Boehner defends House GOP immigration lawsuit

Washington (CNN)House Speaker John Boehner on Wednesday confirmed House Republicans are filing a lawsuit against Obama’s executive action delaying deportations for millions of immigrants here illegally.

“The President’s overreach when he took executive action to deal with the immigration problems in our country, frankly, in my view, is a violation of our Constitution,” he said in an interview on Fox News.

READ: Boehner opens door to Obama immigration lawsuit

“This isn’t about immigration,” he said. “This is the President violating the Constitution, violating his oath of office, and frankly, not upholding the rule of law.”

Boehner had told House Republicans of the planned lawsuit during their closed-door meeting on Tuesday.

    The move comes as House leadership struggles to round up support for a border security bill they planned to vote on this week, in part due to conservative opposition. Conservatives have expressed frustration that leadership hasn’t done enough to oppose Obama’s unilateral action on immigration.

    Boehner insisted during the interview that the bill will ultimately pass.

    But while the lawsuit may help quell some of those complaints, it’s unlikely to ultimately have much impact on deportations. Boehner turned to a similar tactic on Obamacare, bringing a lawsuit against the administration for delaying the employer mandate that remains stalled in court.

    White House spokesman Eric Schultz said the administration believes Obama was acting well within his power when he issued the order on deportations.

    “House Republicans seem to be relying more and more on the courts these days to challenge the president’s authority,” Shultz said at Wednesday’s daily press briefing. “We believe that we acted within the full bounds of authority enshrined to the executive branch, and we’ll be defending that.”

    Boehner also defended his decision to invite Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address the House in March, without letting the White House know in advance, a move that’s drawn widespread criticism from even pro-Israel groups.

    SEE ALSO: Obama says Netanyahu’s visit is too close to election for a meeting

    “The Israeli prime minister can also talk with some expertise about the growing threat of radical Islam,” Boehner said. “We’ve got a serious problem in the world and the President just wants to act like it’s going to just disappear. And so as a co-equal branch of our government, I don’t have any problem at all in doing what I did to invite the prime minister to come to Congress and address those concerns.”

    Netanyahu is expected to lobby Congress to pass new sanctions on Iran, putting him squarely at odds with Obama. The President said during a Wednesday interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that he hadn’t heard “a persuasive rebuttal of my argument that we crafted very effective sanctions against Iran specifically to bring them to the negotiations table.”

    Obama also told Zakaria that he won’t be meeting with Netanyahu when he comes because “our general policy is, we don’t meet with any world leader two weeks before their election.”

    But Boehner said there’s clear “antipathy” from the White House towards Netanyahu.

    “They don’t even try to hide it,” he said.

    Boehner also said House Republicans will eventually offer an alternative to the health care reform law, and that he himself expects to remain speaker — despite facing another conservative coup attempt — for quite some time.

    “I’ll be here for a while,” he said.

Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/28/politics/boehner-obama-immigration-lawsuit/index.html
Boehner defends House GOP immigration lawsuit
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/28/politics/boehner-obama-immigration-lawsuit/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Foster Adds New Attorneys to Growing EB-5 Immigrant Investor Practice

HOUSTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Foster LLP, a leading immigration law firm delivering the full spectrum of U.S. and global immigration solutions, announces the expansion of their investor practice. Established more than 20 years ago, the firm’s nationally renowned investor team is growing as a result of increasing demand from Chinese, Middle Eastern and Latin American investors.

As part of the expansion, Foster is adding three new attorneys with the expertise to handle investor-related immigration issues. The practice represents entrepreneurs in establishing EB-5 regional centers, as well as in existing regional centers, immigrant entrepreneurs and investors seeking permanent residency through the EB-5 investor visa program.

“With a strong U.S. economy, people around the world are seeking to invest in America,” said Charles C. Foster, founder and chairman, Foster LLP. “To meet the needs of an influx of investors seeking lawful permanent residency, we are excited to be adding to our team of highly experienced attorneys in our EB-5 investor section. We believe 2015 will be another landmark year for immigrants investing in the U.S.”

Of eleven attorneys recently added to Foster’s full-service immigration law practice, three attorneys have been added specifically to address immigrant investor matters. By augmenting the firm’s already formidable investor team, the firm continues to demonstrate commitment to the immigrant investor community and believes that their EB-5 investor program offers a uniquely advantageous avenue for immigration to the U.S., while also benefiting our robust economy.

Christian Triantaphyllis has four years of experience focusing his practice on EB-5 and business immigration matters, particularly those related to regional centers and direct investments. Triantaphyllis works with regional centers and real estate developers to setup EB-5 projects throughout the U.S. He specializes in advising businesses and developers structuring prospective EB-5 funding, providing analysis to clients on EB-5 project business plans, securities offering documents and economic reports. Triantaphyllis received his Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Southern Methodist University and received his Juris Doctor from New York Law School. He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Yiting (Dora) Hu has four years of experience counseling immigrant investors through various stages of the EB-5 immigration process. Hu specializes in preparing and filing I-526 and I-829 petitions, assisting EB-5 investors in gaining U.S. permanent residency through adjustment of status and consular processing, and preparing investors for immigrant visa interviews. Fluent in English and Mandarin Chinese, she is an expert in assisting Chinese EB-5 investors by properly documenting source of funds and navigating the EB-5 process from start to finish. Hu received her LL.B in international economic law from the University of Business and International Economics in Beijing, China, and an LL.M. in comparative law from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. She received her J.D. from the University of Houston Law School and is a member of the State Bar of New York.

Jeffrey Thomas has three years of experience counseling foreign investors and entrepreneurs from Latin America in nonimmigrant and immigrant visa matters. Fluent in Spanish, Thomas specializes in nonimmigrant visa options for large and small business startups, including E-1 Treaty Trader, E-2 Treaty Investor and L-1 New Office petitions. He has provided immigration counseling to startup businesses in the information technology, international commerce and professional services industries. Thomas is experienced in representing EB-5 investors with direct investment matters and has experience facilitating the international transfer of executive-level employees to the U.S. Thomas received his law degree from the University of Minnesota Law School and received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Brigham Young University. He is a member of the Minnesota State Bar and the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

“We welcome all of our newest attorneys to our award-winning team of immigration experts and look forward to their many contributions,” continued Foster.

About Foster LLP

Foster LLP is a leading immigration law firm delivering the full spectrum of U.S. and global immigration solutions. Renowned for responsive, personalized service, Foster works on behalf of the largest employers worldwide, as well as top emerging and midmarket companies, investors, and individuals and families. Through experience, leadership and technology, Foster’s team solves the most complex immigration problems, while never forgetting that people are the focus of the firm’s practice. Learn more at www.FosterGlobal.com.

Contact:
for Foster LLP
Matt Maurel, 512-329-5670 ext. 109
matt@anthonybarnum.com

Source Article from http://finance.yahoo.com/news/foster-adds-attorneys-growing-eb-153000301.html
Foster Adds New Attorneys to Growing EB-5 Immigrant Investor Practice
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/foster-adds-attorneys-growing-eb-153000301.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Attorney general nominee pressed on administration’s immigration, drug policies

Attorney general nominee Loretta E. Lynch carefully backed the Obama administration’s policies on immigration and drug enforcement Wednesday, sidestepping political tripwires before lawmakers deeply critical of the department she has been picked to lead.

During an all-day confirmation hearing that highlighted Republican anger with the administration, Lynch declined repeated opportunities to disavow actions taken by the Justice Department under Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

Instead, the first African American woman nominated to be attorney general cast herself as a career federal prosecutor determined to uphold the rule of law and willing to provide honest counsel to the president even when he might disagree.

In calm, polished replies, Lynch also acknowledged Republican concerns and pledged to foster a better relationship with lawmakers if confirmed.

“You’re not Eric Holder, are you?” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) asked at one point.

“No, I’m not, sir,” Lynch replied.

Lynch, 55, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said she supports the use of the death penalty as an effective punishment and considers waterboarding “torture and thus illegal.” She said it was the Justice Department’s job to enforce the laws Congress passes, but when pushed about Holder’s decision not to defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act, she said there are “rare instances” when careful analysis of existing laws raises constitutional issues.

Immigration proved to be the most significant flash point during the hearing, with Republicans voicing continuing outrage over the administration’s executive actions.

At the start of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, which was interrupted many times as senators left to vote, Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) asked whether the president could defer deportations “for millions of individuals in the country illegally and grant them permits and other benefits, regardless of what the U.S. Constitution or immigration laws say.”

Lynch said that it was important for the Justice Department to ensure that any executive action be legal but that she was not involved in the decisions leading up to the president’s actions.

Referring to a Justice Department memo on the president’s authority on immigration matters, she said, “I don’t see any reason to doubt the reasonableness of those views.”

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), who has said he plans to vote against Lynch, said he was “very disappointed and frustrated” with her responses.

“I have a huge concern regarding what I think is the president’s illegal, unconstitutional executive amnesty, and I have a huge concern of the fact that you think it is within the law,” Vitter said. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) agreed with Vitter and said after the hearing that he will vote against Lynch.

Lynch is the first Obama Cabinet nominee to face a confirmation hearing since Republicans took over the Senate this year. The department she has been selected to oversee has been a regular target of Republicans’ ire on a range of issues, including investigations into the Internal Revenue Service and the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, and a botched gun-trafficking operation run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) asked his colleagues not to “turn this exceptional nominee into a political point-scoring exercise” by badgering her on immigration and the controversy over the investigation into the IRS.

He described Lynch as “one of the keenest legal minds that our country has to offer, someone who has excelled at every stage of her education and her career, while cultivating a reputation as someone who was level-headed, fair, judicious and eminently likable.”

Holder — whose six-year tenure overshadowed Wednesday’s hearing — had a particularly rocky relationship with Congress. Lynch has chaired the Justice Department committee that advises him on policy decisions.

Among the points of contention between the administration and Congress has been the Justice Department’s policy on marijuana in response to the legalization of the drug in Colorado and Washington state. The department announced that it would not challenge those state laws and said that in prosecutions it would prioritize marijuana offenses­ such as distribution to minors.

Asked about her own views on marijuana, Lynch said she does not support legalization.

Sessions asked Lynch whether she agreed with a remark made by President Obama — and published last year in the New Yorker magazine — that the drug was no more dangerous than alcohol.

“I certainly don’t hold that view and don’t agree with that view of marijuana,” Lynch said. “I certainly think that the president was speaking from his personal experience and personal opinion, neither of which I’m able to share.”

When pressed on the legality of the National Security Agency’s controversial surveillance programs, Lynch replied that she believed they were “constitutional and effective.”

If Lynch is confirmed as the 83rd attorney general, she will take the reins of the Justice Department at a moment of high tension between law enforcement and minority communities across the country.

In her testimony, she emphasized her strong bonds with law enforcement and her desire to heal the rifts between police and the communities they are tasked with protecting.

One of her priorities, she said, will be to work to strengthen “the vital relationships between our courageous law enforcement personnel and all the communities we serve.”

“In my career, I have seen this relationship flourish — I have seen law enforcement forge unbreakable bonds with community residents and have seen violence-ravaged communities come together to honor officers who risked all to protect them,” Lynch said. “As attorney general, I will draw all voices into this important discussion.”

Lynch was accompanied by her husband, Stephen Hargrove; her father, the Rev. Lorenzo Lynch, who traveled from Durham, N.C., and sat behind her; and her only surviving brother, Leonzo Lynch, who is a preacher in Charlotte. Her other brother, Lorenzo Jr., a former Navy SEAL, died in 2009. She placed his Navy SEAL trident pin on the witness table in front of her while she testified.

A group of two dozen of Lynch’s fellow U.S. attorneys from across the country were in Washington, watching the hearing together on television from the Justice Department building. In the audience at the hearing was a group of Lynch’s Delta Sigma Theta sorority sisters, dressed in bright red.

Lynch told the committee about her family and the values instilled in her by her parents, both from North Carolina.

“My mother, Lorine, who was unable to travel here today, is a retired English teacher and librarian for whom education was the key to a better life,” Lynch said. “She recalls people in her rural community pressing a dime or a quarter into her hands to support her college education. As a young woman, she refused to use segregated restrooms, because they did not represent the America in which she believed.”

“She instilled in me an abiding love of literature and learning, and taught me the value of hard work and sacrifice,” Lynch said.

Lynch’s father, a fourth-generation Baptist preacher, opened his Greensboro church in the early 1960s to those planning sit-ins and marches­, standing with the protesters while carrying her on his shoulders.

“As I come before you today in this historic chamber, I still stand on my father’s shoulders, as well as on the shoulders of all those who have gone before me and who dreamed of making the promise of America a reality for all and worked to achieve that goal,” Lynch said. “I believe in the promise of America because I have lived the promise of America.”

Source Article from http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636635/s/42caaa6e/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cworld0Cnational0Esecurity0Cattorney0Egeneral0Enominee0Eto0Estress0Eoutreach0Ein0Econfirmation0Etestimony0C20A150C0A10C280Ce2efb10Ac0Ea6e20E11e40Ea7c20E0A3d37af98440A0Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Inational/story01.htm
Attorney general nominee pressed on administration’s immigration, drug policies
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636635/s/42caaa6e/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cworld0Cnational0Esecurity0Cattorney0Egeneral0Enominee0Eto0Estress0Eoutreach0Ein0Econfirmation0Etestimony0C20A150C0A10C280Ce2efb10Ac0Ea6e20E11e40Ea7c20E0A3d37af98440A0Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Inational/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Boehner defends immigration lawsuit

Washington (CNN)House Speaker John Boehner on Wednesday confirmed House Republicans are filing a lawsuit against Obama’s executive action delaying deportations for millions of immigrants here illegally.

“The President’s overreach when he took executive action to deal with the immigration problems in our country, frankly, in my view, is a violation of our Constitution,” he said in an interview on Fox News.

READ: Boehner opens door to Obama immigration lawsuit

“This isn’t about immigration,” he said. “This is the President violating the Constitution, violating his oath of office, and frankly, not upholding the rule of law.”

Boehner had told House Republicans of the planned lawsuit during their closed-door meeting on Tuesday.

    The move comes as House leadership struggles to round up support for a border security bill they planned to vote on this week, in part due to conservative opposition. Conservatives have expressed frustration that leadership hasn’t done enough to oppose Obama’s unilateral action on immigration.

    Boehner insisted during the interview that the bill will ultimately pass.

    But while the lawsuit may help quell some of those complaints, it’s unlikely to ultimately have much impact on deportations. Boehner turned to a similar tactic on Obamacare, bringing a lawsuit against the administration for delaying the employer mandate that remains stalled in court.

    White House spokesman Eric Schultz said the administration believes Obama was acting well within his power when he issued the order on deportations.

    “House Republicans seem to be relying more and more on the courts these days to challenge the president’s authority,” Shultz said at Wednesday’s daily press briefing. “We believe that we acted within the full bounds of authority enshrined to the executive branch, and we’ll be defending that.”

    Boehner also defended his decision to invite Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address the House in March, without letting the White House know in advance, a move that’s drawn widespread criticism from even pro-Israel groups.

    SEE ALSO: Obama says Netanyahu’s visit is too close to election for a meeting

    “The Israeli prime minister can also talk with some expertise about the growing threat of radical Islam,” Boehner said. “We’ve got a serious problem in the world and the President just wants to act like it’s going to just disappear. And so as a co-equal branch of our government, I don’t have any problem at all in doing what I did to invite the prime minister to come to Congress and address those concerns.”

    Netanyahu is expected to lobby Congress to pass new sanctions on Iran, putting him squarely at odds with Obama. The President said during a Wednesday interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that he hadn’t heard “a persuasive rebuttal of my argument that we crafted very effective sanctions against Iran specifically to bring them to the negotiations table.”

    Obama also told Zakaria that he won’t be meeting with Netanyahu when he comes because “our general policy is, we don’t meet with any world leader two weeks before their election.”

    But Boehner said there’s clear “antipathy” from the White House towards Netanyahu.

    “They don’t even try to hide it,” he said.

    Boehner also said House Republicans will eventually offer an alternative to the health care reform law, and that he himself expects to remain speaker — despite facing another conservative coup attempt — for quite some time.

    “I’ll be here for a while,” he said.

Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/28/politics/boehner-obama-immigration-lawsuit/index.html
Boehner defends immigration lawsuit
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/28/politics/boehner-obama-immigration-lawsuit/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions

Attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch backed up President Obama on his controversial immigration executive actions during her confirmation hearing Wednesday — while going as far to say she believed in an illegal immigrant’s “right” and “obligation to work.” 

Lynch, who is in line to succeed Eric Holder if confirmed, fielded a barrage of questions on the opening day of her Senate hearing on the Obama administration’s moves to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation and offer them work permits. 

In a carefully worded response, Lynch told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee she’s read the Office of Legal Counsel opinion and other papers that helped justify much of what the Department of Homeland Security is doing. She said they seem a “reasonable discussion” of the law. 

“I don’t see any reason to doubt the reasonableness of those views,” Lynch said, adding that the department always must review such matters “carefully.” 

While clarifying it’s not her role to “support or not support” the legal justification, Lynch went on to back up components of the administration’s policy. 

Under questioning from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who asked whether legal residents or illegal immigrants have more of a right to a job, Lynch said everyone should be able to work. 

“I believe that the right and the obligation to work is one that’s shared by everyone in this country regardless of how they came here,” Lynch said. “If someone is here, regardless of status, I would prefer that they be participating in the workplace than not participating in the workplace.” 

She acknowledged there’s no civil right in the law for illegal immigrants to get citizenship and that employers still have to abide by the nation’s immigration laws. 

Lynch also said DHS’s effort to prioritize deportations by focusing on removing the most dangerous criminals seems a “reasonable way to marshal limited resources.” 

The immigration issue dominated the opening day of the hearing. 

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the committee, was highly critical of Obama’s plan to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation as he questioned Lynch on the matter. 

He told Lynch that “common sense” would dictate it is “impossible” to apply such an exception on such a broad basis. 

Lynch, while backing the “reasonableness” of the legal guidance, repeatedly reminded lawmakers she was not involved in the immigration action review. 

Republican lawmakers also sought to probe whether Lynch would bring a different style to the leadership of the department than Holder, who has had a contentious relationship with Congress. 

Grassley, in his opening remarks, said he wants to know if the nominee can “fix” the department — which he called “deeply politicized.” 

Grassley suggested the attorney general post has been used to represent Obama, not necessarily the American people. He complained that legal memos have sanctioned “the unprecedented authority that [Obama] claims to possess.” 

He said those opinions should be impartial. “They shouldn’t be transparently self-serving attempts to justify whatever the president or an attorney general wants to do for political reasons,” Grassley said. 

Later on in the hearing, Lynch assured lawmakers: “If confirmed as attorney general, I will be myself. I will be Loretta Lynch.” 

Wednesday’s session was the first Republican-led confirmation hearing of the Obama administration, with Republicans in control of the Senate for the first time since Obama took office. 

If approved, Lynch would become the first black female attorney general. She is now the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Lynch would replace Holder, who announced his resignation in September after leading the Justice Department for six years. 

Holder was a lightning rod for conservative criticism and clashed with congressional Republicans. By contrast, Lynch has already earned praise from several of the GOP members of the Judiciary Committee and is widely expected to win confirmation. 

But first she faces tough questions from committee members on immigration, police misconduct and other issues. 

Grassley’s opening statement reflected lingering concerns that the president has taken questionable executive actions and used the Justice Department to help justify them legally. 

Lynch was also asked early on about the controversy over the IRS targeting Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations when they applied for tax-exempt status several years ago. Addressing some confusion over whether the matter is still being investigated, Lynch said she is “generally aware that there is an investigation going on.” 

Lynch also told lawmakers that, with several states legalizing marijuana, the drug is still illegal under federal law. 

In her opening remarks, Lynch vowed that the Constitution “will be my lodestar as I exercise the power and the responsibility of that position.” She also said fighting terrorism — preventing attacks and bringing terrorists to justice — will be the department’s primary mission. 

She said she looks forward to “fostering a new and improved relationship with this committee, the United States Senate, and the entire United States Congress — a relationship based on mutual respect and Constitutional balance.” 

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who introduced Lynch to the committee, called the nominee “eminently qualified” but said some are trying to drag “extraneous issues” into the fray because “they can’t find anything in her record to point to.” 

He reminded lawmakers that Obama’s immigration policies aren’t seeking confirmation: “Loretta Lynch is.” 

Obama nominated Lynch in November 2014 when Democrats controlled the Senate through the end of the year. However, Republicans were able to hold off the confirmation process until they took charge of the Senate in January, as a result of the elections, arguing committee members from both sides needed more time to prepare. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions

Attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch backed up President Obama on his controversial immigration executive actions during her confirmation hearing Wednesday — while going as far to say she believed in an illegal immigrant’s “right” and “obligation to work.” 

Lynch, who is in line to succeed Eric Holder if confirmed, fielded a barrage of questions on the opening day of her Senate hearing on the Obama administration’s moves to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation and offer them work permits. 

In a carefully worded response, Lynch told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee she’s read the Office of Legal Counsel opinion and other papers that helped justify much of what the Department of Homeland Security is doing. She said they seem a “reasonable discussion” of the law. 

“I don’t see any reason to doubt the reasonableness of those views,” Lynch said, adding that the department always must review such matters “carefully.” 

While clarifying it’s not her role to “support or not support” the legal justification, Lynch went on to back up components of the administration’s policy. 

Under questioning from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who asked whether legal residents or illegal immigrants have more of a right to a job, Lynch said everyone should be able to work. 

“I believe that the right and the obligation to work is one that’s shared by everyone in this country regardless of how they came here,” Lynch said. “If someone is here, regardless of status, I would prefer that they be participating in the workplace than not participating in the workplace.” 

She acknowledged there’s no civil right in the law for illegal immigrants to get citizenship and that employers still have to abide by the nation’s immigration laws. 

Lynch also said DHS’s effort to prioritize deportations by focusing on removing the most dangerous criminals seems a “reasonable way to marshal limited resources.” 

The immigration issue dominated the opening day of the hearing. 

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the committee, was highly critical of Obama’s plan to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation as he questioned Lynch on the matter. 

He told Lynch that “common sense” would dictate it is “impossible” to apply such an exception on such a broad basis. 

Lynch, while backing the “reasonableness” of the legal guidance, repeatedly reminded lawmakers she was not involved in the immigration action review. 

Republican lawmakers also sought to probe whether Lynch would bring a different style to the leadership of the department than Holder, who has had a contentious relationship with Congress. 

Grassley, in his opening remarks, said he wants to know if the nominee can “fix” the department — which he called “deeply politicized.” 

Grassley suggested the attorney general post has been used to represent Obama, not necessarily the American people. He complained that legal memos have sanctioned “the unprecedented authority that [Obama] claims to possess.” 

He said those opinions should be impartial. “They shouldn’t be transparently self-serving attempts to justify whatever the president or an attorney general wants to do for political reasons,” Grassley said. 

Later on in the hearing, Lynch assured lawmakers: “If confirmed as attorney general, I will be myself. I will be Loretta Lynch.” 

Wednesday’s session was the first Republican-led confirmation hearing of the Obama administration, with Republicans in control of the Senate for the first time since Obama took office. 

If approved, Lynch would become the first black female attorney general. She is now the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Lynch would replace Holder, who announced his resignation in September after leading the Justice Department for six years. 

Holder was a lightning rod for conservative criticism and clashed with congressional Republicans. By contrast, Lynch has already earned praise from several of the GOP members of the Judiciary Committee and is widely expected to win confirmation. 

But first she faces tough questions from committee members on immigration, police misconduct and other issues. 

Grassley’s opening statement reflected lingering concerns that the president has taken questionable executive actions and used the Justice Department to help justify them legally. 

Lynch was also asked early on about the controversy over the IRS targeting Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations when they applied for tax-exempt status several years ago. Addressing some confusion over whether the matter is still being investigated, Lynch said she is “generally aware that there is an investigation going on.” 

Lynch also told lawmakers that, with several states legalizing marijuana, the drug is still illegal under federal law. 

In her opening remarks, Lynch vowed that the Constitution “will be my lodestar as I exercise the power and the responsibility of that position.” She also said fighting terrorism — preventing attacks and bringing terrorists to justice — will be the department’s primary mission. 

She said she looks forward to “fostering a new and improved relationship with this committee, the United States Senate, and the entire United States Congress — a relationship based on mutual respect and Constitutional balance.” 

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who introduced Lynch to the committee, called the nominee “eminently qualified” but said some are trying to drag “extraneous issues” into the fray because “they can’t find anything in her record to point to.” 

He reminded lawmakers that Obama’s immigration policies aren’t seeking confirmation: “Loretta Lynch is.” 

Obama nominated Lynch in November 2014 when Democrats controlled the Senate through the end of the year. However, Republicans were able to hold off the confirmation process until they took charge of the Senate in January, as a result of the elections, arguing committee members from both sides needed more time to prepare. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions

Attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch backed up President Obama on his controversial immigration executive actions during her confirmation hearing Wednesday — while going as far to say she believed in an illegal immigrant’s “right” and “obligation to work.” 

Lynch, who is in line to succeed Eric Holder if confirmed, fielded a barrage of questions on the opening day of her Senate hearing on the Obama administration’s moves to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation and offer them work permits. 

In a carefully worded response, Lynch told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee she’s read the Office of Legal Counsel opinion and other papers that helped justify much of what the Department of Homeland Security is doing. She said they seem a “reasonable discussion” of the law. 

“I don’t see any reason to doubt the reasonableness of those views,” Lynch said, adding that the department always must review such matters “carefully.” 

While clarifying it’s not her role to “support or not support” the legal justification, Lynch went on to back up components of the administration’s policy. 

Under questioning from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who asked whether legal residents or illegal immigrants have more of a right to a job, Lynch said everyone should be able to work. 

“I believe that the right and the obligation to work is one that’s shared by everyone in this country regardless of how they came here,” Lynch said. “If someone is here, regardless of status, I would prefer that they be participating in the workplace than not participating in the workplace.” 

She acknowledged there’s no civil right in the law for illegal immigrants to get citizenship and that employers still have to abide by the nation’s immigration laws. 

Lynch also said DHS’s effort to prioritize deportations by focusing on removing the most dangerous criminals seems a “reasonable way to marshal limited resources.” 

The immigration issue dominated the opening day of the hearing. 

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the committee, was highly critical of Obama’s plan to spare millions of illegal immigrants from deportation as he questioned Lynch on the matter. 

He told Lynch that “common sense” would dictate it is “impossible” to apply such an exception on such a broad basis. 

Lynch, while backing the “reasonableness” of the legal guidance, repeatedly reminded lawmakers she was not involved in the immigration action review. 

Republican lawmakers also sought to probe whether Lynch would bring a different style to the leadership of the department than Holder, who has had a contentious relationship with Congress. 

Grassley, in his opening remarks, said he wants to know if the nominee can “fix” the department — which he called “deeply politicized.” 

Grassley suggested the attorney general post has been used to represent Obama, not necessarily the American people. He complained that legal memos have sanctioned “the unprecedented authority that [Obama] claims to possess.” 

He said those opinions should be impartial. “They shouldn’t be transparently self-serving attempts to justify whatever the president or an attorney general wants to do for political reasons,” Grassley said. 

Later on in the hearing, Lynch assured lawmakers: “If confirmed as attorney general, I will be myself. I will be Loretta Lynch.” 

Wednesday’s session was the first Republican-led confirmation hearing of the Obama administration, with Republicans in control of the Senate for the first time since Obama took office. 

If approved, Lynch would become the first black female attorney general. She is now the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Lynch would replace Holder, who announced his resignation in September after leading the Justice Department for six years. 

Holder was a lightning rod for conservative criticism and clashed with congressional Republicans. By contrast, Lynch has already earned praise from several of the GOP members of the Judiciary Committee and is widely expected to win confirmation. 

But first she faces tough questions from committee members on immigration, police misconduct and other issues. 

Grassley’s opening statement reflected lingering concerns that the president has taken questionable executive actions and used the Justice Department to help justify them legally. 

Lynch was also asked early on about the controversy over the IRS targeting Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations when they applied for tax-exempt status several years ago. Addressing some confusion over whether the matter is still being investigated, Lynch said she is “generally aware that there is an investigation going on.” 

Lynch also told lawmakers that, with several states legalizing marijuana, the drug is still illegal under federal law. 

In her opening remarks, Lynch vowed that the Constitution “will be my lodestar as I exercise the power and the responsibility of that position.” She also said fighting terrorism — preventing attacks and bringing terrorists to justice — will be the department’s primary mission. 

She said she looks forward to “fostering a new and improved relationship with this committee, the United States Senate, and the entire United States Congress — a relationship based on mutual respect and Constitutional balance.” 

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who introduced Lynch to the committee, called the nominee “eminently qualified” but said some are trying to drag “extraneous issues” into the fray because “they can’t find anything in her record to point to.” 

He reminded lawmakers that Obama’s immigration policies aren’t seeking confirmation: “Loretta Lynch is.” 

Obama nominated Lynch in November 2014 when Democrats controlled the Senate through the end of the year. However, Republicans were able to hold off the confirmation process until they took charge of the Senate in January, as a result of the elections, arguing committee members from both sides needed more time to prepare. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
BACKIN' UP THE BOSS AG nominee Lynch defends Obama immigration actions
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/judiciary-panel-chairman-urges-ag-nominee-to-take-politics-out-justice/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Govt tells immigration agents to ID immigrants not to deport

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration has ordered immigration agents to ask immigrants they encounter living in the country illegally whether they might qualify under President Barack Obama’s plans to avoid deporting them, according to internal training materials obtained by The Associated Press.

Agents also have been told to review government files to identify any jailed immigrants they might be able to release under the program.

The directives from the Homeland Security Department mark an unusual change for U.S. immigration enforcement, placing the obligation on the government for identifying immigrants who might qualify for lenient treatment. Previously, it was the responsibility of immigrants or their lawyers to assert that they might qualify under rules that could keep them out of jail and inside the United States.

It’s akin to the Internal Revenue Service calling taxpayers to recommend they should have used certain exemptions or deductions.

The training materials apply to agents for Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. They instruct agents “to immediately begin identifying persons in their custody, as well as newly encountered persons” who may be eligible for protection from deportation.

One training document includes scenarios describing encounters between agents and immigrants with guidance about how agents should proceed, with a checklist of questions to determine whether immigrants might qualify under the president’s plans. ICE officials earlier began releasing immigrants who qualified for leniency from federal immigration jails.

Obama in November announced a program to allow roughly 4 million parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents to apply for permission to stay in the country for up to three years and get a work permit. The program mirrors one announced in 2012 that provides protection from deportation for young immigrants brought to the country as children.

A spokesman for Customs and Border Protection, Carlos Diaz, said immigrants caught crossing the border illegally remain a top priority for the agency. The training documents for border agents, he said, “provide clear guidance on immigration enforcement operations so that both time and resources are allocated appropriately.”

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, an Illinois Democrat and vocal supporter of Obama’s immigration plans, said having CBP officers screen immigrants out of the deportation line lets the government “move criminals and recent arrivals to the front of the deportation line. The emphasis now is on who should be deported first, not just who can be deported.”

Under Obama’s plans, the government is focused on deporting immigrants with serious criminal records or who otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety. For the most part, under the new policy, immigrants whose only offense is being in the country without permission aren’t supposed to be a priority for immigration officers.

While the administration has estimated that as many as 4 million people will be eligible for protection from deportation, the Congressional Budget Office estimated about 2 million to 2.5 million immigrants are expected to be approved for the program by 2017. As many as 1.7 million young immigrants were estimated to be eligible for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, but since its 2012 creation only about 610,000 people have successfully signed up.

___

Associated Press writer Christopher Sherman in Mexico City contributed to this report.

___

Follow Alicia A. Caldwell on Twitter at www.twitter.com/acaldwellap

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/govt-tells-immigration-agents-id-immigrants-not-deport-052424806.html
Govt tells immigration agents to ID immigrants not to deport
http://news.yahoo.com/govt-tells-immigration-agents-id-immigrants-not-deport-052424806.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Democrats press McConnell to drop immigration fight on DHS bill

Washington (CNN)Democrats on Tuesday pressed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to quickly pass a funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security that omits controversial immigration-related policy provisions included in a House bill that they oppose.

It was an opening salvo in what is surely going to be an ugly battle to get the politically-sensitive agency funded before it runs out of money on Feb. 27.

READ: GOP immigration showdown looms

“As we rapidly approach the date on which the Department of Homeland Security’s funding expires, and as law enforcement officials face major threats to our nation’s safety and security, we write with one simple request: work with us to pass a clean bill that funds Homeland Security for the remainder of the fiscal year,” said a letter to McConnell that was signed by all Senate Democrats.

McConnell announced on Tuesday the Senate would turn to the DHS funding bill once it wraps up a bill to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, which could be later this week or early next week. Republicans will need support from at least six Democrats to pass the House DHS bill — the letter signals that will be hard to get unless the riders are removed.

sot ernst republican response sotu_00012320

“The House bill cannot pass the Senate,” the Democrats wrote.

    At issue are two amendments the House approved when it passed its bill earlier this month. One would block funding within DHS to carry out President Barack Obama’s recent executive orders on immigration that would allow millions of immigrants who are in the U.S illegally to stay. The second would roll back the Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals order that allowed so-called “Dreamers” to stay in the country.

    SEE ALSO: Boehner opens door to Obama immigration lawsuit

    McConnell declined to say how he planned to get around the standoff.

    “All I can tell you right now is that we’re going to the DHS bill after we finish Keystone,” he said at a news conference. “The procedure by which we deal with that will be determined later.”

    The bill is a vexing problem for leaders of both parties. That’s because it’s unlikely Democrats can get the necessary 60 votes to strip out the added House amendments while Republicans are unlikely to get the 60 votes they need to pass the bill with them attached. A stalemate is possible.

    Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Missouri, a member of the GOP leadership said taking on the President’s immigration orders is “an important fight to have.”

    “I think we should do everything we can to persuade at least half a dozen Democrats that they should join us to get this done,” Blunt said. “Sometimes you don’t’ know how theses legislative battles go if you don’t have them, and we intend to have this one.”

    House Republicans also haven’t signaled what they will do if the bill their bill can’t pass the Senate.

    “There’s no reason for me to speculate on what we will or won’t do,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said at a news conference on Tuesday.

Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/27/politics/mcconnell-immigration-funding/index.html
Democrats press McConnell to drop immigration fight on DHS bill
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/27/politics/mcconnell-immigration-funding/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

House GOP moves toward possible lawsuit on immigration

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans are moving toward authorizing a potential lawsuit against President Barack Obama on immigration, House Speaker John Boehner announced Tuesday, as the GOP struggled for a way to stop the president’s unilateral deportation curbs.

Boehner announced the plans in a closed-door meeting with lawmakers, telling them GOP leaders are finalizing a legal plan with the best chance of blocking Obama’s moves, according to a person in the room.

Options include joining a lawsuit already filed by states over the issue, or filing a separate lawsuit. The person in the room spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private meeting.

The plan emerged with Republicans short on realistic options for stopping Obama’s November executive actions, which extended work permits and temporary deportation relief to some 4 million people here illegally.

The House already has passed legislation to overturn the immigration policies, but the Senate looks unlikely to agree to the measures, which were added to must-pass legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security beyond February.

It’s not clear how that issue will be resolved. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised a vote on the House-passed bill, and said Tuesday that the Senate would take up the issue after completing consideration of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which could be as soon as next week.

But nearly all Senate Democrats signed a letter to McConnell Tuesday urging him not to include immigration measures on the Homeland Security spending bill. With Republicans six votes short of the 60 needed to advance most legislation in the Senate, McConnell cannot move the bill without some Democratic support, leaving the way forward unclear. He has promised there will be no government shutdown.

“This is an important fight to have. I think we should do everything we can to persuade at least a half a dozen Democrats that they should join us to get this done,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. “Sometimes you don’t know how these legislative battles go if you don’t have them, and we intend to have this one.”

The uncertainty has frustrated conservative Republicans who believe Congress’ top priority on immigration should be to hold firm against Obama. They united against a separate border security bill that was scheduled to come to a vote on the House floor Wednesday, and GOP leaders delayed action, citing changes to the House schedule caused by the inclement weather. It’s not clear when that bill will come back up.

House Republicans already have sued to try to undo Obama’s health care law.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/house-gop-moves-toward-possible-184340456.html
House GOP moves toward possible lawsuit on immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/house-gop-moves-toward-possible-184340456.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results