Immigration Overhaul Revving Up on Capitol Hill Despite Fewer Crossings

PHOTO: This June 25, 2014, file photo shows a group of immigrants from Honduras and El Salvador who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally as they are stopped in Granjeno, Texas.

Immigration overhaul is expected to take front-and-center of the domestic debate when Congress returns to Capitol Hill next week.

Rumors also abound about exactly when President Obama might take executive action on the issue, while White House press secretary Josh Earnest this week offered no update on the timing.

“There’s a chance it could be before the end of the summer. There’s a chance it could be after the summer,” Earnest said at a press briefing. “The president’s determination to act and his commitment to acting have not changed in any way.”

Here’s What Obama Would See If He Visited the Border

Obama: Americans ‘Don’t Want Me Just Standing Around Twiddling My Thumbs’

Inside Texas’ New Family-Friendly Detention Center for the Undocumented

Earnest added that Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Attorney General Eric Holder are in the midst of reviewing the options Obama has at his disposal to take action unilaterally.

Meanwhile, here’s where things stand on the issue.

Fewer Unaccompanied Minors Are Crossing the Border

Unaccompanied minors are crossing the border in far fewer numbers than they were just months ago. U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) released its latest numbers Wednesday: between Oct. 1 and the end of August (fiscal year 2014) 66,127 unaccompanied minors (UAC) have crossed and been apprehended at the Southwest border (SWB). That is an 88 percent increase over the same time period last year, when 35,209 were apprehended.

• May – 341 daily UAC apprehensions SWB-wide (10,579 for May)

• June – 354 daily UAC apprehensions SWB-wide. (10,628 for June)

• July – 177 daily UAC apprehensions SWB-wide. (5,508 for July)

• August – 104 daily UAC apprehensions SWB-wide. (3,129 for August)

The decrease could be the result of any number of factors, including the campaign launched in Central America by the administration to dissuade people from taking the journey. But it could also be because of the weather. July and August are the hottest months.

More People Prioritize Border Security in Immigration Debate

A new survey out Wednesday by the Pew Research Center finds more people believe prioritizing border security is important.

The study, conducted Aug. 20-24, finds that 33 percent say the priority in the immigration debate should be on better border security and tougher enforcement of immigration laws. That is a change since the last time this survey was done in 2013, where only 25 percent thought border security was the priority.

The majority of those surveyed, 41 percent, believe both border security and creating a way for those already in the United States to become citizens should be equally prioritized, which is down from February 2013’s 47 percent. While those believing that enhanced border security and stronger enforcement of immigration laws should be given the priority have risen 8 points, from 25 percent to 33 percent since February 2013.

There are major differences in those priorities, however, when broken down by age.

Source Article from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/immigration-overhaul-revving-capitol-hill-fewer-crossings/story?id=25251341
Immigration Overhaul Revving Up on Capitol Hill Despite Fewer Crossings
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/immigration-overhaul-revving-capitol-hill-fewer-crossings/story?id=25251341
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Wonkblog: Wonkbook: Will Obama delay immigration reform?

Welcome to Wonkbook, Wonkblog’s morning policy news primer by Puneet Kollipara (@pkollipara). To subscribe by e-mail, click here. Send comments, criticism or ideas to Wonkbook at Washpost dot com. To read more by the Wonkblog team, click here. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.


(Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)

Wonkbook’s Number of the Day: More than 1,900. That’s the number of people who have died in the most recent Ebola outbreak, surpassing the death toll in all previous outbreaks combined.

Wonkbook’s Chart of the Day: Growth in the unauthorized immigrant population has leveled off, a new survey finds.

Wonkbook’s Top 5 Stories: (1) The tricky timing of immigration reform; (2) U.S.’s versus others’ economies; (3) a new era for health spending?; (4) banking regulators keep regulating; and (5) many Americans aren’t eating well despite more jobs.

1. Top story: Obama’s being asked to delay immigration reform moves — by some in his own party

To delay or not: Timing on immigration reform holds risks for Obama. ”White House officials calculated earlier this summer that immigration would not play a major role in the elections, except perhaps for the sizable Hispanic population in Colorado, where executive action could boost Democratic Senator Mark Udall. Now other Democratic candidates in tough Senate races are asking the White House to delay. But immigration rights advocates…warn that Hispanics could stay away from the polls in protest if Obama postpones a decision….Obama must weigh the drawbacks of losing support in Latino-heavy states such as Colorado against the risk of energizing right-leaning Republican voters in states such as Alaska, North Carolina, Louisiana, Kentucky, and New Hampshire.” Jeff Mason and Julia Edwards in Reuters.

ICYMI:

Obama may or may not act on immigration reform this summer. Steven T. Dennis in Roll Call.

Immigration reform hasn’t been such a hot-button issue on the campaign trail lately in pivotal Colorado. Jake Sherman in Politico.

Top Latino Democrat, activists push Obama on immigration reform. ”Rep. Luis V. Gutiérrez and a group of immigrant-rights activists urged President Barack Obama Wednesday to unilaterally reduce deportations before the November elections, despite concerns such action could hurt vulnerable Democrats at the polls….The Illinois Democrat and representatives from several activist groups said the political pluses for the Democratic Party far outweigh the minuses….He said Democrats who are publicly and privately urging caution from the White House have the political calculus wrong.” David Eldridge in Roll Call.

Interview: Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez on immigration reform. WBUR.

Boehner: Immigration reform could happen next year — as long as… ”Boehner…warned it is contingent on President Obama following the law as he decides on executive actions to take on the issue….In July, Boehner said the House would not take up immigration reform this year, pointing to the flood of child immigrants crossing the border over the summer and Obama ‘pounding his chest about using his phone and pen.’ ‘But I did outline that, you know, there’s a possibility that Congress could take this issue up next year,’ he said.” Mario Trujillo in The Hill.

Primary source: Transcript of Boehner’s interview. Hugh Hewitt Show.

Those caveats make immigration reform unlikely in 2015. ”Boehner’s subliminal message to Obama is this: abandon your executive action, enforce the laws and we’ll play ball on reform next year. That’s highly unlikely. Republican and Democratic operatives largely believe the prospects of reform passing in 2015 and 2016 are slim to none. In 2015, the presidential jousting will begin, and there are already signs that Republican candidates will be competing over who’s the toughest sheriff on immigration. Reform is anathema to conservative voters, and GOP leaders would be more wary of crossing them. There’s also a good chance Republicans would rather wait until after the 2016 election.” Sahil Kapur in Talking Points Memo.

Americans more interested in border security. ”A new Pew Research Center survey found that 33% of Americans want to focus on border security, 23% prefer a pathway to citizenship, and 41% want both. Last year, as Congress debated an immigration bill that would have allowed many of the nation’s 11 million undocumented immigrants to become citizens, Pew estimated that 25% of Americans wanted the government to focus on granting citizenship, 25% wanted more focus on enhanced enforcement, and the rest felt both should be given equal priority….The shift in views spans political leanings, as more Republicans, Democrats and independents favor focusing on border security.” Alan Gomez in USA Today.

Pew also says illegal population in U.S. much longer than in past. ”Those numbers could bolster the case made by many Democrats, and some Republicans…that those already living here have become part of the fabric of American society. More immediately, the numbers hold implications for the Obama administration as the White House weighs whether to expand a program that gives temporary relief from deportation and work permits to some illegal immigrants. If President Barack Obama does expand the program, as many expect, his eligibility criteria are likely to include a measure of how long someone has lived in the U.S. as well as what sort of family ties he or she has. The Pew report finds there are millions of people with both longevity and family ties.” Laura Meckler in The Wall Street Journal.

Chart: Where America’s immigrant population comes from, in one map. German Lopez in Vox.

Deportations don’t lower crime rate, study says. ”The finding ‘calls into question the longstanding assumption that deporting noncitizens who commit crimes is an effective crime-control strategy,’ said the study….The analysis…coincides with the Obama administration’s internal review of the program, known as Secure Communities. Jeh Johnson, the Homeland Security secretary, has suggested that he might overhaul the program, saying it needs ‘a fresh start.’ Secure Communities, which began in 2008 under President George W. Bush, became a cornerstone of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy….Yet the program has been plagued with trouble since it began.” Kirk Semple in The New York Times.

Number of children crossing border fell again in August. ”More than 3,000 unaccompanied children were apprehended last month, a 45% decline from the 5,500 children who crossed in July….In June, the number of children crossing illegally was 10,600, mostly originating from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. Last week, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest declared the border crisis over ‘for now.’ Earnest said there are a ‘variety of factors’ that could be contributing to the decline….The number of migrants typically goes down when the weather gets hotter. But Earnest described the situation as ‘volatile’ and said the Obama administration remains focused on securing the border and devoting resources to immigration courts.” Marianne Levine in the Los Angeles Times.

Chart: The counties that have received the most undocumented immigrant children. Niraj Chokshi in The Washington Post.

Stopgap bill could mean more shuffling of funding by border agencies. “The federal agencies on the front lines of the crisis could be left with more of the same in the months ahead if Congress passes a stripped-down continuing resolution without additional funding to manage the surge, as some Republicans have recently suggested. Such a stopgap would avoid a shutdown and keep the federal government operating past Sept. 30. But by stretching prior-year spending levels and policy directives into the early months of fiscal 2015, a CR could leave federal officials with old guidance and little flexibility as they look to respond to a rapidly changing situation.” Tamar Hallerman in Roll Call.

Other immigration reads:

U.S. officials: Facilities for migrant kids were humane. Daniel Gonzalez in The Arizona Republic.

VINIK: Why immigration reform won’t happen next year. ”If those words sound familiar, they should. Boehner has long played footsie with Democrats over passing a comprehensive bill. Last November, Boehner told reporters that immigration reform ‘absolutely’ wasn’t dead. But in February, after the right wing freaked out over ‘immigration principles’ that the House GOP leadership released, Boehner pulled back and announced that no reform was possible, because Obama was untrustworthy. Just like that, immigration reform was dead. But couldn’t this time be different? It seems highly unlikely.” Danny Vinik in The New Republic.

BAUER: A constitutional crisis in the works. ”For many years, President Obama denied that he had the power to take unilateral action on immigration, but now, facing congressional opposition, he seems ready to claim that authority….Ironically, the president’s actions may forestall any future legislative action on immigration by igniting a political firestorm and, some fear, precipitating a constitutional crisis. Behind closed doors, the president and his team may be contemplating actions that would significantly transform the legal-immigration system, legalize millions of illegal immigrants, exacerbate the economic anxieties of many Americans, and kick off a broader public debate about the limits of executive power.” Fred Bauer in National Review.

Top opinion

SAMUELSON: The coming investment boom? ”Suppose we could design the next phase of the economic recovery. What would it look like? Here’s one pleasing vision: Business investment in plants and equipment — factories, computers, freight cars, software, machine tools — would take the lead. This would boost job creation and productivity (a.k.a. efficiency), enabling companies to increase wages without raising prices. It’s a splendid fantasy. But it just might come true. That’s the message from the government’s recent second-quarter report on gross domestic product, which measures the economy’s growth.” Robert J. Samuelson in The Washington Post.

BOVARD: How the feds distort their ‘food-security’ numbers. ”The National Academy of Sciences urged the USDA in 2006 to explicitly state that its food-security survey results are not an estimate of nationwide hunger. The USDA responded by dropping any mention of ‘hunger’ in the survey’s response categories. Nevertheless, the survey’s results continue to be pervasively misrepresented as an accurate measure of hunger in America….Some Americans do indeed suffer from hunger, but the federal government has shed little light on the challenges they face….More than 40 years after President Nixon declared war on hunger, the federal government still doesn’t care to accurately measure the problem.” James Bovard in The Wall Street Journal.

KIRSCH: The case for abolishing political parties. ”American political parties used to be interest coalitions; now they are a cross between ideological camps and lifestyle designations….If people no longer seek the truth in their deliberations, but only try to advance a party agenda, then the general will cannot emerge and justice cannot be done. That is Weil’s first argument against parties: They prevent democracy from finding out the true, correct solutions to problems. More important, however, is Weil’s second argument, that parties necessarily corrupt the souls of their members.” Adam Kirsch in The New Republic.

RICHARDSON: Bring back the party of Lincoln. ”For all the differences between establishment Republicans and Tea Party insurgents, their various efforts to rebrand the Grand Old Party tend to start from a common premise: the belief that Ronald Reagan was the quintessential Republican, and that his principle of defending wealth and the wealthy should remain the party’s guiding vision. In doing so, they misunderstand the party’s longer history. They would do better to look to earlier presidents, and model their new brand on the eras when the Republican Party opposed the control of government by an elite in favor of broader economic opportunity.” Heather Cox Richardson in The New York Times.

Dog days of summer interlude: Pug has fun playing in a pit of plastic balls.

2. How does the U.S. economy stack up with others?

OECD says U.S. has better job market than most. ”The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development…expects the unemployment rate among its 34 member countries to inch down from 7.4 percent to 7.1 percent by the end of next year. That’s still significantly higher than it was before the global financial crisis but a big improvement from the previous three years….The driving force behind those gains is the American labor market, the report said. The rapid decline in the U.S. jobless rate over the past year to 6.2 percent has surprised even some of the world’s top economists. The OECD predicted unemployment would fall another 1.1 percentage points to 5.9 percent, besting the member-country average.” Ylan Q. Mui in The Washington Post.

Interview: Mark Pearson of the OECD on why America’s economy is performing those of so many others. Jim Tankersley in The Washington Post.

Still, Europe’s job market has some strengths that the U.S.’s doesn’t. “No single reason explains why prime-age employment and workforce participation trends are weaker in the United States. But among the factors: Europe better protects prime-age workers….The U.S. disability program forces many ailing Americans to choose between working and collecting disability….Though American and European women are similarly likely to be working or seeking work, in Europe the percentage is climbing. In the United States, it’s falling….Spain, France, Germany and Italy have eased rules that had made it hard for companies to hire part-time and temporary workers. The loosened rules have enabled more Europeans to find work.” Paul Wiseman and Christopher S. Rugaber in the Associated Press.

U.S. climbs to third in ranking of world’s most competitive economies. ”The U.S. trailed only Switzerland and Singapore in the annual survey by the World Economic Forum….The Great Recession and 2008 financial crisis took a toll on U.S. global competitiveness, according to the survey. By 2012-13, the country had fallen to seventh amid a sluggish economy as well as bitter partisan debates over the debt limit and other fiscal issues. But a strengthening economic recovery and less budget strife in Washington has helped the U.S. to improve its ranking among the 148 economies covered by the survey.” Jim Puzzanghera in the Los Angeles Times.

Strong anecdotal reports on growth in new Fed survey. ”The U.S. economy strengthened in all regions of the country in July and August, in areas from consumer spending to auto sales to tourism, the Federal Reserve reported….All 12 of the Fed’s regions reported growth. Six…characterized growth as ‘moderate.’ The other regions reported somewhat slower expansion….The survey found no clear evidence that the economy is expanding so fast that the Fed might soon need to begin raising interest rates to prevent inflation….The survey, known as the Beige Book, is based on anecdotal reports from businesses and will be considered with other data when Fed policymakers next meet Sept. 16-17.” Martin Crutsinger in the Associated Press.

Explainer: We read the Fed’s most recent Beige Book, so you won’t have to. Sarah Portlock in The Wall Street Journal.

Strong factory orders, auto sales brighten U.S. economic picture. ”The Commerce Department said new orders for manufactured goods jumped 10.5 percent in July on robust demand for aircraft and autos, compared to a 1.5 percent rise in June. Orders excluding the volatile transportation category slipped 0.8 percent in July, but that drop followed a 1.4 percent increase the prior month….Separately, industry research firm Autodata Corp said auto sales rose to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 17.53 million units in August, the highest level since January 2006 and above Wall Street’s expectations of a 16.6 million-unit pace. The factory and auto sales reports added to employment and housing data in painting an upbeat picture of the economy.” Lucia Mutikani in Reuters.

Chart: Watch the U.S. transition from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, in one GIF. Reid Wilson in The Washington Post.

OECD offers boost to fiscal stimulus proponents. ”Because cyclical unemployment is the main problem right now in many O.E.C.D. countries, the report said, economic stimulus ‘promoting aggregate demand and job creation remains a key policy priority.’ Otherwise, the report warned, there is a risk that unemployment caused by economic weakness could eventually lead to structural unemployment as ‘the many people who have accumulated long jobless spells, discouragement and loss of human capital make their reintegration more difficult.’ Governments could help, the report suggested, by focusing job training and creation on the long-term unemployed who are most at risk of giving up on work.” David Jolly in The New York Times.

Unemployment trickles down to poorer workers, study finds. “During recessions, higher-income workers with more education take jobs that are below their qualification level, according to new research. Such underemployment, in turn, leaves fewer job openings for which the so-called lower-skilled workers are qualified….Making a case that several Fed officials, including Chairwoman Janet Yellen, have emphasized in the past, Messrs. Barnichon and Zylberberg argue the U-3 rate is too narrow to capture all of the labor market weakness that has resulted from the recent recession, the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression.” Pedro Nicolaci da Costa in The Wall Street Journal.

THOMA: Sagging jobs growth is not just a skills gap. ”According to this view, outsourcing is not the main problem. Instead, technological change is the largest driving force behind sagging employment and income trends for workers in the middle and lower half of the income distribution. Often supporting this argument are statistics showing that while manufacturing employment has dropped considerably, the total value of manufacturing production has not. Just as much or more is being produced, but by machines instead of people. However, new work by Autor and several prominent co-authors calls this into question as the primary explanation for employment trends since 2000.” Mark Thoma in CBS News.

Strange cat interlude: This cat has a strange way of drinking water from a faucet.

3. The end of an era of meteoric health-care spending growth?

Health care spending to rise again, but not as fast as in past. ”Numbers released Wednesday by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services show that spending growth last year is expected to have remained very low by historical standards at just 3.6 percent. (The final data have yet to come in.) In 2014, as the economy gains steam and the Affordable Care Act’s main coverage provisions kick in, that increase is expected to be 5.6 percent. But even the higher number is nearly 2 percentage points lower than what the CMS Office of the Actuary estimated two years ago. And it’s well below the average 7.2 percent annual growth from 1990 to 2008….There’s still reason for concern, however. Almost any rise in health care spending remains a threat over the long run to federal finances.” Brett Norman in Politico.

Why CMS actuaries think health spending growth will be slower. ”One of those reasons is the greater prevalence of high-deductible health plans, which are supposed to make people more careful users of health-care services since they bear more of the cost. Further, the growth in how much Medicare spends per beneficiary has been historically low in recent years, though the actuary expects that will eventually return to normal levels. Drug spending also isn’t expected to hit previously high levels as generics become more widely available, though the expected rise in expensive specialty drugs will drive the spending increase, officials said.” Jason Millman in The Washington Post.

Per capita Medicare spending is actually falling. ”The starkness of the pattern has been obscured because the budget office does not generally adjust its numbers for inflation. So its official charts — and other charts based on them — can mislead when it comes to future costs because they show increases that are simply a reflection of economy-wide inflation. Adjusted to reflect the value of a dollar, Medicare spending has not been rising and is not projected to rise in the next few years. The only other time cost growth has ever stayed below zero was in the late 1990s, when Congress made substantial cuts to Medicare spending. Then, the trend lasted for three years. This time, the budget office expects it to be more enduring.” Margot Sanger-Katz in The New York Times.

Another way of looking at it: Health spending to exceed $5T in 2023. ”U.S. healthcare spending will rise to $5.2 trillion by 2023 as the economy grows and baby boomers become eligible for Medicare, government actuaries said Wednesday. The new forecast from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) showed total health spending will rise to about one-fifth of the economy in nine years compared with 17.2 percent in 2012.” Elise Viebeck in The Hill.

Other health care reads:

CVS to implement its tobacco sales ban early. Michelle Fay Cortez and Kristen Hallam in Bloomberg.

Can Big Data and patient informed consent coexist? Arthur Allen in Politico.

Texas abortion clinic to reopen after ruling. Erik Eckholm in The New York Times.

VA rules may enable benefits long denied to Vietnam War veterans. Dave Philipps in The New York Times.

Baby interlude: 7-week-old baby hears mother for first time after getting hearing aids.

4. What’s happening with bank regulations?

Agencies approve new suite of banking rules. ”U.S. regulators set requirements for the amount of high-quality, liquid assets big banks must stockpile to survive a 30-day liquidity drought, taking a major step in efforts to prevent a repeat of the 2008 credit crisis….The agencies also proposed a rule on collateral for swaps traded outside of clearinghouses and wrapped up rules on how much loss-absorbing capital must be held against total assets. The liquidity and leverage-ratio rules are based on accords reached by the 27-nation Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. They’re meant to keep banks running in a crisis by limiting how indebted they can get and demanding they hold stable assets such as Treasuries, corporate debt and stocks.” Jesse Hamilton in Bloomberg.

Bank-liquidity rule reflects Dodd-Frank requirements. ”The 15 largest banks — those with more than $250 billion in assets — will have to hold enough cash, government bonds and other high-quality assets to fund operations for 30 days during a time of market stress. Smaller banks…will have to keep enough to cover 21 days. Banks with less than $50 billion in assets and nonbank financial firms deemed by regulators as posing a potential threat to the system will not be subject to the requirements….Fed officials say the rules are stronger than new international standards for banks….The requirements were called for by Congress in the sweeping overhaul law responding to the 2008 financial crisis.” Marcy Gordon in the Associated Press.

How the derivatives rule aims to curtail risk buildup. ”The 2008 crisis revealed how flaws in the market had allowed for dangerous buildups of risk at large Wall Street firms and worsened the run on the banking system. Since then, regulators have been trying to make the derivatives market less risky. The rule proposed on Wednesday focuses on margin payments, which traders in derivatives make to each other to protect against the risk that they don’t get paid what they are owed. Such margin payments add discipline to a high-octane trading activity and make it more likely that derivatives traders can bear losses if one large entity collapses. But the industry, seeking to minimize its costs, has not applied margin requirements evenly across the system. The proposed rule aims to change that.” Peter Eavis in The New York Times.

Top bank investigator at DOJ to leave agency. “Tony West, a senior U.S. Justice Department official who oversaw investigations into bank mortgage practices tied to the 2007-2009 financial crisis and negotiated more than $36 billion in payouts, is leaving the agency….West…came to the Justice Department in 2009 to lead the civil division, and was later promoted to the position of associate attorney general. He helped coordinate state and federal investigations into mortgage securities that banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp had sold in the run-up to the financial crisis.” Julia Edwards and Aruna Viswanatha in Reuters.

Other business/financial reads:

House GOP moves toward Export-Import Bank deal. John Bresnahan and Jake Sherman in Politico.

Commerzbank close to settling U.S. sanctions probe. Karen Freifeld in Reuters.

Path of stolen credit cards leads back to Home Depot. Nicole Perlroth in The New York Times.

How taxpayers subsidize Freddie Mac. Joe Light in The Wall Street Journal.

China’s anti-monopoly push creates anxiety for U.S. businesses. Dexter Roberts in Bloomberg Businessweek.

Animal attack interlude: Watch this ram take down a drone.

5. America’s mounting food problem

USDA: More jobs, but little change in number of ‘food-insecure.’ ”The agency says that about 17.5 million families — or 1 in 7 — were food insecure last year….In 2012, the number was 17.6 million. The number of households experiencing what the government calls ‘very low food security’ — which means people actually miss meals or cut back their intake because they don’t have enough money for food — was also essentially unchanged last year at 6.8 million households….USDA sociologist Alisha Coleman-Jensen, an author of the report, says the numbers have not declined as much as one might expect with a drop in unemployment, because higher food prices and inflation last year offset the benefits of a brighter job market.” Pam Fessler in NPR.

Another study: America’s growing food-inequality problem. ”On the one hand, the analysis found that the American diet, on the whole, improved…’from 1999 through 2010,’…suggesting that Americans are likely responding to recent nutrition education efforts. That’s consistent with a number of macroeconomic food trends, including America’s shift away from soda. But that improvement, however encouraging, doesn’t appear to be happening society-wide. Americans in the top socioeconomic tier are leading the charge while Americans in the bottom tier are being left behind.” Roberto A. Ferdman in The Washington Post.

ICYMI:

Tens of millions of Americans — and 620,000 military households — relied on food pantries last year. Pam Fessler in NPR.

Food-stamp use shows continued “underemployment” pain. Tim Henderson in Pew Stateline.

‘To-do list’ on food safety grows larger for agencies. ”The 2010 Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was billed as creating a fundamental shift in the way government protects the nation’s food supply against the threat of food-borne illness. But despite bipartisan and industry support for the program, only a fraction of the funding needed to implement and enforce it has materialized. Now, with most fiscal 2015 funding issues likely in limbo until after the midterm elections, uncertainty remains. Without additional funding, priorities of the ambitious initiative could fall short, public interest groups fear.” Benjamin Goad in The Hill.

Other food policy reads:

Profile: Monsanto, under attack for GMOs, has a new defender. Jacob Bunge in The Wall Street Journal.

Money begins to flow in Oregon over its GMO ballot measure. Niraj Chokshi in The Washington Post.

Relaxation interlude: Dog gets a massage.

Wonkblog roundup

The housing bust turned more renters and homeowners into neighbors. Emily Badger.

The end of health care’s historic spending slowdown is near. Jason Millman.

Can a new $76 million net under the Golden Gate Bridge really prevent suicides? Keith Humphreys.

America is slowly — but surely — becoming a nation of tea drinkers. Roberto A. Ferdman.

20 states bar cities from building their own Internet. Netflix wants the FCC to change that. Brian Fung.

Mapping the counties where public-school children still remain segregated. Emily Badger.

After quitting tobacco, CVS makes its next health-care moves. Jason Millman.

OECD: America’s job market is better than most. Ylan Q. Mui.

Et Cetera

Justice Department to probe Ferguson police force. Sari Horwitz, Carol D. Leonnig and Kimberly Kindy in The Washington Post.

Federal agencies flooded with comments on new rules. Gautham Nagesh in The Wall Street Journal.

Louisana same-sex marriage ban survives federal court challenge. Lyle Denniston in SCOTUSblog.

U.S. and Europe struggle with response to a bold Russia. Peter Baker and Steven Erlanger in The New York Times.

EPA looking at new mandates on methane. Jennifer A. Dlouhy in the Houston Chronicle.

Obama spy chief comes out in favor of NSA reform. Dustin Volz in National Journal.

Long read: Welcome to the Uber wars. Andrew Zaleski in Politico Magazine.

Minimum-wage hike makes Arkansas ballot. Reid Wilson in The Washington Post.

Got tips, additions, or comments? E-mail us.

Wonkbook is produced with help from Michelle Williams and Ryan McCarthy.

Source Article from http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636543/s/3e23c592/sc/4/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cwonkbook0Ewill0Eobama0Edelay0Eimmigration0Ereform0C20A140C0A90C0A40Caa5ead460E298a0E47cf0Eaad60E19e21b0Ab72760Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Ibusiness/story01.htm
Wonkblog: Wonkbook: Will Obama delay immigration reform?
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636543/s/3e23c592/sc/4/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cwonkbook0Ewill0Eobama0Edelay0Eimmigration0Ereform0C20A140C0A90C0A40Caa5ead460E298a0E47cf0Eaad60E19e21b0Ab72760Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Ibusiness/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Immigration law has some rock 'n' roll roots

WASHINGTON (AP) — Imagine. The argument over President Barack Obama’s legal authority to defer deportations begins 42 years ago with a bit of hashish, a dogged lawyer and, yes, John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

President Richard Nixon was seeking re-election, “American Pie” was leading the pop charts and Lennon was in New York facing deportation from a Nixon administration eager to disrupt the famous ex-Beatle’s planned concert tour and voter registration drive. The case hinged on Lennon’s 1968 conviction for possession of “cannabis resin” in London.

Lennon was eager to at least delay his deportation so Ono could fight for custody of her 9-year-old daughter by a previous husband. Lennon and Ono approached Leon Wildes, a lawyer young enough that he shouldn’t have had to ask a colleague, “Tell me, who is John Lennon?” He had grown up in a small town in Pennsylvania coal country, and “I was not into that kind of music,” he says.

But he knew his immigration law.

In time, the effort to extend Lennon’s stay in the United States would become an integral part of the legal foundation the Obama administration relied on in 2012 to set up a program that has deferred the deportation of more than 580,000 immigrants who entered the country illegally as children.

“All I can say is, John Lennon is smiling in his grave,” Wildes said in an interview. “He helped accomplish that.”

The extent of Obama’s legal authority is now central to the White House deliberations over what else Obama can do — and when — without congressional action to reduce deportations and give many of the 11 million immigrants illegally in the United States the ability to stay and work without fear of being removed.

Until the Lennon case, the Immigration and Naturalization Service had not acknowledged it used its own discretion in deciding whom to deport. But through the Freedom of Information Act, Wildes discovered 1,843 instances in which the INS had invoked such prosecutorial discretion as part of a secret program for “non-priority” cases.

Once the program was revealed, the INS had no choice but to concede its existence and issued official guidance on how it would be applied.

“The remarkable work of Leon Wildes really led to the old agency of INS making its policy about prosecutorial discretion and non-priority status public for the first time,” said Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, a law professor at The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law who has written extensively about executive powers in immigration law.

Immigration lawyers and many legal scholars like Wadhia argue Obama draws his authority to act from a broad range of sources, from the Constitution to immigration laws to government regulations.

Critics like John Yoo and Robert Delahunty, both of whom worked in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel during President George W. Bush’s administration, argue that the president doesn’t have such broad latitude and that prosecutorial discretion can only be applied narrowly.

For Wildes, now 81 years old and still at work on immigration cases, the years spent with John & Yoko were a defining time. (The “hold” music on his office phone plays Lennon’s “Imagine.”)

Like a good lawyer, he tried a variety of ways to lengthen Lennon’s stay.

He even attempted a novel approach. The law said convictions for possession of “narcotic drugs or marijuana” were grounds for deportation. Wildes asked Lennon whether cannabis resin, also known as hashish, was marijuana. “Oh, no,” Wildes recalled Lennon replying. “Much better than marijuana.” Wildes presented expert testimony that hashish was not marijuana and thus was not covered by the law. “While this argument has some technical appeal,” the Board of Immigration Appeals concluded, “we are not persuaded.”

In the end, Lennon won by obtaining a “non-priority” classification.

“That discretion exists,” Wildes said. “Any agency which is so huge has to be concerned how they spend their money and what they concentrate on and they shouldn’t be deporting people who are here for 25 years and never did anything really wrong.

“So that is the message that we got from representing John Lennon.”

___

Reach Jim Kuhnhenn on Twitter at http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-law-rock-n-roll-roots-072229301.html
Immigration law has some rock 'n' roll roots
http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-law-rock-n-roll-roots-072229301.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

To delay or not: Timing on immigration reform holds risks for Obama

By Jeff Mason and Julia Edwards

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – When President Barack Obama stepped into the White House Rose Garden in June to announce he would single-handedly reform U.S. immigration policy, he startled advocates by announcing a firm, end-of-summer deadline for executive action.

“If Congress will not do their job, at least we can do ours,” he declared. “I expect … recommendations before the end of summer and I intend to adopt those recommendations without further delay.”

Fast forward nine weeks and both the deadline and the wisdom of setting it are in doubt. Obama’s Democrats risk losing control of the U.S. Senate in Nov. 4 elections and, for many struggling incumbents, a policy shift on a hot-button issue in the middle of their campaigns looks unwelcome.

So the White House, having touted its deadline for weeks, has turned noncommittal on the timing of an immigration announcement, creating the impression of disarray on a top domestic policy priority.

“There is the chance that it could be before the end of the summer, there is the chance that it could be after the summer,” spokesman Josh Earnest said on Tuesday.

Some 11 million immigrants, most of them Hispanics, live in the United States illegally. Their status is a controversial topic for voters. A Reuters/Ipsos poll last month found that 70 percent of Americans believed the immigrants threatened the country’s beliefs and 63 percent that they burdened the economy.

Republicans, who already control the House of Representatives, have seized on the issue to bash vulnerable Democratic senators. In New Hampshire the issue helped Republican Scott Brown erode the lead of Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen.

This has left immigration rights advocates and others close to the White House wondering whether the administration thought through the politics at all.

STAYING HOME

White House officials calculated earlier this summer that immigration would not play a major role in the elections, except perhaps for the sizable Hispanic population in Colorado, where executive action could boost Democratic Senator Mark Udall.

Now other Democratic candidates in tough Senate races are asking the White House to delay.

But immigration rights advocates, wary of what they see as another broken-promise-in-the-making, say waiting carries risks as well. They warn that Hispanics could stay away from the polls in protest if Obama postpones a decision.

“If he doesn’t follow through on his promise to take action by the end of the summer, it will make it harder for the people who are knocking on doors in the Latino community to mobilize voters,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of the America’s Voice advocacy group.

Lorella Praeli, director of advocacy and policy at immigrant youth organization United We Dream, said civil disobedience and an aggressive media strategy with Latinos would increase in the event of a delay.

PROS AND CONS

Obama must weigh the drawbacks of losing support in Latino-heavy states such as Colorado against the risk of energizing right-leaning Republican voters in states such as Alaska, North Carolina, Louisiana, Kentucky, and New Hampshire.

A surge of some 60,000 children crossing the border from Central America to the United States has complicated the debate. Obama pledged to send the migrant children home, an approach that advocacy groups see as overly harsh.

He sought to soothe anger over that policy with his promise to use executive measures to ease deportations of undocumented immigrants who have already lived in the United States a long time. Among the reforms his administration is considering are granting work permits and temporary relief from deportation to as many as five million undocumented immigrants.

Other issues could factor into a delay of that decision.

A House Democratic aide said Obama likely was “tamping down expectations” of an imminent announcement to ease tensions that might stand in the way of Congress passing a spending bill in September to keep the government running.

Republican efforts to undermine Obama’s signature healthcare initiative led to a 16-day shutdown of the federal government last year.

All of this raises the question of why Obama set a deadline in the first place.

“I wish I knew,” said Angela Kelley, an immigration specialist at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress, adding the White House would have to explain its thinking if it decided on a delay. “I don’t know what their plan is, but they sure better have one.”

(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan and Roberta Rampton; Editing by Howard Goller)

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/delay-not-timing-immigration-reform-holds-risks-obama-184703428–business.html
To delay or not: Timing on immigration reform holds risks for Obama
http://news.yahoo.com/delay-not-timing-immigration-reform-holds-risks-obama-184703428–business.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Boehner Beats the Immigration Horse He Killed

Immigration reform in 2015? Speaker John Boehner says it could happen.

Of course, Boehner also said it could happen in 2013, and in 2014, and more than anyone else, he was responsible for killing the chance of Congress passing legislation both times.

So after more than two years of hanging on the Boehner’s every utterance on immigration, reform advocates and their Democratic allies have had enough of the Speaker Who Cried Wolf.

Boehner’s comments this time came in an interview Tuesday on the Hugh Hewitt Show. While he again blamed President Obama for sowing too much distrust among House Republicans for the party to act on immigration legislation, he said he told the president in July that there was “a possibility” to revive the issue in 2015.

I’ve outlined to the president in July that the House, the Congress, ought to be dealing with immigration reform. It wasn’t likely to happen this year because of the flood on the border, and the president’s own pounding his chest about using his phone and his pen. But I did outline that you know, there’s a possibility that Congress could take this issue up next year. But if that were going to happen, there are things that he should do, and things he should not do as we lead up to this. And I think adhering to the law is a minimum requirement from the president. And he ought to be takin actions to better secure our borders. And so I would hope that the president would continue to follow the law, and begin to take steps that would better secure our border. It would create an environment where you could do immigration reform in a responsible way next year.”

Democrats view the speaker’s line citing a lack of trust in Obama to enforce the law as an excuse for Boehner’s unwillingness to risk a revolt by putting up a bill that would pass with a combination of mostly Democratic and some Republican votes. And Boehner himself has undermined his talking point by mocking conservatives who begged him not to touch the hot-button issue.

RELATED: Obama Tells Putin He Can’t Redraw Borders ‘At the Barrel of A Gun’

Yet his suggestion that immigration reform would be viable in 2015, after all that has now transpired, flies in the face of reality in a number of ways.

For one, Obama is likely to announce, either in September or after the November elections, that he is acting by executive order to give some sort of legal status to potentially millions of undocumented immigrants. Boehner has obviously warned the president against this move, but even the staunchest Republican supporters of immigration reform believe this would torpedo any chance of Congress passing its own overhaul in the short term.

Sen. Mitch McConnell/AP

Secondly, Republicans are likely to gain seats in Senate and may very well win control of the chamber. The likely GOP majority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), voted against the immigration bill that passed the Senate in 2013 and told Politico last month that the issue suffered “an immense setback” when migrant children from Central America flooded the border earlier this summer.

RELATED: Berkeley’s Free Weed for the Poor Program Isn’t As Ridiculous As It Sounds

Finally, while establishment Republicans still believe the party needs to address immigration to have a chance at winning Latino voters in presidential elections, the start of the 2016 primary jousting early next year is likely to push the party further to the right, making a big reform push in the House all the more difficult.

So while Boehner may not be ready to bury immigration reform for the next two years, he’s going to have a heck of a time resuscitating it in 2015.

This article was originally published at http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/09/boehner-beats-the-immigration-horse-he-killed/379542/

Read more from The Wire

•   What Grover Norquist Learned at Burning Man

•   Even Supreme Court Justices Cite ‘Internet Facts’ (Just Like the Rest of Us)

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-beats-immigration-horse-killed-161615920.html
Boehner Beats the Immigration Horse He Killed
http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-beats-immigration-horse-killed-161615920.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama Weighs Risks and Rewards on Immigration Action

President Barack Obama speaks at Laborfest 2014 in Milwaukee, Sept. 1, 2014.
President Barack Obama speaks at Laborfest 2014 in Milwaukee, Sept. 1, 2014.
Gabriella Demczuk—The New York Times/Redux

The President is weighing whether to wait until after the midterms to move on immigration, after promising action at the end of the summer

President Barack Obama is weighing whether to postpone a self-imposed deadline to make unilateral changes to U.S. immigration laws as the midterm elections draw near.

Source Article from http://time.com/3258209/barack-obama-immigration-reform-2014/
Obama Weighs Risks and Rewards on Immigration Action
http://time.com/3258209/barack-obama-immigration-reform-2014/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Asylum seekers or welfare? Swedish election breaks immigration taboo

By Johan Ahlander and Simon Johnson

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – A Swedish anti-immigration party is likely to score its best ever general election result this month, as a growing number of voters question the cost of the country’s open door asylum policy.

Opinion polls show that a majority in Sweden, where 16 percent of the population is foreign-born, still backs the liberal regime which over the decades has welcomed refugees from Chile and Yugoslavia to Somalia and Syria.

An absolute political consensus in support of the policy, however, is no more in a nation divided over record numbers of asylum seekers as Sweden’s cradle-to-grave welfare system comes under strain.

A decade ago questioning the policy of granting refuge to those fleeing oppression and war was almost taboo, even though a sizeable number of Swedes have long believed that it is too lenient. Now high unemployment, declining welfare and worsening standards in schools have helped to put the debate center stage in the election campaign.

In August, center-right Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, facing defeat in the Sept. 14 vote, broke an unwritten rule among mainstream parties of supporting the policy unreservedly. The cost of receiving new asylum seekers, he said, would leave little room for more spending on boosting jobs and improving schools.

“The Prime Minister has confirmed it – the election is a choice between mass immigration and welfare. You choose on Sept. 14,” Jimmie Akesson, leader of the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, immediately tweeted after Reinfeldt’s speech.

Opinion polls give the Sweden Democrats around 10 percent support – almost double their showing four years ago – and they could become the third biggest party in parliament behind the favorites, the center-left Social Democrats, and Reinfeldt’s struggling Moderates.

A study by the SOM Institute at Gothenburg University shows that many voters have doubts about the asylum policy. It found that around 44 percent believe the country should take fewer refugees. That figure has been largely stable in recent years, although it is down from around 65 percent in 1992 when Sweden was suffering a financial crisis.

Mainstream parties have excluded any form of cooperation with the Sweden Democrats, but a strong result may make it hard for anyone to form a stable government without their support.

The rise of the far-right has polarized a society that has long been proud of its peaceful and consensus-led politics. Last year skinheads attacked a peaceful demonstration against racism, leaving around 30 people injured and two people stab wounds.

Police arrested 28 neo-Nazis and tens of thousands of Swedes took to the streets the following weekend to protest against extreme-right violence.

CHURCHES SOUND WARNING

On Saturday, a massive police presence greeted around 10,000 who turned out in central Stockholm in a counter-demonstration against an election rally staged by around 100 members of the extreme right Party of the Swedes.

“Immigration costs are enormous and it is the Swedish people who have to pay,” Party of the Swedes leader Stefan Jacobsson, told Reuters at the rally.

The demonstrations passed off peacefully, but emotions were running high. “We are here to make a statement against Nazis and racists,” said Jenny, 24, a protester from the small town of Enkoping, 80 km (50 miles) northwest of the capital.

Churches rang their bells in a symbolic warning during the extreme-right rally. “We are doing this to demonstrate the inviolable worth of all people at a time when it is being questioned,” read a sign on the door of St Jacob’s church in Stockholm’s shopping district.

Asylum seekers, mainly fleeing the civil war in Syria, will cost the government an extra 48 billion Swedish crowns ($7 billion) over four years, a 50 percent rise on previous estimates. Costs for new arrivals – including housing, language lessons and a welfare allowance – totaled 1.5 percent of the country’s 921 billion crown budget in 2013.

At the same time Swedes have been shocked by reports of school standards slipping to the levels of poor, ex-communist European Union nations across the Baltic Sea, and of malnutrition among the some of the elderly.

“What is fundamental now is that we lower the cost of immigration,” Akesson, who wants to slash arrivals by 90 percent, told Reuters. “Sooner or later you cross a line when it simply does not work anymore and I think that the line was crossed a long time ago.”

The far-right has been making gains across Europe as economic downturn has left millions without jobs, but in relatively prosperous and traditionally liberal Sweden the change in mood is particularly noticeable.

Social Democrat leader Stefan Lovfen, a strong supporter of the open door policy and the man likely to be next prime minister, said the far right is playing on Swedes’ fears.

“When you have lots of people unemployed and they don’t know how they are going to get by … clearly people are going to be worried,” he said. “Then you have a party that points to a group of people and says if they weren’t here everything would be fine. It is easy to accept that simple explanation if you are afraid.”

INTEGRATION FAILURES

Other Nordic countries have similar trend. In Norway, the populist Progress Party is in power for the first time while the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party has become the country’s biggest group in the European Parliament.

Sweden opened its doors to Chileans fleeing right-wing dictatorship in the 1970s, Iraqis escaping Saddam Hussein’s brutality in the 1980s, people driven out during the violent break up of Yugoslavia in 1990s and now refugees from Syria.

But integration failures have left many immigrants on the margins of Swedish society. Unemployment among young immigrants is more than double the national average.

In August, torched cars in the immigrant-dominated Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby provided a small-scale reminder of riots in 2013 that gave the Sweden Democrats a platform for their message that the open door policy isn’t working.

One Rinkeby resident, who spoke to Reuters as people streamed out of the local mosque after Friday prayers, said the troublemakers were not representative of the community. “They’re just young hooligans causing trouble for no reason,” said the resident, who declined to be named.

Asked if the latest violence would provide a boost for the Sweden Democrats, he said: “Definitely. They’re already over ten percent, and this will help them further. It certainly won’t help the people here.”

About 36,000 Syrians have sought asylum in Sweden since an uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began in 2011. Sweden stands out in Europe for giving Syrians asylum seekers automatic residency.

Relative to its size, Sweden has received more asylum applications than any other European country over the last 12 months and the Migration Board reckons around 80,000 people will apply this year, up from around 54,000 in 2013.

“Sweden is a peaceful country. We can build a future here,” said Eid, 33, from Damascus. Sitting in a comfortable hostel for refugees in a Stockholm suburb, Eid said he had traveled through Turkey, Greece, France and Germany to get to Sweden.

Formed in the late 1980s by former members of far-right organizations, the Sweden Democrats have moved closer to the mainstream since Akesson took over as leader in 2005. He has softened the party’s stance, including introducing a zero tolerance policy on racism.

“There was consensus among mainstream political parties that we should have generous immigration policies,” Magnus Blomgren, associate professor of political science at Umea University said. “Now you have a party that says ‘we don’t think this is right’, and as a voter you have a chance to make a choice.”

The party has been hit by scandals – its economic spokesman quit parliament after a video showed him using racist language and wielding a metal bar after a night out in Stockholm.

But after breaking into parliament for the first time in 2010, winning 20 seats and 5.7 percent of the votes, the party is set to do even better this time.

Swedish liberals worry about what happened in Denmark when the Danish People’s Party held the balance of power until elections in 2011, pushing policies including tightening border controls that fueled tension with other European nations.

(1 US dollar = 6.9549 Swedish crown)

(Additional reporting by Philip O’Connor; Editing by Alistair Scrutton and David Stamp)

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/asylum-seekers-welfare-swedish-election-breaks-immigration-taboo-123749287.html
Asylum seekers or welfare? Swedish election breaks immigration taboo
http://news.yahoo.com/asylum-seekers-welfare-swedish-election-breaks-immigration-taboo-123749287.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

White House may hold off on immigration action until after election

At the beginning of the summer, President Obama said that he was directing his administration to come up with steps that he could take as president to deal with immigration issues in light of the fact that the House of Representatives had made it clear that it would not be acting on either the bill that the Senate passed last year or any other bill before the midterm elections. Almost immediately, the president’s announcement was cited by many on the right as another sign of the executive overreach that they have accused him of for several years now, and which is also the basis for the lawsuit that the House of Representative recently authorized to be filed against him. More recently, some members of Congress, most especially Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas, hinted that if the president took any such action prior to the midterms, then Republicans in Congress would be forced to consider shutting down the government over the issue. Indeed, Senator Cruz himself had threatened such a shutdown earlier this summer, although he and other Republicans have backed off of that talk in recent weeks and have asserted that all of the talk of shutdowns is coming from Democrats.

On the other side of the political aisle, the pressures on President Obama have been pulling him in different directions. On the one side are the groups that have been pushing for immigration reform for some time now, including organized labor, and are now pressing him to at least do something similar to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that he announced last year. On the other side, though, are party officials and, especially, vulnerable Democrats, who are concerned that executive action announced before the midterm elections would only serve to increase turnout from those opposed to immigration reform. While it’s unclear what the president is going to do, there have been several recent hints from the White House that we shouldn’t expect any action any time soon:

The White House has signaled that President Obama’s pledge to reform the nation’s immigration system could happen later than the end of the summer, a deadline it set earlier this year.

Obama has pledged to circumvent Congress and unilaterally overhaul immigration, and has said previously that he would do so by the end of the summer. But he and other White House officials began suggesting in recent days that any action may happen later than planned.

During a news conference Thursday, Obama suggested that a flood of Central American children at the southwestern border, which peaked in the spring and is now abating, has had an impact on the potential timing of his decision.

Some of these things do affect timelines, and we’re just going to be working through as systematically as possible in order to get this done,” he said.

A White House official said the timing of any potential action on immigration could influence migrations to the border.

 When asked about a timeline Friday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest did not mention the end-of-summer deadline, which officials have been touting for weeks. But he also declined to say whether Obama would delay decisions on immigration until later this fall or after the November midterms.

“That’s putting the cart before the horse,” Earnest said.

Earnest said Obama has not yet received final recommendations from Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on how to address the immigration issue. The White House had previously said that those recommendations were to be given to Obama by the end of summer.

“So those who are speculating about how those recommendations might be implemented are a little ahead of themselves,” Earnest said.

Obama said Thursday that the flow of unaccompanied minors and other issues have “kept us busy, but it has not stopped the process of looking more broadly about how do we get a smarter immigration system in place while we’re waiting for Congress to act.”

Obama said he still believes “that if I can’t see congressional action, that I need to do at least what I can in order to make the system work better.”

Administration officials said earlier this month that the surge of children and Congress’s failure to pass broad immigration reform spurred Obama toward taking action by the end of the summer.

However, some Democrats in tight midterm election races, including Sens. Kay Hagan (N.C.), Mark Begich (Alaska) and Mark Pryor (Ark.), have said that Obama should not sidestep Congress when it comes to immigration reform.

Based on some of the reports that have come out over the summer, if the president does take action in this area, it is likely to be something quite similar to DACA. Instead of just applying to children who have been here illegally, though, it would likely apply to spouses and family members of people who do have legal status as well as others who might fairly be said to fall into some sort of a family hardship category. This wouldn’t be any means cover all of the people who are in the country illegally, notwithstanding the claims by some on the right that President Obama is planning to legalize everyone who’s in the country, not the least because he doesn’t have the legal authority to do that. What the president does have the legal authority to do, though, is exactly what he did with DACA: provide temporary relief to a group of people that meet certain criteria. This authority exists both thanks to the discretion granted to the executive branch by Congress and to the concept of prosecutorial discretion. So, whatever it is that the president is planning to do, it’s pretty clear that he has the legal authority to do it, and in that regard it’s worth noting that Congress has not included DACA as one of the examples of alleged executive overreach that form the basis for the lawsuit.

Leaving aside the legal merits for executive action, though, what the White House finds itself dealing with here is the politics of the matter. In some broad sense, the president’s actions would probably be supported by the American public, although even that is unclear given the fact that his own job approval is so low that anything he does is likely to be opposed by a majority of the public, just for that reason. However, the passion on this issue is almost entirely one sided, and if taking this action before the election leads to more voters who would vote for Republicans in states like North Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana, Iowa, and Colorado to turn out on Election Day, then it could end up costing the Democrats the Senate in a year when it is still theoretically possible that they could pull off holding on to enough seats to maintain control. Given that, you have to ask whether it would be worth it and, if the White House decides to hold off until after November, then I can’t say I blame them.

Doug Mataconis appears on the Outside the Beltway blog at http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/

Source Article from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/Decoder-Voices/2014/0831/White-House-may-hold-off-on-immigration-action-until-after-election
White House may hold off on immigration action until after election
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/Decoder-Voices/2014/0831/White-House-may-hold-off-on-immigration-action-until-after-election
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

IMMIGRATION WAIT? Obama may hold action until after midterms, report says

 

President Obama is reportedly mulling the possibility of delaying making changes to U.S. immigration policy until after the upcoming midterm elections, after Democrats in tough Senate races have argued that it could damage their chances in November.

The president had been expected to use his executive authority to ease deportations and give temporary work permits to millions of illegal immigrants. 

After Republicans in the House of Representatives voted down a version of immigration reform, Obama announced that he intended to act on his own before the end of summer in order to make what he said were urgent changes to the immigration system. Republicans claim that such moves would exceed his legal authority if he were to act without congressional approval.

However, The Wall Street Journal reports that White House officials are now debating whether to put off some or all of Obama’s policy changes until after the November election, after several Democrats running in tight elections in conservative states have urged the president to do so, claiming that such a move would damage their election prospects.

Democratic Senators Mark Pryor in Arkansas, Kay Hagan in North Carolina, Mark Begich in Alaska and Jeanne Shaheen in New Hampshire, all have called for immigration reform to be addressed by Congress, not by the White House, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Obama said in a news conference Thursday that his timeline for immigration reform was unclear, and said that the child-migration crisis could affect the timing of any announcement.

“Some of these things do affect timelines, and we’re just going to be working through as systematically as possible in order to get this done,” Obama said.

Obama also faces pressure from immigrant-rights advocates strongly urging the president not to back down and to move forward as planned, especially as he has already delayed action once in 2014.

However, Brad Dayspring, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said Mr. Obama’s executive action on immigration would be unpopular no matter when he made it. 

“Whether President Obama declares executive amnesty in September, October or November, he has neither the legal authority nor the public support to do it,” Dayspring told The Wall Street Journal.

Click for more from The Wall Street Journal.

Source Article from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/31/obama-under-pressure-to-delay-immigration-action-until-after-midterms/
IMMIGRATION WAIT? Obama may hold action until after midterms, report says
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/31/obama-under-pressure-to-delay-immigration-action-until-after-midterms/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama's delay on immigration creates uncertainty

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama’s possible delay in taking action on immigration has created uncertainty among advocates and lawmakers from both parties, barely two months before the November national elections.

Democrats who were bracing for the impact that Obama’s long-awaited announcement would have on their campaigns are now rethinking aspects of their campaign strategy. Republicans who were considering legislative attempts to block Obama must reconsider whether that’s the best use of the few remaining work weeks before Election Day.

And immigration advocates, already frustrated by how long it’s taken Obama to act, must decide whether to pressure the president publicly to stop stalling or remain hopeful he’ll give them a favorable outcome in the end.

Obama in June said that by the end of the summer, he’d announce what steps he had decided to take to fix the U.S. immigration system in the absence of a legislative fix from Congress. But Obama backed away from that deadline on Thursday, and the White House on Friday acknowledged it was possible the decision would slip past the end of summer. It was unclear whether any delay would be a mere matter of weeks or could push the announcement past the November elections.

“The president is determined to take the kinds of steps that are available to him,” said White House spokesman Josh Earnest. But he added he had no details about when that would happen.

Reluctant to be seen as putting on the brakes for political reasons, White House officials suggested that if the decision slips past summer, it would be because of the situation on the border, not the election.

For months, the Obama administration has been working to stem the surge of unaccompanied minors crossing into the U.S. Those numbers have declined, but officials have said the numbers could creep back up as cooler temperatures arrive.

The White House has been coy about what options Obama is considering, but much of the focus has centered on steps Obama could take to defer deportations for millions of people in the U.S. illegally, effectively granting them permission to remain and work in the U.S. Republicans say that’s beyond Obama’s authority and even a few endangered Democrats have said Obama should look to Congress to take that step.

For Democrats, who are fighting most of their toughest races this year in conservative-leaning states where Obama is unpopular, presidential action has been seen as a likely liability in the election, fueling Republican arguments that Obama is exceeding his authority and that he and Democrats are refusing to enforce immigration laws. Chris Lehane, a California-based Democratic strategist, said the timing of Obama’s action could affect whether voters enthusiastic about immigration show up to vote.

“All of these elections are going to be so laser-tight — 5,000 votes one way or the other — that at some level, what’s out there at the broader, national level at election time could push things over the edge,” Lehane said.

Obama’s timing could affect congressional action on a must-pass spending bill to fund government operations into December. Congress is expected to make that its first order of business when lawmakers return from their summer recess in early September.

A number of Republicans have raised the possibility of using that legislation to block Obama from expanding deportation deferrals or granting work permits to those here illegally. Such a move would set up a confrontation between the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and the Democratic-controlled Senate that raises the specter of a government shutdown, which would likely be blamed on Republicans and could hurt their prospects in November.

Sen. Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, has been urging Obama not to act alone on immigration, and warned the president in a letter this week that doing so would imperil prospects for overhauling immigration laws after the election. Rubio’s spokesman, Alex Conant, called the apparent delay a positive sign and one he hoped Obama would make permanent.

“It appears that the White House made a short-term political calculation that this was bad for them in the midterms,” Conant said.

Immigration advocates were taken aback by word of the potential delay, having been given no advance warning by the White House. Kica Matos of the Fair Immigration Reform Movement said that after spending months keeping the pressure on Obama, the group had been shifting into preparations for the announcement itself. Now, Matos said, exhausted advocates will have to keep up the pressure to ensure Obama doesn’t get cold feet and call off the announcement altogether.

“They say they’re going to move forward, then somebody goes boo and then they hide,” Matos said.

___

Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/obamas-delay-immigration-creates-uncertainty-145243687.html
Obama's delay on immigration creates uncertainty
http://news.yahoo.com/obamas-delay-immigration-creates-uncertainty-145243687.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results