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, director of social policy and politics at Third Way, a moderate Democrat think tank. She, and others, can think of several ways that Mr. Obama can respond on the trust front.

Hold the line on deportations. The president is under tremendous pressure to ease up on deportations, even stop them altogether, especially given his State of the Union emphasis on using executive orders, when necessary, when Congress fails to act. But the president has so far held the line on these anti-deportation demands. There may be no better way to show that he’s enforcing the law than by reminding Congress that he’s doing that now in the face of huge pressure.

Keep working on the personal. Trust gets built through personal relationships – and as America has learned by now, schmoozing is not this professor-in-chief’s strong point. As Ms. Erickson Hatalsky points out, he may not be able to build relationships with the “backbenchers” but he can at least improve them with Republican leaders in the House. “He’s begun to do that,” she said, and if there is continued progress on issues such as a noneventful raising of the debt ceiling, that could continue.

Get others to reinforce the enforcement message. Republicans complain that Obama has ignored the law by blocking deportation action for children of illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria and by prioritizing enforcement for those who  are considered of highest risk to America. But this is well within the president’s authority, says Doris Meissner, director of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that studies global migration. Not only that, she says, the Obama administration has continued a 20-year trend of increasing spending and action on enforcement of US immigration laws. In fact, spending on immigration outpaces all other federal criminal law enforcement combined, she says.

This positive record of enforcement and its benefits should be voiced by police chiefs and mayors around the country, as well as leaders of other countries who are receiving record numbers of deportees,” not by a toxic president who’s made the case before, says Ms. Meissner. Many in Congress weren’t around for the last big immigration push and aren’t aware of the two-decade upward trend in enforcement, she adds.

These, however, are the views of outsiders. Democrats on the Hill and the White House don’t see the president as having to respond – the ball is in Boehner’s court, they say. He needs to follow through on his repeated line that he wants to get immigration reform done.

White House spokesman Jay Carney dismissed the trust issue as irrelevant. ”The challenges within the Republican Party on this issue are well-known, and they certainly don’t have anything to do with the president,” Mr. Carney said.

A key House Democrat, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D) of Maryland, echoed that sentiment: “I see this as a sad and desperate attempt by the speaker to blame the president for the speaker’s own inability to persuade his caucus of the importance of taking action on immigration reform,” he said, in an interview.

“I interpret this as the speaker throwing in the towel with his own caucus,” he added. Democrats had hoped – and “still hold out hope” – that House Republicans will move forward on immigration reform. “But these kinds of comments just poison the well” with Democrats.

In fact, many Republicans oppose taking up immigration in an election year, period. At his press conference Thursday, Boehner acknowledged the “difficulty” of getting immigration reform done in the House this year.

But Third Way’s Erickson Hatalsky suggests that if Boehner is sincere in wanting immigration reform – and many Democrats, even minority leader Nancy Pelosi, believe he is – he has plenty of cover to push an unpopular position, including from the business community and Evangelicals.

It’s possible, she adds, that Boehner could get started this year and finish next year. Republicans and Democrats are now “very close together” on the “big issues,” she says. “I’m feeling pretty optimistic that at least some progress will happen in this Congress.”

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'

Immigration reform, long stalled in the US House, is coming down to this: Republicans don’t trust President Obama to enforce immigration laws and won’t act on new legislation until that trust gap narrows. 

On Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio said that distrust is “one of the biggest obstacles” to getting reform done.“There’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws,” he said. “And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes.”

Democrats dubbed this new focus on “trust” a dodge to get around the fact that Boehner can’t control his fractious caucus. But some close observers of Congress’s difficult and protracted struggle over immigration debate see some promise in this turn in the debate.

For the first time in a very long time, policy differences are not at the heart of the immigration dispute – at least among many Republicans in the House, where immigration reform hit a wall after the Senate passed a bipartisan bill last year.

In an aside, Mr. Boehner commented Thursday that Republicans “by and large” support principles that he released at a private GOP retreat for House members a week ago. Both the president and key Democrats in the House have expressed openness to the principles, which allow for a path to legal status for some 11 million undocumented immigrants in America, but no “special” path to citizenship.

That said, the trust issue is a mountainous obstacle, depending on whose trust the president needs to win. If “trustees” include the faction of Republicans who will never agree to immigration reform, who dislike Mr. Obama so intensely that they can’t bring themselves to support anything he supports, then, no, he is unlikely to ever win their trust. But if it refers to the Republican leadership – and if it is the leadership that is driving reform in the House – it is not mission impossible, according to some observers.

“Certainly, some Republicans, no matter what, say ‘We can’t trust this guy and we can’t negotiate with him.’ But they’re not the head of the party and they’re not the kingmaker,” says Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, director of social policy and politics at Third Way, a moderate Democrat think tank. She, and others, can think of several ways that Mr. Obama can respond on the trust front.

Hold the line on deportations. The president is under tremendous pressure to ease up on deportations, even stop them altogether, especially given his State of the Union emphasis on using executive orders, when necessary, when Congress fails to act. But the president has so far held the line on these anti-deportation demands. There may be no better way to show that he’s enforcing the law than by reminding Congress that he’s doing that now in the face of huge pressure.

Keep working on the personal. Trust gets built through personal relationships – and as America has learned by now, schmoozing is not this professor-in-chief’s strong point. As Ms. Erickson Hatalsky points out, he may not be able to build relationships with the “backbenchers” but he can at least improve them with Republican leaders in the House. “He’s begun to do that,” she said, and if there is continued progress on issues such as a noneventful raising of the debt ceiling, that could continue.

Get others to reinforce the enforcement message. Republicans complain that Obama has ignored the law by blocking deportation action for children of illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria and by prioritizing enforcement for those who  are considered of highest risk to America. But this is well within the president’s authority, says Doris Meissner, director of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that studies global migration. Not only that, she says, the Obama administration has continued a 20-year trend of increasing spending and action on enforcement of US immigration laws. In fact, spending on immigration outpaces all other federal criminal law enforcement combined, she says.

This positive record of enforcement and its benefits should be voiced by police chiefs and mayors around the country, as well as leaders of other countries who are receiving record numbers of deportees,” not by a toxic president who’s made the case before, says Ms. Meissner. Many in Congress weren’t around for the last big immigration push and aren’t aware of the two-decade upward trend in enforcement, she adds.

These, however, are the views of outsiders. Democrats on the Hill and the White House don’t see the president as having to respond – the ball is in Boehner’s court, they say. He needs to follow through on his repeated line that he wants to get immigration reform done.

White House spokesman Jay Carney dismissed the trust issue as irrelevant. ”The challenges within the Republican Party on this issue are well-known, and they certainly don’t have anything to do with the president,” Mr. Carney said.

A key House Democrat, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D) of Maryland, echoed that sentiment: “I see this as a sad and desperate attempt by the speaker to blame the president for the speaker’s own inability to persuade his caucus of the importance of taking action on immigration reform,” he said, in an interview.

“I interpret this as the speaker throwing in the towel with his own caucus,” he added. Democrats had hoped – and “still hold out hope” – that House Republicans will move forward on immigration reform. “But these kinds of comments just poison the well” with Democrats.

In fact, many Republicans oppose taking up immigration in an election year, period. At his press conference Thursday, Boehner acknowledged the “difficulty” of getting immigration reform done in the House this year.

But Third Way’s Erickson Hatalsky suggests that if Boehner is sincere in wanting immigration reform – and many Democrats, even minority leader Nancy Pelosi, believe he is – he has plenty of cover to push an unpopular position, including from the business community and Evangelicals.

It’s possible, she adds, that Boehner could get started this year and finish next year. Republicans and Democrats are now “very close together” on the “big issues,” she says. “I’m feeling pretty optimistic that at least some progress will happen in this Congress.”

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
Immigration reform: Boehner says it's down to a matter of 'trust'
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-reform-boehner-says-39-down-matter-39-015600538.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration reform delay will be Obama’s fault, Boehner says

Just a week ago, House Republican leaders released a set of principles for an immigration overhaul, raising the expectation that they were finally preparing to tackle the issue after months of inaction. But House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, suggested another long delay is imminent because the president can’t be trusted to enforce existing laws.

“This is an important issue in our country, its been kicked round forever and it needs to be dealt with,” Boehner said. But, he added, members of Congress and the American people “don’t trust that the reform that we’re talking about will be implemented as it was intended to be. The president seems to change the health care law on a whim whenever it likes…now he’s running all over the country telling everyone that he’s going to keep acting on his own.”

“We are going to continue to discuss this issue with our members, but I think the president’s going to have to demonstrate to the American people and to my colleagues that he can be trusted to enforce the law as it is written,” Boehner added.

When asked about Boehner’s comments, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, “I think the president’s record speaks for itself.” He pointed to enhanced border enforcement and surveillance technology. Left unsaid – but something of which pro-citizenship activists are keenly aware of – is that the president has deported record numbers of immigrants caught living illegally in the United States.

Immigrant advocates have stepped up pressure on the president to unilaterally halt deportations, a move the president has resisted because he says it’s well beyond his authority. Carney repeated that point in his briefing Wednesday, telling reporters, “There’s no alternative to comprehensive immigration reform passing through Congress. It requires legislation.”

Lynn Tramonte, deputy director of the pro-citizenship organization America’s Voice, noted the high deportation numbers in response to Boehner’s comments. “Just one week after issuing their standards for immigration reform, the House Republicans are already seeking to lower expectations about passing legislation this year and testing out excuses. Republicans need to realize this isn’t about Obama …it’s about them,” she said.

Still, Boehner is far from the first Republican to make this argument. Last, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. – one of the architects of the Senate’s comprehensive immigration reform bill — said the administration’s handling of the attack on the 2012 attack on American diplomats in Benghazi and the increased scrutiny of conservative organizations by some employees of the Internal Revenue Service were proof they wouldn’t enforce the law.

“I don’t know if it can happen under this administration given its lack of willingness to enforce the law. It’s a real impediment,” Rubio said at a breakfast hosted by the Wall Street Journal.

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., who has been one of the more vocal supporters of immigration reform among House Republicans, said he doubted whether an immigration bill could pass in 2014 because of Republican agreement on one big issue: “We don’t trust the president to enforce the law.”

Boehner’s comments follow on a gathering of conservative congressman yesterday where several members said the GOP should wait to act on immigration legislation until after the midterm elections, when Republicans could gain control of the Senate.

“I think it’s a mistake for us to have an internal battle in the Republican Party this year about immigration reform,” said Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who was part of a group of eight House lawmakers from both parties working on a comprehensive immigration bill last year before dropping out of the group. “I think when we take back the Senate in 2014 one of the first things we should do next year after we do certain economic issues, I think we should address the immigration issue.”

On top of that, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said the House and Senate have an “irresolvable conflict” on how to reform the immigration system – the Senate passed a single bill, whereas House leaders have said they will only consider a series of smaller measures – and so he doesn’t see how anything could pass this year.

Senate Democrats insist the only thing standing in the way of the House passing immigration reform is Boehner’s insistence on adhering to the so-called “Hastert Rule,” meaning he wouldn’t put a bill on the floor unless a majority of his members supported it.

The rule’s namesake, former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert, came out in favor of immigration reform yesterday that includes a way for immigrants who are currently illegal to seek citizenship one day.

 

 Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said Hastert should call Boehner and tell him to dump the rule.

“If we didn’t have the Hastert rule, we would pass comprehensive immigration reform. I just don’t think it’s a refuge for Speaker Boehner to say I just can’t convince a majority of my caucus – he will never convince a majority of his caucus. But if he’ll join with the other members of the House of Representatives, there will be a majority on the floor to pass comprehensive immigration reform,” he said. 

Source Article from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-reform-delay-will-be-obamas-fault-boehner-says/
Immigration reform delay will be Obama’s fault, Boehner says
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-reform-delay-will-be-obamas-fault-boehner-says/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results