Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate

STOCKHOLM (AP) — A Swedish far-right party demanding sharp cuts in immigration has more than doubled its support in a parliamentary election.

Ironically, the surge for the far-right Sweden Democrats means the country’s government itself is poised to shift to the left, since many of the Sweden Democrats’ new voters defected from Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s center-right coalition. That left Stefan Lofven’s Social Democrats and its smaller partners as the top vote-getter in Sunday’s election.

Here’s a guide to Sweden’s shifting political situation:

A NEW GOVERNMENT IS COMING

Reinfeldt’s four-party coalition, known as the Alliance, is out after eight years of tax cuts and pro-market policies that critics say have eroded Sweden’s welfare system. The prime minister says he will resign Monday.

The Alliance lost 31 seats in the 349-member Parliament, paving the way for the left-leaning Social Democrats to start coalition talks on forming a new government.

Still, those talks are going to be complicated. Even with the support of the smaller Green and Left parties, the Social Democrats’ bloc would only have 158 seats in Parliament, 17 short of a majority. It’s also unclear if Lofven can get any support from the center-right parties.

A SURGE FOR THE FAR-RIGHT

Far-right parties with an anti-immigration agenda have gained ground across Europe for more than a decade. Sweden was an exception until four years ago when the Sweden Democrats entered Parliament.

Born out of a radical nationalist movement with neo-Nazi links, the Sweden Democrats have softened their rhetoric and expelled openly racist members. On Sunday they surged from 20 to 49 seats to become the third biggest party in Sweden’s parliament. The Brussels-based European Jewish Congress called the vote a “wake-up call for Sweden and the rest of Europe.”

This year, Sweden expects to accept up to 80,000 asylum-seekers from Syria, Eritrea, Iraq and Afghanistan, among other countries. Relative to Sweden’s population, that’s the biggest flow in the 28-nation European Union.

Surveys show about 40 percent of Swedes want less immigration. Yet before the Sweden Democrats, no party in parliament wanted to tighten the rules.

The other parties see it as their moral duty to keep wealthy Sweden’s borders open to refugees fleeing war and poverty — and are likely to reach agreements across the political divide to keep the Sweden Democrats from having any influence on immigration.

MINORITY GOVERNMENT DEADLOCK

It looks like Lofven will be in charge of a weak left-leaning minority government that’s going to struggle to push its agenda through parliament.

Lofven won’t reverse Reinfeldt’s most popular reforms, such as tax cuts for middle-income earners. The Social Democrats only want to raise taxes for people making more than $100,000 a year. But he has vowed to remove the tax breaks that made it cheaper for companies to hire young employees.

No dramatic shift in foreign policy is expected. Sweden, a member of the EU, will remain outside NATO and keep its krona instead of using the euro, the EU’s common currency.

___

Karl Ritter can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/karl_ritter

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate
http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate

STOCKHOLM (AP) — A Swedish far-right party demanding sharp cuts in immigration has more than doubled its support in a parliamentary election.

Ironically, the surge for the far-right Sweden Democrats means the country’s government itself is poised to shift to the left, since many of the Sweden Democrats’ new voters defected from Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s center-right coalition. That left Stefan Lofven’s Social Democrats and its smaller partners as the top vote-getter in Sunday’s election.

Here’s a guide to Sweden’s shifting political situation:

A NEW GOVERNMENT IS COMING

Reinfeldt’s four-party coalition, known as the Alliance, is out after eight years of tax cuts and pro-market policies that critics say have eroded Sweden’s welfare system. The prime minister says he will resign Monday.

The Alliance lost 31 seats in the 349-member Parliament, paving the way for the left-leaning Social Democrats to start coalition talks on forming a new government.

Still, those talks are going to be complicated. Even with the support of the smaller Green and Left parties, the Social Democrats’ bloc would only have 158 seats in Parliament, 17 short of a majority. It’s also unclear if Lofven can get any support from the center-right parties.

A SURGE FOR THE FAR-RIGHT

Far-right parties with an anti-immigration agenda have gained ground across Europe for more than a decade. Sweden was an exception until four years ago when the Sweden Democrats entered Parliament.

Born out of a radical nationalist movement with neo-Nazi links, the Sweden Democrats have softened their rhetoric and expelled openly racist members. On Sunday they surged from 20 to 49 seats to become the third biggest party in Sweden’s parliament. The Brussels-based European Jewish Congress called the vote a “wake-up call for Sweden and the rest of Europe.”

This year, Sweden expects to accept up to 80,000 asylum-seekers from Syria, Eritrea, Iraq and Afghanistan, among other countries. Relative to Sweden’s population, that’s the biggest flow in the 28-nation European Union.

Surveys show about 40 percent of Swedes want less immigration. Yet before the Sweden Democrats, no party in parliament wanted to tighten the rules.

The other parties see it as their moral duty to keep wealthy Sweden’s borders open to refugees fleeing war and poverty — and are likely to reach agreements across the political divide to keep the Sweden Democrats from having any influence on immigration.

MINORITY GOVERNMENT DEADLOCK

It looks like Lofven will be in charge of a weak left-leaning minority government that’s going to struggle to push its agenda through parliament.

Lofven won’t reverse Reinfeldt’s most popular reforms, such as tax cuts for middle-income earners. The Social Democrats only want to raise taxes for people making more than $100,000 a year. But he has vowed to remove the tax breaks that made it cheaper for companies to hire young employees.

No dramatic shift in foreign policy is expected. Sweden, a member of the EU, will remain outside NATO and keep its krona instead of using the euro, the EU’s common currency.

___

Karl Ritter can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/karl_ritter

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate
http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate

STOCKHOLM (AP) — A Swedish far-right party demanding sharp cuts in immigration has more than doubled its support in a parliamentary election.

Ironically, the surge for the far-right Sweden Democrats means the country’s government itself is poised to shift to the left, since many of the Sweden Democrats’ new voters defected from Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s center-right coalition. That left Stefan Lofven’s Social Democrats and its smaller partners as the top vote-getter in Sunday’s election.

Here’s a guide to Sweden’s shifting political situation:

A NEW GOVERNMENT IS COMING

Reinfeldt’s four-party coalition, known as the Alliance, is out after eight years of tax cuts and pro-market policies that critics say have eroded Sweden’s welfare system. The prime minister says he will resign Monday.

The Alliance lost 31 seats in the 349-member Parliament, paving the way for the left-leaning Social Democrats to start coalition talks on forming a new government.

Still, those talks are going to be complicated. Even with the support of the smaller Green and Left parties, the Social Democrats’ bloc would only have 158 seats in Parliament, 17 short of a majority. It’s also unclear if Lofven can get any support from the center-right parties.

A SURGE FOR THE FAR-RIGHT

Far-right parties with an anti-immigration agenda have gained ground across Europe for more than a decade. Sweden was an exception until four years ago when the Sweden Democrats entered Parliament.

Born out of a radical nationalist movement with neo-Nazi links, the Sweden Democrats have softened their rhetoric and expelled openly racist members. On Sunday they surged from 20 to 49 seats to become the third biggest party in Sweden’s parliament. The Brussels-based European Jewish Congress called the vote a “wake-up call for Sweden and the rest of Europe.”

This year, Sweden expects to accept up to 80,000 asylum-seekers from Syria, Eritrea, Iraq and Afghanistan, among other countries. Relative to Sweden’s population, that’s the biggest flow in the 28-nation European Union.

Surveys show about 40 percent of Swedes want less immigration. Yet before the Sweden Democrats, no party in parliament wanted to tighten the rules.

The other parties see it as their moral duty to keep wealthy Sweden’s borders open to refugees fleeing war and poverty — and are likely to reach agreements across the political divide to keep the Sweden Democrats from having any influence on immigration.

MINORITY GOVERNMENT DEADLOCK

It looks like Lofven will be in charge of a weak left-leaning minority government that’s going to struggle to push its agenda through parliament.

Lofven won’t reverse Reinfeldt’s most popular reforms, such as tax cuts for middle-income earners. The Social Democrats only want to raise taxes for people making more than $100,000 a year. But he has vowed to remove the tax breaks that made it cheaper for companies to hire young employees.

No dramatic shift in foreign policy is expected. Sweden, a member of the EU, will remain outside NATO and keep its krona instead of using the euro, the EU’s common currency.

___

Karl Ritter can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/karl_ritter

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate
http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate

STOCKHOLM (AP) — A Swedish far-right party demanding sharp cuts in immigration has more than doubled its support in a parliamentary election.

Ironically, the surge for the far-right Sweden Democrats means the country’s government itself is poised to shift to the left, since many of the Sweden Democrats’ new voters defected from Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s center-right coalition. That left Stefan Lofven’s Social Democrats and its smaller partners as the top vote-getter in Sunday’s election.

Here’s a guide to Sweden’s shifting political situation:

A NEW GOVERNMENT IS COMING

Reinfeldt’s four-party coalition, known as the Alliance, is out after eight years of tax cuts and pro-market policies that critics say have eroded Sweden’s welfare system. The prime minister says he will resign Monday.

The Alliance lost 31 seats in the 349-member Parliament, paving the way for the left-leaning Social Democrats to start coalition talks on forming a new government.

Still, those talks are going to be complicated. Even with the support of the smaller Green and Left parties, the Social Democrats’ bloc would only have 158 seats in Parliament, 17 short of a majority. It’s also unclear if Lofven can get any support from the center-right parties.

A SURGE FOR THE FAR-RIGHT

Far-right parties with an anti-immigration agenda have gained ground across Europe for more than a decade. Sweden was an exception until four years ago when the Sweden Democrats entered Parliament.

Born out of a radical nationalist movement with neo-Nazi links, the Sweden Democrats have softened their rhetoric and expelled openly racist members. On Sunday they surged from 20 to 49 seats to become the third biggest party in Sweden’s parliament. The Brussels-based European Jewish Congress called the vote a “wake-up call for Sweden and the rest of Europe.”

This year, Sweden expects to accept up to 80,000 asylum-seekers from Syria, Eritrea, Iraq and Afghanistan, among other countries. Relative to Sweden’s population, that’s the biggest flow in the 28-nation European Union.

Surveys show about 40 percent of Swedes want less immigration. Yet before the Sweden Democrats, no party in parliament wanted to tighten the rules.

The other parties see it as their moral duty to keep wealthy Sweden’s borders open to refugees fleeing war and poverty — and are likely to reach agreements across the political divide to keep the Sweden Democrats from having any influence on immigration.

MINORITY GOVERNMENT DEADLOCK

It looks like Lofven will be in charge of a weak left-leaning minority government that’s going to struggle to push its agenda through parliament.

Lofven won’t reverse Reinfeldt’s most popular reforms, such as tax cuts for middle-income earners. The Social Democrats only want to raise taxes for people making more than $100,000 a year. But he has vowed to remove the tax breaks that made it cheaper for companies to hire young employees.

No dramatic shift in foreign policy is expected. Sweden, a member of the EU, will remain outside NATO and keep its krona instead of using the euro, the EU’s common currency.

___

Karl Ritter can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/karl_ritter

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
Sweden's far-right rises amid immigration debate
http://news.yahoo.com/swedens-vote-leaders-seek-form-government-064357151.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Eyeing 2016, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio shifts stance on immigration

Sen. Marco Rubio is focusing on border security in a shift of his position.

MIAMI — Two years ago, immigration activist Gaby Pacheco got a call from Marco Rubio. The Florida senator wanted advice as he developed a plan to help people like her: immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children.

Now, Pacheco is aghast that Rubio is taking a harder line on illegal immigration. The potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate has abandoned the sweeping bill he helped write and is calling for an end to the Obama administration program that lets Pacheco stay in America.

“It’s another Marco Rubio that I just don’t know,” she said.

After the first-term senator saw his political standing fall among conservatives who balked at his immigration advocacy, Rubio is focusing on border security — more in line with the GOP activists who wield influence in how a White House nominee is picked.

Last month, Rubio urged President Barack Obama not to take actions that would shield from deportation millions of people who entered the U.S. illegally. Congress, Rubio said, should first “make real progress on stemming the tide of illegal immigration.”

Rubio’s aides say the senator always has stressed border security and that he insisted on tougher enforcement measures as a condi-tion for his Senate vote last year.

Immigrant advocates contend that in emphasizing only border security and dismissing his own bill, Rubio is effectively switching sides in the heated debate.

The shift comes as potential 2016 rivals such as Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Rand Paul of Kentucky, who voted against the overhaul that Rubio helped write, take hard-line stands on immigration.

Rubio has begun visiting South Carolina and Iowa, early-voting states in the 2016 nominating calendar where immigration is an important test for White House hopefuls.

Rubio was the only potential GOP candidate who helped write the immigration bill, which would strengthen border security while also offering a way to citizenship for many of the 11.5 million people who are in the U.S. illegally.

Now, in a sign of how much the political climate has changed, the party committee that is working to elect Republicans to the Senate is using that bill, which more than a dozen Republicans back, in ads to attack Democrats as pro-”amnesty.”

On a recent tour through central Florida, an important swing-voting region with a fast-growing Latino population, Rubio told reporters in English and Spanish that his emphasis on border security is an acknowledgment that House conservatives do not support a comprehensive immigration bill.

“The votes aren’t there,” Rubio said. “You’re going to have to deal with the border first. Otherwise, we’re going to continue to beat our head against a wall here for another decade without any changes or any progress.”

Source Article from http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_26528467/eyeing-2016-florida-sen-marco-rubio-shifts-stance?source=rss
Eyeing 2016, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio shifts stance on immigration
http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_26528467/eyeing-2016-florida-sen-marco-rubio-shifts-stance?source=rss
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Detention center brings immigration debate to small-town New Mexico

In this small New Mexican town, high school football is so popular that the celebration of Halloween gets moved if it happens to fall on a Friday.

The sport is especially welcome this year after Department of Homeland Security officials opened up a makeshift immigration detention center during the summer, thrusting this oil town just shy of 11,500 residents into the middle of a national immigration debate.

“Football takes their minds off of it,” said Shales Zuniga, who sported an orange Artesia High School Bulldogs football jersey. “It’s hard not having anything else to talk about. Now there is.”

Unprepared for thousands of parents with children who entered the country illegally, immigration officials parceled out a portion of the federal law enforcement training facility in Artesia to use as a detention center for about 600 women and children, most of them from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

Although more than 280 women and children have been deported, hundreds more remain as they wait for immigration hearings or to be returned to their native countries.

The new arrivals have sparked controversy in this mostly conservative town, where a statue of an oil pump is the centerpiece in a downtown park. Some say the strangers’ detentions have divided neighbors, inconvenienced new mothers looking for baby formula and touched off heated arguments during history class at the high school.

Whether people think the outsiders should stay or go, most in town seem to agree that rumors surrounding the facility have been fueled by a lack of information from federal officials about the center and its operation.

Which helps explain why the arrival of football season is so welcome.

On a recent Friday afternoon, most of downtown Artesia seemed deserted. The Bulldogs were playing an away game and many residents already had headed off for the 7 p.m. kickoff in Hobbs, about 80 miles east.

Some of those who couldn’t make the trip could be found at the Wellhead Restaurant & Brewpub, wearing orange jerseys and noshing on queso-drowned tortilla chips chased with beer.

“It’s God, football and family. You’re in the Bible belt of New Mexico right now,” said Meghan Harris, who was enjoying the start of the weekend with two girlfriends.

Most of what the 21-year-old Harris and her friends have heard about the detention facility has come from Facebook, and it was troubling.

“You have a bunch of pissed-off rednecks in this town, and it’s not going to be good,” she said.

Harris’ friend Danielle Cabezuela, 26, weighed in. “It’s not what Artesia signed up for,” she said. “I don’t think they thought it through.”

This year’s surge in illegal immigration, most funneled through Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, took authorities by surprise. Women with children were taken to Arizona, where they were released at bus stations in Phoenix and Tucson under orders to report to immigration officials later. At the time, only one facility was available to house parents traveling with children — and it was in Pennsylvania.

After a severe backlash from some congressional leaders and anti-illegal-immigration activists, federal officials opened up the Artesia facility in June. A permanent facility opened up two months later in Karnes, Texas.

Immigrant advocates filed a complaint this summer with the Department of Homeland Security accusing the detention centers, including the one in Artesia, of maintaining substandard living conditions; it also charged that young migrants had been subjected to abuse. The department’s inspector general recently rejected those allegations.

Federal officials, under orders from the White House, have vowed to speed up the processing and deportation of thousands of single women with children. The advocates say that directive has led to slipshod and hurried legal proceedings that have denied migrants due process.

Homeland Security officials insist that the Family Residential Center in Artesia is temporary. However, some residents say that improvements to the complex, such as new education trailers for the children and a repaved parking lot for visitors — particularly a platoon of pro bono immigration attorneys for the detainees — suggest otherwise.

Some residents say they are already miffed that the center was opened without community input.

“If they would have taken a community vote, it would have been turned down,” Harris said. “It’s like we’re being taken advantage of.”

Harris says she has friends with newborns who have had to drive an hour away to Roswell, because federal officials had cleared out local store shelves of diapers and baby formula.

“They’re pulling from our community to supply over there,” she said.

But not everyone feels the same way. Larry Combs, who teaches earth science at the junior high school, called the run at the store “minuscule.”

“I don’t understand that thinking,” Combs said. “Do we just not take care of these kids because they are not our own … because they inconvenience someone else?”

Combs, who leads Bible study at a local church, said the mothers and children in the facility hadn’t negatively affected his life. The 57-year-old rides his bicycle by the facility twice a day on his way to and from school, and said he heard children giggling a few evenings ago. Though he couldn’t see them, he called it “heartwarming.”

“These kids were just having a lot of fun. How cool is that?” he said.

Zuniga described the comments she’d heard about the new arrivals as overwhelmingly negative.

The daughter of one of Zuniga’s friends told her mother recently that three Central American child detainees had enrolled at her school.

Zuniga said her friend told her, “We’ll get tuberculosis and malaria.”

Although there have been a few cases of chickenpox at the detention center, federal officials say everyone entering the facility receives vaccinations. They also point out that many medical problems, such as diarrhea, colds and vomiting, can be found in any day-care facility — lice too.

Zuniga said she thought her friend’s daughter likely just assumed three new students were from the detention center. Children don’t know any better, Zuniga said with a shake of her head, adding, “but that’s what starts the rumors.”

If migrants do leave the facility, they tend to reunite with their families across the nation, where they are given a notice to appear to an immigration hearing. Rarely do they stay in Artesia.

cindy.carcamo@latimes.com

Twitter: @TheCindyCarcamo

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times

Source Article from http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ff-artesia-detention-center-20140914-story.html?track=rss
Detention center brings immigration debate to small-town New Mexico
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ff-artesia-detention-center-20140914-story.html?track=rss
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Obama's wise move on immigration

Editor’s note: Maria Cardona is a political commentator for CNN, a Democratic strategist and principal at the Dewey Square Group. She is a former senior adviser to Hillary Clinton and was communications director for the Democratic National Committee. She also is a former communications director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

(CNN) — As a Latina activist I was devastated to learn the President would delay executive action to keep undocumented immigrants with no criminal record from getting deported.

He’d promised he’d do it, our community expected it, and the country’s economy needed it — especially as Republicans have abdicated their obligation to pass real and lasting legislative reform for our broken immigration system.

But as a political strategist, I understand why the President delayed his decision.

Maria Cardona

Let’s be clear: This is Obama’s promise delayed, not broken.

The decision was indeed political. But unlike his critics on both sides of the aisle — the activists who, like me, are deeply disappointed, and Republicans who hypocritically accuse him of giving Latinos a slap in the face — I believe it was political for the right reasons.

The President’s action was a political “Hippocratic Oath:” first do no harm. There are a handful of vulnerable Democrats in very red states that are fighting to be re-elected, and control of the Senate is in the balance.

Hanging on to a Democratic-controlled Senate is essential to the future of any legislative fix on immigration. It is also essential to keeping the President’s Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, in place. If Republicans take over the Senate, Latinos — indeed the entire country — can kiss any possibility of real reform goodbye and can expect an immediate full frontal attack to repeal DACA.

The President said on “Meet the Press” that the reason for the decision was that the politics on the issue had changed since he made the announcement in the Rose Garden in June. He is right. By June, public attention to the influx of unaccompanied minors was just starting to hit a crescendo. And Republicans were masterly in injecting cynicism as well as downright lies into the discussion of the cause of the influx and the security at the border.

When the President finally makes his announcement before the end of the year, the American people, understandably distressed about what has been happening at the border, will deserve a full accounting on the realities of border security, the undocumented flows into the country, why our economy needs immediate action and why we need to achieve real legislative reform in the long run.

With everything going on in the foreign policy arena as the country confronts a brutal terrorist organization in ISIS that is seeking to do us harm, as well as the politicking of midterm elections upon us, there is no room in the public square for a real dialogue that would explain and sustain the President’s Executive Action and draw support to the reasons to work toward real reform.

The President will need to lay out facts and figures that prove the border is safer and more secure now than ever before. These would include:

– Under both President Clinton and President George W. Bush, the undocumented population grew at an unprecedented level. Even after the summer influx of undocumented children, under President Obama, the growth has been net negative.

– The flow of unaccompanied minors now is less than it was in February of 2013.

– There has been an unprecedented surge in resources at the border under President Obama that includes doubling the number of Border Patrol agents and tripling the money that goes to technology and infrastructure.

– The border is safer today and border crime is down from 10 years ago.

President delays immigration action

Obama defers action on immigration

He should reiterate the benefits of letting undocumented immigrants work and contribute legally to our economy. He should explain that in the long run, these immigrants should have to get right with the law, pass a background check, pay a fine and back taxes, learn English, and then get in line behind others who are following current legal procedures in order to become a U.S. citizen (key elements to real immigration reform).

The President should underscore that passing real immigration reform will inject more than $700 billion into our economy over the next 10 years, and $1.4 trillion over the next 20, reduce the deficit by almost a $1 trillion in the next 20 years, raise wages, as undocumented workers will no longer be taken advantage of by unscrupulous employers, and boost our overall global competitiveness.

There is a reason why most (even conservative) economists support immigration reform and why the business community has joined with the faith community, law enforcement leaders and labor in an improbable alliance of partners working toward this type of reform.

While I am disappointed the President’s executive action is not coming sooner–and any family ripped apart in the interim is one too many — we also have to consider two things that will make it improbable that an undocumented immigrant without a criminal record in the interior of the country would be immediately removed:

1) The 2011 new Department of Homeland Security policy that made it administration policy to deprioritize non-criminal undocumented immigrants and focus resources on removing the most dangerous criminals from our midst. In fact, of the 370,000 undocumented immigrants removed last year, all but 10,000 had criminal records — and yes, that is still too big a number. This is why we need real reform now.

2) Since June, the removal architecture of the immigration system — enforcement agents, and immigration judges — has moved from the interior to the border to deal with the influx of unaccompanied minors more fairly and efficiently.

I know these assurances are not enough for immigration activists seeking immediate relief. But even Latinos who are as deeply saddened as I am that we will not see action for another several weeks, at least, understand that what we will be getting from President Obama is far more effective and real than what we have gotten so far from Republicans who have turned their backs on our community and the American economy. If not for GOP inaction, immigration reform would be a reality today.

So amigos, let’s be confident President Obama will act before the end of the year. If he doesn’t, I will be the first one to join you in a picket line at the White House.

Read CNNOpinion’s new Flipboard magazine

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.

Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.


Source Article from http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/12/opinion/cardona-obama-executive-order-on-immigration-delayed/index.html
Obama's wise move on immigration
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/12/opinion/cardona-obama-executive-order-on-immigration-delayed/index.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

No immigration action yet, but deportations are down

When President Obama decided to delay his plans to unilaterally implement immigration reforms, immigrant advocates slammed him as the “deporter-in-chief.” Yet according to an analysis from the Associated Press, the president has quietly slowed deportations by nearly 20 percent in about the past year.

The Homeland Security Department is now on pace to remove the fewest number of immigrants since 2007.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the agency responsible for deportations, sent home 258,608 immigrants between the start of the budget year last Oct. 1 and July 28 this summer, a decrease of nearly 20 percent from the same period in 2013, when 320,167 people were removed.

Over 10 months in 2012, ICE deported 344,624 people, some 25 percent more than this year, according to federal figures obtained by the AP.

The president has been mulling executive action to grant deportation relief to some undocumented immigrants in the United States and strengthen border security resources. In June, he announced that he’d asked Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Attorney General Eric Holder to present a list of executive actions he could take within the scope of his authority to modernize and streamline U.S. immigration policy.

Mr. Obama previously signaled he would move on the issue by the end of summer, but earlier this month, he announced he would delay any action until after the congressional elections in November. The White House suggested that Republicans’ “extreme politicization of the issue” would harm the policymaking.

“The reality the President has had to weigh is that we’re in the midst of the political season, and because of the Republicans’ extreme politicization of this issue, the President believes it would be harmful to the policy itself and to the long-term prospects for comprehensive immigration reform to announce administrative action before the elections,” a White House official explained.

There are two principal reasons fewer immigrants already are being deported:

-The Obama administration decided as early as summer 2011 to focus its deportation efforts on criminal immigrants or those who posed a threat to national security or public safety. Many others who crossed into the United States illegally or overstayed their visas and could be subject to deportation are stuck in a federal immigration court system. Last month the backlog in that system exceeded 400,000 cases for the first time, according to court data analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. For each case, it now takes several years for a judge to issue a final order to leave the U.S.

-As Border Patrol agents detain more people from countries in Central America, not Mexico, the volume and circumstances of the cases take more time for overwhelmed immigration officials and courts to process because, among other reasons, the U.S. must fly such immigrants home rather than letting them walk back across the border into Mexico. A surge in the number of immigrant families, mostly women and young children, has swamped temporary holding facilities, leading the Homeland Security Department to release many people into the U.S. interior with instructions to report back to authorities later.

Source Article from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/no-immigration-action-yet-but-deportations-are-down/
No immigration action yet, but deportations are down
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/no-immigration-action-yet-but-deportations-are-down/
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

Federal officials propose Texas immigration lockup

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Federal authorities want to build a new South Texas immigration lockup for families amid an unprecedented surge in the number of youngsters pouring across the U.S. border, a federal official said Thursday.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement is proposing a residential center in the town of Dilley, about 70 miles southwest of San Antonio, agency spokeswoman Adelina Pruneda said.

“Structures on the site may be used temporarily to house up to 680 residents while the new facilities are built,” she said.

Pruneda said ICE isn’t discussing further details, including how many adults and children the 50-acre facility would house, how much it would cost or when it might be ready.

ICE is working to “finalize contracts with construction and service providers” for the South Texas facility, she said.

The spike in unaccompanied children and families crossing the border has strained federal authorities’ capacity to house those arrested on immigration charges. Many of the immigrants say they are fleeing drug and gang violence in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. Some are seeking asylum. Others are held in detention while awaiting deportation or placement with relatives already in the U.S.

Last month, federal authorities converted an all-male facility in Karnes City, southeast of San Antonio, to accept 532 mothers and their children. Another immigration center for families in Pennsylvania and a temporary site in New Mexico have a combined capacity of about 800.

“ICE’s family residential centers are an effective option to maintain family units as they await the outcome of immigration hearings or return to their home countries,” Pruneda said in a statement. “ICE ensures that family detention facilities operate in an open environment that includes play rooms, social workers, medical care, and classrooms with state-certified teachers and bilingual teachers.”

The plan is being decried by advocacy groups, who point to the fraught history of a past Texas family immigration lockup, the T. Don Hutto detention center, northeast of Austin. The ACLU and University of Texas Immigration Law Clinic sued in 2007 over incarcerating families there, alleging inhumane conditions.

Authorities in 2009 removed all families and sent them to the Pennsylvania facility, and Hutto now only houses women.

“The lesson from Hutto is that detention is inappropriate for kids and their families and I think that viewpoint has already been proven,” said Bob Libal, executive director of Grassroots Leadership, an organization that opposes the use of for-profit prisons and immigration detention centers.

Libal also expressed concern about locating the new immigration center in isolated Dilley, on Interstate 35 about 85 miles north of the border city of Laredo.

“When you put detention centers in remote areas, far away from legal services or the eyes of community members or proper oversight, it makes it more likely that bad things are going to happen,” Libal said.

Source Article from http://news.yahoo.com/federal-officials-propose-texas-immigration-lockup-160954211.html
Federal officials propose Texas immigration lockup
http://news.yahoo.com/federal-officials-propose-texas-immigration-lockup-160954211.html
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results

The Fix: Immigration reform just went from extremely unlikely to impossible

SECTION: {section=politics, subsection=null}!!!
INITIAL commentConfig: {includereply=true, canvas_permalink_id=washpost.com/8bvh5zpd9k, allow_comments=true, commentmaxlength=2000, includeshare=true, display_comments=true, canvas_permalink_app_instance=m6yzjj840m, display_more=true, moderationrequired=false, includefeaturenotification=true, comments_period=14, defaultsort=reverseChronological, canvas_allcomments_id=washpost.com/km4ey0dajm, includevoteofftopic=false, allow_videos=false, childrenitemsperpage=3, markerdisplay=post_commenter:Post Commenter|staff:Post Writer|top_commenter:Post Forum|top_local:Washingtologist|top_sports:SuperFan|fact_checker:Fact Checker|post_recommended:Post Recommended|world_watcher:World Watcher|cultuer_connoisseur:Culture Connoisseur|weather_watcher:Capital Weather Watcher|post_contributor:Post Contributor, includesorts=true, includeheader=true, defaulttab=all, includeverifiedcommenters=true, includerecommend=true, maxitemstop=2, includereport=true, source=washpost.com, allow_photos=false, maxitems=7, display_ugc_photos=false, includepause=true, canvas_allcomments_app_instance=6634zxcgfd, includepermalink=false}!!!

UGC FROM ARTICLE: !!!

FINAL commentConfig: {includereply=true, canvas_permalink_id=washpost.com/8bvh5zpd9k, allow_comments=true, commentmaxlength=2000, includeshare=true, display_comments=true, canvas_permalink_app_instance=m6yzjj840m, display_more=true, moderationrequired=false, includefeaturenotification=true, comments_period=14, defaultsort=reverseChronological, canvas_allcomments_id=washpost.com/km4ey0dajm, includevoteofftopic=false, allow_videos=false, childrenitemsperpage=3, markerdisplay=post_commenter:Post Commenter|staff:Post Writer|top_commenter:Post Forum|top_local:Washingtologist|top_sports:SuperFan|fact_checker:Fact Checker|post_recommended:Post Recommended|world_watcher:World Watcher|cultuer_connoisseur:Culture Connoisseur|weather_watcher:Capital Weather Watcher|post_contributor:Post Contributor, includesorts=true, includeheader=true, defaulttab=all, includeverifiedcommenters=true, includerecommend=true, maxitemstop=2, includereport=true, source=washpost.com, allow_photos=false, maxitems=7, display_ugc_photos=false, includepause=true, canvas_allcomments_app_instance=6634zxcgfd, includepermalink=false}!!

Source Article from http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636635/s/3e55861b/sc/7/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cpolitics0Cimmigration0Ereform0Ejust0Ewent0Efrom0Eimpossible0Eto0Emore0Eimpossible0C20A140C0A90C10A0C0A4257b610E5bd20E418e0Ea5860E610Ae0Aa47134c0Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Inational/story01.htm
The Fix: Immigration reform just went from extremely unlikely to impossible
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/636635/s/3e55861b/sc/7/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cpolitics0Cimmigration0Ereform0Ejust0Ewent0Efrom0Eimpossible0Eto0Emore0Eimpossible0C20A140C0A90C10A0C0A4257b610E5bd20E418e0Ea5860E610Ae0Aa47134c0Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Inational/story01.htm
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/rss?p=immigration
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results
immigration – Yahoo News Search Results